Total Posts:96|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

LOST Mafia Sign-Ups

Danielle
Posts: 22,515
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 4:03:32 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
This game won't begin until after wjmelements' game finishes, but he suggested we begin sign-ups so here goes. I'll start the sign-ups at 26 but more players are always welcome if by some chance the game fills up. Also, please write YES or NO next to your name indicating whether or not you've watched Lost.

01. Marauder - yes
02.
03.
04.
05.
06.
07.
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
President of DDO
LaissezFaire
Posts: 2,050
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 4:05:02 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03.
04.
05.
06.
07.
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
Should we subsidize education?
http://www.debate.org...

http://mises.org...

http://lewrockwell.com...

http://antiwar.com...

: At 6/22/2011 6:57:23 PM, el-badgero wrote:
: i didn't like [Obama]. he was the only black dude in moneygall yet he claimed to be home. obvious liar is obvious liar. i bet him and bin laden are bumfvcking right now.
Koopin
Posts: 12,090
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 4:07:25 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04.
05.
06.
07.
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
kfc
Korashk
Posts: 4,597
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 4:08:58 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04.
05.
06.
07.
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19. Korashk - No
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
When large numbers of otherwise-law abiding people break specific laws en masse, it's usually a fault that lies with the law. - Unknown
mongoose
Posts: 3,500
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 4:16:14 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04.
05.
06.
07. mongoose - no
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19. Korashk - No
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
It is odd when one's capacity for compassion is measured not in what he is willing to do by his own time, effort, and property, but what he will force others to do with their own property instead.
Chrysippus
Posts: 2,173
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 4:29:48 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04.
05.
06.
07. mongoose - no
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16. Chrysippus - no
17.
18.
19. Korashk - No
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
Cavete mea inexorabilis legiones mimus!
VoodooChild
Posts: 91
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 4:33:26 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04.
05.
06.
07. mongoose - no
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16. Chrysippus - no
17.
18.
19. Korashk - No
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25. VoodooChild - No
26.
And Burn, You will Burn, You will Burn in Hell Yeah You'll Burn in Hell Yeah You'll Burn in Hell for All your Sins.
-Matt Bellamy
studentathletechristian8
Posts: 5,810
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 5:31:54 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04.
05.
06.
07. mongoose - no
08. sac8 - no
09.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16. Chrysippus - no
17.
18.
19. Korashk - No
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25. VoodooChild - No
26.
mongoose
Posts: 3,500
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 5:51:15 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04.
05.
06.
07.
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22. mongoose - no
23. sac8 - no
24. Chrysippus - no
25. Korashk - No
26. VoodooChild - No

for convenience
It is odd when one's capacity for compassion is measured not in what he is willing to do by his own time, effort, and property, but what he will force others to do with their own property instead.
studentathletechristian8
Posts: 5,810
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 5:56:25 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/8/2010 5:51:15 PM, mongoose wrote:
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04.
05.
06.
07.
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22. mongoose - no
23. sac8 - no
24. Chrysippus - no
25. Korashk - No
26. VoodooChild - No

for convenience

You do realize that you have essentially forced several of us to take roles that are different from those we indirectly assigned ourselves in accordance with the number system the mods use?

I reckon we ignore mongoose's convenience list. I for one am not okay with another player assigning me a new number.
xxdarkxx
Posts: 3,090
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 6:09:19 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04.
05.
06.
07. mongoose - no
08. sac8 - no
09.
10.
11.
12.
13. xxdarkxx Fvck Yes >.>
14.
15.
16. Chrysippus - no
17.
18.
19. Korashk - No
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25. VoodooChild - No
26.
mongoose
Posts: 3,500
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 6:31:16 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/8/2010 5:56:25 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
At 10/8/2010 5:51:15 PM, mongoose wrote:
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04.
05.
06.
07.
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22. mongoose - no
23. sac8 - no
24. Chrysippus - no
25. Korashk - No
26. VoodooChild - No

for convenience

You do realize that you have essentially forced several of us to take roles that are different from those we indirectly assigned ourselves in accordance with the number system the mods use?

I reckon we ignore mongoose's convenience list. I for one am not okay with another player assigning me a new number.

Which role goes with which number is typically determined at random. There is no reason to believe that different numbers will give you different chances of different results. The convenience is that it is much easier to see who has or has not watched Lost. Much easier.
It is odd when one's capacity for compassion is measured not in what he is willing to do by his own time, effort, and property, but what he will force others to do with their own property instead.
oceanix
Posts: 747
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 6:54:29 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04.
05.
06.
07. mongoose - no
08. sac8 - no
09.
10.
11.
12.
13. xxdarkxx Fvck Yes >.>
14.
15.
16. Chrysippus - no
17.
18.
19. Korashk - No
20.
21. oceanix
22.
23.
24.
25. VoodooChild - No
26.
studentathletechristian8
Posts: 5,810
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 6:57:18 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/8/2010 6:31:16 PM, mongoose wrote:
At 10/8/2010 5:56:25 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
At 10/8/2010 5:51:15 PM, mongoose wrote:
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04.
05.
06.
07.
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22. mongoose - no
23. sac8 - no
24. Chrysippus - no
25. Korashk - No
26. VoodooChild - No

for convenience

You do realize that you have essentially forced several of us to take roles that are different from those we indirectly assigned ourselves in accordance with the number system the mods use?

I reckon we ignore mongoose's convenience list. I for one am not okay with another player assigning me a new number.

Which role goes with which number is typically determined at random. There is no reason to believe that different numbers will give you different chances of different results. The convenience is that it is much easier to see who has or has not watched Lost. Much easier.

It's kind of simple.

In this game, it could be that number eight is a townie-role. This is the role I should receive since I selected number eight.

If you move my name down to the bottom, and consequently give me a different number, it is possible that the new number you gave me contains a mafioso role, which would change the game completely.

It simply is not fair for you to do this. If you were the mod of this game, then I would have no qualms. Since you are a participant, I don't understand how you have the audacity to change the numbers and consequent roles of other players in this game.

L would agree with me.
mongoose
Posts: 3,500
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 7:02:47 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/8/2010 6:57:18 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
At 10/8/2010 6:31:16 PM, mongoose wrote:
At 10/8/2010 5:56:25 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
At 10/8/2010 5:51:15 PM, mongoose wrote:
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04.
05.
06.
07.
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22. mongoose - no
23. sac8 - no
24. Chrysippus - no
25. Korashk - No
26. VoodooChild - No

for convenience

You do realize that you have essentially forced several of us to take roles that are different from those we indirectly assigned ourselves in accordance with the number system the mods use?

I reckon we ignore mongoose's convenience list. I for one am not okay with another player assigning me a new number.

Which role goes with which number is typically determined at random. There is no reason to believe that different numbers will give you different chances of different results. The convenience is that it is much easier to see who has or has not watched Lost. Much easier.

It's kind of simple.

In this game, it could be that number eight is a townie-role. This is the role I should receive since I selected number eight.

If you move my name down to the bottom, and consequently give me a different number, it is possible that the new number you gave me contains a mafioso role, which would change the game completely.

It simply is not fair for you to do this. If you were the mod of this game, then I would have no qualms. Since you are a participant, I don't understand how you have the audacity to change the numbers and consequent roles of other players in this game.

L would agree with me.

I believed it was implied that L would have to approve this to continue, but perhaps not. Now it is stated anyways.
It is odd when one's capacity for compassion is measured not in what he is willing to do by his own time, effort, and property, but what he will force others to do with their own property instead.
Korashk
Posts: 4,597
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 7:20:06 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/8/2010 7:02:47 PM, mongoose wrote:
I believed it was implied that L would have to approve this to continue, but perhaps not. Now it is stated anyways.

We choose our numbers for reasons. For instance 19 or the highest prime number is the one I always pick, because I have to.
When large numbers of otherwise-law abiding people break specific laws en masse, it's usually a fault that lies with the law. - Unknown
mongoose
Posts: 3,500
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 7:21:54 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/8/2010 7:20:06 PM, Korashk wrote:
At 10/8/2010 7:02:47 PM, mongoose wrote:
I believed it was implied that L would have to approve this to continue, but perhaps not. Now it is stated anyways.

We choose our numbers for reasons. For instance 19 or the highest prime number is the one I always pick, because I have to.

...sure.
It is odd when one's capacity for compassion is measured not in what he is willing to do by his own time, effort, and property, but what he will force others to do with their own property instead.
studentathletechristian8
Posts: 5,810
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 7:29:28 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/8/2010 7:21:54 PM, mongoose wrote:
At 10/8/2010 7:20:06 PM, Korashk wrote:
At 10/8/2010 7:02:47 PM, mongoose wrote:
I believed it was implied that L would have to approve this to continue, but perhaps not. Now it is stated anyways.

We choose our numbers for reasons. For instance 19 or the highest prime number is the one I always pick, because I have to.

...sure.

You do realize that Korashk has mild OCD, right?
Chrysippus
Posts: 2,173
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 8:44:53 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Mongoose, it may not be the biggest deal in the world, but I chose the number 16. Please have the goodness to leave me there. Were you the mod, moving me around would be no problem; were you just making a pair of list of those who had and hadn't watched LOST, that would be fine; but it's the sign-up list. Don't touch.
Cavete mea inexorabilis legiones mimus!
oceanix
Posts: 747
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2010 9:48:29 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04.
05.
06.
07. mongoose - no
08. sac8 - no
09.
10.
11.
12.
13. xxdarkxx Fvck Yes >.>
14.
15.
16. Chrysippus - no
17.
18.
19. Korashk - No
20.
21. oceanix - No
22.
23.
24.
25. VoodooChild - No
26.

Fixed.
wush
Posts: 330
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/9/2010 1:41:02 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/8/2010 9:48:29 PM, oceanix wrote:
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04.
05.
06.
07. mongoose - no
08. sac8 - no
09.wush-no but i know a little of the story
10.
11.
12.
13. xxdarkxx Fvck Yes >.>
14.
15.
16. Chrysippus - no
17.
18.
19. Korashk - No
20.
21. oceanix - No
22.
23.
24.
25. VoodooChild - No
26.

Fixed.
BE HAPPY!! =D
you are beautiful, don't let anyone tell you you're not
you're 100X more beautiful when you smile, not that you need it
innomen
Posts: 10,056
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/9/2010 2:06:28 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04. innomen - more or less, yes
05.
06.
07. mongoose - no
08. sac8 - no
09.wush-no but i know a little of the story
10.
11.
12.
13. xxdarkxx Fvck Yes >.>
14.
15.
16. Chrysippus - no
17.
18.
19. Korashk - No
20.
21. oceanix - No
22.
23.
24.
25. VoodooChild - No
26.
Kinesis
Posts: 3,667
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/9/2010 2:19:06 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/9/2010 2:06:28 AM, innomen wrote:
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04. innomen - more or less, yes
05.
06.
07. mongoose - no
08. sac8 - no
09.wush-no but i know a little of the story
10.
11.
12.
13. xxdarkxx Fvck Yes >.>
14.
15.
16. Chrysippus - no
17.
18.
19. Korashk - No
20. Kinesis - Yes
21. oceanix - No
22.
23.
24.
25. VoodooChild - No
26.
Zetsubou
Posts: 4,933
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/9/2010 5:06:20 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
01. Marauder - yes
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04. innomen - more or less, yes
05.
06.
07. mongoose - no
08. sac8 - no
09.wush-no but i know a little of the story
10.
11.
12. Zetsubou - No
13. xxdarkxx Fvck Yes >.>
14.
15.
16. Chrysippus - no
17.
18.
19. Korashk - No
20. Kinesis - Yes
21. oceanix - No
22.
23.
24.
25. VoodooChild - No
26.
'sup DDO -- july 2013
Marauder
Posts: 3,271
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/9/2010 9:22:37 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
I bet the roles that go with these numbers in this game will be special
4 8 15 16 23 42 http://lostpedia.wikia.com...

if you 4 you'll probably be John Lock, in your 8 you will probably be Hugo, 15 Sawyer, 16 Sayid, 23 Jack, and 42 one of the Kwons.
One act of Rebellion created all the darkness and evil in the world; One life of Total Obedience created a path back to eternity and God.

A Scout is Obedient.
Marauder
Posts: 3,271
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/9/2010 9:25:17 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/9/2010 9:22:37 AM, Marauder wrote:
I bet the roles that go with these numbers in this game will be special
4 8 15 16 23 42 http://lostpedia.wikia.com...

if you 4 you'll probably be John Lock, in your 8 you will probably be Hugo, 15 Sawyer, 16 Sayid, 23 Jack, and 42 one of the Kwons.

in fact, just in case I'm right on that I'm moving my spot to 23.

01.
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04. innomen - more or less, yes
05.
06.
07. mongoose - no
08. sac8 - no
09.wush-no but i know a little of the story
10.
11.
12. Zetsubou - No
13. xxdarkxx Fvck Yes >.>
14.
15.
16. Chrysippus - no
17.
18.
19. Korashk - No
20. Kinesis - Yes
21. oceanix - No
22.
23. Marauder - Yes
24.
25. VoodooChild - No
26.
One act of Rebellion created all the darkness and evil in the world; One life of Total Obedience created a path back to eternity and God.

A Scout is Obedient.
Vi_Veri
Posts: 4,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/9/2010 9:27:38 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
The numbers you all pick are extremely arbitrary. We will be mixing you up regardless of the numbers you pick. They wont even matter. We are just using them to see how many people sign up and how many people have watched the show.
I could give a f about no haters as long as my ishes love me.
Danielle
Posts: 22,515
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/9/2010 9:33:14 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/9/2010 9:27:38 AM, Vi_Veri wrote:
The numbers you all pick are extremely arbitrary. We will be mixing you up regardless of the numbers you pick. They wont even matter. We are just using them to see how many people sign up and how many people have watched the show.

Maybe ;) Mwahahaha
President of DDO
Danielle
Posts: 22,515
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/9/2010 11:15:43 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
-- Updated List --

01.
02. LaissezFaire - YES
03. Koopin - Heck yes
04. innomen - more or less, yes
05.
06.
07. mongoose - no
08. sac8 - no
09.wush-no but i know a little of the story
10.
11.
12. Zetsubou - No
13. xxdarkxx Fvck Yes >.>
14.
15.
16. Chrysippus - no
17.
18.
19. Korashk - No
20. Kinesis - Yes
21. oceanix - No
22.
23. Marauder - Yes
24.
25. VoodooChild - No
26.

C'mon, 12 spots left. LOST = EPIC.
President of DDO
xxdarkxx
Posts: 3,090
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/9/2010 1:23:33 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
bamp

and don't assume anything from the numbers marauder. Also I would suggest you stop talking about factors that may be useful in the game because you are then giving the town/mafia knowledge that they might not have had before.