Total Posts:13|Showing Posts:1-13
Jump to topic:

Ron Paul Supporters Dysfunctional *

inferno
Posts: 10,689
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2012 10:57:19 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
Bill O'Reilly called Ron Pauls supporters, "protesters". He said that your votes will not count, nor will they become electable. This just goes to show you yet again, the disdain the GOP Establishment has for America's youth.
These young people are every bit as credible by showing their support for Mr Ron Paul. They are creating the next Independent Party which is growing larger than it ever has before. Do you agree ?
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2012 11:27:00 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 1/12/2012 10:57:19 AM, inferno wrote:
Bill O'Reilly called Ron Pauls supporters, "protesters". He said that your votes will not count, nor will they become electable. This just goes to show you yet again, the disdain the GOP Establishment has for America's youth.
These young people are every bit as credible by showing their support for Mr Ron Paul. They are creating the next Independent Party which is growing larger than it ever has before. Do you agree ?

The Democratic Party also shows disdain for America's youth. This is not restricted to one party.

This is not a matter of wasting votes. The more support an individual receives, the more viable their position becomes as time passes. The electability argument is used to stifle reform.
inferno
Posts: 10,689
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2012 12:19:27 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 1/12/2012 11:27:00 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 1/12/2012 10:57:19 AM, inferno wrote:
Bill O'Reilly called Ron Pauls supporters, "protesters". He said that your votes will not count, nor will they become electable. This just goes to show you yet again, the disdain the GOP Establishment has for America's youth.
These young people are every bit as credible by showing their support for Mr Ron Paul. They are creating the next Independent Party which is growing larger than it ever has before. Do you agree ?

The Democratic Party also shows disdain for America's youth. This is not restricted to one party.

This is not a matter of wasting votes. The more support an individual receives, the more viable their position becomes as time passes. The electability argument is used to stifle reform.

The Dems have compassion for humanity. Of course they have their corrupt ways as well. BUT, they are much better at attracting the youth of America. For many various reasons as well. Reform only comes when people deny the statu quo and the establishment. For now, their weapon is much stronger. It is the reformist responsibility to find their weakness.
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2012 12:48:20 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 1/12/2012 12:40:48 PM, innomen wrote:
Change the voting age to 31.

Next time they institute the draft, 31 year olds can fight, because we definitely will not if this is what happens.
inferno
Posts: 10,689
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2012 12:58:51 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 1/12/2012 12:48:20 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 1/12/2012 12:40:48 PM, innomen wrote:
Change the voting age to 31.

Next time they institute the draft, 31 year olds can fight, because we definitely will not if this is what happens.

Ron Paul is starting a revolution in the electorial process. However, it is going to take some needed time. You have the enlarge your base, but the hard part is this.
You must get them away from the bottle of the status quo, and keep them from drinking the kool aid of deception. Its gonna take a major grass roots effort and adapt and adjust to different ideologies all across the board. The question is this.
Can it be done.
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2012 1:03:15 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 1/12/2012 12:40:48 PM, innomen wrote:
Change the voting age to 31.

That would be stupid. The older crowd are the ones who generally vote like retards. The older crowd already makes up the majority of the voting demographic. They voted for Bush, they voted for Romney, Santorum, Gingrich, and all these clowns. They voted for all the fascists in the White House, Senate, and Congress.

If young people made up the majority of voters, economically knowledgeable, politically sound Libertarians would be our political leaders, not the clowns who support Patriot Act and SOPA.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2012 1:05:34 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 1/12/2012 1:03:15 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 1/12/2012 12:40:48 PM, innomen wrote:
Change the voting age to 31.

That would be stupid. The older crowd are the ones who generally vote like retards. The older crowd already makes up the majority of the voting demographic. They voted for Bush, they voted for Romney, Santorum, Gingrich, and all these clowns. They voted for all the fascists in the White House, Senate, and Congress.

If young people made up the majority of voters, economically knowledgeable, politically sound Libertarians would be our political leaders, not the clowns who support Patriot Act and SOPA.

I believe that I have more in common with Geo than I thought possible.

Excellent post.
inferno
Posts: 10,689
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2012 1:06:46 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 1/12/2012 1:03:15 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 1/12/2012 12:40:48 PM, innomen wrote:
Change the voting age to 31.

That would be stupid. The older crowd are the ones who generally vote like retards. The older crowd already makes up the majority of the voting demographic. They voted for Bush, they voted for Romney, Santorum, Gingrich, and all these clowns. They voted for all the fascists in the White House, Senate, and Congress.

If young people made up the majority of voters, economically knowledgeable, politically sound Libertarians would be our political leaders, not the clowns who support Patriot Act and SOPA.

This would be a major setback for our country. When Obama was elected, we had a record turnout for the under 25 voting demographic here in the US.
If this were the law, Ron Pauls base would be cut in half. His followers would not be taken seriously at all.
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2012 1:08:38 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 1/12/2012 1:06:46 PM, inferno wrote:
At 1/12/2012 1:03:15 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 1/12/2012 12:40:48 PM, innomen wrote:
Change the voting age to 31.

That would be stupid. The older crowd are the ones who generally vote like retards. The older crowd already makes up the majority of the voting demographic. They voted for Bush, they voted for Romney, Santorum, Gingrich, and all these clowns. They voted for all the fascists in the White House, Senate, and Congress.

If young people made up the majority of voters, economically knowledgeable, politically sound Libertarians would be our political leaders, not the clowns who support Patriot Act and SOPA.

This would be a major setback for our country. When Obama was elected, we had a record turnout for the under 25 voting demographic here in the US.
If this were the law, Ron Pauls base would be cut in half. His followers would not be taken seriously at all.

Innomen's idea was politically motivated because most college-aged students and people below the age of 31 tend to be left of the Democratic Party.
inferno
Posts: 10,689
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2012 1:12:28 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 1/12/2012 1:08:38 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 1/12/2012 1:06:46 PM, inferno wrote:
At 1/12/2012 1:03:15 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 1/12/2012 12:40:48 PM, innomen wrote:
Change the voting age to 31.

That would be stupid. The older crowd are the ones who generally vote like retards. The older crowd already makes up the majority of the voting demographic. They voted for Bush, they voted for Romney, Santorum, Gingrich, and all these clowns. They voted for all the fascists in the White House, Senate, and Congress.

If young people made up the majority of voters, economically knowledgeable, politically sound Libertarians would be our political leaders, not the clowns who support Patriot Act and SOPA.

This would be a major setback for our country. When Obama was elected, we had a record turnout for the under 25 voting demographic here in the US.
If this were the law, Ron Pauls base would be cut in half. His followers would not be taken seriously at all.

Innomen's idea was politically motivated because most college-aged students and people below the age of 31 tend to be left of the Democratic Party.

This is true. Keep going, your winning the war.
imabench
Posts: 21,230
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2012 9:57:19 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
If this were the law, Ron Pauls base would be cut in half. His followers would not be taken seriously at all.

People dont take them seriously ALREADY
Kevin24018 : "He's just so mean it makes me want to ball up my fists and stamp on the ground"
Geogeer: "Nobody is dumb enough to become my protege."

7/14/16 = The Presidency Dies

DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015