Total Posts:36|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Freedo.

Atheism
Posts: 2,033
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/6/2010 11:51:02 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Is it me, or has his ban gone on long after the date he was supposed to come back?
I don't know, maybe I just miss the things he stirs up.
I miss the old members.
Sobriquet
Posts: 390
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/6/2010 11:58:42 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
He really should be returning right about now. It definitely seems to be dragging on a bit too long though.
"Bullsh!t is unavoidable whenever circumstance require someone to talk without knowing what he is talking about."
— Harry G. Frankfurt
annhasle
Posts: 6,657
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/7/2010 12:19:45 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/6/2010 11:51:02 PM, Atheism wrote:
Is it me, or has his ban gone on long after the date he was supposed to come back?
I don't know, maybe I just miss the things he stirs up.

Seconded.
I'm not back. This idiot just upset me which made me stop lurking.
True2GaGa
Posts: 1,574
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/7/2010 3:05:23 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/6/2010 11:51:02 PM, Atheism wrote:
Is it me, or has his ban gone on long after the date he was supposed to come back?
I don't know, maybe I just miss the things he stirs up.

This.
Atheism
Posts: 2,033
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 1:25:05 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 1:24:00 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
Needs to stop reviving sh*tty threads.
They keep the forums active, and they let you know more about the people on this site.
I miss the old members.
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 1:30:07 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 1:25:05 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:24:00 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
Needs to stop reviving sh*tty threads.
They keep the forums active, and they let you know more about the people on this site.

1) There's activity and then there's retards bashing keyboards. We should let spammers in to get maximum activity then!

2) Learn more about users? Go to a PM for that, not some forums games. They have have their novelty but not en masse.
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
Atheism
Posts: 2,033
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 1:31:31 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 1:30:07 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:25:05 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:24:00 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
Needs to stop reviving sh*tty threads.
They keep the forums active, and they let you know more about the people on this site.

1) There's activity and then there's retards bashing keyboards. We should let spammers in to get maximum activity then!

2) Learn more about users? Go to a PM for that, not some forums games. They have have their novelty but not en masse.

1)Freedo's threads are coherent and are actually kinda fun.
2)That may be taken wrong, and it's more fun to not know what kind've thing they'll post.
I miss the old members.
Kinesis
Posts: 3,667
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 1:33:32 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 12:56:57 PM, FREEDO wrote:
Yeah, seriously. I'm getting tired of waiting.

Nah, I hope that pr*ck never comes back.
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 1:34:04 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 1:31:31 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:30:07 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:25:05 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:24:00 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
Needs to stop reviving sh*tty threads.
They keep the forums active, and they let you know more about the people on this site.

1) There's activity and then there's retards bashing keyboards. We should let spammers in to get maximum activity then!

2) Learn more about users? Go to a PM for that, not some forums games. They have have their novelty but not en masse.

1)Freedo's threads are coherent and are actually kinda fun.

They're threads where you type one word and feel uber. Seriously, there's a limit to how much you can compliment someone.

2)That may be taken wrong, and it's more fun to not know what kind've thing they'll post.

And generally that is better seen in real discussant, not

"You're funny."

"You're nice"

"HURR BERP A DERP FORRRUUMMM GAAAAMMMMEE!!!!"
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 1:36:59 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
As long as he keeps his threads out of the other threads, what is the harm? Really? Its not like he's making 20+ debates calling people lamers and accusing everyone of trolling him.
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
Atheism
Posts: 2,033
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 1:37:23 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 1:34:04 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:31:31 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:30:07 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:25:05 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:24:00 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
Needs to stop reviving sh*tty threads.
They keep the forums active, and they let you know more about the people on this site.

1) There's activity and then there's retards bashing keyboards. We should let spammers in to get maximum activity then!

2) Learn more about users? Go to a PM for that, not some forums games. They have have their novelty but not en masse.

1)Freedo's threads are coherent and are actually kinda fun.

1)They're threads where you type one word and feel uber. 1B)Seriously, there's a limit to how much you can compliment someone.

2)That may be taken wrong, and it's more fun to not know what kind've thing they'll post.

And generally that is better seen in real discussant, not

"You're funny."

"You're nice"

"HURR BERP A DERP FORRRUUMMM GAAAAMMMMEE!!!!"
1)With the amount responses/feedback gotten from them, it's safe to say they are nice to participate in.
1B)Not to some.
2)Again, I don't think people will appreciate an unwarranted questionnaire about their life. Random facts people give about themselves is better.
I miss the old members.
Loserboi
Posts: 1,232
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 1:42:23 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 1:36:59 PM, lovelife wrote:
As long as he keeps his threads out of the other threads, what is the harm? Really? Its not like he's making 20+ debates calling people lamers and accusing everyone of trolling him.

Sigh... I really miss that 9bnx guy
InsertNameHere
Posts: 15,699
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 3:47:11 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
I honestly don't see a problem with forum games and other off-topic threads. They help keep pointless spam out of other threads, which panda seems to hate so much. If you don't want spam in serious threads then let us have game threads. Quit being a DDO Nazi.
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 4:23:06 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 1:37:23 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:34:04 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:31:31 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:30:07 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:25:05 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:24:00 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
Needs to stop reviving sh*tty threads.
They keep the forums active, and they let you know more about the people on this site.

1) There's activity and then there's retards bashing keyboards. We should let spammers in to get maximum activity then!

2) Learn more about users? Go to a PM for that, not some forums games. They have have their novelty but not en masse.

1)Freedo's threads are coherent and are actually kinda fun.

1)They're threads where you type one word and feel uber. 1B)Seriously, there's a limit to how much you can compliment someone.

2)That may be taken wrong, and it's more fun to not know what kind've thing they'll post.

And generally that is better seen in real discussant, not

"You're funny."

"You're nice"

"HURR BERP A DERP FORRRUUMMM GAAAAMMMMEE!!!!"
1)With the amount responses/feedback gotten from them, it's safe to say they are nice to participate in.
1B)Not to some.
2)Again, I don't think people will appreciate an unwarranted questionnaire about their life. Random facts people give about themselves is better.

This. If the game threads are not affecting your threads, why hate them?
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
annhasle
Posts: 6,657
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 4:26:52 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 4:23:06 PM, lovelife wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:37:23 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:34:04 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:31:31 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:30:07 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:25:05 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:24:00 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
Needs to stop reviving sh*tty threads.
They keep the forums active, and they let you know more about the people on this site.

1) There's activity and then there's retards bashing keyboards. We should let spammers in to get maximum activity then!

2) Learn more about users? Go to a PM for that, not some forums games. They have have their novelty but not en masse.

1)Freedo's threads are coherent and are actually kinda fun.

1)They're threads where you type one word and feel uber. 1B)Seriously, there's a limit to how much you can compliment someone.

2)That may be taken wrong, and it's more fun to not know what kind've thing they'll post.

And generally that is better seen in real discussant, not

"You're funny."

"You're nice"

"HURR BERP A DERP FORRRUUMMM GAAAAMMMMEE!!!!"
1)With the amount responses/feedback gotten from them, it's safe to say they are nice to participate in.
1B)Not to some.
2)Again, I don't think people will appreciate an unwarranted questionnaire about their life. Random facts people give about themselves is better.

This. If the game threads are not affecting your threads, why hate them?

I don't think it's about "affecting other threads" but more about the actual threads themselves. Some people are here for the "serious" threads and can be annoyed by the ones considered "fun" or "spam", which is their opinion. Personally, I find some to be fun but others to be annoying... That means I won't participate in them obviously, but also if I see a thread about them, I would share my opinion. That is what you do on a debate site... Now, I wouldn't automatically hate the user who creates them but if it gets to the point where the Miscellaneous thread is the most active and is just filled with random games and spam.... Yeah, I'd be pissed off.
I'm not back. This idiot just upset me which made me stop lurking.
annhasle
Posts: 6,657
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 4:28:53 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 4:27:32 PM, juvanya wrote:
Off topic threads are a key part of every forum in existence.

Does that make it okay? Corruption is part of every government around today, but I still hate it...
I'm not back. This idiot just upset me which made me stop lurking.
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 4:39:41 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 4:26:52 PM, annhasle wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:23:06 PM, lovelife wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:37:23 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:34:04 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:31:31 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:30:07 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:25:05 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:24:00 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
Needs to stop reviving sh*tty threads.
They keep the forums active, and they let you know more about the people on this site.

1) There's activity and then there's retards bashing keyboards. We should let spammers in to get maximum activity then!

2) Learn more about users? Go to a PM for that, not some forums games. They have have their novelty but not en masse.

1)Freedo's threads are coherent and are actually kinda fun.

1)They're threads where you type one word and feel uber. 1B)Seriously, there's a limit to how much you can compliment someone.

2)That may be taken wrong, and it's more fun to not know what kind've thing they'll post.

And generally that is better seen in real discussant, not

"You're funny."

"You're nice"

"HURR BERP A DERP FORRRUUMMM GAAAAMMMMEE!!!!"
1)With the amount responses/feedback gotten from them, it's safe to say they are nice to participate in.
1B)Not to some.
2)Again, I don't think people will appreciate an unwarranted questionnaire about their life. Random facts people give about themselves is better.

This. If the game threads are not affecting your threads, why hate them?

I don't think it's about "affecting other threads" but more about the actual threads themselves. Some people are here for the "serious" threads and can be annoyed by the ones considered "fun" or "spam", which is their opinion. Personally, I find some to be fun but others to be annoying... That means I won't participate in them obviously, but also if I see a thread about them, I would share my opinion. That is what you do on a debate site... Now, I wouldn't automatically hate the user who creates them but if it gets to the point where the Miscellaneous thread is the most active and is just filled with random games and spam.... Yeah, I'd be pissed off.

Well there is no reason that a fun forum couldn't become debatable. Example:
Compliments (hypothetical)
Person A: "Person X is funny"
Person B: "No they are not -list of reasons, Y is a better quality of person X"
Person A: either defends statement or agrees

Its just a different form of discussion that has possibilites for debate, and they are good to relieve tension. I however agree that the serious topics should be more dominant but there is no reason both can't exist. I don't see any problem in FREEDO renewing the games, because there has been way too much tension and hate on this site.
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 4:40:54 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 4:28:53 PM, annhasle wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:27:32 PM, juvanya wrote:
Off topic threads are a key part of every forum in existence.

Does that make it okay? Corruption is part of every government around today, but I still hate it...

More like everyone under a government has different opinions, why outlaw a certain opinion?
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
annhasle
Posts: 6,657
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 4:46:44 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 4:39:41 PM, lovelife wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:26:52 PM, annhasle wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:23:06 PM, lovelife wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:37:23 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:34:04 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:31:31 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:30:07 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:25:05 PM, Atheism wrote:
At 9/8/2010 1:24:00 PM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
Needs to stop reviving sh*tty threads.
They keep the forums active, and they let you know more about the people on this site.

1) There's activity and then there's retards bashing keyboards. We should let spammers in to get maximum activity then!

2) Learn more about users? Go to a PM for that, not some forums games. They have have their novelty but not en masse.

1)Freedo's threads are coherent and are actually kinda fun.

1)They're threads where you type one word and feel uber. 1B)Seriously, there's a limit to how much you can compliment someone.

2)That may be taken wrong, and it's more fun to not know what kind've thing they'll post.

And generally that is better seen in real discussant, not

"You're funny."

"You're nice"

"HURR BERP A DERP FORRRUUMMM GAAAAMMMMEE!!!!"
1)With the amount responses/feedback gotten from them, it's safe to say they are nice to participate in.
1B)Not to some.
2)Again, I don't think people will appreciate an unwarranted questionnaire about their life. Random facts people give about themselves is better.

This. If the game threads are not affecting your threads, why hate them?

I don't think it's about "affecting other threads" but more about the actual threads themselves. Some people are here for the "serious" threads and can be annoyed by the ones considered "fun" or "spam", which is their opinion. Personally, I find some to be fun but others to be annoying... That means I won't participate in them obviously, but also if I see a thread about them, I would share my opinion. That is what you do on a debate site... Now, I wouldn't automatically hate the user who creates them but if it gets to the point where the Miscellaneous thread is the most active and is just filled with random games and spam.... Yeah, I'd be pissed off.

Well there is no reason that a fun forum couldn't become debatable. Example:
Compliments (hypothetical)
Person A: "Person X is funny"
Person B: "No they are not -list of reasons, Y is a better quality of person X"
Person A: either defends statement or agrees

Its just a different form of discussion that has possibilites for debate, and they are good to relieve tension. I however agree that the serious topics should be more dominant but there is no reason both can't exist. I don't see any problem in FREEDO renewing the games, because there has been way too much tension and hate on this site.

Yes, they can also be debatable but is that their real purpose? Isn't it just meant to be for fun and games?

And yes, they could relieve tension in some people but in others, like myself, they seem more like distractions. I know that they can also be good since it might keep fights from happening and reduce some tension... but I wish that could happen in serious threads as well. FREEDO is of course allowed to renew the old game threads, and I obviously cannot stop him, but I will share my distaste for some of them.

I guess it gets kind of aggravating for me since I hoped to debate philosophy, religion or politics a lot but it's come down to spam threads, Mafia games, personal insults and the occasional serious thread... And the serious thread is usually just a repeat of something discussed a month ago. And that ends in a fight as well... It's probably just me feeling like this, but it's annoyed me enough that I felt I should share my opinion and see how others feel as well.
I'm not back. This idiot just upset me which made me stop lurking.
annhasle
Posts: 6,657
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 4:48:42 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 4:40:54 PM, lovelife wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:28:53 PM, annhasle wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:27:32 PM, juvanya wrote:
Off topic threads are a key part of every forum in existence.

Does that make it okay? Corruption is part of every government around today, but I still hate it...

More like everyone under a government has different opinions, why outlaw a certain opinion?

I haven't outlawed any opinions... I'm explaining mine and discussing yours as well. Have I said, "Don't post your opinion! It's stupid!!" Of course not. That's not how I work.
I'm not back. This idiot just upset me which made me stop lurking.
tvellalott
Posts: 10,864
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 4:57:59 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 4:52:51 PM, annhasle wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:51:31 PM, tvellalott wrote:
a

?

It comes before b. :)
"Caitlyn Jenner is an incredibly brave and stunningly beautiful woman."

Muh threads
Using mafia tactics in real-life: http://www.debate.org...
6 years of DDO: http://www.debate.org...
annhasle
Posts: 6,657
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 5:00:30 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 4:57:59 PM, tvellalott wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:52:51 PM, annhasle wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:51:31 PM, tvellalott wrote:
a

?

It comes before b. :)

I was trying to say... Why would you post "a"?? Smart@ss.... Lol :P
I'm not back. This idiot just upset me which made me stop lurking.
Atheism
Posts: 2,033
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 5:00:51 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 4:57:59 PM, tvellalott wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:52:51 PM, annhasle wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:51:31 PM, tvellalott wrote:
a

?

It comes before b. :)
Really? I hadn't noticed.
I miss the old members.
tvellalott
Posts: 10,864
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 5:02:05 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 5:00:30 PM, annhasle wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:57:59 PM, tvellalott wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:52:51 PM, annhasle wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:51:31 PM, tvellalott wrote:
a

?

It comes before b. :)

I was trying to say... Why would you post "a"?? Smart@ss.... Lol :P

You were getting all serious. It's called misdirection!
"Caitlyn Jenner is an incredibly brave and stunningly beautiful woman."

Muh threads
Using mafia tactics in real-life: http://www.debate.org...
6 years of DDO: http://www.debate.org...
annhasle
Posts: 6,657
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/8/2010 5:11:31 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/8/2010 5:02:05 PM, tvellalott wrote:
At 9/8/2010 5:00:30 PM, annhasle wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:57:59 PM, tvellalott wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:52:51 PM, annhasle wrote:
At 9/8/2010 4:51:31 PM, tvellalott wrote:
a

?

It comes before b. :)

I was trying to say... Why would you post "a"?? Smart@ss.... Lol :P

You were getting all serious. It's called misdirection!

Blah, fine. >.>
I'm not back. This idiot just upset me which made me stop lurking.