Total Posts:30|Showing Posts:1-30
Jump to topic:

Jesus Land

xxdarkxx
Posts: 3,090
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:
Ha ha ha, what the heck is this suppose to be?

My political science teacher showed it to my class today.

It was made after the.. 2004? election.

Showing the difference between Liberal and Conservatives in America (by state to a degree)
innomen
Posts: 10,052
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:
Ha ha ha, what the heck is this suppose to be?

My political science teacher showed it to my class today.

It was made after the.. 2004? election.

Showing the difference between Liberal and Conservatives in America (by state to a degree)

Looks like your political science teacher has an obvious slant going on.
xxdarkxx
Posts: 3,090
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:
Ha ha ha, what the heck is this suppose to be?

My political science teacher showed it to my class today.

It was made after the.. 2004? election.

Showing the difference between Liberal and Conservatives in America (by state to a degree)

Looks like your political science teacher has an obvious slant going on.

well theirs a wiki for it....

http://en.wikipedia.org...
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 9:57:17 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
It actually seems pretty accurate to me, but why would your teacher show you that?

It just looks like something people would post on the internet as an insult, teachers usually give more scientific looking maps. Unless your teacher is a cool fun one, then I could see why.
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
jharry
Posts: 4,984
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:
Ha ha ha, what the heck is this suppose to be?

My political science teacher showed it to my class today.

It was made after the.. 2004? election.

Showing the difference between Liberal and Conservatives in America (by state to a degree)

Looks like your political science teacher has an obvious slant going on.

well theirs a wiki for it....

http://en.wikipedia.org...

The wiki said that some suggested secession, I don't think that would be a bad idea. If you think about it would satisfy all.
In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen
xxdarkxx
Posts: 3,090
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 10:01:49 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 9:57:17 AM, lovelife wrote:
It actually seems pretty accurate to me, but why would your teacher show you that?

It just looks like something people would post on the internet as an insult, teachers usually give more scientific looking maps. Unless your teacher is a cool fun one, then I could see why.

We were talking about political ideology, mainly liberals and conservatives (all though he touched on Fascist, Socialist, Communist, and Libertarians), and also political polls and how certain ideologies follow certain parties.. so he tried to use it as an example.

It's also worthy to note that he does have bias... apparently Libertarians are "the odd ones"
innomen
Posts: 10,052
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 10:02:38 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:
Ha ha ha, what the heck is this suppose to be?

My political science teacher showed it to my class today.

It was made after the.. 2004? election.

Showing the difference between Liberal and Conservatives in America (by state to a degree)

Looks like your political science teacher has an obvious slant going on.

well theirs a wiki for it....

http://en.wikipedia.org...

The wiki said that some suggested secession, I don't think that would be a bad idea. If you think about it would satisfy all.

Easy for you to say, i'd be stuck on the Canadian side.
xxdarkxx
Posts: 3,090
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 10:04:21 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:
Ha ha ha, what the heck is this suppose to be?

My political science teacher showed it to my class today.

It was made after the.. 2004? election.

Showing the difference between Liberal and Conservatives in America (by state to a degree)

Looks like your political science teacher has an obvious slant going on.

well theirs a wiki for it....

http://en.wikipedia.org...

The wiki said that some suggested secession, I don't think that would be a bad idea. If you think about it would satisfy all.

meh, i'd prefer not to be apart of the United States of Canada (nationalized health care isn't my thing)...

although their would be a greater amount of hockey... hmmmm
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 10:06:02 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 10:02:38 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:
Ha ha ha, what the heck is this suppose to be?

My political science teacher showed it to my class today.

It was made after the.. 2004? election.

Showing the difference between Liberal and Conservatives in America (by state to a degree)

Looks like your political science teacher has an obvious slant going on.

well theirs a wiki for it....

http://en.wikipedia.org...

The wiki said that some suggested secession, I don't think that would be a bad idea. If you think about it would satisfy all.

Easy for you to say, i'd be stuck on the Canadian side.

And I'd be stuck on the jesusland side. I'll trade you.

Dark, lol its pretty funny. Jesusland kinda sucks but being in California is much worse about the religious homophobic, bible clinging, racist bigots than Oklahoma.
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
xxdarkxx
Posts: 3,090
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 10:08:28 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 10:06:02 AM, lovelife wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:02:38 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:
Ha ha ha, what the heck is this suppose to be?

My political science teacher showed it to my class today.

It was made after the.. 2004? election.

Showing the difference between Liberal and Conservatives in America (by state to a degree)

Looks like your political science teacher has an obvious slant going on.

well theirs a wiki for it....

http://en.wikipedia.org...

The wiki said that some suggested secession, I don't think that would be a bad idea. If you think about it would satisfy all.

Easy for you to say, i'd be stuck on the Canadian side.

And I'd be stuck on the jesusland side. I'll trade you.

Dark, lol its pretty funny. Jesusland kinda sucks but being in California is much worse about the religious homophobic, bible clinging, racist bigots than Oklahoma.

I hate religion...
jharry
Posts: 4,984
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 10:09:25 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 10:02:38 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:
Ha ha ha, what the heck is this suppose to be?

My political science teacher showed it to my class today.

It was made after the.. 2004? election.

Showing the difference between Liberal and Conservatives in America (by state to a degree)

Looks like your political science teacher has an obvious slant going on.

well theirs a wiki for it....

http://en.wikipedia.org...

The wiki said that some suggested secession, I don't think that would be a bad idea. If you think about it would satisfy all.

Easy for you to say, i'd be stuck on the Canadian side.

Lol. You could always move.
In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen
jharry
Posts: 4,984
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 10:20:23 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 10:09:25 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:02:38 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:
Ha ha ha, what the heck is this suppose to be?

My political science teacher showed it to my class today.

It was made after the.. 2004? election.

Showing the difference between Liberal and Conservatives in America (by state to a degree)

Looks like your political science teacher has an obvious slant going on.

well theirs a wiki for it....

http://en.wikipedia.org...

The wiki said that some suggested secession, I don't think that would be a bad idea. If you think about it would satisfy all.

Easy for you to say, i'd be stuck on the Canadian side.

Lol. You could always move.

Seriously though. It would be a good idea. Maybe not total secession but definitely a separation.

Liberals have their part, conservatives have their own. Kill social security and take what's left (if there is anything left but IOU's) help everyone move. In the liberal countries they can kill all the old people and other drags on the economy and on the conservative side they can let the Church get involved and take care of the "drags". Then each economy can either stand or fall on it's own merit. Each side pays a tax to the federal government killing individual taxation by the feds, so the feds can defend the country and what ever and stay the flip out of personal business. If the liberal side wants social tax care they can pay for it and vice verse. I haven't thought it all the way through but it looks like a "good" for all. Each side can create their own laws and rules and the federal government can keep their hands out of peoples pockets. Wait a darn minute!!!!!! I think this was proposed once before!!!!!!!!!!! What the heck happened?!?!?!?!?!?!
In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 10:39:39 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 10:20:23 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:09:25 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:02:38 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:
Ha ha ha, what the heck is this suppose to be?

My political science teacher showed it to my class today.

It was made after the.. 2004? election.

Showing the difference between Liberal and Conservatives in America (by state to a degree)

Looks like your political science teacher has an obvious slant going on.

well theirs a wiki for it....

http://en.wikipedia.org...

The wiki said that some suggested secession, I don't think that would be a bad idea. If you think about it would satisfy all.

Easy for you to say, i'd be stuck on the Canadian side.

Lol. You could always move.

Seriously though. It would be a good idea. Maybe not total secession but definitely a separation.

Liberals have their part, conservatives have their own. Kill social security and take what's left (if there is anything left but IOU's) help everyone move. In the liberal countries they can kill all the old people and other drags on the economy and on the conservative side they can let the Church get involved and take care of the "drags". Then each economy can either stand or fall on it's own merit. Each side pays a tax to the federal government killing individual taxation by the feds, so the feds can defend the country and what ever and stay the flip out of personal business. If the liberal side wants social tax care they can pay for it and vice verse. I haven't thought it all the way through but it looks like a "good" for all. Each side can create their own laws and rules and the federal government can keep their hands out of peoples pockets. Wait a darn minute!!!!!! I think this was proposed once before!!!!!!!!!!! What the heck happened?!?!?!?!?!?!

Jesusland took over.
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
jharry
Posts: 4,984
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 10:54:34 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 10:39:39 AM, lovelife wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:20:23 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:09:25 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:02:38 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:
Ha ha ha, what the heck is this suppose to be?

My political science teacher showed it to my class today.

It was made after the.. 2004? election.

Showing the difference between Liberal and Conservatives in America (by state to a degree)

Looks like your political science teacher has an obvious slant going on.

well theirs a wiki for it....

http://en.wikipedia.org...

The wiki said that some suggested secession, I don't think that would be a bad idea. If you think about it would satisfy all.

Easy for you to say, i'd be stuck on the Canadian side.

Lol. You could always move.

Seriously though. It would be a good idea. Maybe not total secession but definitely a separation.

Liberals have their part, conservatives have their own. Kill social security and take what's left (if there is anything left but IOU's) help everyone move. In the liberal countries they can kill all the old people and other drags on the economy and on the conservative side they can let the Church get involved and take care of the "drags". Then each economy can either stand or fall on it's own merit. Each side pays a tax to the federal government killing individual taxation by the feds, so the feds can defend the country and what ever and stay the flip out of personal business. If the liberal side wants social tax care they can pay for it and vice verse. I haven't thought it all the way through but it looks like a "good" for all. Each side can create their own laws and rules and the federal government can keep their hands out of peoples pockets. Wait a darn minute!!!!!! I think this was proposed once before!!!!!!!!!!! What the heck happened?!?!?!?!?!?!

Jesusland took over.

But is this a bad idea? It would be a literal utopia for both sides. Liberals and Atheists could have things their way without the big meany God getting in the way, and the conservatives could have it their way. The religious could plunge back into he dark ages and non could have their enlightened paradise. Just think about it, yall could sit in your coffee shops all day and talk about how dumb the religious are and your government could take care of you. And the dumb religious could go to work and raise their families as they chose. It would be AWESOME.
In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen
brian_eggleston
Posts: 3,347
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 11:44:33 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 10:04:21 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:

meh, i'd prefer not to be apart of the United States of Canada (nationalized health care isn't my thing)...

Let's hope you're not poor when you get ill then, eh?
Visit the burglars' bulletin board: http://www.break-in-news.com...
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 11:46:07 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 11:44:33 AM, brian_eggleston wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:04:21 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:

meh, i'd prefer not to be apart of the United States of Canada (nationalized health care isn't my thing)...

Let's hope you're not poor when you get ill then, eh?

It's called health insurance.
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
xxdarkxx
Posts: 3,090
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 11:47:45 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 11:44:33 AM, brian_eggleston wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:04:21 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:

meh, i'd prefer not to be apart of the United States of Canada (nationalized health care isn't my thing)...

Let's hope you're not poor when you get ill then, eh?

lol

Surprisingly I very rarely get sick. I've been sick a total of maybe twice over the past 3 years (strep throat sick, because I pretty much always have a cough but i just deal with it)

However I do tend to get injured often... the downside to playing sports alot.
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 12:38:09 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 10:54:34 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:39:39 AM, lovelife wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:20:23 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:09:25 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:02:38 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:
Ha ha ha, what the heck is this suppose to be?

My political science teacher showed it to my class today.

It was made after the.. 2004? election.

Showing the difference between Liberal and Conservatives in America (by state to a degree)

Looks like your political science teacher has an obvious slant going on.

well theirs a wiki for it....

http://en.wikipedia.org...

The wiki said that some suggested secession, I don't think that would be a bad idea. If you think about it would satisfy all.

Easy for you to say, i'd be stuck on the Canadian side.

Lol. You could always move.

Seriously though. It would be a good idea. Maybe not total secession but definitely a separation.

Liberals have their part, conservatives have their own. Kill social security and take what's left (if there is anything left but IOU's) help everyone move. In the liberal countries they can kill all the old people and other drags on the economy and on the conservative side they can let the Church get involved and take care of the "drags". Then each economy can either stand or fall on it's own merit. Each side pays a tax to the federal government killing individual taxation by the feds, so the feds can defend the country and what ever and stay the flip out of personal business. If the liberal side wants social tax care they can pay for it and vice verse. I haven't thought it all the way through but it looks like a "good" for all. Each side can create their own laws and rules and the federal government can keep their hands out of peoples pockets. Wait a darn minute!!!!!! I think this was proposed once before!!!!!!!!!!! What the heck happened?!?!?!?!?!?!

Jesusland took over.

But is this a bad idea? It would be a literal utopia for both sides. Liberals and Atheists could have things their way without the big meany God getting in the way, and the conservatives could have it their way. The religious could plunge back into he dark ages and non could have their enlightened paradise. Just think about it, yall could sit in your coffee shops all day and talk about how dumb the religious are and your government could take care of you. And the dumb religious could go to work and raise their families as they chose. It would be AWESOME.

Now what happens if there is a liberal or conservitive born on the wrong side? What if an atheist is among the religious? When do they get to change locations? Do they still get to keep fanily ties? What if they cannot afford to move and stay? Then they will raise their children under their own mindset and start changing the way one side thinks, thus changing the other side as well. What if one area has better land, and scenery than the other? How do you deal with such problems?
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 12:39:56 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 11:46:07 AM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 9/9/2010 11:44:33 AM, brian_eggleston wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:04:21 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:

meh, i'd prefer not to be apart of the United States of Canada (nationalized health care isn't my thing)...

Let's hope you're not poor when you get ill then, eh?

It's called health insurance.

Hopefully you correctly filled out the forms and that your treatment is covered and that your body survives the sub-standard care.
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
jharry
Posts: 4,984
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 7:03:00 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 12:38:09 PM, lovelife wrote:


Now what happens if there is a liberal or conservitive born on the wrong side? What if an atheist is among the religious? When do they get to change locations? Do they still get to keep fanily ties? What if they cannot afford to move and stay? Then they will raise their children under their own mindset and start changing the way one side thinks, thus changing the other side as well. What if one area has better land, and scenery than the other? How do you deal with such problems?

Sorry, I missed this one some how.

Move when you decide. I'm sure the liberals will have free housing and the conserves would have a spare room somewhere, Church probably.

Scenery? Hmm, didn't think about that. Not a real big issue though. I would love to live in Cali, awesome weather but it is too different then Alabama socially. I like my Bible, Guns and money too much to live there. Some sacrifice would be needed, I know that is Greek to Libs but if they get their way then I'm sure they would do it.

There are a lot of bugs to work out but I think it could work.

And probably not just two sides either. States work well. Northern States are already predominantly blue, wouldn't be to hard of a switch.

I still think it would be great.
In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 10:17:04 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 10:01:49 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:57:17 AM, lovelife wrote:
It actually seems pretty accurate to me, but why would your teacher show you that?

It just looks like something people would post on the internet as an insult, teachers usually give more scientific looking maps. Unless your teacher is a cool fun one, then I could see why.

We were talking about political ideology, mainly liberals and conservatives (all though he touched on Fascist, Socialist, Communist, and Libertarians), and also political polls and how certain ideologies follow certain parties.. so he tried to use it as an example.

It's also worthy to note that he does have bias... apparently Libertarians are "the odd ones"

That's a compliment considering the history of the world.

It's also true considering the history of the world. Is Barack Obama president? Check. Was Ronald Reagan president? check. Was Mussolini dictator of Italy? Check. Is Castro dictator of Cuba? Check. Did Ayn Rand manage to get Nathaniel Branden in his previous incarnation (she would have refused the job herself, too busy with hero worship) declared king of Ragnarland? I'm afraid not.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/9/2010 10:31:48 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 7:03:00 PM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 12:38:09 PM, lovelife wrote:


Now what happens if there is a liberal or conservitive born on the wrong side? What if an atheist is among the religious? When do they get to change locations? Do they still get to keep fanily ties? What if they cannot afford to move and stay? Then they will raise their children under their own mindset and start changing the way one side thinks, thus changing the other side as well. What if one area has better land, and scenery than the other? How do you deal with such problems?

Sorry, I missed this one some how.

Move when you decide. I'm sure the liberals will have free housing and the conserves would have a spare room somewhere, Church probably.

Scenery? Hmm, didn't think about that. Not a real big issue though. I would love to live in Cali, awesome weather but it is too different then Alabama socially. I like my Bible, Guns and money too much to live there. Some sacrifice would be needed, I know that is Greek to Libs but if they get their way then I'm sure they would do it.

There are a lot of bugs to work out but I think it could work.

And probably not just two sides either. States work well. Northern States are already predominantly blue, wouldn't be to hard of a switch.

I still think it would be great.

But what if you can't afford the move, or wish to stay close to family? I'm sure it could work out to a certain extent, but I doubt it would do that much good. It would basically just be giving the government less powers, and the states more powers.
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
jharry
Posts: 4,984
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2010 4:04:00 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 10:31:48 PM, lovelife wrote:
At 9/9/2010 7:03:00 PM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 12:38:09 PM, lovelife wrote:


Now what happens if there is a liberal or conservitive born on the wrong side? What if an atheist is among the religious? When do they get to change locations? Do they still get to keep fanily ties? What if they cannot afford to move and stay? Then they will raise their children under their own mindset and start changing the way one side thinks, thus changing the other side as well. What if one area has better land, and scenery than the other? How do you deal with such problems?

Sorry, I missed this one some how.

Move when you decide. I'm sure the liberals will have free housing and the conserves would have a spare room somewhere, Church probably.

Scenery? Hmm, didn't think about that. Not a real big issue though. I would love to live in Cali, awesome weather but it is too different then Alabama socially. I like my Bible, Guns and money too much to live there. Some sacrifice would be needed, I know that is Greek to Libs but if they get their way then I'm sure they would do it.

There are a lot of bugs to work out but I think it could work.

And probably not just two sides either. States work well. Northern States are already predominantly blue, wouldn't be to hard of a switch.

I still think it would be great.

But what if you can't afford the move, or wish to stay close to family? I'm sure it could work out to a certain extent, but I doubt it would do that much good. It would basically just be giving the government less powers, and the states more powers.

It's not that hard to move, I've done it three times. To different states. Family? After you and others have explained their family relationships after switching views one way or the other I didn't think that would be much of an issue. But I live 3000 miles away from family, talk to them regular. I go to another country every time I go see them out in California.

States having more power. Exactly!!!!! And if you don't like it go to another state. I would be absolutely up for that. I would move to California in a second if they held my beliefs more then Alabama. I can make what ever I want from my life any where I go. And the less federal control the better. Kinda like it started out as. Did you know there was no federal taxation of individuals before the civil war. That should sound like a GREAT idea to many people here. Unless they realize they need the ones they hate to survive that is.
In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2010 4:07:55 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 12:39:56 PM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 9/9/2010 11:46:07 AM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 9/9/2010 11:44:33 AM, brian_eggleston wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:04:21 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:

meh, i'd prefer not to be apart of the United States of Canada (nationalized health care isn't my thing)...

Let's hope you're not poor when you get ill then, eh?

It's called health insurance.

Hopefully you correctly filled out the forms

That's the customers responsibility to make sure he \she has filled out the correct forms and inquire if they have done to the contrary.

and that your treatment is covered

Reads the terms of the insurance to make sure you're covered.

and that your body survives the sub-standard care.

Sub-standard care? If it's sub-standard change health-insurers.
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
InsertNameHere
Posts: 15,699
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2010 4:10:25 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/9/2010 11:44:33 AM, brian_eggleston wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:04:21 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:00:13 AM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:46:44 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:44:06 AM, innomen wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:38:48 AM, xxdarkxx wrote:
At 9/9/2010 9:33:34 AM, Koopin wrote:

meh, i'd prefer not to be apart of the United States of Canada (nationalized health care isn't my thing)...

Let's hope you're not poor when you get ill then, eh?

Seconded, but I'm not going to dive into this thread...
Danielle
Posts: 21,330
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2010 4:41:44 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
That's funny lol but is Iowa depicted as blue? Iowa is surprisingly a SUPER liberal state randomly amidst the midwest lol. Even moreso than Illinois I'd say (though Illinois is probs in a lot more debt).
President of DDO
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2010 8:28:20 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/10/2010 4:04:00 PM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 10:31:48 PM, lovelife wrote:
At 9/9/2010 7:03:00 PM, jharry wrote:
At 9/9/2010 12:38:09 PM, lovelife wrote:


Now what happens if there is a liberal or conservitive born on the wrong side? What if an atheist is among the religious? When do they get to change locations? Do they still get to keep fanily ties? What if they cannot afford to move and stay? Then they will raise their children under their own mindset and start changing the way one side thinks, thus changing the other side as well. What if one area has better land, and scenery than the other? How do you deal with such problems?

Sorry, I missed this one some how.

Move when you decide. I'm sure the liberals will have free housing and the conserves would have a spare room somewhere, Church probably.

Scenery? Hmm, didn't think about that. Not a real big issue though. I would love to live in Cali, awesome weather but it is too different then Alabama socially. I like my Bible, Guns and money too much to live there. Some sacrifice would be needed, I know that is Greek to Libs but if they get their way then I'm sure they would do it.

There are a lot of bugs to work out but I think it could work.

And probably not just two sides either. States work well. Northern States are already predominantly blue, wouldn't be to hard of a switch.

I still think it would be great.

But what if you can't afford the move, or wish to stay close to family? I'm sure it could work out to a certain extent, but I doubt it would do that much good. It would basically just be giving the government less powers, and the states more powers.

It's not that hard to move, I've done it three times. To different states. Family? After you and others have explained their family relationships after switching views one way or the other I didn't think that would be much of an issue. But I live 3000 miles away from family, talk to them regular. I go to another country every time I go see them out in California.


Don't get me wrong I'm not saying its impossible for some or even most. I plan on moving to Canada, Sweden <if possible>, Germany, or Australia if its decent there.

Some people just can't afford to move, and some want/need to stay close to their family. I guess I'm looking at it as two different countries with a common military <set ONLY as defense I hope>

States having more power. Exactly!!!!! And if you don't like it go to another state. I would be absolutely up for that. I would move to California in a second if they held my beliefs more then Alabama. I can make what ever I want from my life any where I go. And the less federal control the better. Kinda like it started out as. Did you know there was no federal taxation of individuals before the civil war. That should sound like a GREAT idea to many people here. Unless they realize they need the ones they hate to survive that is.

Lol it sounds good, but what if you can't afford it? Does the government pay for every conservitive born liberal to move cross country?
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
jharry
Posts: 4,984
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2010 8:56:12 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 9/10/2010 8:28:20 PM, lovelife wrote:

Don't get me wrong I'm not saying its impossible for some or even most. I plan on moving to Canada, Sweden <if possible>, Germany, or Australia if its decent there.

Some people just can't afford to move, and some want/need to stay close to their family. I guess I'm looking at it as two different countries with a common military <set ONLY as defense I hope>

No more like states in union. One country, just different laws and ways. So it would be just like now. I visit my family that is in another country but really it's another State. I'm bound to the laws while there but not when I get home. I own several firearms that are highly illegal in California. I don't bring them with me to Cali or I could go to jail. I know, some neutral ground that can be governed by the feds. No one will live there, but they can still pass laws as if they have the right.


States having more power. Exactly!!!!! And if you don't like it go to another state. I would be absolutely up for that. I would move to California in a second if they held my beliefs more then Alabama. I can make what ever I want from my life any where I go. And the less federal control the better. Kinda like it started out as. Did you know there was no federal taxation of individuals before the civil war. That should sound like a GREAT idea to many people here. Unless they realize they need the ones they hate to survive that is.

Lol it sounds good, but what if you can't afford it? Does the government pay for every conservitive born liberal to move cross country?

Yes. I would defiantly come out of pocket for that, shoot I would do it right now. Of course it would be more of a drain on the conservative side because I doubt the liberal side will have the funds. But either way I think most conservative folks would recognize the gain by helping libs get out of state, and even helping conservatives get out of lib country and into God's country.

And the conservative side could always loan the libs money to help them out, I could see the difficulty in paying for the health care if the people that are receiving it aint paying in and there are no more conservatives to pay the bill. Wait, this won't work.

Then they libs will end up paying the bill by themselves, get tired of paying all the bills and end up wanting to move to the conservative side so they can just pay for their own health care. Then all the libs that depend on the health care won't have anyone to pay the bill and they won't have health care or other government subsidies and then they will end up wanting to move to the conservative side and start whining about not having health care.

And then the libs that have moved to the conservative side will feel bad for them and get a liberal judge into the State supreme court and force the rest of the people to start paying the bill and take God of of the money to pay the bill. Yep, this will never work, it will end up just like it is now.

Scratch that.
In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen