Total Posts:36|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Spencerjoyage14

NiamC
Posts: 905
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 4:37:34 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
I will sue you for EVERYTHING!! You wnted to block me, ha good luck!
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Niam est amor, vita Niam
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
ESocialBookworm
Posts: 14,368
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 5:02:42 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
O_O nac
Solonkr~
I don't care about whether an ideology is "necessary" or not,
I care about how to solve problems,
which is what everyone else should also care about.

Ken~
In essence, the world is fucked up and you can either ignore it, become cynical or bitter about it.

Me~
"BAILEY + SOLON = SAILEY
MY SHIP SAILEY MUST SAIL"

SCREW THAT SHIZ #BANNIE = BAILEY & ANNIE

P.S. Shipped Sailey before it was cannon bitches.
NiamC
Posts: 905
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 5:06:01 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 5:02:42 PM, ESocialBookworm wrote:
O_O nac

Go away! you dont need to get involved in this. Tell spence to get on this thread!
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Niam est amor, vita Niam
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
mishapqueen
Posts: 3,995
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 5:51:28 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 5:06:01 PM, NiamC wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:02:42 PM, ESocialBookworm wrote:
O_O nac

Go away! you dont need to get involved in this. Tell spence to get on this thread!

I definitely will not!!!!
You cannot choose whether or not you will live by rules, but you can choose which rules you will live by. --Me

"I was wrong. Squirrels are objectively superior to bunnies in every conceivable dimension."
--Joey

"Silence is golden, duct tape is silver" --PetersSmith

Nunc aut Numquam
NiamC
Posts: 905
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 5:52:40 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 5:51:28 PM, mishapqueen wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:06:01 PM, NiamC wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:02:42 PM, ESocialBookworm wrote:
O_O nac

Go away! you dont need to get involved in this. Tell spence to get on this thread!

I definitely will not!!!!
no lol, don't worry. It's all a ruse. Ask spence lol
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Niam est amor, vita Niam
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
mishapqueen
Posts: 3,995
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 5:53:16 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 5:52:40 PM, NiamC wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:51:28 PM, mishapqueen wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:06:01 PM, NiamC wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:02:42 PM, ESocialBookworm wrote:
O_O nac

Go away! you dont need to get involved in this. Tell spence to get on this thread!

I definitely will not!!!!
no lol, don't worry. It's all a ruse. Ask spence lol

I hope so....
You cannot choose whether or not you will live by rules, but you can choose which rules you will live by. --Me

"I was wrong. Squirrels are objectively superior to bunnies in every conceivable dimension."
--Joey

"Silence is golden, duct tape is silver" --PetersSmith

Nunc aut Numquam
NiamC
Posts: 905
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 5:55:03 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 5:53:16 PM, mishapqueen wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:52:40 PM, NiamC wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:51:28 PM, mishapqueen wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:06:01 PM, NiamC wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:02:42 PM, ESocialBookworm wrote:
O_O nac

Go away! you dont need to get involved in this. Tell spence to get on this thread!

I definitely will not!!!!
no lol, don't worry. It's all a ruse. Ask spence lol

I hope so....
it was lol, it started with a spam instance *cough cough spence*
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Niam est amor, vita Niam
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
mishapqueen
Posts: 3,995
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 5:55:38 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 5:55:03 PM, NiamC wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:53:16 PM, mishapqueen wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:52:40 PM, NiamC wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:51:28 PM, mishapqueen wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:06:01 PM, NiamC wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:02:42 PM, ESocialBookworm wrote:
O_O nac

Go away! you dont need to get involved in this. Tell spence to get on this thread!

I definitely will not!!!!
no lol, don't worry. It's all a ruse. Ask spence lol

I hope so....
it was lol, it started with a spam instance *cough cough spence*

*sigh of relief*
You cannot choose whether or not you will live by rules, but you can choose which rules you will live by. --Me

"I was wrong. Squirrels are objectively superior to bunnies in every conceivable dimension."
--Joey

"Silence is golden, duct tape is silver" --PetersSmith

Nunc aut Numquam
GodChoosesLife
Posts: 3,461
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 5:56:09 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 4:37:34 PM, NiamC wrote:
I will sue you for EVERYTHING!! You wnted to block me, ha good luck!

Eh, its threads like this that are a bit spammy. :/
Better than deserved, as ALWAYS.
"The strongest principle of growth lies in human choices."
"The Lord doesn't promise us a perfect life that is free of problems, but he does promise that He'll get us through anything." ~SweeTea
"Good Times" ~ Max
"If Jesus isn't in heaven, then it's not heaven; instead, it's hell." ~anonymous
"Suffering is unimaginably confusing, but it's a way to be drawn closer to God" ~Me
"Tell me what consumes your heart most, and I'll tell you who your God is." ~Dad
NiamC
Posts: 905
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 5:57:55 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 5:56:09 PM, GodChoosesLife wrote:
At 8/25/2014 4:37:34 PM, NiamC wrote:
I will sue you for EVERYTHING!! You wnted to block me, ha good luck!

Eh, its threads like this that are a bit spammy. :/

Lets hope it gets removed. ;p
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Niam est amor, vita Niam
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
SamStevens
Posts: 3,819
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 5:57:57 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 5:06:01 PM, NiamC wrote:
At 8/25/2014 5:02:42 PM, ESocialBookworm wrote:
O_O nac

Go away! you dont need to get involved in this. Tell spence to get on this thread!

Lets get pitch forks, torches, and the town mob to get her to this thread!
"This is the true horror of religion. It allows perfectly decent and sane people to believe by the billions, what only lunatics could believe on their own." Sam Harris
Life asked Death "Why do people love me but hate you?"
Death responded: "Because you are a beautiful lie, and I am the painful truth."
9spaceking
Posts: 4,213
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 6:05:15 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
naw man. I can just walk in and show off my muscles and spencer will cum running towards me.
Equestrian election
http://www.debate.org...

This House would impose democracy
http://www.debate.org...

Reign of Terror is unjustified
http://www.debate.org...

Raise min. wage to $10.10
http://www.debate.org...
JohnMaynardKeynes
Posts: 1,512
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 7:43:03 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
*grabs popcorn*

*waits for Krit to interject*

This shall be fun...
~JohnMaynardKeynes

"The sight of my succulent backside acts as a sedative for the beholder. It soothes the pain of life and makes all which hurts seem like bliss. I urge all those stressed by ridiculous drama on DDO which will never affect your real life to gaze upon my cheeks for they will make you have an excitement and joy you've never felt before." -- Dr. Dennybug

Founder of the BSH-YYW Fan Club
Founder of the Barkalotti
Stand with Dogs and Economics
9spaceking
Posts: 4,213
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 7:45:02 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 7:43:03 PM, JohnMaynardKeynes wrote:
*grabs popcorn*


*waits for Krit to interject*



This shall be fun...
Please, please, my friends, this won't be fun. It will be bloodbath all over and you don't want to see him exploding in your faces while I walk gloriously over lego bricks without any hint of pain.
Equestrian election
http://www.debate.org...

This House would impose democracy
http://www.debate.org...

Reign of Terror is unjustified
http://www.debate.org...

Raise min. wage to $10.10
http://www.debate.org...
JohnMaynardKeynes
Posts: 1,512
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 7:45:52 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 7:45:02 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
At 8/25/2014 7:43:03 PM, JohnMaynardKeynes wrote:
*grabs popcorn*


*waits for Krit to interject*



This shall be fun...
Please, please, my friends, this won't be fun. It will be bloodbath all over and you don't want to see him exploding in your faces while I walk gloriously over lego bricks without any hint of pain.

You're making me want to see this even more.
~JohnMaynardKeynes

"The sight of my succulent backside acts as a sedative for the beholder. It soothes the pain of life and makes all which hurts seem like bliss. I urge all those stressed by ridiculous drama on DDO which will never affect your real life to gaze upon my cheeks for they will make you have an excitement and joy you've never felt before." -- Dr. Dennybug

Founder of the BSH-YYW Fan Club
Founder of the Barkalotti
Stand with Dogs and Economics
9spaceking
Posts: 4,213
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 7:47:00 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 7:45:52 PM, JohnMaynardKeynes wrote:
At 8/25/2014 7:45:02 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
At 8/25/2014 7:43:03 PM, JohnMaynardKeynes wrote:
*grabs popcorn*


*waits for Krit to interject*



This shall be fun...
Please, please, my friends, this won't be fun. It will be bloodbath all over and you don't want to see him exploding in your faces while I walk gloriously over lego bricks without any hint of pain.

You're making me want to see this even more.

Oh, don't be rude. I know you love NC-17 films but this is gonna be so bad it's gonna be more like NCST (NOBODY CAN SEE THIS).
Equestrian election
http://www.debate.org...

This House would impose democracy
http://www.debate.org...

Reign of Terror is unjustified
http://www.debate.org...

Raise min. wage to $10.10
http://www.debate.org...
JohnMaynardKeynes
Posts: 1,512
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 7:47:44 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 7:47:00 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
Oh, don't be rude. I know you love NC-17 films but this is gonna be so bad it's gonna be more like NCST (NOBODY CAN SEE THIS).

You keep giving me an incentive to blow off live mafia and watch this lol.

I'm betting on Rebekah. Anyone want to take Niam's side?
~JohnMaynardKeynes

"The sight of my succulent backside acts as a sedative for the beholder. It soothes the pain of life and makes all which hurts seem like bliss. I urge all those stressed by ridiculous drama on DDO which will never affect your real life to gaze upon my cheeks for they will make you have an excitement and joy you've never felt before." -- Dr. Dennybug

Founder of the BSH-YYW Fan Club
Founder of the Barkalotti
Stand with Dogs and Economics
9spaceking
Posts: 4,213
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 7:48:39 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 7:47:44 PM, JohnMaynardKeynes wrote:
At 8/25/2014 7:47:00 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
Oh, don't be rude. I know you love NC-17 films but this is gonna be so bad it's gonna be more like NCST (NOBODY CAN SEE THIS).

You keep giving me an incentive to blow off live mafia and watch this lol.


I'm betting on Rebekah. Anyone want to take Niam's side?

Yeah, but that's only because your mighty troll is also standing on the side of the cute girl with the puppy face as her profile picture.
Equestrian election
http://www.debate.org...

This House would impose democracy
http://www.debate.org...

Reign of Terror is unjustified
http://www.debate.org...

Raise min. wage to $10.10
http://www.debate.org...
JohnMaynardKeynes
Posts: 1,512
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 7:50:09 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 7:48:39 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
At 8/25/2014 7:47:44 PM, JohnMaynardKeynes wrote:
At 8/25/2014 7:47:00 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
Oh, don't be rude. I know you love NC-17 films but this is gonna be so bad it's gonna be more like NCST (NOBODY CAN SEE THIS).

You keep giving me an incentive to blow off live mafia and watch this lol.


I'm betting on Rebekah. Anyone want to take Niam's side?

Yeah, but that's only because your mighty troll is also standing on the side of the cute girl with the puppy face as her profile picture.

What? Lol. I don't even know what you're saying, man!
~JohnMaynardKeynes

"The sight of my succulent backside acts as a sedative for the beholder. It soothes the pain of life and makes all which hurts seem like bliss. I urge all those stressed by ridiculous drama on DDO which will never affect your real life to gaze upon my cheeks for they will make you have an excitement and joy you've never felt before." -- Dr. Dennybug

Founder of the BSH-YYW Fan Club
Founder of the Barkalotti
Stand with Dogs and Economics
9spaceking
Posts: 4,213
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 7:56:30 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 7:50:09 PM, JohnMaynardKeynes wrote:
At 8/25/2014 7:48:39 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
At 8/25/2014 7:47:44 PM, JohnMaynardKeynes wrote:
At 8/25/2014 7:47:00 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
Oh, don't be rude. I know you love NC-17 films but this is gonna be so bad it's gonna be more like NCST (NOBODY CAN SEE THIS).

You keep giving me an incentive to blow off live mafia and watch this lol.


I'm betting on Rebekah. Anyone want to take Niam's side?

Yeah, but that's only because your mighty troll is also standing on the side of the cute girl with the puppy face as her profile picture.

What? Lol. I don't even know what you're saying, man!
I said, you are only betting on Rebekah because currently nobody is on Niam's side and at the very least two people are on Spencer's side due to your joining.
Equestrian election
http://www.debate.org...

This House would impose democracy
http://www.debate.org...

Reign of Terror is unjustified
http://www.debate.org...

Raise min. wage to $10.10
http://www.debate.org...
JohnMaynardKeynes
Posts: 1,512
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 7:57:28 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 7:56:30 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
What? Lol. I don't even know what you're saying, man!
I said, you are only betting on Rebekah because currently nobody is on Niam's side and at the very least two people are on Spencer's side due to your joining.

Ah, so you're saying I'm a joiner.

IDK, man. Have you seen Rebekah when she's mad? I would be frightened beyond belief.
~JohnMaynardKeynes

"The sight of my succulent backside acts as a sedative for the beholder. It soothes the pain of life and makes all which hurts seem like bliss. I urge all those stressed by ridiculous drama on DDO which will never affect your real life to gaze upon my cheeks for they will make you have an excitement and joy you've never felt before." -- Dr. Dennybug

Founder of the BSH-YYW Fan Club
Founder of the Barkalotti
Stand with Dogs and Economics
9spaceking
Posts: 4,213
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 8:08:13 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 7:57:28 PM, JohnMaynardKeynes wrote:
At 8/25/2014 7:56:30 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
What? Lol. I don't even know what you're saying, man!
I said, you are only betting on Rebekah because currently nobody is on Niam's side and at the very least two people are on Spencer's side due to your joining.


Ah, so you're saying I'm a joiner.


IDK, man. Have you seen Rebekah when she's mad? I would be frightened beyond belief.
Eh. Being outrageous mad is completely different to being cold calm mad. Have you seen the movies?
Being outrageous mad creates the perspective of immediate threat, and you are scared to the core.
Being cold calm mad creates the slow seeping horror of insanity as well as creepiness under the stress of the opponent being so darn calm.
Matilda achieves both of these, and IMO the darn calm was much scarier than the parts where the villain was being outrageously mad. When she was outrageously mad, we felt her rage go everywhere and we worried about Matilda and Mrs. Honey, but as soon as it was over, we sighed with relief. This is similar to the ponytail girl scene, as soon as the girl landed safely, we went "phew, it's over" and went on to watch the rest of the movie.
However, when Mrs. Trunchbull was darn-calm mad, we see the insanity inside her. We truly know that this woman cannot be fooled, you should not mess with her. She offers the slice of cake to the boy, and we are filled with horror set up from the outrageous mad scene, and as the boy slowly chomps down on the cake, we are intrigued yet at the same time at our guard, and nervous about what comes next--and as the cook comes in with the humongous cake and Mrs. Trunchbull forces the boy to eat it all with a crazed look on her face, we're filled with more and more horror, and ultimately terror and the boy lays down, defeated, ready to vomit while looking at the half-finished cake. I really feel like the darn-calm mad had much more development into Mrs. Trunchbull and overall portrayed her as creepier and scarier.
Equestrian election
http://www.debate.org...

This House would impose democracy
http://www.debate.org...

Reign of Terror is unjustified
http://www.debate.org...

Raise min. wage to $10.10
http://www.debate.org...
JohnMaynardKeynes
Posts: 1,512
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 8:09:57 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 8:08:13 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
At 8/25/2014 7:57:28 PM, JohnMaynardKeynes wrote:
At 8/25/2014 7:56:30 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
What? Lol. I don't even know what you're saying, man!
I said, you are only betting on Rebekah because currently nobody is on Niam's side and at the very least two people are on Spencer's side due to your joining.


Ah, so you're saying I'm a joiner.


IDK, man. Have you seen Rebekah when she's mad? I would be frightened beyond belief.
Eh. Being outrageous mad is completely different to being cold calm mad. Have you seen the movies?
Being outrageous mad creates the perspective of immediate threat, and you are scared to the core.
Being cold calm mad creates the slow seeping horror of insanity as well as creepiness under the stress of the opponent being so darn calm.
Matilda achieves both of these, and IMO the darn calm was much scarier than the parts where the villain was being outrageously mad. When she was outrageously mad, we felt her rage go everywhere and we worried about Matilda and Mrs. Honey, but as soon as it was over, we sighed with relief. This is similar to the ponytail girl scene, as soon as the girl landed safely, we went "phew, it's over" and went on to watch the rest of the movie.
However, when Mrs. Trunchbull was darn-calm mad, we see the insanity inside her. We truly know that this woman cannot be fooled, you should not mess with her. She offers the slice of cake to the boy, and we are filled with horror set up from the outrageous mad scene, and as the boy slowly chomps down on the cake, we are intrigued yet at the same time at our guard, and nervous about what comes next--and as the cook comes in with the humongous cake and Mrs. Trunchbull forces the boy to eat it all with a crazed look on her face, we're filled with more and more horror, and ultimately terror and the boy lays down, defeated, ready to vomit while looking at the half-finished cake. I really feel like the darn-calm mad had much more development into Mrs. Trunchbull and overall portrayed her as creepier and scarier.

My god dude, I may need to tl;dr this lmfao.
~JohnMaynardKeynes

"The sight of my succulent backside acts as a sedative for the beholder. It soothes the pain of life and makes all which hurts seem like bliss. I urge all those stressed by ridiculous drama on DDO which will never affect your real life to gaze upon my cheeks for they will make you have an excitement and joy you've never felt before." -- Dr. Dennybug

Founder of the BSH-YYW Fan Club
Founder of the Barkalotti
Stand with Dogs and Economics
9spaceking
Posts: 4,213
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 8:11:55 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 8:09:57 PM, JohnMaynardKeynes wrote:
At 8/25/2014 8:08:13 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
At 8/25/2014 7:57:28 PM, JohnMaynardKeynes wrote:
At 8/25/2014 7:56:30 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
What? Lol. I don't even know what you're saying, man!
I said, you are only betting on Rebekah because currently nobody is on Niam's side and at the very least two people are on Spencer's side due to your joining.


Ah, so you're saying I'm a joiner.


IDK, man. Have you seen Rebekah when she's mad? I would be frightened beyond belief.
Eh. Being outrageous mad is completely different to being cold calm mad. Have you seen the movies?
Being outrageous mad creates the perspective of immediate threat, and you are scared to the core.
Being cold calm mad creates the slow seeping horror of insanity as well as creepiness under the stress of the opponent being so darn calm.
Matilda achieves both of these, and IMO the darn calm was much scarier than the parts where the villain was being outrageously mad. When she was outrageously mad, we felt her rage go everywhere and we worried about Matilda and Mrs. Honey, but as soon as it was over, we sighed with relief. This is similar to the ponytail girl scene, as soon as the girl landed safely, we went "phew, it's over" and went on to watch the rest of the movie.
However, when Mrs. Trunchbull was darn-calm mad, we see the insanity inside her. We truly know that this woman cannot be fooled, you should not mess with her. She offers the slice of cake to the boy, and we are filled with horror set up from the outrageous mad scene, and as the boy slowly chomps down on the cake, we are intrigued yet at the same time at our guard, and nervous about what comes next--and as the cook comes in with the humongous cake and Mrs. Trunchbull forces the boy to eat it all with a crazed look on her face, we're filled with more and more horror, and ultimately terror and the boy lays down, defeated, ready to vomit while looking at the half-finished cake. I really feel like the darn-calm mad had much more development into Mrs. Trunchbull and overall portrayed her as creepier and scarier.


My god dude, I may need to tl;dr this lmfao.

I have a tl;dr version right up there.
Being outrageous mad creates the perspective of immediate threat, and you are scared to the core.
Being cold calm mad creates the slow seeping horror of insanity as well as creepiness under the stress of the opponent being so darn calm.
Equestrian election
http://www.debate.org...

This House would impose democracy
http://www.debate.org...

Reign of Terror is unjustified
http://www.debate.org...

Raise min. wage to $10.10
http://www.debate.org...
JohnMaynardKeynes
Posts: 1,512
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/25/2014 8:20:31 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 8:11:55 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
My god dude, I may need to tl;dr this lmfao.

I have a tl;dr version right up there.
Being outrageous mad creates the perspective of immediate threat, and you are scared to the core.
Being cold calm mad creates the slow seeping horror of insanity as well as creepiness under the stress of the opponent being so darn calm.

I feel like you've thought of this a lot. lol.
~JohnMaynardKeynes

"The sight of my succulent backside acts as a sedative for the beholder. It soothes the pain of life and makes all which hurts seem like bliss. I urge all those stressed by ridiculous drama on DDO which will never affect your real life to gaze upon my cheeks for they will make you have an excitement and joy you've never felt before." -- Dr. Dennybug

Founder of the BSH-YYW Fan Club
Founder of the Barkalotti
Stand with Dogs and Economics
9spaceking
Posts: 4,213
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/26/2014 7:10:56 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/25/2014 8:20:31 PM, JohnMaynardKeynes wrote:
At 8/25/2014 8:11:55 PM, 9spaceking wrote:
My god dude, I may need to tl;dr this lmfao.

I have a tl;dr version right up there.
Being outrageous mad creates the perspective of immediate threat, and you are scared to the core.
Being cold calm mad creates the slow seeping horror of insanity as well as creepiness under the stress of the opponent being so darn calm.

I feel like you've thought of this a lot. lol.

what do you mean?
Equestrian election
http://www.debate.org...

This House would impose democracy
http://www.debate.org...

Reign of Terror is unjustified
http://www.debate.org...

Raise min. wage to $10.10
http://www.debate.org...
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Posts: 1,040
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/27/2014 12:14:12 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
If you are stimulated by new ideas and if you can think for yourself rather than simply accept what Lord Niam Sanctus Milan Seraphim Fri'chickenisha I dishes out, I think you will find this letter of interest. Unless you share my view that it's brazen traitors that make self-deceiving pr"torianism possible, there's no need for you to hear me further. According to the latest scientific evidence, if you want truth, you have to struggle for it. This letter represents my struggle, my attempt at resolving a number of lingering problems. It is also my soapbox for informing the community at large that I can reword my point as follows. The best available data suggest that a leopard can't change its spots.

What I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of a clumsy wacko. It's a fact. Whatever else may be the case, it is certain that Lord Fri'chickenisha is doing some serious mau-mauing. That may sound unbelievable, but it's the truth. Another unbelievable but true statement is that every time Lord Fri'chickenisha tries, he gets increasingly successful in his attempts to put rabid sophisters on the federal payroll. This dangerous trend means not only death for free thought but for imagination as well. By any objective standard, his orations are absolutely apolaustic, but what makes matters entirely intolerable is knowing that he wants to cure the evil of discrimination with more discrimination. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Lord Fri'chickenisha's gossamer grasp of reality.

Lord Fri'chickenisha keeps insisting that he defends the real needs of the working class. To me, there is something fundamentally wrong with that story. Maybe it's that Lord Fri'chickenisha's argument that we ought to worship homophobic, pigheaded ochlocrats as folk heroes is hopelessly flawed and thoroughly circuitous. While I don't know his secret plans, I do know that he claims that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved. That story is full of more holes than a cheap hooker with a piercing fetish and a heroin habit. We need to keep our eyes on Lord Fri'chickenisha. Otherwise, he'll subordinate all spheres of society to an ideological vision of organic community any day now. If that thought doesn't send chills down your spine then you are dead to the love of freedom. The rest of us are concerned that Lord Fri'chickenisha should start developing the parts of his brain that have been impaired by mandarinism. At least then he'll stop trying to dominate the whole earth and take possession of all its riches.

Did you know that some worthless idiots want to help Lord Fri'chickenisha regiment the public mind as much as an army regiments the bodies of its soldiers? Others just want to ride the Satanism bandwagon. In either case, if I didn't think Lord Fri'chickenisha would pull the levers of demagogism and oil the gears of nonrepresentationalism, I wouldn't say that he refers to a variety of things using the word "anticonfederationist". Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, Lord Fri'chickenisha is saying that the sun rises just for him, which we all know is patently absurd. At any rate, he has separate, oftentimes antipodal, interests from ours. For instance, Lord Fri'chickenisha is intererested in dismantling the family unit. In contrast, my interests"and perhaps yours as well"include telling people that a number of serious questions need to be asked"and answered"before we give Lord Fri'chickenisha carte blanche to push all of us to the brink of insanity. Don't make the mistake of thinking otherwise. Lord Fri'chickenisha does, and that's why his favorite tactic is known as "deceiving with the truth". The idea behind this tactic is that Lord Fri'chickenisha wins our trust by revealing the truth but leaving some of it out. This makes us less likely to subject his insinuations to the rigorous scrutiny they warrant.

Nature is a wonderful teacher. For instance, the lesson that Nature teaches us from newly acephalous poultry is that you really don't need a brain to run around like a dang fool making a spectacle of yourself. Nature also teaches us that I stand by what I've written before, that sometimes I think that Lord Fri'chickenisha is simply a willing pawn of those vapid raving-types who undermine the basic values of work, responsibility, and family. I typically drop that willing-pawn notion, however, whenever I remember that the law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. Lord Fri'chickenisha has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and rescue particularism from the rubbish heap of history, dust it off, slap on a coat of cheap sophistry, and market it as new and improved"all by trumping up a phony emergency.

There's a little-known truth that isn't readily acknowledged by the most revolting smart alecks you'll ever see: Lord Fri'chickenisha keeps saying that escapism is the only alternative to sexism. I suggest taking such statements with a grain of salt because you should not ask, "Is his incessant burbling about the wonders of metagrobolism supposed to convince us that a knowledge of correct diction, even if unused, evinces a superiority that covers cowardice or stupidity?" but rather, "What provoked him to impose a 'glass ceiling' that limits our opportunities for promotions in most jobs?". The latter question is the better one to ask because I avouch that his mordacious threats will not deter me from my fight against statism. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that he has written more than his fair share of lengthy, over-worded, pseudo-intellectual tripe. In all such instances Lord Fri'chickenisha conveniently overlooks the fact that this is no time to be unrestrained and no time to be wayward. But that's not all: He seems unable to think of turns of speech that aren't hackneyed. What really grates on my nerves, however, is that Lord Fri'chickenisha's prose consists less of words chosen for the sake of their meaning than of phrases tacked together like the sections of a prefabricated henhouse.

I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like Lord Fri'chickenisha want to squabash his rivals. To believe that I and others who think he's a saturnine biggety-type are secretly using etheric attachment cords to drain people's karmic energy is to deceive ourselves. I am not making a generalization when I say that there is something inherently wrong with a man who wants, more than anything else, to set up dissident groups and individuals for conspiracy charges and then carry out searches and seizures on flimsy pretexts. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that there are many roads leading to the defeat of his plans to substitute pap for art. I really claim that all of these roads must eventually pass through the same set of gates: the ability to rouse people's indignation at Lord Fri'chickenisha. Some of you may feel a little sheepish about pushing the envelope on our knowledge of the world around us. Don't. We must all work together towards that end if we're ever to discuss the programmatic foundations of Lord Fri'chickenisha's imperious conclusions in detail.

Be honest; can you in any way believe Lord Fri'chickenisha's claim that his blanket statements are Holy Writ? I cannot, mainly because by the irresistible force of involuntary conviction, people everywhere will one day grant people the freedom to pursue any endeavor they deem fitting to their skills, talent, and interest. It is no more complicated than that.
I'm so fancy, you already know.
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Posts: 1,040
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/27/2014 12:15:21 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
The problem with Lord Fri'chickenisha is not that he's unpatriotic. It's that he wants to lead an active disinformation campaign. Pardon me for not being able to empathize with uncontrollable converts to nepotism, but he has managed to mollify his more trusting critics simply by promising not to extirpate the things that I cherish. We shall see how long that lasts. In the meantime, Lord Fri'chickenisha doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive.

Just look at the bill of fare served up in recent movies and television programs and you will hardly be able to deny that I would like to believe that Lord Fri'chickenisha acts with our interests in mind. I really would. But Lord Fri'chickenisha sure makes it difficult to believe such things. For instance, he sees the world as somewhat anarchic, a game of catch-as-catch-can in which the sneakiest mythomaniacs nab the biggest prizes. Sure, he may have a right to bad-mouth worthy causes but we certainly don't have to stand idly by while he exercises that right. For better or for worse, every time Lord Fri'chickenisha utters or writes a statement that supports clericalism"even indirectly"it sends a message that Lord Fri'chickenisha's hariolations can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality. I maintain that we mustn't let him make such statements, partly because his mandarin prose has always appealed to the most possession-obsessed loons you'll ever see, but primarily because I, not being one of the many pompous Svengalis of this world, definitely dislike him. Likes or dislikes, however, are irrelevant to observed facts, such as that the mistaken claim that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of niddering stereotypes is not only incorrect but is somewhat telling of Lord Fri'chickenisha's core sentiments. The sooner he comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us. Finally, to those of you who are faithfully helping me take personal action and criticize the obvious incongruities presented by Lord Niam Sanctus Milan Seraphim Fri'chickenisha I and his loyalists, let me extend, as always, my deepest gratitude and my most affectionate regards.
I'm so fancy, you already know.
NiamC
Posts: 905
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/27/2014 12:19:33 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/27/2014 12:14:12 PM, SPENCERJOYAGE14 wrote:
If you are stimulated by new ideas and if you can think for yourself rather than simply accept what Lord Niam Sanctus Milan Seraphim Fri'chickenisha I dishes out, I think you will find this letter of interest. Unless you share my view that it's brazen traitors that make self-deceiving pr"torianism possible, there's no need for you to hear me further. According to the latest scientific evidence, if you want truth, you have to struggle for it. This letter represents my struggle, my attempt at resolving a number of lingering problems. It is also my soapbox for informing the community at large that I can reword my point as follows. The best available data suggest that a leopard can't change its spots.

What I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of a clumsy wacko. It's a fact. Whatever else may be the case, it is certain that Lord Fri'chickenisha is doing some serious mau-mauing. That may sound unbelievable, but it's the truth. Another unbelievable but true statement is that every time Lord Fri'chickenisha tries, he gets increasingly successful in his attempts to put rabid sophisters on the federal payroll. This dangerous trend means not only death for free thought but for imagination as well. By any objective standard, his orations are absolutely apolaustic, but what makes matters entirely intolerable is knowing that he wants to cure the evil of discrimination with more discrimination. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Lord Fri'chickenisha's gossamer grasp of reality.

Lord Fri'chickenisha keeps insisting that he defends the real needs of the working class. To me, there is something fundamentally wrong with that story. Maybe it's that Lord Fri'chickenisha's argument that we ought to worship homophobic, pigheaded ochlocrats as folk heroes is hopelessly flawed and thoroughly circuitous. While I don't know his secret plans, I do know that he claims that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved. That story is full of more holes than a cheap hooker with a piercing fetish and a heroin habit. We need to keep our eyes on Lord Fri'chickenisha. Otherwise, he'll subordinate all spheres of society to an ideological vision of organic community any day now. If that thought doesn't send chills down your spine then you are dead to the love of freedom. The rest of us are concerned that Lord Fri'chickenisha should start developing the parts of his brain that have been impaired by mandarinism. At least then he'll stop trying to dominate the whole earth and take possession of all its riches.

Did you know that some worthless idiots want to help Lord Fri'chickenisha regiment the public mind as much as an army regiments the bodies of its soldiers? Others just want to ride the Satanism bandwagon. In either case, if I didn't think Lord Fri'chickenisha would pull the levers of demagogism and oil the gears of nonrepresentationalism, I wouldn't say that he refers to a variety of things using the word "anticonfederationist". Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, Lord Fri'chickenisha is saying that the sun rises just for him, which we all know is patently absurd. At any rate, he has separate, oftentimes antipodal, interests from ours. For instance, Lord Fri'chickenisha is intererested in dismantling the family unit. In contrast, my interests"and perhaps yours as well"include telling people that a number of serious questions need to be asked"and answered"before we give Lord Fri'chickenisha carte blanche to push all of us to the brink of insanity. Don't make the mistake of thinking otherwise. Lord Fri'chickenisha does, and that's why his favorite tactic is known as "deceiving with the truth". The idea behind this tactic is that Lord Fri'chickenisha wins our trust by revealing the truth but leaving some of it out. This makes us less likely to subject his insinuations to the rigorous scrutiny they warrant.

Nature is a wonderful teacher. For instance, the lesson that Nature teaches us from newly acephalous poultry is that you really don't need a brain to run around like a dang fool making a spectacle of yourself. Nature also teaches us that I stand by what I've written before, that sometimes I think that Lord Fri'chickenisha is simply a willing pawn of those vapid raving-types who undermine the basic values of work, responsibility, and family. I typically drop that willing-pawn notion, however, whenever I remember that the law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. Lord Fri'chickenisha has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and rescue particularism from the rubbish heap of history, dust it off, slap on a coat of cheap sophistry, and market it as new and improved"all by trumping up a phony emergency.

There's a little-known truth that isn't readily acknowledged by the most revolting smart alecks you'll ever see: Lord Fri'chickenisha keeps saying that escapism is the only alternative to sexism. I suggest taking such statements with a grain of salt because you should not ask, "Is his incessant burbling about the wonders of metagrobolism supposed to convince us that a knowledge of correct diction, even if unused, evinces a superiority that covers cowardice or stupidity?" but rather, "What provoked him to impose a 'glass ceiling' that limits our opportunities for promotions in most jobs?". The latter question is the better one to ask because I avouch that his mordacious threats will not deter me from my fight against statism. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that he has written more than his fair share of lengthy, over-worded, pseudo-intellectual tripe. In all such instances Lord Fri'chickenisha conveniently overlooks the fact that this is no time to be unrestrained and no time to be wayward. But that's not all: He seems unable to think of turns of speech that aren't hackneyed. What really grates on my nerves, however, is that Lord Fri'chickenisha's prose consists less of words chosen for the sake of their meaning than of phrases tacked together like the sections of a prefabricated henhouse.

I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like Lord Fri'chickenisha want to squabash his rivals. To believe that I and others who think he's a saturnine biggety-type are secretly using etheric attachment cords to drain people's karmic energy is to deceive ourselves. I am not making a generalization when I say that there is something inherently wrong with a man who wants, more than anything else, to set up dissident groups and individuals for conspiracy charges and then carry out searches and seizures on flimsy pretexts. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that there are many roads leading to the defeat of his plans to substitute pap for art. I really claim that all of these roads must eventually pass through the same set of gates: the ability to rouse people's indignation at Lord Fri'chickenisha. Some of you may feel a little sheepish about pushing the envelope on our knowledge of the world around us. Don't. We must all work together towards that end if we're ever to discuss the programmatic foundations of Lord Fri'chickenisha's imperious conclusions in detail.

Be honest; can you in any way believe Lord Fri'chickenisha's claim that his blanket statements are Holy Writ? I cannot, mainly because by the irresistible force of involuntary conviction, people everywhere will one day grant people the freedom to pursue any endeavor they deem fitting to their skills, talent, and interest. It is no more complicated than that.

Aw... thank you?
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Niam est amor, vita Niam
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Posts: 1,040
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/27/2014 12:33:59 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Be honest; can you in any way believe Lord Fri'chickenisha's claim that his blanket statements are Holy Writ? I cannot, mainly because by the irresistible force of involuntary conviction, people everywhere will one day grant people the freedom to pursue any endeavor they deem fitting to their skills, talent, and interest. It is no more complicated than that.

Aw... thank you?

That's my formal complaint against you.
I'm so fancy, you already know.