Total Posts:49|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page

# How many Lives is your Life Worth?

 Posts: 5,848 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoLet's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?Empress of DDO (also Poll and Forum "Maintenance" Moderator) "The two most important days in your life is the day you were born, and the day you find out why." ~Mark Twain "Wow" -Doge "Don't believe everything you read on the internet just because there's a picture with a quote next to it." ~Abraham Lincoln Guide to the Polls Section: http://www.debate.org...
 Posts: 2,181 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/20/2016 7:09:41 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?Can we ask a question or two first ?How will they die. Real quick , painlessly.And the other person, do you know them ? How many 50 year olds will die before a 8 year old.
 Posts: 5,848 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/20/2016 7:10:43 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/20/2016 7:09:41 AM, Deb-8-A-Bull wrote:At 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?Can we ask a question or two first ?How will they die. Real quick , painlessly.They'll be shot.And the other person, do you know them ? How many 50 year olds will die before a 8 year old.Randomly selected, normal people.Empress of DDO (also Poll and Forum "Maintenance" Moderator) "The two most important days in your life is the day you were born, and the day you find out why." ~Mark Twain "Wow" -Doge "Don't believe everything you read on the internet just because there's a picture with a quote next to it." ~Abraham Lincoln Guide to the Polls Section: http://www.debate.org...
 Posts: 2,181 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/20/2016 7:12:23 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/20/2016 7:10:43 AM, PetersSmith wrote:At 11/20/2016 7:09:41 AM, Deb-8-A-Bull wrote:At 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?Can we ask a question or two first ?How will they die. Real quick , painlessly.They'll be shot.And the other person, do you know them ? How many 50 year olds will die before a 8 year old.Randomly selected, normal people.And is their a slight chance of getting to the person with the gun .
 Posts: 5,848 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/20/2016 7:19:35 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/20/2016 7:12:23 AM, Deb-8-A-Bull wrote:At 11/20/2016 7:10:43 AM, PetersSmith wrote:At 11/20/2016 7:09:41 AM, Deb-8-A-Bull wrote:At 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?Can we ask a question or two first ?How will they die. Real quick , painlessly.They'll be shot.And the other person, do you know them ? How many 50 year olds will die before a 8 year old.Randomly selected, normal people.And is their a slight chance of getting to the person with the gun .This is a hypothetical question that is not based on reality, simply asking what is the max amount of people you'd be willing to let die so you can live. I do not need to get into the specifics.Empress of DDO (also Poll and Forum "Maintenance" Moderator) "The two most important days in your life is the day you were born, and the day you find out why." ~Mark Twain "Wow" -Doge "Don't believe everything you read on the internet just because there's a picture with a quote next to it." ~Abraham Lincoln Guide to the Polls Section: http://www.debate.org...
 Posts: 2,181 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/20/2016 7:24:10 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoIf I can see the gun they are getting shoot with . And it holds between 1 to 10 bullets .10 people will have to die before me.If the person can simply reload and you can't get to them .The amount of people that my life is worth is 1 more then the amount of bullets they have.I'm no gentleman when it comes to getting shot unfortunately.
 Posts: 2,181 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/20/2016 7:35:14 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/20/2016 7:19:35 AM, PetersSmith wrote:At 11/20/2016 7:12:23 AM, Deb-8-A-Bull wrote:At 11/20/2016 7:10:43 AM, PetersSmith wrote:At 11/20/2016 7:09:41 AM, Deb-8-A-Bull wrote:At 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?Can we ask a question or two first ?How will they die. Real quick , painlessly.They'll be shot.And the other person, do you know them ? How many 50 year olds will die before a 8 year old.Randomly selected, normal people.And is their a slight chance of getting to the person with the gun .This is a hypothetical question that is not based on reality, simply asking what is the max amount of people you'd be willing to let die so you can live. I do not need to get into the specifics.Well 1, 5 maybe , or 150,769. Since we are not getting into specifics.Maybe 33, or 18,000 and a half.Good game , Good game.
 Posts: 2,181 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/20/2016 8:28:20 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?Sorry PetersOK I went away and had a good think about it.I'm stressed out to the max for you putting me in this situation.I'm worth 30 ish I worked out1 to know if it's real, 2 to know I'm not dreaming , 3 to know it's really real . 4 because the last person they shoot was one of them types of people I don't like, and was hoping it was another one of em. 5 because maybe it might be one of them types I don't like.6 the same reasons the 4th. 7 because the 6th person was another one of the types I don't like. 8 Because it might be one of the types of people I don't like. 9 because this can't be real 10 to know it's real again . 11 to sink in . 12 because I'm starting to like it .13 to realize I really do like it. 14 because I don't want to die, 15 , 16 , 17, 18, because I just remembered it's hypocritical. 19 , 20 ,21 22, because I love it aND have to wait for my erection to go down. 23, 24, 25, 26 just hoping it's one of them types of people I don't like. 27, 28 , because I am gambler and it might be one of them types of people I don't like, and then me 29 just to see if this is for real and I'm not dreaming it.
 Posts: 3,227 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/20/2016 11:15:35 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?This implies that life has any sort of worth whatsoever./end nihilistic observationsI'm becoming less defined as days go by, fading away, and well you might say, I'm losing focus, kinda drifting into the abstract in terms of how I see myself.
 Posts: 465 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/20/2016 3:30:33 PMPosted: 2 weeks agoI'd kill a man in self-defense. Might kill the whole world of men in self-defense. Wouldn't kill a man who was just minding his own business.: : : At 11/15/2016 6:22:17 PM, Greyparrot wrote: : That's not racism. Thats economics.
 Posts: 465 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/20/2016 3:53:40 PMPosted: 2 weeks agoThen there's question of letting people die. I'd give my life to save a child's, maybe a pretty girl's, probably anyone in my family, or maybe just someone I thought would do some good in the world (though I'd never sacrifice anyone else for a greater good). Letting people die is a weird question though. I'm probably not a very good person, I'm probably in fact wholly self-interested. I don't give blood, don't do charitable work, don't really help anyone out in any way at all. How many people am I letting die in that? What am I valuing greater than their lives? You know I think there's a sort of apathy in Christianity...: : : At 11/15/2016 6:22:17 PM, Greyparrot wrote: : That's not racism. Thats economics.
 Posts: 777 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/20/2016 8:46:39 PMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?Exactly 69831742042036986902Forum Record: 6/0 Funny Quotes: "i worship satan and allahu akbar and hispanic muslims i am an illigal immigrant" -communist_snake- "What fuking dates are you talking about child. the and ridiculous and stay out of mummies drugs, you're fuked." -I'll keep this anonymous...- "fuk off bog, no one even reads your crap, what price is you hooker now?" -same dude as above....-
 Posts: 8,838 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/20/2016 9:16:13 PMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?If I were to live in a world where there is a power that is able to eliminate the entire human population, I would let the entire population die. For we would all be living in tyranny and as slaves.It's not your views that divide us, it's what you think my views should be that divides us. If you think I will give up my rights and forsake social etiquette to make you "FEEL" better you are sadly mistaken If liberal democrats would just stop shooting people gun violence would drop by 90%
 Posts: 465 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/20/2016 9:17:23 PMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/20/2016 9:16:13 PM, sadolite wrote:At 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?If I were to live in a world where there is a power that is able to eliminate the entire human population, I would let the entire population die. For we would all be living in tyranny and as slaves.I would die for you sadolite.: : : At 11/15/2016 6:22:17 PM, Greyparrot wrote: : That's not racism. Thats economics.
 Posts: 8,838 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/21/2016 12:11:28 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/20/2016 9:17:23 PM, Devilry wrote:At 11/20/2016 9:16:13 PM, sadolite wrote:At 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?If I were to live in a world where there is a power that is able to eliminate the entire human population, I would let the entire population die. For we would all be living in tyranny and as slaves.I would die for you sadolite.that would be a waste of your lifeIt's not your views that divide us, it's what you think my views should be that divides us. If you think I will give up my rights and forsake social etiquette to make you "FEEL" better you are sadly mistaken If liberal democrats would just stop shooting people gun violence would drop by 90%
 Posts: 56 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/21/2016 2:32:10 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?I see a paradox here. Nobody else's life is worth anything, so that would mean my life is worth 0 lives. But if I would let everyone in the world die for my survival, clearly, mine would be worth more.I came here to troll everyone :D
 Posts: 1,137 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/21/2016 2:56:24 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?I choose for them to live, and that I live and hope for the best. I would risk my life and fight till the end gladly under the right circumstances. I will not volunteer ending my life. It is not a possibility. I am not responsible for choosing whether others die. It is not a capacity of mine to choose death of a person. I will choose life.Wisdom is found where the wise seek it.
 Posts: 56 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/21/2016 3:09:27 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/21/2016 2:56:24 AM, Quadrunner wrote:At 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?I choose for them to live, and that I live and hope for the best. I would risk my life and fight till the end gladly under the right circumstances. I will not volunteer ending my life. It is not a possibility. I am not responsible for choosing whether others die. It is not a capacity of mine to choose death of a person. I will choose life.Pffffft. Now why would you want to do that? Oh yeah you're probably worthless too, nvm.I came here to troll everyone :D
 Posts: 1,137 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/21/2016 3:12:53 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/21/2016 3:09:27 AM, GrassyPunk wrote:At 11/21/2016 2:56:24 AM, Quadrunner wrote:At 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?I choose for them to live, and that I live and hope for the best. I would risk my life and fight till the end gladly under the right circumstances. I will not volunteer ending my life. It is not a possibility. I am not responsible for choosing whether others die. It is not a capacity of mine to choose death of a person. I will choose life.Pffffft. Now why would you want to do that? Oh yeah you're probably worthless too, nvm.After calling me worthless, and not even taking the time to spell out never mind. :') Oh the authenticity.Wisdom is found where the wise seek it.
 Posts: 56 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/21/2016 3:18:26 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/21/2016 3:12:53 AM, Quadrunner wrote:At 11/21/2016 3:09:27 AM, GrassyPunk wrote:At 11/21/2016 2:56:24 AM, Quadrunner wrote:At 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?I choose for them to live, and that I live and hope for the best. I would risk my life and fight till the end gladly under the right circumstances. I will not volunteer ending my life. It is not a possibility. I am not responsible for choosing whether others die. It is not a capacity of mine to choose death of a person. I will choose life.Pffffft. Now why would you want to do that? Oh yeah you're probably worthless too, nvm.After calling me worthless, and not even taking the time to spell out never mind. :') Oh the authenticity.What's life like being a grammar Nazi? Do you like getting your @ss beaten by Soviets and capitalist Americans?I came here to troll everyone :D
 Posts: 56 Add as FriendChallenge to a DebateSend a Message 11/21/2016 3:22:11 AMPosted: 2 weeks agoAt 11/21/2016 3:12:53 AM, Quadrunner wrote:At 11/21/2016 3:09:27 AM, GrassyPunk wrote:At 11/21/2016 2:56:24 AM, Quadrunner wrote:At 11/20/2016 6:21:19 AM, PetersSmith wrote:Let's say you're in some crazy scenario where it's either your life or another person's. You have a choice where either you live, but the other person dies, or you die and the other person lives. However, what if it's more than one person? Such as if you live then two other people die or three or four and so on. So, the question is: what is the max number of people would you let die so that you may live? Just one? Two? 100? The entire human population?I choose for them to live, and that I live and hope for the best. I would risk my life and fight till the end gladly under the right circumstances. I will not volunteer ending my life. It is not a possibility. I am not responsible for choosing whether others die. It is not a capacity of mine to choose death of a person. I will choose life.Pffffft. Now why would you want to do that? Oh yeah you're probably worthless too, nvm.After calling me worthless, and not even taking the time to spell out never mind. :') Oh the authenticity.Nlgga, go back to the sewer you crawled out from and think of some better insults.I came here to troll everyone :D