Total Posts:48|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Clueless on the political spectrum

Microsuck
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 7:36:54 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
I am really clueless as to where to put me on the political spectrum. A side of me despises the current government (the anarchy side); one side says 'conservative"; and another side tells me I'm a solid liberal! I have no clue where to rank myself on the political spectrum.

Is there any way to more accurately gague where I am?
Wall of Fail

Devil worship much? - SD
Newsflash: Atheists do not believe in the Devil! - Me
Newsflash: I doesnt matter if you think you do or not.....You do - SD

"you [imabench] are very naive and so i do not consider your opinions as having any merit. you must still be in highschool" - falconduler
johnnyboy54
Posts: 6,362
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 7:40:42 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 7:36:54 PM, Microsuck wrote:
I am really clueless as to where to put me on the political spectrum. A side of me despises the current government (the anarchy side); one side says 'conservative"; and another side tells me I'm a solid liberal! I have no clue where to rank myself on the political spectrum.

Is there any way to more accurately gague where I am?

Which one of your personalities took the political compass test?

/jk
I didn't order assholes with my whiskey.
johnnyboy54
Posts: 6,362
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 7:41:50 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
I understand it though. Depending on the day I drift from social conservatism to minarchism. Not as radical as yours but still.
I didn't order assholes with my whiskey.
Microsuck
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 7:42:18 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 7:40:42 PM, johnnyboy54 wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:36:54 PM, Microsuck wrote:
I am really clueless as to where to put me on the political spectrum. A side of me despises the current government (the anarchy side); one side says 'conservative"; and another side tells me I'm a solid liberal! I have no clue where to rank myself on the political spectrum.

Is there any way to more accurately gague where I am?

Which one of your personalities took the political compass test?

/jk

Lol. I don't even understand how the political compass test is suppose to work. I mean, how do I read what the political graph says?
Wall of Fail

Devil worship much? - SD
Newsflash: Atheists do not believe in the Devil! - Me
Newsflash: I doesnt matter if you think you do or not.....You do - SD

"you [imabench] are very naive and so i do not consider your opinions as having any merit. you must still be in highschool" - falconduler
Microsuck
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 7:44:52 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 7:43:54 PM, Mirza wrote:
Well, if you stop moving maybe you'll settle on a spot. <.<

Yeah, my problem is I'm a moving target.
Wall of Fail

Devil worship much? - SD
Newsflash: Atheists do not believe in the Devil! - Me
Newsflash: I doesnt matter if you think you do or not.....You do - SD

"you [imabench] are very naive and so i do not consider your opinions as having any merit. you must still be in highschool" - falconduler
Microsuck
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 7:46:38 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Economic Left/Right: -3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.56

This is where I keep bouncing back and forth in this area here.

http://www.politicalcompass.org...
Wall of Fail

Devil worship much? - SD
Newsflash: Atheists do not believe in the Devil! - Me
Newsflash: I doesnt matter if you think you do or not.....You do - SD

"you [imabench] are very naive and so i do not consider your opinions as having any merit. you must still be in highschool" - falconduler
LibertyCampbell
Posts: 288
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 7:47:06 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 7:36:54 PM, Microsuck wrote:
I am really clueless as to where to put me on the political spectrum. A side of me despises the current government (the anarchy side); one side says 'conservative"; and another side tells me I'm a solid liberal! I have no clue where to rank myself on the political spectrum.

Is there any way to more accurately gague where I am?

Start with the base assumptions about government. Should it exist? Should it help people in need? Does it promote nationalism etc. etc.

No government? Anarchy.
Some government to protect everyone equally? Conservatism.
A lot of government to help those in need? Liberalism.
The government should regime everyone's lives for the greater good of the collective? Facism/Communism.
"[Society] has no vested interest in continuing to exist." -RP
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 7:48:13 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Wishy-Washyness seems to be a thing for you.

Your religion, your politics, even your username.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
Microsuck
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 7:49:50 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 7:47:06 PM, LibertyCampbell wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:36:54 PM, Microsuck wrote:
I am really clueless as to where to put me on the political spectrum. A side of me despises the current government (the anarchy side); one side says 'conservative"; and another side tells me I'm a solid liberal! I have no clue where to rank myself on the political spectrum.

Is there any way to more accurately gague where I am?

Start with the base assumptions about government. Should it exist? Should it help people in need? Does it promote nationalism etc. etc.

Yes, government should exist. Yes, government should help people and need; and no it doesn't promote nationalism.


No government? Anarchy.

In theory, anarcho-capitalism is good, but in reality it cannot work. It would be worse than USSR communism.

Some government to protect everyone equally? Conservatism.
A lot of government to help those in need? Liberalism.

More medium sized government to do both.

The government should regime everyone's lives for the greater good of the collective? Facism/Communism.

NO! STRONGLY AGAINST FASCISM AND COMMUNISM!
Wall of Fail

Devil worship much? - SD
Newsflash: Atheists do not believe in the Devil! - Me
Newsflash: I doesnt matter if you think you do or not.....You do - SD

"you [imabench] are very naive and so i do not consider your opinions as having any merit. you must still be in highschool" - falconduler
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 7:54:11 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 7:49:50 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:47:06 PM, LibertyCampbell wrote:
No government? Anarchy.

In theory, anarcho-capitalism is good, but in reality it cannot work. It would be worse than USSR communism.

You just summed up my views on several different political views.

Goes for Communism, Anarchy, and Socialism, to an extent.

They just don't work. Would be awesome if they did, but they don't.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
Microsuck
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 7:55:40 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 7:54:11 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:49:50 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:47:06 PM, LibertyCampbell wrote:
No government? Anarchy.

In theory, anarcho-capitalism is good, but in reality it cannot work. It would be worse than USSR communism.

You just summed up my views on several different political views.

Goes for Communism, Anarchy, and Socialism, to an extent.

They just don't work. Would be awesome if they did, but they don't.

Glad we agree.

Anarcho capitalism can't work because, in all reality, business require regulation. What prevents a monopoly from forming and what prevents businesses from misleading the public?
Wall of Fail

Devil worship much? - SD
Newsflash: Atheists do not believe in the Devil! - Me
Newsflash: I doesnt matter if you think you do or not.....You do - SD

"you [imabench] are very naive and so i do not consider your opinions as having any merit. you must still be in highschool" - falconduler
Microsuck
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 7:56:51 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 7:55:38 PM, Mirza wrote:
Ah, there you are! http://tinypic.com...

THIS!
Wall of Fail

Devil worship much? - SD
Newsflash: Atheists do not believe in the Devil! - Me
Newsflash: I doesnt matter if you think you do or not.....You do - SD

"you [imabench] are very naive and so i do not consider your opinions as having any merit. you must still be in highschool" - falconduler
LibertyCampbell
Posts: 288
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 7:59:22 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 7:49:50 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:47:06 PM, LibertyCampbell wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:36:54 PM, Microsuck wrote:
I am really clueless as to where to put me on the political spectrum. A side of me despises the current government (the anarchy side); one side says 'conservative"; and another side tells me I'm a solid liberal! I have no clue where to rank myself on the political spectrum.

Is there any way to more accurately gague where I am?

Start with the base assumptions about government. Should it exist? Should it help people in need? Does it promote nationalism etc. etc.

Yes, government should exist. Yes, government should help people and need; and no it doesn't promote nationalism.


No government? Anarchy.

In theory, anarcho-capitalism is good, but in reality it cannot work. It would be worse than USSR communism.

Some government to protect everyone equally? Conservatism.
A lot of government to help those in need? Liberalism.

More medium sized government to do both.

The government should regime everyone lives for the greater good of the collective? Fascism/Communism.

NO! STRONGLY AGAINST FASCISM AND COMMUNISM!

Well that narrows it down!

Do you believe mankind is inherently flawed or perfectible over time and social change?
Should people who are incapable of providing for themselves be given aid?
Do you believe capitalism is the most efficient and fair way to redistribute wealth accordingly?
What is the most desirable type of government? (Democracy, Republic, Dictatorship, etc. etc.)

Given these answers I think I could label you pretty well.
"[Society] has no vested interest in continuing to exist." -RP
Microsuck
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 8:02:00 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 7:59:22 PM, LibertyCampbell wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:49:50 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:47:06 PM, LibertyCampbell wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:36:54 PM, Microsuck wrote:
I am really clueless as to where to put me on the political spectrum. A side of me despises the current government (the anarchy side); one side says 'conservative"; and another side tells me I'm a solid liberal! I have no clue where to rank myself on the political spectrum.

Is there any way to more accurately gague where I am?

Start with the base assumptions about government. Should it exist? Should it help people in need? Does it promote nationalism etc. etc.

Yes, government should exist. Yes, government should help people and need; and no it doesn't promote nationalism.


No government? Anarchy.

In theory, anarcho-capitalism is good, but in reality it cannot work. It would be worse than USSR communism.

Some government to protect everyone equally? Conservatism.
A lot of government to help those in need? Liberalism.

More medium sized government to do both.

The government should regime everyone lives for the greater good of the collective? Fascism/Communism.

NO! STRONGLY AGAINST FASCISM AND COMMUNISM!

Well that narrows it down!

Do you believe mankind is inherently flawed or perfectible over time and social change?

Mankind is generally good; though certainly not perfect. I don't believe in the BS that the Bible and religion tells us that mankind is evil and is in constant need of a redeemer from the moment of conception.

Should people who are incapable of providing for themselves be given aid?

Yes.

Do you believe capitalism is the most efficient and fair way to redistribute wealth accordingly?

Yes. As stated earlier, socialism can't and will never work. Although we are in need of reform, socialism and redistrbution is not the answer.

What is the most desirable type of government? (Democracy, Republic, Dictatorship, etc. etc.)

Representative Republic.


Given these answers I think I could label you pretty well.
Wall of Fail

Devil worship much? - SD
Newsflash: Atheists do not believe in the Devil! - Me
Newsflash: I doesnt matter if you think you do or not.....You do - SD

"you [imabench] are very naive and so i do not consider your opinions as having any merit. you must still be in highschool" - falconduler
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 8:06:07 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 7:55:40 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:54:11 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:49:50 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:47:06 PM, LibertyCampbell wrote:
No government? Anarchy.

In theory, anarcho-capitalism is good, but in reality it cannot work. It would be worse than USSR communism.

You just summed up my views on several different political views.

Goes for Communism, Anarchy, and Socialism, to an extent.

They just don't work. Would be awesome if they did, but they don't.

Glad we agree.

Anarcho capitalism can't work because, in all reality, business require regulation. What prevents a monopoly from forming and what prevents businesses from misleading the public?

Well, one common misconception is that monopolies are really possible, which is VERY unlikely. In fact, the only real monopoly in history that wasn't government funded had something to do with diamonds.

However, I do agreed business needs some government regulation.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
Microsuck
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 8:07:59 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 8:06:07 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:55:40 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:54:11 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:49:50 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:47:06 PM, LibertyCampbell wrote:
No government? Anarchy.

In theory, anarcho-capitalism is good, but in reality it cannot work. It would be worse than USSR communism.

You just summed up my views on several different political views.

Goes for Communism, Anarchy, and Socialism, to an extent.

They just don't work. Would be awesome if they did, but they don't.

Glad we agree.

Anarcho capitalism can't work because, in all reality, business require regulation. What prevents a monopoly from forming and what prevents businesses from misleading the public?

Well, one common misconception is that monopolies are really possible, which is VERY unlikely. In fact, the only real monopoly in history that wasn't government funded had something to do with diamonds.

However, I do agreed business needs some government regulation.

There have been lots of monopolies. Bank of America is arguablly one of them.
Wall of Fail

Devil worship much? - SD
Newsflash: Atheists do not believe in the Devil! - Me
Newsflash: I doesnt matter if you think you do or not.....You do - SD

"you [imabench] are very naive and so i do not consider your opinions as having any merit. you must still be in highschool" - falconduler
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 8:08:49 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 8:07:59 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 8:06:07 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:55:40 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:54:11 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:49:50 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:47:06 PM, LibertyCampbell wrote:
No government? Anarchy.

In theory, anarcho-capitalism is good, but in reality it cannot work. It would be worse than USSR communism.

You just summed up my views on several different political views.

Goes for Communism, Anarchy, and Socialism, to an extent.

They just don't work. Would be awesome if they did, but they don't.

Glad we agree.

Anarcho capitalism can't work because, in all reality, business require regulation. What prevents a monopoly from forming and what prevents businesses from misleading the public?

Well, one common misconception is that monopolies are really possible, which is VERY unlikely. In fact, the only real monopoly in history that wasn't government funded had something to do with diamonds.

However, I do agreed business needs some government regulation.

There have been lots of monopolies. Bank of America is arguablly one of them.

So, there are no other banks people go to?

None at all?
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
Microsuck
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 8:13:18 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 8:08:49 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 8:07:59 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 8:06:07 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:55:40 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:54:11 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:49:50 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:47:06 PM, LibertyCampbell wrote:
No government? Anarchy.

In theory, anarcho-capitalism is good, but in reality it cannot work. It would be worse than USSR communism.

You just summed up my views on several different political views.

Goes for Communism, Anarchy, and Socialism, to an extent.

They just don't work. Would be awesome if they did, but they don't.

Glad we agree.

Anarcho capitalism can't work because, in all reality, business require regulation. What prevents a monopoly from forming and what prevents businesses from misleading the public?

Well, one common misconception is that monopolies are really possible, which is VERY unlikely. In fact, the only real monopoly in history that wasn't government funded had something to do with diamonds.

However, I do agreed business needs some government regulation.

There have been lots of monopolies. Bank of America is arguablly one of them.

So, there are no other banks people go to?

None at all?

http://en.wikipedia.org...
Wall of Fail

Devil worship much? - SD
Newsflash: Atheists do not believe in the Devil! - Me
Newsflash: I doesnt matter if you think you do or not.....You do - SD

"you [imabench] are very naive and so i do not consider your opinions as having any merit. you must still be in highschool" - falconduler
LibertyCampbell
Posts: 288
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 8:13:28 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 8:02:00 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:59:22 PM, LibertyCampbell wrote:
Well that narrows it down!

Do you believe mankind is inherently flawed or perfectible over time and social change?

Mankind is generally good; though certainly not perfect. I don't believe in the BS that the Bible and religion tells us that mankind is evil and is in constant need of a redeemer from the moment of conception.

Should people who are incapable of providing for themselves be given aid?

Yes.

Do you believe capitalism is the most efficient and fair way to redistribute wealth accordingly?

Yes. As stated earlier, socialism can't and will never work. Although we are in need of reform, socialism and redistrbution is not the answer.

What is the most desirable type of government? (Democracy, Republic, Dictatorship, etc. etc.)

Representative Republic.


Given these answers I think I could label you pretty well.

Ok, heres what I got:

There needs to be a government or else things will descend into chaos, which is not good for anybody.
When someone is temporarily/permanentally injured the government should step in and help via taxing those who are capable.
The Market is a fair system but has its failures and requires some regulation.
(From above) Regulation is not inherently destructive.
And the public are too stupid to directly vote for policies, however they should be represented by an intelligent body, or representatives.

You sound kind of moderate-conservative. I think you'd fit in well with anti-corporate Republicans, but since you are prone to extremist shifts it'd probably be suffocating to be a Republican :P
"[Society] has no vested interest in continuing to exist." -RP
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 8:21:12 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 8:13:18 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 8:08:49 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 8:07:59 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 8:06:07 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:55:40 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:54:11 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:49:50 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:47:06 PM, LibertyCampbell wrote:
No government? Anarchy.

In theory, anarcho-capitalism is good, but in reality it cannot work. It would be worse than USSR communism.

You just summed up my views on several different political views.

Goes for Communism, Anarchy, and Socialism, to an extent.

They just don't work. Would be awesome if they did, but they don't.

Glad we agree.

Anarcho capitalism can't work because, in all reality, business require regulation. What prevents a monopoly from forming and what prevents businesses from misleading the public?

Well, one common misconception is that monopolies are really possible, which is VERY unlikely. In fact, the only real monopoly in history that wasn't government funded had something to do with diamonds.

However, I do agreed business needs some government regulation.

There have been lots of monopolies. Bank of America is arguablly one of them.

So, there are no other banks people go to?

None at all?

http://en.wikipedia.org...

All of the listed were either government funded, or have been disbanded because someone "beat" them in their monopolizing.

Can you show me a consistently successful, and non-government funded one?
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
Cody_Franklin
Posts: 9,483
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 8:28:42 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 8:21:12 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 8:13:18 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 8:08:49 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 8:07:59 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 8:06:07 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:55:40 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:54:11 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:49:50 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 7:47:06 PM, LibertyCampbell wrote:
No government? Anarchy.

In theory, anarcho-capitalism is good, but in reality it cannot work. It would be worse than USSR communism.

You just summed up my views on several different political views.

Goes for Communism, Anarchy, and Socialism, to an extent.

They just don't work. Would be awesome if they did, but they don't.

Glad we agree.

Anarcho capitalism can't work because, in all reality, business require regulation. What prevents a monopoly from forming and what prevents businesses from misleading the public?

Well, one common misconception is that monopolies are really possible, which is VERY unlikely. In fact, the only real monopoly in history that wasn't government funded had something to do with diamonds.

However, I do agreed business needs some government regulation.

There have been lots of monopolies. Bank of America is arguablly one of them.

So, there are no other banks people go to?

None at all?

http://en.wikipedia.org...

All of the listed were either government funded, or have been disbanded because someone "beat" them in their monopolizing.

Can you show me a consistently successful, and non-government funded one?

Let's take that arg and drop it like it's hot, drop it like it's hot, drop it like it's hot~

It's basically apples and oranges, like those people who say "go live in Somalia if you like anarchy so much." Well, no, it's not about that. I could say "Go live in [oppressive state] if you like government so much," but that's all dumb. You have to compare Somalia temporally between statism and non-statism--you must do the same for the United States.

You could say "all good banks get government funding, so we need government for good banking". But, if basically all big banks lobby and get subsidized, then you have to compare banking + government to banking + anarchy. Some of the subsidized conglomerates might die, but, even if there is a "banking collapse", it seems way easier to rebuild banking from the ground up than to return to scale after being gathered in a state-supported cartel. :P
RoyLatham
Posts: 4,488
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 8:35:28 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
I think the basic left-right distinction is based upon your position on free market economics. The more government control, the further left, the less control the further right. Libertarians are way right.

Currently, social conservatism is associated with the right wing, but there are lots of exceptions. Barry Goldwater was pro choice; William Buckley favored legalizing marijuana. Old style communist regimes were, at least officially, highly puritanical.

There is another complicating factor. William Buckley defined conservatism as "the doctrine of evolutionary change." So it's okay to move society, but conservatives would do it gradually. The Left has actually adhered to that conservative principle. They have expanded government control a slice at a time. Libertarians tend to reject the notion of taking freedom back a slice at time: it's Ron Paul or nothing.
Contra
Posts: 3,941
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 8:51:19 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
I will try to make a nonbiased definition for each:

Conservative:

Those who seek less government intervention in the economy, but favor some intervention in social lives. Hawkish foreign policy.

Liberal:

One who seeks personal freedom. Social justice in the economy. Government should protect consumers. Diplomacy before force.

Progressive:

One who seeks personal freedom. A degree of government intervention in the economy. Policies to create more equitable social conditions (job training, etc.) and Social Justice. Diplomacy before force.

Libertarian:

One who seeks personal and fully economic freedom. Very low taxation. Total free markets, with a safety net, regulations, and high taxes eliminated. Market fundamentalists. Limited government.

Authoritarian:

Government intervention that is quite extensive in both economic and social lives. Big government.

**Progressives and liberals are very similar. But Progressives are more concerned about reforms in institutions to make them better. Liberals usually are more oriented about getting a certain institution to become established. Both are very similar.
"The solution [for Republicans] is to admit that Bush was a bad president, stop this racist homophobic stuff, stop trying to give most of the tax cuts to the rich, propose a real alternative to Obamacare that actually works, and propose smart free market solutions to our economic problems." - Distraff

"Americans are better off in a dynamic, free-enterprise-based economy that fosters economic growth, opportunity and upward mobility." - Paul Ryan
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 9:01:41 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 8:51:19 PM, Contra wrote:
I will try to make a nonbiased definition for each:

I stopped reading after you said this.

I hear MSNBC is hiring.
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
Microsuck
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 9:04:55 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 9:01:41 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
At 5/27/2012 8:51:19 PM, Contra wrote:
I will try to make a nonbiased definition for each:

I stopped reading after you said this.

I hear MSNBC is hiring.

He is right on his definitions from my understanding.

Btw, O'Rilley callled, he wants his line back
Wall of Fail

Devil worship much? - SD
Newsflash: Atheists do not believe in the Devil! - Me
Newsflash: I doesnt matter if you think you do or not.....You do - SD

"you [imabench] are very naive and so i do not consider your opinions as having any merit. you must still be in highschool" - falconduler
Microsuck
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 9:05:50 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 9:04:55 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 9:01:41 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
At 5/27/2012 8:51:19 PM, Contra wrote:
I will try to make a nonbiased definition for each:

I stopped reading after you said this.

I hear MSNBC is hiring.

He is right on his definitions from my understanding.

However, he could have been a bit more wider as there are different ranges of each idealogu.

Btw, O'Rilley callled, he wants his line back
Wall of Fail

Devil worship much? - SD
Newsflash: Atheists do not believe in the Devil! - Me
Newsflash: I doesnt matter if you think you do or not.....You do - SD

"you [imabench] are very naive and so i do not consider your opinions as having any merit. you must still be in highschool" - falconduler
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 9:06:25 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/27/2012 9:04:55 PM, Microsuck wrote:
At 5/27/2012 9:01:41 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
At 5/27/2012 8:51:19 PM, Contra wrote:
I will try to make a nonbiased definition for each:

I stopped reading after you said this.

I hear MSNBC is hiring.

He is right on his definitions from my understanding.

From a basic understand, yes. But he puts an insane left wing twist.

Btw, O'Rilley callled, he wants his line back

If that is supposed to be an insult, then I would like to point out that I cannot stand Bill O'Reilly.
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/27/2012 9:08:02 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
For example, Liberals don't seek personal freedom. They seek to restrict personal freedom and replace it with collective "freedom," directly shown by their implementation of ludicrous government dependency policies and expansion of government.
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."