Total Posts:9|Showing Posts:1-9
Jump to topic:

New Evidence in Trayvon case

sadolite
Posts: 10,012
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/22/2012 7:40:11 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
There is no evidence, only here say that is all. There hasn't even been a trail. Anything you here is all BS until a trial has been conducted.
Beware of the people who are in your circle but are not in your corner.

And with the stroke of a pen people 18 to 21 who own a gun became criminals and public enemy #1 having committed no crime and having said nothing. Just like the Jews in Germany during WW2. Must be a weird feeling.

When I hear people crying and whining about their first world problems I think about the universe with everything in it and people in wheelchairs and all of their problems go away.
sadolite
Posts: 10,012
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2012 5:41:23 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 4/22/2012 9:46:13 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
No evidence = no conviction.

That is correct. If no conclusive evidence is given at the trial, then a dissmisal is in order. Law 101. Here say talk outside of a court room is as worthless as two tits on a hog.
Beware of the people who are in your circle but are not in your corner.

And with the stroke of a pen people 18 to 21 who own a gun became criminals and public enemy #1 having committed no crime and having said nothing. Just like the Jews in Germany during WW2. Must be a weird feeling.

When I hear people crying and whining about their first world problems I think about the universe with everything in it and people in wheelchairs and all of their problems go away.
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/26/2012 6:25:47 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 4/25/2012 5:41:23 PM, sadolite wrote:
At 4/22/2012 9:46:13 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
No evidence = no conviction.

That is correct. If no conclusive evidence is given at the trial, then a dissmisal is in order. Law 101. Here say talk outside of a court room is as worthless as two tits on a hog.

That doesn't mean that we shouldn't discuss what the outcome should be.
sadolite
Posts: 10,012
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/2/2012 8:10:42 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 4/26/2012 6:25:47 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 4/25/2012 5:41:23 PM, sadolite wrote:
At 4/22/2012 9:46:13 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
No evidence = no conviction.

That is correct. If no conclusive evidence is given at the trial, then a dissmisal is in order. Law 101. Here say talk outside of a court room is as worthless as two tits on a hog.

That doesn't mean that we shouldn't discuss what the outcome should be.

Um how can you discuss what the outcome should be when you weren't even there and don't even know what happened or what the REAL facts are. To do so is sheer and unadulterated ignorance of the highest order.
Beware of the people who are in your circle but are not in your corner.

And with the stroke of a pen people 18 to 21 who own a gun became criminals and public enemy #1 having committed no crime and having said nothing. Just like the Jews in Germany during WW2. Must be a weird feeling.

When I hear people crying and whining about their first world problems I think about the universe with everything in it and people in wheelchairs and all of their problems go away.
TheOrator
Posts: 172
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2012 10:08:57 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 5/2/2012 8:10:42 PM, sadolite wrote:
At 4/26/2012 6:25:47 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 4/25/2012 5:41:23 PM, sadolite wrote:
At 4/22/2012 9:46:13 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
No evidence = no conviction.

That is correct. If no conclusive evidence is given at the trial, then a dissmisal is in order. Law 101. Here say talk outside of a court room is as worthless as two tits on a hog.

That doesn't mean that we shouldn't discuss what the outcome should be.

Um how can you discuss what the outcome should be when you weren't even there and don't even know what happened or what the REAL facts are. To do so is sheer and unadulterated ignorance of the highest order.

Discussing what has been reported as legitimate facts isn't ignorance, it's expressing your right to freedom of speech. Furthermore, what's the more ignorant, to discuss the situation to find the best solution, or to refuse to talk about a situation and stick to your beliefs regardless of other facts?
My legend begins in the 12th century
TheOrator
Posts: 172
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/20/2012 2:17:38 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 4/20/2012 11:46:12 PM, Scorbie wrote:
http://gma.yahoo.com...

New evidence..thoughts...debate?

I don't really see how it would overturn the case. Zimmerman is still wrong for following the kid, especially when the police told him not to. Martin saw Zimmerman following him, and felt threatened so he was justified in attacking first.
My legend begins in the 12th century