Total Posts:46|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

political ideology question

Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2011 10:41:05 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Neo-con?
It's okay you will probably grow out of it. I do respect your honesty with regards Imperialism however.
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
DetectableNinja
Posts: 6,043
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2011 10:45:54 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
I agree that you're more neo-con. Well, on those issues, here's where I am:

9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM
Posted: 5 minutes ago
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Pro
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: To the right to express the idea: Pro, to the idea itself: Con
-Elitist/Elitism: Same as above
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Neutral
-Death Penalty: Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Pro
-Using military intervention to topple enemies: Con
-Starting wars for economic benefits: Con
-Drug legalization: Pro
-Drug crime sentences: None, as I think there should be no such thing as "drug crime."

Which puts me in the libertarian range, I believe.
Think'st thou heaven is such a glorious thing?
I tell thee, 'tis not half so fair as thou
Or any man that breathes on earth.

- Christopher Marlowe, Doctor Faustus
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2011 10:46:41 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
good.
-Gay Rights: Con
?
-Higher taxes: Con
?
-Sharing your wealth: Con
sharing your wealth is actually a reworded and contorted view on the issue. No one would be pro on sharing wealth, its just the negative way of misinterpreting it...
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
????
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
??
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
~
-Death Penalty:Pro
good.
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
?????
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
?
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
?
-Drug legalization: Con
good.
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher
?

Methinks this is a troll who wanted an excuse to tell us his views and see our reaction.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
thett3
Posts: 14,336
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2011 10:56:56 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Conservative. PS we agree on all of that! Except the drug crime sentences, I'm nuetral.
DDO Vice President

#StandwithBossy

#UnbanTheMadman

#BetOnThett

"Don't quote me, ever." -Max

"My name is max. I'm not a big fan of slacks"- Max rapping

"Walmart should have the opportunity to bribe a politician to it's agenda" -Max

"Thett, you're really good at convincing people you're a decent person"-tulle

"You fit the character of Regina George quite nicely"- Sam

: At 11/12/2016 11:49:40 PM, Raisor wrote:
: thett was right
seraine
Posts: 734
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2011 11:47:50 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/10/2011 10:41:05 AM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Neo-con?
It's okay you will probably grow out of it. I do respect your honesty with regards Imperialism however.

This

Don't worry, it doesn't actually take that long to grow out of being a neo-con. I used to be one and now I am a libertarian.
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2011 3:03:02 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/10/2011 11:47:50 AM, seraine wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:41:05 AM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Neo-con?
It's okay you will probably grow out of it. I do respect your honesty with regards Imperialism however.

This

Don't worry, it doesn't actually take that long to grow out of being a neo-con. I used to be one and now I am a libertarian.

Were a neo-con? your profile says you are 13. Did you have a political ideology when you were 10? lol
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
seraine
Posts: 734
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2011 7:22:13 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/10/2011 3:03:02 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
At 9/10/2011 11:47:50 AM, seraine wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:41:05 AM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Neo-con?
It's okay you will probably grow out of it. I do respect your honesty with regards Imperialism however.

This

Don't worry, it doesn't actually take that long to grow out of being a neo-con. I used to be one and now I am a libertarian.

Were a neo-con? your profile says you are 13. Did you have a political ideology when you were 10? lol

My parents indoctrinated me.
iamdrunkritenow
Posts: 25
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news
iamdrunkritenow
Posts: 25
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 12:29:05 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/10/2011 10:46:41 AM, 000ike wrote:
Methinks this is a troll who wanted an excuse to tell us his views and see our reaction.

methinks you're retarded
jimtimmy
Posts: 3,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news

Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...
President of DDO
iamdrunkritenow
Posts: 25
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.
jimtimmy
Posts: 3,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 1:18:45 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.

True enough... Drug laws have been a complete failure...
President of DDO
iamdrunkritenow
Posts: 25
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 1:20:14 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 1:18:45 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.


True enough... Drug laws have been a complete failure...

You would have thought we'd have learned our lesson with prohibition? Apparently not. We still have archaic alcohol laws (not selling it in the grocery stores in most states wtf)
jimtimmy
Posts: 3,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 1:21:37 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 1:20:14 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:18:45 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.


True enough... Drug laws have been a complete failure...

You would have thought we'd have learned our lesson with prohibition? Apparently not. We still have archaic alcohol laws (not selling it in the grocery stores in most states wtf)

Government officials don't care about results, all they care about is intentions...
President of DDO
OMGJustinBieber
Posts: 3,484
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 1:29:05 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.

That's one of his least offensive views. Apparently in his worldview gays are not entitled to the same rights as heterosexuals, white supremacy is a legitimate viewpoint worthy of further exploration, and elitism and a rigid class system is desirable. He is neutral on freedom.

I'm calling him borderline fascist.
iamdrunkritenow
Posts: 25
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 1:32:15 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 1:29:05 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.

That's one of his least offensive views. Apparently in his worldview gays are not entitled to the same rights as heterosexuals, white supremacy is a legitimate viewpoint worthy of further exploration, and elitism and a rigid class system is desirable. He is neutral on freedom.

I'm calling him borderline fascist.

lol i agree that's why i said authoritarian. Elitism is a reality not a goal IMO. Do we have elites? Yes. Why are they elite? Because they're not stupid. In my opinion people choose their social class based upon the decisions they make and their intelligence. I'm in favor allowing people to stay in their selected classes instead of redistributing wealth to eliminate them.
jimtimmy
Posts: 3,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 1:34:58 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 1:29:05 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.

That's one of his least offensive views. Apparently in his worldview gays are not entitled to the same rights as heterosexuals, white supremacy is a legitimate viewpoint worthy of further exploration, and elitism and a rigid class system is desirable. He is neutral on freedom.

I'm calling him borderline fascist.

I don't know what he means by gay rights... Some people say gay rights thinking about things like anti discrimination laws that actually reduce the freedom and rights of others... In which case I agree with him...

I don't think he said anything about the class system either...
President of DDO
OMGJustinBieber
Posts: 3,484
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 1:39:50 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 1:34:58 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:29:05 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.

That's one of his least offensive views. Apparently in his worldview gays are not entitled to the same rights as heterosexuals, white supremacy is a legitimate viewpoint worthy of further exploration, and elitism and a rigid class system is desirable. He is neutral on freedom.

I'm calling him borderline fascist.

I don't know what he means by gay rights... Some people say gay rights thinking about things like anti discrimination laws that actually reduce the freedom and rights of others... In which case I agree with him...

I don't think he said anything about the class system either...

He said he was pro-Elitism which I interpreted as in favor of a stringent class system where elitism is preserved. You're right that gay rights is ambiguous, and I interpreted his rejection of it literally.
jimtimmy
Posts: 3,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 1:44:18 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 1:39:50 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:34:58 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:29:05 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.

That's one of his least offensive views. Apparently in his worldview gays are not entitled to the same rights as heterosexuals, white supremacy is a legitimate viewpoint worthy of further exploration, and elitism and a rigid class system is desirable. He is neutral on freedom.

I'm calling him borderline fascist.

I don't know what he means by gay rights... Some people say gay rights thinking about things like anti discrimination laws that actually reduce the freedom and rights of others... In which case I agree with him...

I don't think he said anything about the class system either...

He said he was pro-Elitism which I interpreted as in favor of a stringent class system where elitism is preserved. You're right that gay rights is ambiguous, and I interpreted his rejection of it literally.

Don't get me wrong, Im not much a fan of this guys views...

I am a man of the right... but this fellow is on the authoritarian right (perhaps a moderate fascist, as you said...)
President of DDO
OMGJustinBieber
Posts: 3,484
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 1:48:37 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 1:44:18 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:39:50 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:34:58 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:29:05 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.

That's one of his least offensive views. Apparently in his worldview gays are not entitled to the same rights as heterosexuals, white supremacy is a legitimate viewpoint worthy of further exploration, and elitism and a rigid class system is desirable. He is neutral on freedom.

I'm calling him borderline fascist.

I don't know what he means by gay rights... Some people say gay rights thinking about things like anti discrimination laws that actually reduce the freedom and rights of others... In which case I agree with him...

I don't think he said anything about the class system either...

He said he was pro-Elitism which I interpreted as in favor of a stringent class system where elitism is preserved. You're right that gay rights is ambiguous, and I interpreted his rejection of it literally.

Don't get me wrong, Im not much a fan of this guys views...

I am a man of the right... but this fellow is on the authoritarian right (perhaps a moderate fascist, as you said...)

I just look at what I see as critical views. Ideas like being neutral towards racial supremacy and the concept of freedom likely entail some kind of ideological confusion that hopefully those on the board can resolve for him.
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 2:04:05 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/10/2011 3:03:02 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
At 9/10/2011 11:47:50 AM, seraine wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:41:05 AM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Neo-con?
It's okay you will probably grow out of it. I do respect your honesty with regards Imperialism however.

This

Don't worry, it doesn't actually take that long to grow out of being a neo-con. I used to be one and now I am a libertarian.

Were a neo-con? your profile says you are 13. Did you have a political ideology when you were 10? lol

I was a socialist when I was 10.
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 11:58:13 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 1:48:37 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:44:18 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:39:50 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:34:58 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:29:05 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.

That's one of his least offensive views. Apparently in his worldview gays are not entitled to the same rights as heterosexuals, white supremacy is a legitimate viewpoint worthy of further exploration, and elitism and a rigid class system is desirable. He is neutral on freedom.

I'm calling him borderline fascist.

I don't know what he means by gay rights... Some people say gay rights thinking about things like anti discrimination laws that actually reduce the freedom and rights of others... In which case I agree with him...

I don't think he said anything about the class system either...

He said he was pro-Elitism which I interpreted as in favor of a stringent class system where elitism is preserved. You're right that gay rights is ambiguous, and I interpreted his rejection of it literally.

Don't get me wrong, Im not much a fan of this guys views...

I am a man of the right... but this fellow is on the authoritarian right (perhaps a moderate fascist, as you said...)

I just look at what I see as critical views. Ideas like being neutral towards racial supremacy and the concept of freedom likely entail some kind of ideological confusion that hopefully those on the board can resolve for him.

So basically anybody that doesn't have the same views as you has an "ideological confusion"?
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
OMGJustinBieber
Posts: 3,484
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 12:03:03 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 11:58:13 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:48:37 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:44:18 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:39:50 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:34:58 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:29:05 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.

That's one of his least offensive views. Apparently in his worldview gays are not entitled to the same rights as heterosexuals, white supremacy is a legitimate viewpoint worthy of further exploration, and elitism and a rigid class system is desirable. He is neutral on freedom.

I'm calling him borderline fascist.

I don't know what he means by gay rights... Some people say gay rights thinking about things like anti discrimination laws that actually reduce the freedom and rights of others... In which case I agree with him...

I don't think he said anything about the class system either...

He said he was pro-Elitism which I interpreted as in favor of a stringent class system where elitism is preserved. You're right that gay rights is ambiguous, and I interpreted his rejection of it literally.

Don't get me wrong, Im not much a fan of this guys views...

I am a man of the right... but this fellow is on the authoritarian right (perhaps a moderate fascist, as you said...)

I just look at what I see as critical views. Ideas like being neutral towards racial supremacy and the concept of freedom likely entail some kind of ideological confusion that hopefully those on the board can resolve for him.

So basically anybody that doesn't have the same views as you has an "ideological confusion"?

Yes, that's exactly what I said. Anyone who doesn't have the exact same views as me is ideologically confused [sarcasm.]

Being neutral is like being undecided. You seem to be undecided on the idea of freedom and white supremacy.
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 12:06:23 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 12:03:03 PM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 11:58:13 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:48:37 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:44:18 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:39:50 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:34:58 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:29:05 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.

That's one of his least offensive views. Apparently in his worldview gays are not entitled to the same rights as heterosexuals, white supremacy is a legitimate viewpoint worthy of further exploration, and elitism and a rigid class system is desirable. He is neutral on freedom.

I'm calling him borderline fascist.

I don't know what he means by gay rights... Some people say gay rights thinking about things like anti discrimination laws that actually reduce the freedom and rights of others... In which case I agree with him...

I don't think he said anything about the class system either...

He said he was pro-Elitism which I interpreted as in favor of a stringent class system where elitism is preserved. You're right that gay rights is ambiguous, and I interpreted his rejection of it literally.

Don't get me wrong, Im not much a fan of this guys views...

I am a man of the right... but this fellow is on the authoritarian right (perhaps a moderate fascist, as you said...)

I just look at what I see as critical views. Ideas like being neutral towards racial supremacy and the concept of freedom likely entail some kind of ideological confusion that hopefully those on the board can resolve for him.

So basically anybody that doesn't have the same views as you has an "ideological confusion"?

Yes, that's exactly what I said. Anyone who doesn't have the exact same views as me is ideologically confused [sarcasm.]

Being neutral is like being undecided. You seem to be undecided on the idea of freedom and white supremacy.

The reason I'm undecided is because I can see merits to both sides of the ideas.
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
thett3
Posts: 14,336
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 12:06:30 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 12:03:03 PM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 11:58:13 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:48:37 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:44:18 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:39:50 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:34:58 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:29:05 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.

That's one of his least offensive views. Apparently in his worldview gays are not entitled to the same rights as heterosexuals, white supremacy is a legitimate viewpoint worthy of further exploration, and elitism and a rigid class system is desirable. He is neutral on freedom.

I'm calling him borderline fascist.

I don't know what he means by gay rights... Some people say gay rights thinking about things like anti discrimination laws that actually reduce the freedom and rights of others... In which case I agree with him...

I don't think he said anything about the class system either...

He said he was pro-Elitism which I interpreted as in favor of a stringent class system where elitism is preserved. You're right that gay rights is ambiguous, and I interpreted his rejection of it literally.

Don't get me wrong, Im not much a fan of this guys views...

I am a man of the right... but this fellow is on the authoritarian right (perhaps a moderate fascist, as you said...)

I just look at what I see as critical views. Ideas like being neutral towards racial supremacy and the concept of freedom likely entail some kind of ideological confusion that hopefully those on the board can resolve for him.

So basically anybody that doesn't have the same views as you has an "ideological confusion"?

Yes, that's exactly what I said. Anyone who doesn't have the exact same views as me is ideologically confused [sarcasm.]

Being neutral is like being undecided. You seem to be undecided on the idea of freedom and white supremacy.

I can't speak for his views, but just saying there is a difference between thinking whites are superior and hating other races. Granted the VAST majority of white supremacists are hate filled bigots, but still...
DDO Vice President

#StandwithBossy

#UnbanTheMadman

#BetOnThett

"Don't quote me, ever." -Max

"My name is max. I'm not a big fan of slacks"- Max rapping

"Walmart should have the opportunity to bribe a politician to it's agenda" -Max

"Thett, you're really good at convincing people you're a decent person"-tulle

"You fit the character of Regina George quite nicely"- Sam

: At 11/12/2016 11:49:40 PM, Raisor wrote:
: thett was right
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 12:08:02 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 12:06:30 PM, thett3 wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:03:03 PM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 11:58:13 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:48:37 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:44:18 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:39:50 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:34:58 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:29:05 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.

That's one of his least offensive views. Apparently in his worldview gays are not entitled to the same rights as heterosexuals, white supremacy is a legitimate viewpoint worthy of further exploration, and elitism and a rigid class system is desirable. He is neutral on freedom.

I'm calling him borderline fascist.

I don't know what he means by gay rights... Some people say gay rights thinking about things like anti discrimination laws that actually reduce the freedom and rights of others... In which case I agree with him...

I don't think he said anything about the class system either...

He said he was pro-Elitism which I interpreted as in favor of a stringent class system where elitism is preserved. You're right that gay rights is ambiguous, and I interpreted his rejection of it literally.

Don't get me wrong, Im not much a fan of this guys views...

I am a man of the right... but this fellow is on the authoritarian right (perhaps a moderate fascist, as you said...)

I just look at what I see as critical views. Ideas like being neutral towards racial supremacy and the concept of freedom likely entail some kind of ideological confusion that hopefully those on the board can resolve for him.

So basically anybody that doesn't have the same views as you has an "ideological confusion"?

Yes, that's exactly what I said. Anyone who doesn't have the exact same views as me is ideologically confused [sarcasm.]

Being neutral is like being undecided. You seem to be undecided on the idea of freedom and white supremacy.

I can't speak for his views, but just saying there is a difference between thinking whites are superior and hating other races. Granted the VAST majority of white supremacists are hate filled bigots, but still...

I am by no means Joseph Mengele who thinks that anyone other than whites are inferior pieces of sh$t.
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
OMGJustinBieber
Posts: 3,484
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 12:09:21 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/11/2011 12:06:30 PM, thett3 wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:03:03 PM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 11:58:13 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:48:37 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:44:18 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:39:50 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:34:58 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:29:05 AM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:15:37 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/11/2011 1:08:51 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 9/11/2011 12:27:54 AM, iamdrunkritenow wrote:
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher

Authoritarian, socially backward, republican, never taken an econ class, most likely residing in the south, watches fox news


Never taken a econ class?

He was against wealth redistribution. An economic illiterate would be for this...

He was for jailing people for using drugs. An economic literate person would know that it's a massive waste of tax dollars.

That's one of his least offensive views. Apparently in his worldview gays are not entitled to the same rights as heterosexuals, white supremacy is a legitimate viewpoint worthy of further exploration, and elitism and a rigid class system is desirable. He is neutral on freedom.

I'm calling him borderline fascist.

I don't know what he means by gay rights... Some people say gay rights thinking about things like anti discrimination laws that actually reduce the freedom and rights of others... In which case I agree with him...

I don't think he said anything about the class system either...

He said he was pro-Elitism which I interpreted as in favor of a stringent class system where elitism is preserved. You're right that gay rights is ambiguous, and I interpreted his rejection of it literally.

Don't get me wrong, Im not much a fan of this guys views...

I am a man of the right... but this fellow is on the authoritarian right (perhaps a moderate fascist, as you said...)

I just look at what I see as critical views. Ideas like being neutral towards racial supremacy and the concept of freedom likely entail some kind of ideological confusion that hopefully those on the board can resolve for him.

So basically anybody that doesn't have the same views as you has an "ideological confusion"?

Yes, that's exactly what I said. Anyone who doesn't have the exact same views as me is ideologically confused [sarcasm.]

Being neutral is like being undecided. You seem to be undecided on the idea of freedom and white supremacy.

I can't speak for his views, but just saying there is a difference between thinking whites are superior and hating other races. Granted the VAST majority of white supremacists are hate filled bigots, but still...

Point taken, but it doesn't change my views.
PARADIGM_L0ST
Posts: 6,958
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2011 12:17:54 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/10/2011 10:36:02 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Where on the scale am I?

-Gun Rights: Pro
-Gay Rights: Con
-Higher taxes: Con
-Sharing your wealth: Con
-White Nationalism/ White Supremacism: Neutral
-Elitist/Elitism: Pro
-Tougher sentences for criminals: Pro
-Death Penalty:Pro
-Freedom(speech, opinions, everything...): Neutral
-Using military intervention to topple enemies:Pro
-Starting wars for economic benefits:Pro
-Drug legalization: Con
-Drug crime sentences: Much much tougher:

You're a fascist... Good luck with the 4th Reich.
"Have you ever considered suicide? If not, please do." -- Mouthwash (to Inferno)