Total Posts:50|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

What I saw out of my window today

Rob1_Billion
Posts: 1,300
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2011 5:21:06 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
http://i201.photobucket.com...

http://i201.photobucket.com...

He's carrying an M16 (or something comparable). Just another day in the ghetto. Looked like a domestic dispute of some sort. Not sure why they thought it necessary for automatic weapons... kind of alarming to be outside with my daughter and then have this going on right next to us.
kfc
mongoose
Posts: 3,500
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2011 5:22:45 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/27/2011 5:21:06 PM, Rob1_Billion wrote:
http://i201.photobucket.com...

http://i201.photobucket.com...

He's carrying an M16 (or something comparable). Just another day in the ghetto. Looked like a domestic dispute of some sort. Not sure why they thought it necessary for automatic weapons... kind of alarming to be outside with my daughter and then have this going on right next to us.

Rob, you're not supposed to take pictures of the police. It puts too much pressure on them to know that what they do is exposed to the public! They work much better when assured that nobody can prove what you're doing. Duh.
It is odd when one's capacity for compassion is measured not in what he is willing to do by his own time, effort, and property, but what he will force others to do with their own property instead.
askbob
Posts: 7,254
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2011 6:08:01 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
*kid makes a sudden movement*

I DONT NEED NO WARRANT MUTHAFUCKA

*gunfire*
Me -Phil left the site in my charge. I have a recorded phone conversation to prove it.
kohai -If you're the owner, then do something useful like ip block him and get us away from juggle and on a dofferent host!
Me -haha you apparently don't know my history
Kohai - Maybe not, but that doesn't matter! You shoukd still listen to your community and quit being a tyrrant!
Me - i was being completely sarcastic
Kohai - then u misrepresented yourself by impersonating the owner—a violation of the tos
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2011 7:16:25 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/27/2011 5:21:06 PM, Rob1_Billion wrote:
http://i201.photobucket.com...

http://i201.photobucket.com...

He's carrying an M16 (or something comparable). Just another day in the ghetto. Looked like a domestic dispute of some sort. Not sure why they thought it necessary for automatic weapons... kind of alarming to be outside with my daughter and then have this going on right next to us.

The joke that modern justice is today.
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
BennyW
Posts: 698
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2011 7:29:55 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
With all the corruption in the police lately, I'm sure this is becoming standard practice.
You didn't build that-Obama
It's pretty lazy to quote things you disagree with, call it stupid and move on, rather than arguing with the person. -000ike
Rockylightning
Posts: 2,862
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2011 7:30:22 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
Police profiling at its worse.

Cop: Hey kids, I'm gonna search you for crack.
Kids: What's crack?
Cop: Dont play dumb with me now get in the car.
Kids: Stranger dont touch me! *screams and runs away*
Cop: Resisting arrest? Fk yeah now I can use this big momma. *gunfire*
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2011 7:36:46 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/27/2011 7:30:22 PM, Rockylightning wrote:
Police profiling at its worse.

Cop: Hey kids, I'm gonna search you for crack.
Kids: What's crack?
Cop: Dont play dumb with me now get in the car.
Kids: Stranger dont touch me! *screams and runs away*
Cop: Resisting arrest? Fk yeah now I can use this big momma. *gunfire*

I guess it is ethical for a police officer to show his gun and threaten/accost kids with it.
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2011 11:40:11 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
It's not like he could holster it or kiester stash it. Nor was he pointing it at anyone.

Though considering where his finger was he better have been conversing with the kids on the location of someone significantly more dangerous.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Grape
Posts: 989
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2011 11:46:49 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
Rob, nothing brings us together like police brutality.

Okay, we all agree that he doesn't need an assault rifle. /thread until OreEle arrives and says he should have a bazooka.
David-Duke
Posts: 102
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:00:03 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/27/2011 7:30:22 PM, Rockylightning wrote:
Police profiling at its worse.

Cop: Hey kids, I'm gonna search you for crack.
Kids: What's crack?
Cop: Dont play dumb with me now get in the car.
Kids: Stranger dont touch me! *screams and runs away*
Cop: Resisting arrest? Fk yeah now I can use this big momma. *gunfire*

What is wrong with police profiling?
tudaloo
Posts: 93
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:01:51 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/27/2011 5:21:06 PM, Rob1_Billion wrote:
http://i201.photobucket.com...

http://i201.photobucket.com...

He's carrying an M16 (or something comparable). Just another day in the ghetto. Looked like a domestic dispute of some sort. Not sure why they thought it necessary for automatic weapons... kind of alarming to be outside with my daughter and then have this going on right next to us.

I remember this used to go on all the time in one of my friends neighborhoods. Usually the media turns a blind eye to ghetto cops.
Andromeda_Z
Posts: 4,151
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:03:23 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:00:03 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/27/2011 7:30:22 PM, Rockylightning wrote:
Police profiling at its worse.

Cop: Hey kids, I'm gonna search you for crack.
Kids: What's crack?
Cop: Dont play dumb with me now get in the car.
Kids: Stranger dont touch me! *screams and runs away*
Cop: Resisting arrest? Fk yeah now I can use this big momma. *gunfire*

What is wrong with police profiling?

It's the legitimization of assumptions based on stereotypes.
David-Duke
Posts: 102
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:12:52 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:03:23 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:00:03 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/27/2011 7:30:22 PM, Rockylightning wrote:
Police profiling at its worse.

Cop: Hey kids, I'm gonna search you for crack.
Kids: What's crack?
Cop: Dont play dumb with me now get in the car.
Kids: Stranger dont touch me! *screams and runs away*
Cop: Resisting arrest? Fk yeah now I can use this big momma. *gunfire*

What is wrong with police profiling?

It's the legitimization of assumptions based on stereotypes.

Yes, how is that a bad thing?
Andromeda_Z
Posts: 4,151
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:15:18 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:12:52 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:03:23 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:00:03 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/27/2011 7:30:22 PM, Rockylightning wrote:
Police profiling at its worse.

Cop: Hey kids, I'm gonna search you for crack.
Kids: What's crack?
Cop: Dont play dumb with me now get in the car.
Kids: Stranger dont touch me! *screams and runs away*
Cop: Resisting arrest? Fk yeah now I can use this big momma. *gunfire*

What is wrong with police profiling?

It's the legitimization of assumptions based on stereotypes.

Yes, how is that a bad thing?

It wouldn't be if stereotypes were true in all cases. That is not the case.
David-Duke
Posts: 102
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:16:16 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:15:18 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:12:52 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:03:23 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:00:03 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/27/2011 7:30:22 PM, Rockylightning wrote:
Police profiling at its worse.

Cop: Hey kids, I'm gonna search you for crack.
Kids: What's crack?
Cop: Dont play dumb with me now get in the car.
Kids: Stranger dont touch me! *screams and runs away*
Cop: Resisting arrest? Fk yeah now I can use this big momma. *gunfire*

What is wrong with police profiling?

It's the legitimization of assumptions based on stereotypes.

Yes, how is that a bad thing?

It wouldn't be if stereotypes were true in all cases. That is not the case.

But they are accurate most of the time. So that justifies police profiling.
jat93
Posts: 1,440
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:16:57 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:12:52 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:03:23 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:00:03 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/27/2011 7:30:22 PM, Rockylightning wrote:
Police profiling at its worse.

Cop: Hey kids, I'm gonna search you for crack.
Kids: What's crack?
Cop: Dont play dumb with me now get in the car.
Kids: Stranger dont touch me! *screams and runs away*
Cop: Resisting arrest? Fk yeah now I can use this big momma. *gunfire*

What is wrong with police profiling?

It's the legitimization of assumptions based on stereotypes.

Yes, how is that a bad thing?

Assumption - A thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof: "they made certain assumptions about the market".

Stereotype - A widely held but fixed and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing: "sexual and racial stereotypes"
Andromeda_Z
Posts: 4,151
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:19:31 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:16:16 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:15:18 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:12:52 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:03:23 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:00:03 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/27/2011 7:30:22 PM, Rockylightning wrote:
Police profiling at its worse.

Cop: Hey kids, I'm gonna search you for crack.
Kids: What's crack?
Cop: Dont play dumb with me now get in the car.
Kids: Stranger dont touch me! *screams and runs away*
Cop: Resisting arrest? Fk yeah now I can use this big momma. *gunfire*

What is wrong with police profiling?

It's the legitimization of assumptions based on stereotypes.

Yes, how is that a bad thing?

It wouldn't be if stereotypes were true in all cases. That is not the case.

But they are accurate most of the time. So that justifies police profiling.

No, it doesn't. You are still assuming things about people that may or may not be true, and basing your reaction off of that instead of evidence. Even if it is accurate ninety percent of the time, there's still the ten percent of cases where it isn't.
jharry
Posts: 4,984
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:21:25 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/27/2011 5:21:06 PM, Rob1_Billion wrote:
http://i201.photobucket.com...

http://i201.photobucket.com...

He's carrying an M16 (or something comparable). Just another day in the ghetto. Looked like a domestic dispute of some sort. Not sure why they thought it necessary for automatic weapons... kind of alarming to be outside with my daughter and then have this going on right next to us.

Yeah it was probably a Colt AR-15, by the stock it is probably an A4. I have one just like it. It hangs in the gun rack in my truck most if the time. It's kinda like an American express, don't leave home without it.
In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen
David-Duke
Posts: 102
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:21:38 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:19:31 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:16:16 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:15:18 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:12:52 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:03:23 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:00:03 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/27/2011 7:30:22 PM, Rockylightning wrote:
Police profiling at its worse.

Cop: Hey kids, I'm gonna search you for crack.
Kids: What's crack?
Cop: Dont play dumb with me now get in the car.
Kids: Stranger dont touch me! *screams and runs away*
Cop: Resisting arrest? Fk yeah now I can use this big momma. *gunfire*

What is wrong with police profiling?

It's the legitimization of assumptions based on stereotypes.

Yes, how is that a bad thing?

It wouldn't be if stereotypes were true in all cases. That is not the case.

But they are accurate most of the time. So that justifies police profiling.

No, it doesn't. You are still assuming things about people that may or may not be true, and basing your reaction off of that instead of evidence. Even if it is accurate ninety percent of the time, there's still the ten percent of cases where it isn't.

Yes, but that ten percent of the time is still an exceptable risk, if police profiling is implemented correctly. The problem is that it isn't all of the time.
Andromeda_Z
Posts: 4,151
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:25:13 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:21:38 AM, David-Duke wrote:
Yes, but that ten percent of the time is still an exceptable risk,

How is it acceptable?
if police profiling is implemented correctly. The problem is that it isn't all of the time.

How do you think it should be implemented?
David-Duke
Posts: 102
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:27:42 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:25:13 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:21:38 AM, David-Duke wrote:
Yes, but that ten percent of the time is still an exceptable risk,

How is it acceptable?
Because police profiling works!
if police profiling is implemented correctly. The problem is that it isn't all of the time.

How do you think it should be implemented?

Like the way did they did it in Nazi Germany. Except of course, we aren't doing what the Nazis did. (In terms of violence and murder)

If you look at the crime rate for Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1944-1945, it is extremely low. How did this happen? Racial/police profiling! (Well other factors as well, but this being the main one)
gavin.ogden
Posts: 1,729
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:31:25 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:27:42 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:25:13 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:21:38 AM, David-Duke wrote:
Yes, but that ten percent of the time is still an exceptable risk,

How is it acceptable?
Because police profiling works!
if police profiling is implemented correctly. The problem is that it isn't all of the time.

How do you think it should be implemented?

Like the way did they did it in Nazi Germany. Except of course, we aren't doing what the Nazis did. (In terms of violence and murder)

If you look at the crime rate for Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1944-1945, it is extremely low. How did this happen? Racial/police profiling! (Well other factors as well, but this being the main one)

Wow...
jat93
Posts: 1,440
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:32:08 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:27:42 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:25:13 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:21:38 AM, David-Duke wrote:
Yes, but that ten percent of the time is still an exceptable risk,

How is it acceptable?
Because police profiling works!
if police profiling is implemented correctly. The problem is that it isn't all of the time.

How do you think it should be implemented?

Like the way did they did it in Nazi Germany. Except of course, we aren't doing what the Nazis did. (In terms of violence and murder)

If you look at the crime rate for Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1944-1945, it is extremely low. How did this happen?

Ya, totalitarian dictatorships have a strange way of doing that. But hey, whatever works.
David-Duke
Posts: 102
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:34:03 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:31:25 AM, gavin.ogden wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:27:42 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:25:13 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:21:38 AM, David-Duke wrote:
Yes, but that ten percent of the time is still an exceptable risk,

How is it acceptable?
Because police profiling works!
if police profiling is implemented correctly. The problem is that it isn't all of the time.

How do you think it should be implemented?

Like the way did they did it in Nazi Germany. Except of course, we aren't doing what the Nazis did. (In terms of violence and murder)

If you look at the crime rate for Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1944-1945, it is extremely low. How did this happen? Racial/police profiling! (Well other factors as well, but this being the main one)

Wow...

"Wow..." what?
David-Duke
Posts: 102
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:37:00 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:32:08 AM, jat93 wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:27:42 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:25:13 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:21:38 AM, David-Duke wrote:
Yes, but that ten percent of the time is still an exceptable risk,

How is it acceptable?
Because police profiling works!
if police profiling is implemented correctly. The problem is that it isn't all of the time.

How do you think it should be implemented?

Like the way did they did it in Nazi Germany. Except of course, we aren't doing what the Nazis did. (In terms of violence and murder)

If you look at the crime rate for Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1944-1945, it is extremely low. How did this happen?

Ya, totalitarian dictatorships have a strange way of doing that. But hey, whatever works.

Police profiling isn't exclusive to totalitarian "dictatorships". I'm not saying we should become a totalitarian regime, but we should at least examine how the Nazi's perfected racial profiling and perhaps implement that.
Andromeda_Z
Posts: 4,151
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:38:18 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:27:42 AM, David-Duke wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:25:13 AM, Andromeda_Z wrote:
At 6/28/2011 12:21:38 AM, David-Duke wrote:
Yes, but that ten percent of the time is still an exceptable risk,

How is it acceptable?
Because police profiling works!

You have conceded that is not necessarily true, and now you try to assert that it is? Even if it does work, how is it justifiable?
if police profiling is implemented correctly. The problem is that it isn't all of the time.

How do you think it should be implemented?

Like the way did they did it in Nazi Germany. Except of course, we aren't doing what the Nazis did. (In terms of violence and murder)

So, like the Nazi's, but not like the Nazi's? What is it that you are advocating, and how do you justify it?

If you look at the crime rate for Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1944-1945, it is extremely low. How did this happen? Racial/police profiling! (Well other factors as well, but this being the main one)

Or maybe, idk, people didn't want to get thrown in gas chambers? Crime rates are influenced by many variables. Prove that it was profiling that resulted in a drop in crime rates, or this isn't even an argument.
quarterexchange
Posts: 1,549
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:38:47 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:34:03 AM, David-Duke wrote:
"Wow..." what?

"Wow" as in "Wow you use oppressive totalitarian regimes to show how they effectively lower the crime rate."

I agree with you on police profiling to an extent, but you seem to be taking it too far.
I don't discriminate....I hate everybody.
Rockylightning
Posts: 2,862
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2011 12:40:04 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/28/2011 12:21:25 AM, jharry wrote:
At 6/27/2011 5:21:06 PM, Rob1_Billion wrote:




He's carrying an M16 (or something comparable). Just another day in the ghetto. Looked like a domestic dispute of some sort. Not sure why they thought it necessary for automatic weapons... kind of alarming to be outside with my daughter and then have this going on right next to us.

Yeah it was probably a Colt AR-15, by the stock it is probably an A4. I have one just like it. It hangs in the gun rack in my truck most if the time. It's kinda like an American express, don't leave home without it.

Lol I was just waiting for jharry to come along with a gun post.