Total Posts:78|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Democrats are better than Republicans ?

interrogator
Posts: 1,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 11:01:27 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
True or false. We can easily do some research on this matter.
And no, even though they are both part of the dragon', they by definition
are not the same. There is a very profound and philosophical difference
between Democrats and Republicans. One says that government is necessary
and that it should expand along with humanity's needs and desires.
The other one says we need less government and more hands progress from
mankind. They see our world as a community and that we should create our
own destiny. Dems believe this as well, but they prefer to have some assistance
from the bureaucrats. Our system is corrupt needless to say. But the Dems are
more socially inclined and abstract as a party to fit the needs of a modern day world.
They are not goaded by tradition, and they are not religious nutcases by far.
They are strategic and methodical by nature. Repubs seem to be more detatched
and less sympathetic. They are the manuals, they are the machines. Dems are the
humanitarians here. They have empathy. And Repubs do not. What do you think about this ? Are the Dems really better ?
THE_OPINIONATOR
Posts: 575
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 1:09:34 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
This is the exact reason I don't favor Democrats you label people and you call them machine you call this a modern day world but I call it a society that is going down the drain with all the drugs violence and hatred racism that is goings around this is anything but a modern world but a hateful one.
My Blog: Life Through The Eyes of a Christian

http://bloggingforjchrist.blogspot.com...

Life Through The Eyes of a Christian Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com...
THE_OPINIONATOR
Posts: 575
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 1:12:10 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
This is the exact reason I don't favor Democrats you label people and you call them machine you call this a modern day world but I call it a society that is going down the drain with all the drugs violence and hatred racism that is goings around this is anything but a modern world but a hateful one. There is no party better than the other we are just all arrogant idiots that think we can run a country better than the other party.
My Blog: Life Through The Eyes of a Christian

http://bloggingforjchrist.blogspot.com...

Life Through The Eyes of a Christian Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com...
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 1:19:25 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 7/5/2011 1:09:34 PM, THE_OPINIONATOR wrote:
This is the exact reason I don't favor Democrats you label people and you call them machine

That's a dumb reason then. You should judge them by their platform and ideology, not by how a few self-proclaimed Democrats act.

you call this a modern day world but I call it a society that is going down the drain with all the drugs violence and hatred racism that is goings around this is anything but a modern world but a hateful one.

What's wrong with drugs. Also, racism has declined especially given that it's taboo to even be racist or say things mildly similar to a racist remark.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Tim_Spin
Posts: 446
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 1:22:45 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
Which is better, suffocating or drowning?
Astonished, the talent agent asks the man what him and his family call their act.The man responds, "The Aristocrats!"
interrogator
Posts: 1,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 1:43:56 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
Opinionator. Say what you must about the race issue. But the Repubs fail on this issue every time. And do you know why ? It is their inabilit to cope and adapt
to change. As well as their willingness to accept it. People notice this about you.
Which is why you are now at the back of the line. Did you get that ? Good.
interrogator
Posts: 1,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 1:45:21 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 7/5/2011 1:14:01 PM, David-Duke wrote:
I tend to favor Republicans a lot more because they are more likely to be pro-white and racist towards minorites.

David Duke. Thank you for making my statements that much more true.
I rest my case.
CiRrK
Posts: 670
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 2:11:03 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 7/5/2011 11:01:27 AM, interrogator wrote:
They are the manuals, they are the machines. Dems are the
humanitarians here. They have empathy. And Repubs do not. What do you think about this ? Are the Dems really better ?

Dems give the facade of humanitarianism whereas the end result if far from it. Reps on the other hand dont pretend to be humanitarians but the result the reps provide in the long-run is much more humanitarian. This can be seen economically where Dems play politics by expanding the welfare state which just in turn casues unemployment, inflation, restricted capital flow, lower investment and lower capital structure. Thus as a whole the dems kill economic growth which hurts everyone, especially the poor since quality of life and capital movement stagnates.
interrogator
Posts: 1,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 2:18:47 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 7/5/2011 2:11:03 PM, CiRrK wrote:
At 7/5/2011 11:01:27 AM, interrogator wrote:
They are the manuals, they are the machines. Dems are the
humanitarians here. They have empathy. And Repubs do not. What do you think about this ? Are the Dems really better ?

Dems give the facade of humanitarianism whereas the end result if far from it. Reps on the other hand dont pretend to be humanitarians but the result the reps provide in the long-run is much more humanitarian. This can be seen economically where Dems play politics by expanding the welfare state which just in turn casues unemployment, inflation, restricted capital flow, lower investment and lower capital structure. Thus as a whole the dems kill economic growth which hurts everyone, especially the poor since quality of life and capital movement stagnates.

Cirk. I would find your argument to be very believable. But the Democratic Presidents have put more money into the system and has a record that proves
under a Democratic president, we have had higher economic progress than the
latter. Epic failure. Try again.
CiRrK
Posts: 670
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 2:37:55 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 7/5/2011 2:18:47 PM, interrogator wrote:
At 7/5/2011 2:11:03 PM, CiRrK wrote:
At 7/5/2011 11:01:27 AM, interrogator wrote:
They are the manuals, they are the machines. Dems are the
humanitarians here. They have empathy. And Repubs do not. What do you think about this ? Are the Dems really better ?

Dems give the facade of humanitarianism whereas the end result if far from it. Reps on the other hand dont pretend to be humanitarians but the result the reps provide in the long-run is much more humanitarian. This can be seen economically where Dems play politics by expanding the welfare state which just in turn casues unemployment, inflation, restricted capital flow, lower investment and lower capital structure. Thus as a whole the dems kill economic growth which hurts everyone, especially the poor since quality of life and capital movement stagnates.

Cirk. I would find your argument to be very believable. But the Democratic Presidents have put more money into the system and has a record that proves
under a Democratic president, we have had higher economic progress than the
latter. Epic failure. Try again.

Your argument would be true if the following were true: (1) the econ policies of the Dem president was in-line with the policies of the new Left and (2) those econ policies were instituted with a congruent Congress. However, lets evaluate: JFK was not compeltely in-line with the policies of the new left - he cut taxes. Clinton applied centrist policies due to Republicans controlling the house. Carter had some luck but that was short-lived. The economy stagnated and retrogressed. And then reagan....who was republican.
jat93
Posts: 1,440
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 2:43:52 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
I hope it's not too cliche'd to say that they both suck. Democrats are the party of big government liberals who tend to be for social personal liberties and freedoms, but they also bow down to a supposedly infallible government that knows exactly what's right for them and how to take care of them from cradle to grave. their fiscal views make absolutely no sense and they don't know economics for sh!t.

Republicans are supposedly for small government, and they are in some respects, when it comes to fiscal issues (i.e tax cuts) but when it comes to social issues, they suddenly ignore their philosophy of small government and advocate big government with the power to restrain social liberties and force Christian theology down every citizen's throat at will.

So when you choose one party over another you're making a choice - You can choose the party which generally has better social policies that allow for more personal liberty and freedom, the way America should be, but with fiscal policies that allow for a government dictatorship gone wild. Or you can choose the party which has better fiscal policies that allow for more personal liberty and freedom, the way America should be, but with social policies that allow for a government dictatorship gone wild.

In the end, they're the same thing, and they both suck. So the answer is neither.
interrogator
Posts: 1,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 2:47:55 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
Cirk. You also fail to admit that you party is the party of no.
They do not have any type of progressive relationships with minorities.
And they have had more Presidents with only 1 term than Dems.
Not to mention the one who had to resign because of Watergate.
Needless to say that Bush is still not nearly as respected as Obama.
Dems tend to be more strategic and technically sound as Repubs.
Your party has a tainted reputation of being in bed with big oils companies
and giving huge tax breaks to multi billion dollar companies.
Good luck in 2012.
BennyW
Posts: 698
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 2:53:25 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
The two party system is a sham. They both work toward larger government and more wars.
You didn't build that-Obama
It's pretty lazy to quote things you disagree with, call it stupid and move on, rather than arguing with the person. -000ike
interrogator
Posts: 1,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 3:09:01 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
Benny. Yes that is true. But the recent violations of the last administration is
what made way for the current climate of corruption that you see now.
Bush 'created' this mess and now we are paying for this as a whole.
BennyW
Posts: 698
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 3:23:42 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 7/5/2011 3:09:01 PM, interrogator wrote:
Benny. Yes that is true. But the recent violations of the last administration is
what made way for the current climate of corruption that you see now.
Bush 'created' this mess and now we are paying for this as a whole.

First of all Bush didn't create the mess, the corruption and economic recklessness has been going on for decades a least. Second of all, Obama is not merely riding the storm Bush created but adding to it. He got us further into debt than Bush did in all his 8 years, and got us into ye another Unconstitutional war (Libya).
You didn't build that-Obama
It's pretty lazy to quote things you disagree with, call it stupid and move on, rather than arguing with the person. -000ike
BennyW
Posts: 698
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 3:25:19 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 7/5/2011 2:49:09 PM, interrogator wrote:
By the way, Reagan and Bush Sr left us in a deficit.
Republicans start wars. Dems finish them.

Oh really? Who started the Vietnam war? Kennedy and Johnson. Wh9o got us out? Nixon.
Who dropped the bomb on Hiroshima? Truman, who opposed it Eisenhower. (Technically that is an example of a Democrat getting us out of war but is is not the proper way to do so.
You didn't build that-Obama
It's pretty lazy to quote things you disagree with, call it stupid and move on, rather than arguing with the person. -000ike
interrogator
Posts: 1,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 3:27:47 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
Benny. Yes that is true. But in the year 2000, the elites released their plans
about The New World Order. Bush Sr gave a speech about this era during
his Presidential reign back in September 11, 2001. Irony ? I dont think so.
His son was sent to finish what he started. And before you know it we got
rid of a budget surplus, a terrorist attack, a whole smorgasboard of illegal aliens,
and a housing market pyramid scheme. Do your research. It was not even close
to being this way prior to 2000.
interrogator
Posts: 1,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 3:28:27 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 7/5/2011 3:27:47 PM, interrogator wrote:
Benny. Yes that is true. But in the year 2000, the elites released their plans
about The New World Order. Bush Sr gave a speech about this era during
his Presidential reign back in September 11, 1991. Irony ? I dont think so. <<<<
His son was sent to finish what he started. And before you know it we got
rid of a budget surplus, a terrorist attack, a whole smorgasboard of illegal aliens,
and a housing market pyramid scheme. Do your research. It was not even close
to being this way prior to 2000.
interrogator
Posts: 1,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 3:32:08 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
Benny. Vietnam was a war about race. The Dems and Repubs created this on their
own merits and wanted to destroy a group of people they deemed to be
subhuman. That was the sentiments in Congress during that time. Anyway.
Nixion is not seen as an acredited President under any circumstances.
He lied and was kicked out of The White House. The Republicans contract with
America, which was created in 1994 stated that once they reached a certain level
of currency here in the US. They would sell this country out to China.
It is true. And now it cannot be stopped. This is why our jobs haven bee shipped
overseas by the thousands.
BennyW
Posts: 698
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 3:33:14 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 7/5/2011 3:28:27 PM, interrogator wrote:
At 7/5/2011 3:27:47 PM, interrogator wrote:
Benny. Yes that is true. But in the year 2000, the elites released their plans
about The New World Order. Bush Sr gave a speech about this era during
his Presidential reign back in September 11, 1991. Irony ? I dont think so. <<<<
His son was sent to finish what he started. And before you know it we got
rid of a budget surplus, a terrorist attack, a whole smorgasboard of illegal aliens,
and a housing market pyramid scheme. Do your research. It was not even close
to being this way prior to 2000.

I was going to correct you on something but it looks like you already did, though I think you are still a year off, I believe it was Sept. 11, 1990. Although Eisenhower did warn about the MIC way back in the 50s. Corruption before then was Woodrow Wilson, he was one of the most corrupt presidents.
You didn't build that-Obama
It's pretty lazy to quote things you disagree with, call it stupid and move on, rather than arguing with the person. -000ike
lewis20
Posts: 5,093
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 3:37:40 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 7/5/2011 2:49:09 PM, interrogator wrote:
By the way, Reagan and Bush Sr left us in a deficit.
Republicans start wars. Dems finish them.

Which Wars have the dems finished? Obama has bumped the war count up to 5.
"If you are a racist I will attack you with the north"- Abraham Lincoln

"Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material" - Leviticus 19 19

"War is a racket" - Smedley Butler
interrogator
Posts: 1,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 3:42:36 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
Lewis. Nice try. But we are leaving Iaq and Afghan under Obamas watch.
It has already been planned by the New World Order. And they will issue him
again back into the White House. It has already been planned and Obama is
part of their clan. It is true.
BennyW
Posts: 698
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 3:44:38 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 7/5/2011 3:42:36 PM, interrogator wrote:
Lewis. Nice try. But we are leaving Iaq and Afghan under Obamas watch.
It has already been planned by the New World Order. And they will issue him
again back into the White House. It has already been planned and Obama is
part of their clan. It is true.

He claimed to have already gotten us out of Iraq, which is clearly not true, what makes you think he will get us out of Afghanistan?
You didn't build that-Obama
It's pretty lazy to quote things you disagree with, call it stupid and move on, rather than arguing with the person. -000ike
interrogator
Posts: 1,322
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 3:50:19 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
Benny. Its already been planned by the New World Order.
Rockefeller, Soros, Bilderberg. They are making way for the next agenda.
Irag will be a non issue just like Libya. This war is false and is only
an act of evil. Dont play into the propaganda.
SuperRobotWars
Posts: 3,906
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2011 3:54:46 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 7/5/2011 3:52:12 PM, FREEDO wrote:
Yeah, they are different.

Democrats are a slow death and Republicans are a quick one.
Minister Of Trolling
: At 12/6/2011 2:21:41 PM, badger wrote:
: ugly people should beat beautiful people ugly. simple! you'd be killing two birds with the one stone... women like violent men and you're making yourself more attractive, relatively. i met a blonde dude who was prettier than me not so long ago. he's not so pretty now! ha!
:
: ...and well, he wasn't really prettier than me. he just had nice hair.