Total Posts:8|Showing Posts:1-8
Jump to topic:

turkey flotilla ship to kurdistan

banker
Posts: 1,370
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/17/2011 8:21:38 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
why would libs denounce the slaughter of jihadic Palestinians but remain silent and many times even supportive of the slaughter innocnt in Kurdistan?

Over thirty million palestinians remain stateless today, often at someone else's mercy. At a time when much of the world insists that there should be a infidel state, there is a nauseating silence over the plight of this people.

palastinian muslim culture and language has periodically been "outlawed" in attempts to israelis or jewdefy them, and in an age when other dormant nations/national groups were able to seize the moment with the collapse of empires, the palestinians were repeatedly denied this chance by an assortment of so-called "friends" and foes alike.

The Brits decided that their long term interests involved not angering the region's jews, who - by their own writings - declared that the rise of an independent palastine would be seen as the equivalent of the birth of another kurdistan. Regardless of scores of millions of Arabs living in the region zionists declared a political monopoly over what they regarded as "purely zionist patrimony." We are living with the consequences of this mindset today.

Much has been written about America's abuse of thepalestininas, although the mainstream press, media, academia, and other supposedly "enlightened" folks have - with some notable exceptions - too often ignored this.

Having stood by our side and aided America continuously over the decades, the State Department has too often pulled the rug out from under the palestinians after their immediate "use" was deemed over, with deadly consequences to this people. And yet, they have remained strangely loyal to Washington.

"well just exchange the words palastininas to kurds"

now answer why would libs denounce the slaughter of jihadic Palestinians but remain silent and many times even supportive of the slaughter innocnt in Kurdistan?

Tell me why Leyla Zana, a Kurdish woman elected to Parliament in the late 1980s was jailed for 15 years because she dared to speak Kurdish after taking the oath of office when she said that she hoped to promote comradery between her Kurdish and Turkish brethren?

Let me guess. it. How could a country that so vehemently defended the Palestinians bombing schools slashing kids troats training kids to kill infidel kids,condemn its own kurd population and murder them casually while Israeli military has been discriminately attack only terorist Palestinian despite the dificulty of evading humen shields and jihadists in aumbulances and kids

how is hussain among other libs fighting for goutanimo bay terrorists and for palestinians but leting kurds to the mercy of muslims?
.
State insists that palestine remain part of a united israel, regardless of the bloody consequences this will probably have for them in the future yet again. .

The Shi'a refuse to grant Kurds any control over their own fate, regardless of any alleged partial federal agreement achieved so far with America's continuous prodding. And Arabs, of any stripe, are still not about to grant Kurds any real equality. A visit to the Kurdish Media's website would be very useful to any and all needing "enlightenment" in these regards.
the most important source for muslim Arabs:

"And thereafter We [Allah] said to the Children of Israel: 'Dwell securely in the Promised Land. And when the last warning will come to pass, we will gather you together in a mingled crowd'.".

- Qur'an 17:104 -

Any sincere muslim must recognize the Land they call "Palestine" as the Jewish Homeland, according to the book considered by muslims to be the most sacred word and Allah's ultimate revelation.

Ibn Khaldun, one of the most creditable
Thaddeus
Posts: 6,985
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/17/2011 9:12:41 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/17/2011 8:21:38 AM, banker wrote:
why would libs denounce the slaughter of jihadic Palestinians but remain silent and many times even supportive of the slaughter innocnt in Kurdistan?

Over thirty million palestinians remain stateless today, often at someone else's mercy. At a time when much of the world insists that there should be a infidel state, there is a nauseating silence over the plight of this people.

palastinian muslim culture and language has periodically been "outlawed" in attempts to israelis or jewdefy them, and in an age when other dormant nations/national groups were able to seize the moment with the collapse of empires, the palestinians were repeatedly denied this chance by an assortment of so-called "friends" and foes alike.


The Brits decided that their long term interests involved not angering the region's jews, who - by their own writings - declared that the rise of an independent palastine would be seen as the equivalent of the birth of another kurdistan. Regardless of scores of millions of Arabs living in the region zionists declared a political monopoly over what they regarded as "purely zionist patrimony." We are living with the consequences of this mindset today.

Much has been written about America's abuse of thepalestininas, although the mainstream press, media, academia, and other supposedly "enlightened" folks have - with some notable exceptions - too often ignored this.

Having stood by our side and aided America continuously over the decades, the State Department has too often pulled the rug out from under the palestinians after their immediate "use" was deemed over, with deadly consequences to this people. And yet, they have remained strangely loyal to Washington.

"well just exchange the words palastininas to kurds"

now answer why would libs denounce the slaughter of jihadic Palestinians but remain silent and many times even supportive of the slaughter innocnt in Kurdistan?

Tell me why Leyla Zana, a Kurdish woman elected to Parliament in the late 1980s was jailed for 15 years because she dared to speak Kurdish after taking the oath of office when she said that she hoped to promote comradery between her Kurdish and Turkish brethren?

Let me guess. it. How could a country that so vehemently defended the Palestinians bombing schools slashing kids troats training kids to kill infidel kids,condemn its own kurd population and murder them casually while Israeli military has been discriminately attack only terorist Palestinian despite the dificulty of evading humen shields and jihadists in aumbulances and kids

how is hussain among other libs fighting for goutanimo bay terrorists and for palestinians but leting kurds to the mercy of muslims?
.
State insists that palestine remain part of a united israel, regardless of the bloody consequences this will probably have for them in the future yet again. .

The Shi'a refuse to grant Kurds any control over their own fate, regardless of any alleged partial federal agreement achieved so far with America's continuous prodding. And Arabs, of any stripe, are still not about to grant Kurds any real equality. A visit to the Kurdish Media's website would be very useful to any and all needing "enlightenment" in these regards.

Yeah. Lets get those mad libs!

>.>

<.<
...

Somedays I think you just need a big hug.
banker
Posts: 1,370
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/17/2011 9:33:10 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
thanks for proving my point...!! selective outrage and opportunistic use of humanity : At 3/17/2011 9:12:41 AM, Thaddeus wrote:
At 3/17/2011 8:21:38 AM, banker wrote:
why would libs denounce the slaughter of jihadic Palestinians but remain silent and many times even supportive of the slaughter innocnt in Kurdistan?

Over thirty million palestinians remain stateless today, often at someone else's mercy. At a time when much of the world insists that there should be a infidel state, there is a nauseating silence over the plight of this people.

palastinian muslim culture and language has periodically been "outlawed" in attempts to israelis or jewdefy them, and in an age when other dormant nations/national groups were able to seize the moment with the collapse of empires, the palestinians were repeatedly denied this chance by an assortment of so-called "friends" and foes alike.


The Brits decided that their long term interests involved not angering the region's jews, who - by their own writings - declared that the rise of an independent palastine would be seen as the equivalent of the birth of another kurdistan. Regardless of scores of millions of Arabs living in the region zionists declared a political monopoly over what they regarded as "purely zionist patrimony." We are living with the consequences of this mindset today.

Much has been written about America's abuse of thepalestininas, although the mainstream press, media, academia, and other supposedly "enlightened" folks have - with some notable exceptions - too often ignored this.

Having stood by our side and aided America continuously over the decades, the State Department has too often pulled the rug out from under the palestinians after their immediate "use" was deemed over, with deadly consequences to this people. And yet, they have remained strangely loyal to Washington.

"well just exchange the words palastininas to kurds"

now answer why would libs denounce the slaughter of jihadic Palestinians but remain silent and many times even supportive of the slaughter innocnt in Kurdistan?

Tell me why Leyla Zana, a Kurdish woman elected to Parliament in the late 1980s was jailed for 15 years because she dared to speak Kurdish after taking the oath of office when she said that she hoped to promote comradery between her Kurdish and Turkish brethren?

Let me guess. it. How could a country that so vehemently defended the Palestinians bombing schools slashing kids troats training kids to kill infidel kids,condemn its own kurd population and murder them casually while Israeli military has been discriminately attack only terorist Palestinian despite the dificulty of evading humen shields and jihadists in aumbulances and kids

how is hussain among other libs fighting for goutanimo bay terrorists and for palestinians but leting kurds to the mercy of muslims?
.
State insists that palestine remain part of a united israel, regardless of the bloody consequences this will probably have for them in the future yet again. .

The Shi'a refuse to grant Kurds any control over their own fate, regardless of any alleged partial federal agreement achieved so far with America's continuous prodding. And Arabs, of any stripe, are still not about to grant Kurds any real equality. A visit to the Kurdish Media's website would be very useful to any and all needing "enlightenment" in these regards.

Yeah. Lets get those mad libs!

>.>

<.<
...

Somedays I think you just need a big hug.
the most important source for muslim Arabs:

"And thereafter We [Allah] said to the Children of Israel: 'Dwell securely in the Promised Land. And when the last warning will come to pass, we will gather you together in a mingled crowd'.".

- Qur'an 17:104 -

Any sincere muslim must recognize the Land they call "Palestine" as the Jewish Homeland, according to the book considered by muslims to be the most sacred word and Allah's ultimate revelation.

Ibn Khaldun, one of the most creditable
banker
Posts: 1,370
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/17/2011 9:42:05 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
thanks to your response . point still stands...!!!: At 3/17/2011 9:37:28 AM, Thaddeus wrote:
*Thaddeus gives banker a big internet hug*
the most important source for muslim Arabs:

"And thereafter We [Allah] said to the Children of Israel: 'Dwell securely in the Promised Land. And when the last warning will come to pass, we will gather you together in a mingled crowd'.".

- Qur'an 17:104 -

Any sincere muslim must recognize the Land they call "Palestine" as the Jewish Homeland, according to the book considered by muslims to be the most sacred word and Allah's ultimate revelation.

Ibn Khaldun, one of the most creditable
banker
Posts: 1,370
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/17/2011 8:12:41 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
I have a problem to understand how antisemitisem is part of this issue..! Its very desturbing how some love victimhood..! Christans are the most persicuted people in the world and I like to see some recognition for the millions persecuted in nigiria,darfur,indonesia iraq,etc. Now if you just like to pointout their hate its also not antisemitisem .its thieroun hate that's trainink their own kids to kill...!its their hown hate that makes them bring jihad war to their own hospitels and instructing their oun : At 3/17/2011 3:35:50 PM, sal wrote:
Antisemitism is nothing new.
the most important source for muslim Arabs:

"And thereafter We [Allah] said to the Children of Israel: 'Dwell securely in the Promised Land. And when the last warning will come to pass, we will gather you together in a mingled crowd'.".

- Qur'an 17:104 -

Any sincere muslim must recognize the Land they call "Palestine" as the Jewish Homeland, according to the book considered by muslims to be the most sacred word and Allah's ultimate revelation.

Ibn Khaldun, one of the most creditable
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/18/2011 2:36:00 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
I love how you intersperse stuff copied and pasted from the internet between your own gibberish.
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.