Total Posts:62|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Global Warming violates the 1st amendment

DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 8:39:47 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
"congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise there of."
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
M.Torres
Posts: 3,626
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 9:37:31 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 8:39:47 AM, DanT wrote:
"congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise there of."

I don't even--
: At 11/28/2011 1:28:24 PM, BlackVoid wrote:
: M. Torres said it, so it must be right.

I'm an Apatheistic Ignostic. ... problem? ;D

I believe in the heart of the cards. .:DDO Duelist:.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 9:54:11 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
I think you mean "environmentalism" not "Global warming." Global warming is a phenomena, not a political coalition, regardless of whether it is associated with one.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 9:54:40 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 9:37:31 AM, M.Torres wrote:
At 10/13/2011 8:39:47 AM, DanT wrote:
"congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise there of."

I don't even--

Congress funded Global Warming research, is like congress funded E-meter technology
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 9:56:37 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 9:54:11 AM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
I think you mean "environmentalism" not "Global warming." Global warming is a phenomena, not a political coalition, regardless of whether it is associated with one.

No I meant to say Global warming activism, which is different from environmentalism since CO2 is a nutrient not a pollutant.
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
M.Torres
Posts: 3,626
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 9:59:25 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 9:56:37 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:54:11 AM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
I think you mean "environmentalism" not "Global warming." Global warming is a phenomena, not a political coalition, regardless of whether it is associated with one.

No I meant to say Global warming activism, which is different from environmentalism since CO2 is a nutrient not a pollutant.

Seriously. I can't even--
: At 11/28/2011 1:28:24 PM, BlackVoid wrote:
: M. Torres said it, so it must be right.

I'm an Apatheistic Ignostic. ... problem? ;D

I believe in the heart of the cards. .:DDO Duelist:.
M.Torres
Posts: 3,626
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:00:17 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 9:54:40 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:37:31 AM, M.Torres wrote:
At 10/13/2011 8:39:47 AM, DanT wrote:
"congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise there of."

I don't even--

Congress funded Global Warming research, is like congress funded E-meter technology

Is like how should fund grammer must they when posts this like look government?
: At 11/28/2011 1:28:24 PM, BlackVoid wrote:
: M. Torres said it, so it must be right.

I'm an Apatheistic Ignostic. ... problem? ;D

I believe in the heart of the cards. .:DDO Duelist:.
Kinesis
Posts: 3,667
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:06:07 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
Yeah, but global warming isn't an American citizen so we can't use the 1st amendment. Perhaps we should put global warming on trial before the UN commission on human rights?
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:06:26 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 10:00:17 AM, M.Torres wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:54:40 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:37:31 AM, M.Torres wrote:
At 10/13/2011 8:39:47 AM, DanT wrote:
"congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise there of."

I don't even--

Congress funded Global Warming research, is like congress funded E-meter technology

Is like how should fund grammer must they when posts this like look government?

*congressional

Idk WTF u just tried to say, but it's definitely trolling
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:07:44 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 10:06:26 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 10:00:17 AM, M.Torres wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:54:40 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:37:31 AM, M.Torres wrote:
At 10/13/2011 8:39:47 AM, DanT wrote:
"congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise there of."

I don't even--

Congress funded Global Warming research, is like congress funded E-meter technology

Is like how should fund grammer must they when posts this like look government?


*congressional

Idk WTF u just tried to say, but it's definitely trolling

*Congressionally keys are sticking
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
M.Torres
Posts: 3,626
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:08:30 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 10:06:26 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 10:00:17 AM, M.Torres wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:54:40 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:37:31 AM, M.Torres wrote:
At 10/13/2011 8:39:47 AM, DanT wrote:
"congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise there of."

I don't even--

Congress funded Global Warming research, is like congress funded E-meter technology

Is like how should fund grammer must they when posts this like look government?


*congressional

Idk WTF u just tried to say, but it's definitely trolling

http://tinyurl.com...
: At 11/28/2011 1:28:24 PM, BlackVoid wrote:
: M. Torres said it, so it must be right.

I'm an Apatheistic Ignostic. ... problem? ;D

I believe in the heart of the cards. .:DDO Duelist:.
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:09:01 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 9:59:25 AM, M.Torres wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:56:37 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:54:11 AM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
I think you mean "environmentalism" not "Global warming." Global warming is a phenomena, not a political coalition, regardless of whether it is associated with one.

No I meant to say Global warming activism, which is different from environmentalism since CO2 is a nutrient not a pollutant.

Seriously. I can't even--
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
Kinesis
Posts: 3,667
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:09:25 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 9:56:37 AM, DanT wrote:
No I meant to say Global warming activism, which is different from environmentalism since CO2 is a nutrient not a pollutant.

The two aren't mutually exclusive. Even oxygen in significantly higher quantities that it is now in the atmosphere would be disastrous to the environment.
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:16:12 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 10:06:07 AM, Kinesis wrote:
Yeah, but global warming isn't an American citizen so we can't use the 1st amendment. Perhaps we should put global warming on trial before the UN commission on human rights?

WTF can we have a serious talk, or are you people going to troll this thread till it's dead?
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:20:20 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 10:09:25 AM, Kinesis wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:56:37 AM, DanT wrote:
No I meant to say Global warming activism, which is different from environmentalism since CO2 is a nutrient not a pollutant.

The two aren't mutually exclusive. Even oxygen in significantly higher quantities that it is now in the atmosphere would be disastrous to the environment.

CO2 starts getting dangerous to animals at 10,000ppm
It's currently 380ppm

2 billion years ago was between 100 and 1,000 times higher than today.
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:21:47 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 10:20:20 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 10:09:25 AM, Kinesis wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:56:37 AM, DanT wrote:
No I meant to say Global warming activism, which is different from environmentalism since CO2 is a nutrient not a pollutant.

The two aren't mutually exclusive. Even oxygen in significantly higher quantities that it is now in the atmosphere would be disastrous to the environment.

CO2 starts getting dangerous to animals at 10,000ppm
It's currently 380ppm

2 billion years ago was between 100 and 1,000 times higher than today.

*it

Keys are sticking
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
M.Torres
Posts: 3,626
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:23:29 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 10:16:12 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 10:06:07 AM, Kinesis wrote:
Yeah, but global warming isn't an American citizen so we can't use the 1st amendment. Perhaps we should put global warming on trial before the UN commission on human rights?

WTF can we have a serious talk, or are you people going to troll this thread till it's dead?

http://tinyurl.com...
: At 11/28/2011 1:28:24 PM, BlackVoid wrote:
: M. Torres said it, so it must be right.

I'm an Apatheistic Ignostic. ... problem? ;D

I believe in the heart of the cards. .:DDO Duelist:.
M.Torres
Posts: 3,626
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:25:23 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 10:21:47 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 10:20:20 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 10:09:25 AM, Kinesis wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:56:37 AM, DanT wrote:
No I meant to say Global warming activism, which is different from environmentalism since CO2 is a nutrient not a pollutant.

The two aren't mutually exclusive. Even oxygen in significantly higher quantities that it is now in the atmosphere would be disastrous to the environment.

CO2 starts getting dangerous to animals at 10,000ppm
It's currently 380ppm

2 billion years ago was between 100 and 1,000 times higher than today.


*it

Keys are sticking

I'm really starting to worry due to the fact your "keyboard" is so sticky... o_O
: At 11/28/2011 1:28:24 PM, BlackVoid wrote:
: M. Torres said it, so it must be right.

I'm an Apatheistic Ignostic. ... problem? ;D

I believe in the heart of the cards. .:DDO Duelist:.
M.Torres
Posts: 3,626
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:27:13 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 10:25:23 AM, M.Torres wrote:
At 10/13/2011 10:21:47 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 10:20:20 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 10:09:25 AM, Kinesis wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:56:37 AM, DanT wrote:
No I meant to say Global warming activism, which is different from environmentalism since CO2 is a nutrient not a pollutant.

The two aren't mutually exclusive. Even oxygen in significantly higher quantities that it is now in the atmosphere would be disastrous to the environment.

CO2 starts getting dangerous to animals at 10,000ppm
It's currently 380ppm

2 billion years ago was between 100 and 1,000 times higher than today.


*it

Keys are sticking

I'm really starting to worry due to the fact your keyboard is so "sticky"... o_O

Better with the quotes moved around.
: At 11/28/2011 1:28:24 PM, BlackVoid wrote:
: M. Torres said it, so it must be right.

I'm an Apatheistic Ignostic. ... problem? ;D

I believe in the heart of the cards. .:DDO Duelist:.
Kinesis
Posts: 3,667
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:44:49 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 10:25:23 AM, M.Torres wrote:
Keys are sticking

I'm really starting to worry due to the fact your "keyboard" is so sticky... o_O

Eeuurgh.
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:46:14 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 10:25:23 AM, M.Torres wrote:
At 10/13/2011 10:21:47 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 10:20:20 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 10:09:25 AM, Kinesis wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:56:37 AM, DanT wrote:
No I meant to say Global warming activism, which is different from environmentalism since CO2 is a nutrient not a pollutant.

The two aren't mutually exclusive. Even oxygen in significantly higher quantities that it is now in the atmosphere would be disastrous to the environment.

CO2 starts getting dangerous to animals at 10,000ppm
It's currently 380ppm

2 billion years ago was between 100 and 1,000 times higher than today.


*it

Keys are sticking

I'm really starting to worry due to the fact your "keyboard" is so sticky... o_O

Not sticky, sticking. They are jammed
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:48:44 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 10:16:12 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 10:06:07 AM, Kinesis wrote:
Yeah, but global warming isn't an American citizen so we can't use the 1st amendment. Perhaps we should put global warming on trial before the UN commission on human rights?

WTF can we have a serious talk, or are you people going to troll this thread till it's dead?












I'm gonna report you guys for trolling if you don't get back on topic
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
Kinesis
Posts: 3,667
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:51:42 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 10:48:59 AM, Kinesis wrote:
In any case, it's patently obvious that OP doesn't understand what climate change is. Try reading this children's guide to start with: http://www.explainthatstuff.com...

BTW, I'm not trolling about this. Having strong opinions about things you don't understand is a recipe for disaster.
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 10:56:18 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 10:48:59 AM, Kinesis wrote:
In any case, it's patently obvious that OP doesn't understand what climate change is. Try reading this children's guide to start with: http://www.explainthatstuff.com...

I know what climate change is... I believe in Natural Climate Change.

The Global Warming Cult on the other hand is a fraud, and attacks anyone who questions them.

Much like you are doing.

They use faulty methods, and they treat it more like a religion than actual science. It's no better than Scientology; both are faith based pseudoscientific philosophies.
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
M.Torres
Posts: 3,626
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 11:02:28 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
How long have you been on DDO?

Trolling is part of the spirit. Also, can't find anything in the Terms that says we can't troll.

So trollolololololol. ;D
: At 11/28/2011 1:28:24 PM, BlackVoid wrote:
: M. Torres said it, so it must be right.

I'm an Apatheistic Ignostic. ... problem? ;D

I believe in the heart of the cards. .:DDO Duelist:.
RoyLatham
Posts: 4,488
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 11:06:12 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
There is a valid point about opposition to CO2 being like a religion. Easier this year, the EPA imposed regulations that will cost $7 trillion, with the claim that 0.00375 degree of warming will be averted. $7 trillion is a whole bunch of money. That's nutcase fanaticism of the sort associated with extreme faith. California tried to ban black automobiles, on the grounds that they would use more air conditioning, hence more gasoline, and ultimately produce more CO2.
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 11:06:39 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 11:02:28 AM, M.Torres wrote:
How long have you been on DDO?

Trolling is part of the spirit. Also, can't find anything in the Terms that says we can't troll.

So trollolololololol. ;D

I'll debate with you on man made global warming vs natural climate change
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
M.Torres
Posts: 3,626
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 11:11:59 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 11:06:39 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 11:02:28 AM, M.Torres wrote:
How long have you been on DDO?

Trolling is part of the spirit. Also, can't find anything in the Terms that says we can't troll.

So trollolololololol. ;D

I'll debate with you on man made global warming vs natural climate change

No thanks. But I appreciate you considered me to debate!
: At 11/28/2011 1:28:24 PM, BlackVoid wrote:
: M. Torres said it, so it must be right.

I'm an Apatheistic Ignostic. ... problem? ;D

I believe in the heart of the cards. .:DDO Duelist:.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2011 11:16:08 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 10/13/2011 9:56:37 AM, DanT wrote:
At 10/13/2011 9:54:11 AM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
I think you mean "environmentalism" not "Global warming." Global warming is a phenomena, not a political coalition, regardless of whether it is associated with one.

No I meant to say Global warming activism, which is different from environmentalism since CO2 is a nutrient not a pollutant.

Such considerations are irrelevant, a ban on establishment of religion has no care whether such religions's devils are nutrients or pollutants.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.