Total Posts:15|Showing Posts:1-15
Jump to topic:

How much to bang this?

Kleptin
Posts: 5,095
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 7:13:55 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Shoot off of this thread:

http://www.debate.org...

How much would someone have to pay you minimum to bang this:

(Ragnar's Warning: Site below is not pornographic, but it is nude. Do not visit, offendible people).

http://www.science-art.com...

Feel free to posit this question for other things :D
: At 5/2/2010 2:43:54 PM, innomen wrote:
It isn't about finding a theory, philosophy or doctrine and thinking it's the answer, but a practical application of one's experiences that is the answer.

: At 10/28/2010 2:40:07 PM, jharry wrote: I have already been given the greatest Gift that anyone could ever hope for [Life], I would consider myself selfish if I expected anything more.
studentathletechristian8
Posts: 5,810
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 7:32:47 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
I would f*ck Mary Elizabeth Winstead.

Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Richard Nixon: Which would you (one person cannot be used more than once): a) assassinate, b) serve for, c) give your life for. Of course, we are assuming that you would be alive during the times that each of these men served.
J.Kenyon
Posts: 4,194
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 7:37:25 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 7:32:47 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
I would f*ck Mary Elizabeth Winstead.

I thought you were "asexual?"

Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Richard Nixon: Which would you (one person cannot be used more than once): a) assassinate, b) serve for, c) give your life for. Of course, we are assuming that you would be alive during the times that each of these men served.

Kill Roosevelt, serve Nixon, die for Jefferson. I'm not a fan of either Roosevelt or Nixon, but, forced to choose, I'd rather serve Nixon.
LaissezFaire
Posts: 2,050
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 7:40:52 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 7:32:47 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
I would f*ck Mary Elizabeth Winstead.

Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Richard Nixon: Which would you (one person cannot be used more than once): a) assassinate, b) serve for, c) give your life for. Of course, we are assuming that you would be alive during the times that each of these men served.

Die for Thomas Jefferson, assassinate Richard Nixon, and serve for Theodore Roosevelt. I don't like Nixon or Roosevelt, but I think Roosevelt would be a much more interesting person to work for.
Should we subsidize education?
http://www.debate.org...

http://mises.org...

http://lewrockwell.com...

http://antiwar.com...

: At 6/22/2011 6:57:23 PM, el-badgero wrote:
: i didn't like [Obama]. he was the only black dude in moneygall yet he claimed to be home. obvious liar is obvious liar. i bet him and bin laden are bumfvcking right now.
studentathletechristian8
Posts: 5,810
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 7:42:59 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 7:37:25 PM, J.Kenyon wrote:
At 10/12/2010 7:32:47 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
I would f*ck Mary Elizabeth Winstead.

I thought you were "asexual?"

Not exactly. I admit that I certainly have sexual attractions towards and fantasies of women, but I simply don't believe that I will "commit" to a type of sexual relationship. I plan on being career-oriented, and I am not sure if it would be best for a sexual relationship to interfere.

Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Richard Nixon: Which would you (one person cannot be used more than once): a) assassinate, b) serve for, c) give your life for. Of course, we are assuming that you would be alive during the times that each of these men served.

Kill Roosevelt, serve Nixon, die for Jefferson. I'm not a fan of either Roosevelt or Nixon, but, forced to choose, I'd rather serve Nixon.

I'm glad that you would die for Jefferson. As would I.
studentathletechristian8
Posts: 5,810
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 7:44:11 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 7:40:52 PM, LaissezFaire wrote:
At 10/12/2010 7:32:47 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
I would f*ck Mary Elizabeth Winstead.

Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Richard Nixon: Which would you (one person cannot be used more than once): a) assassinate, b) serve for, c) give your life for. Of course, we are assuming that you would be alive during the times that each of these men served.

Die for Thomas Jefferson, assassinate Richard Nixon, and serve for Theodore Roosevelt. I don't like Nixon or Roosevelt, but I think Roosevelt would be a much more interesting person to work for.

I agree with the dying for Jefferson part.

Actually, Nixon was a relatively productive president. He accomplished many relatively positive acts of legislation for this country; however, he is clouded by the unfortunate Water Gate scandal. TR seemed like a cool dude.
tvellalott
Posts: 10,864
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 7:45:54 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 7:13:55 PM, Kleptin wrote:
Shoot off of this thread:

http://www.debate.org...

How much would someone have to pay you minimum to bang this:

(Ragnar's Warning: Site below is not pornographic, but it is nude. Do not visit, offendible people).

http://www.science-art.com...

Feel free to posit this question for other things :D

Nothing. I'd fvck a hole in the fence if the weather was humid enough.
"Caitlyn Jenner is an incredibly brave and stunningly beautiful woman."

Muh threads
Using mafia tactics in real-life: http://www.debate.org...
6 years of DDO: http://www.debate.org...
LaissezFaire
Posts: 2,050
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 7:47:00 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 7:44:11 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
At 10/12/2010 7:40:52 PM, LaissezFaire wrote:
At 10/12/2010 7:32:47 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
I would f*ck Mary Elizabeth Winstead.

Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Richard Nixon: Which would you (one person cannot be used more than once): a) assassinate, b) serve for, c) give your life for. Of course, we are assuming that you would be alive during the times that each of these men served.

Die for Thomas Jefferson, assassinate Richard Nixon, and serve for Theodore Roosevelt. I don't like Nixon or Roosevelt, but I think Roosevelt would be a much more interesting person to work for.

I agree with the dying for Jefferson part.

Actually, Nixon was a relatively productive president. He accomplished many relatively positive acts of legislation for this country; however, he is clouded by the unfortunate Water Gate scandal. TR seemed like a cool dude.
I wouldn't really die for Jefferson, I'd just rather die for him than for the other two choices. And Nixon was a horrible president. Peacetime wage/price controls, taking us off the gold standards, mass murder in the Vietnam war (He did take us out, but far, far too late), and a bunch more crazy stuff he didn't get a chance to do. The one good thing he did was open up relations with China.
Should we subsidize education?
http://www.debate.org...

http://mises.org...

http://lewrockwell.com...

http://antiwar.com...

: At 6/22/2011 6:57:23 PM, el-badgero wrote:
: i didn't like [Obama]. he was the only black dude in moneygall yet he claimed to be home. obvious liar is obvious liar. i bet him and bin laden are bumfvcking right now.
studentathletechristian8
Posts: 5,810
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 7:50:44 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 7:47:00 PM, LaissezFaire wrote:
At 10/12/2010 7:44:11 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
At 10/12/2010 7:40:52 PM, LaissezFaire wrote:
At 10/12/2010 7:32:47 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
I would f*ck Mary Elizabeth Winstead.

Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Richard Nixon: Which would you (one person cannot be used more than once): a) assassinate, b) serve for, c) give your life for. Of course, we are assuming that you would be alive during the times that each of these men served.

Die for Thomas Jefferson, assassinate Richard Nixon, and serve for Theodore Roosevelt. I don't like Nixon or Roosevelt, but I think Roosevelt would be a much more interesting person to work for.

I agree with the dying for Jefferson part.

Actually, Nixon was a relatively productive president. He accomplished many relatively positive acts of legislation for this country; however, he is clouded by the unfortunate Water Gate scandal. TR seemed like a cool dude.
I wouldn't really die for Jefferson, I'd just rather die for him than for the other two choices. And Nixon was a horrible president. Peacetime wage/price controls, taking us off the gold standards, mass murder in the Vietnam war (He did take us out, but far, far too late), and a bunch more crazy stuff he didn't get a chance to do. The one good thing he did was open up relations with China.

I was talking more along the lines of environment, social services, etc. Not saying that I support what he did, I am merely saying that he could have been worse.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 8:24:54 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
100 bucks? I'm poor.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Koopin
Posts: 12,090
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2010 9:10:01 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 8:24:54 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
100 bucks? I'm happy with any girl I can get.

It's ok, don't be ashamed.
kfc
brian_eggleston
Posts: 3,347
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2010 10:28:04 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 7:45:54 PM, tvellalott wrote:
At 10/12/2010 7:13:55 PM, Kleptin wrote:
Shoot off of this thread:

http://www.debate.org...

How much would someone have to pay you minimum to bang this:

(Ragnar's Warning: Site below is not pornographic, but it is nude. Do not visit, offendible people).

http://www.science-art.com...

Feel free to posit this question for other things :D

Nothing. I'd fvck a hole in the fence if the weather was humid enough.

Only an Aussie would come out with something like that! ha-ha-ha!
Visit the burglars' bulletin board: http://www.break-in-news.com...
innomen
Posts: 10,052
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2010 1:45:34 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 7:47:00 PM, LaissezFaire wrote:
At 10/12/2010 7:44:11 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
At 10/12/2010 7:40:52 PM, LaissezFaire wrote:
At 10/12/2010 7:32:47 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
I would f*ck Mary Elizabeth Winstead.

Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Richard Nixon: Which would you (one person cannot be used more than once): a) assassinate, b) serve for, c) give your life for. Of course, we are assuming that you would be alive during the times that each of these men served.

Die for Thomas Jefferson, assassinate Richard Nixon, and serve for Theodore Roosevelt. I don't like Nixon or Roosevelt, but I think Roosevelt would be a much more interesting person to work for.

I agree with the dying for Jefferson part.

Actually, Nixon was a relatively productive president. He accomplished many relatively positive acts of legislation for this country; however, he is clouded by the unfortunate Water Gate scandal. TR seemed like a cool dude.
I wouldn't really die for Jefferson, I'd just rather die for him than for the other two choices. And Nixon was a horrible president. Peacetime wage/price controls, taking us off the gold standards, mass murder in the Vietnam war (He did take us out, but far, far too late), and a bunch more crazy stuff he didn't get a chance to do. The one good thing he did was open up relations with China.

Nixon was certainly not one of my faves, and i agree that Roosevelt would be way more interesting to serve with, but he also changed the entire course of our history in our thinking internationally, and getting involved globally, and i don't think that was a good course for this country; it eventually changed our definition in the world.
LaissezFaire
Posts: 2,050
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2010 2:16:37 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/13/2010 1:45:34 PM, innomen wrote:
At 10/12/2010 7:47:00 PM, LaissezFaire wrote:
At 10/12/2010 7:44:11 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
At 10/12/2010 7:40:52 PM, LaissezFaire wrote:
At 10/12/2010 7:32:47 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
I would f*ck Mary Elizabeth Winstead.

Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Richard Nixon: Which would you (one person cannot be used more than once): a) assassinate, b) serve for, c) give your life for. Of course, we are assuming that you would be alive during the times that each of these men served.

Die for Thomas Jefferson, assassinate Richard Nixon, and serve for Theodore Roosevelt. I don't like Nixon or Roosevelt, but I think Roosevelt would be a much more interesting person to work for.

I agree with the dying for Jefferson part.

Actually, Nixon was a relatively productive president. He accomplished many relatively positive acts of legislation for this country; however, he is clouded by the unfortunate Water Gate scandal. TR seemed like a cool dude.
I wouldn't really die for Jefferson, I'd just rather die for him than for the other two choices. And Nixon was a horrible president. Peacetime wage/price controls, taking us off the gold standards, mass murder in the Vietnam war (He did take us out, but far, far too late), and a bunch more crazy stuff he didn't get a chance to do. The one good thing he did was open up relations with China.

Nixon was certainly not one of my faves, and i agree that Roosevelt would be way more interesting to serve with, but he also changed the entire course of our history in our thinking internationally, and getting involved globally, and i don't think that was a good course for this country; it eventually changed our definition in the world.

The U.S. has been getting involved internationally since the very beginning with the Westward expansion, especially the Mexican-American war. And the overseas interference mostly got started with the Spanish-American war and the domination of the colonies the U.S. "liberated" from Spain. Roosevelt certainly took us farther in the wrong direction, but it didn't start with him.
Should we subsidize education?
http://www.debate.org...

http://mises.org...

http://lewrockwell.com...

http://antiwar.com...

: At 6/22/2011 6:57:23 PM, el-badgero wrote:
: i didn't like [Obama]. he was the only black dude in moneygall yet he claimed to be home. obvious liar is obvious liar. i bet him and bin laden are bumfvcking right now.
Kleptin
Posts: 5,095
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2010 2:40:45 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 8:24:54 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
100 bucks? I'm poor.

OH MY GOD, you'd bang that for $100?

It was better when that other guy said he'd do it for free, at least he's twisted. You're admittedly doing this for the money, that's just sad XD
: At 5/2/2010 2:43:54 PM, innomen wrote:
It isn't about finding a theory, philosophy or doctrine and thinking it's the answer, but a practical application of one's experiences that is the answer.

: At 10/28/2010 2:40:07 PM, jharry wrote: I have already been given the greatest Gift that anyone could ever hope for [Life], I would consider myself selfish if I expected anything more.