Total Posts:9|Showing Posts:1-9
Jump to topic:

Rules

sadolite
Posts: 9,192
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/14/2011 4:26:53 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
You ever notice how people who subscribe to "moral relativism" are the first to give you crap about not following debate "rules"
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/14/2011 4:29:03 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 8/14/2011 4:26:53 PM, sadolite wrote:
You ever notice how people who subscribe to "moral relativism" are the first to give you crap about not following debate "rules"

And your point would be?
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
CosmicAlfonzo
Posts: 5,955
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/14/2011 4:29:30 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
What does a violation of moral relativism have to do with the established rules of a debate?
Official "High Priest of Secular Affairs and Transient Distributor of Sonic Apple Seeds relating to the Reptilian Division of Paperwork Immoliation" of The FREEDO Bureaucracy, a DDO branch of the Erisian Front, a subdivision of the Discordian Back, a Limb of the Illuminatian Cosmic Utensil Corp
mattrodstrom
Posts: 12,028
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/14/2011 4:34:21 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 8/14/2011 4:26:53 PM, sadolite wrote:
You ever notice how people who subscribe to "moral relativism" are the first to give you crap about not following debate "rules"

I'm a 'relativist' but I insist on how I would have things..
(and don't you even suggest this is inconsistent b/c it's not and if you'd suggest it is you're just proving yourself a dummy :P)

also... I'm a relativist... and I hate "rules" of many stripes... and wouldn't care much at all for "debate rules"
"He who does not know how to put his will into things at least puts a meaning into them: that is, he believes there is a will in them already."

Metaphysics:
"The science.. which deals with the fundamental errors of mankind - but as if they were the fundamental truths."
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/14/2011 9:18:29 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
what a useless thread.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/14/2011 9:25:47 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 8/14/2011 9:18:29 PM, 000ike wrote:
what a useless thread.
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/15/2011 5:08:58 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 8/14/2011 4:29:30 PM, CosmicAlfonzo wrote:
What does a violation of moral relativism have to do with the established rules of a debate?

How is it a violation of moral relativism?
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.