Total Posts:33|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

A Third George Bush Coming to the Scene

GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 10:29:00 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
There is a third Bush coming into politics. They have been breeding him since he was a child to be a politician, he was giving speeches at 12 y/o to the RNC and attended Yale. Now he looks like a charismatic movie star. I give you the 3rd Bush, George Prescott Garnica Bush, aka George P. Bush, 36 years old.

Some of you missed George Bush, so now you got him.

http://www.redicecreations.com...

.
.
.
.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 10:31:38 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
Bush Jr. is likely the most infamous President in modern history. No way a relative of his is going to be President. Dream on, bud.
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 11:22:18 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 10:31:38 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Bush Jr. is likely the most infamous President in modern history. No way a relative of his is going to be President. Dream on, bud.

Father Bush was bad, if not worse than his son. And then guess what, George W. Bush became President. And then they voted for Bush AGAIN for a 2nd term. Are you freaking kidding me? The American people are stupid. Their philosophy is vote for the charismatic fascist, vote for evil thats less so than the other.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
DetectableNinja
Posts: 6,043
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 11:27:26 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 11:22:18 AM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 7/16/2012 10:31:38 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Bush Jr. is likely the most infamous President in modern history. No way a relative of his is going to be President. Dream on, bud.

Father Bush was bad, if not worse than his son. And then guess what, George W. Bush became President. And then they voted for Bush AGAIN for a 2nd term. Are you freaking kidding me? The American people are stupid. Their philosophy is vote for the charismatic fascist, vote for evil thats less so than the other.

Which is a terrible philosophy: "lesser of two evils."
Think'st thou heaven is such a glorious thing?
I tell thee, 'tis not half so fair as thou
Or any man that breathes on earth.

- Christopher Marlowe, Doctor Faustus
drafterman
Posts: 18,870
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 11:30:51 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 11:22:18 AM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 7/16/2012 10:31:38 AM, Lordknukle wrote:
Bush Jr. is likely the most infamous President in modern history. No way a relative of his is going to be President. Dream on, bud.

Father Bush was bad, if not worse than his son. And then guess what, George W. Bush became President. And then they voted for Bush AGAIN for a 2nd term. Are you freaking kidding me? The American people are stupid. Their philosophy is vote for the charismatic fascist, vote for evil thats less so than the other.

Which is why Nixon beat Kennedy, right?
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 12:06:53 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 11:30:51 AM, drafterman wrote:
Which is why Nixon beat Kennedy, right?

There's a few good Presidents scattered around history, sure. But I bet it ain't for the right reasons. Be real, they picked Kennedy cause of his looks. And he was a bred fascist from a big Illuminati family. He rebelled, that's what happened.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Apollo.11
Posts: 3,478
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 12:18:12 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 12:06:53 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 7/16/2012 11:30:51 AM, drafterman wrote:
Which is why Nixon beat Kennedy, right?

There's a few good Presidents scattered around history, sure. But I bet it ain't for the right reasons. Be real, they picked Kennedy cause of his looks. And he was a bred fascist from a big Illuminati family. He rebelled, that's what happened.

You can't honestly believe that...
Sapere Aude!
THE_OPINIONATOR
Posts: 575
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 12:25:53 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
I would take a Bush over Mr.Obama anyday, atleast Bush didn't force health care down our throats.
My Blog: Life Through The Eyes of a Christian

http://bloggingforjchrist.blogspot.com...

Life Through The Eyes of a Christian Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com...
Apollo.11
Posts: 3,478
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 12:27:49 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 12:25:53 PM, THE_OPINIONATOR wrote:
I would take a Bush over Mr.Obama anyday, atleast Bush didn't force health care down our throats.

You're right. What Bush did was much, much worse.
Sapere Aude!
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 12:30:28 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 12:25:53 PM, THE_OPINIONATOR wrote:
I would take a Bush over Mr.Obama anyday, atleast Bush didn't force health care down our throats.

This is an example of why a Bush can be elected again for a third time.

Obama is so bad, everyone forgot and forgave Bush.

Personally, I'd vote for a Bush cause it's funny, but my conscience would say Ron Paul.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Greyparrot
Posts: 14,247
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 12:31:39 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Tarp gave the signal to Obama that the candy store was open and a few extra trillion debt would not be noticed.

Prolly the worst thing Bush could have done for the future of the country and for future generations.
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 12:54:13 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 12:18:12 PM, Apollo.11 wrote:
At 7/16/2012 12:06:53 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
There's a few good Presidents scattered around history, sure. But I bet it ain't for the right reasons. Be real, they picked Kennedy cause of his looks. And he was a bred fascist from a big Illuminati family. He rebelled, that's what happened.

You can't honestly believe that...

I don't believe it, it's confirmed fact that Kennedy is an Illuminati family:

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com...

And it's explicit that he rebelled. Look at his speeches exposing secret societies and attempting to abolish the Fed and rejected his own administrations attempt to do a false flag attack on America called Operation Northwoods.

.
.
.
.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 1:18:07 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 12:40:17 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
Geo, why not Jill Stein? Aren't you a Left Libertarian?

How on Earth can you support Jill Stein while being an anarchist? All of her policies centre around the government forcing us to do X and Y.
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 1:56:12 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 1:18:07 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
At 7/16/2012 12:40:17 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
Geo, why not Jill Stein? Aren't you a Left Libertarian?

How on Earth can you support Jill Stein while being an anarchist? All of her policies centre around the government forcing us to do X and Y.

Nope. Her policies are about decentralization of government and about local enforcement of specific principles.

Also, I don't support Jill Stein. I don't support ANY candidate. I will vote for Jill Stein because she will decentralize the state while simultaneously provide for rights. It's a step in the right direction.
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 2:05:57 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 1:56:12 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 7/16/2012 1:18:07 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
At 7/16/2012 12:40:17 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
Geo, why not Jill Stein? Aren't you a Left Libertarian?

How on Earth can you support Jill Stein while being an anarchist? All of her policies centre around the government forcing us to do X and Y.

Nope. Her policies are about decentralization of government and about local enforcement of specific principles.

Meh. After looking up the U.S's Green Party policies, you are probably right. Here in Canada, the Green Party is uber-centralize everything-socialist.

Also, I don't support Jill Stein. I don't support ANY candidate. I will vote for Jill Stein because she will decentralize the state while simultaneously provide for rights. It's a step in the right direction.

You support a candidate by supporting some or all of her policies, and thus voting for her. Clearly, you are in favour of some of her policies and are therefore voting for her because of them, hence you are supporting her run for Presidency- even though it is an utter failure.
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 3:54:24 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 3:27:07 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
Is this "new" Bush in politics at all?

He gave a speech at the Republican National Convention when he was 12, he campaigned for both Herbert Walker Bush and George W. Bush. He's also served in the military like many leaders have done in their past.

I'd say yes.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
ConservativePolitico
Posts: 8,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 4:05:14 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 3:54:24 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 7/16/2012 3:27:07 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
Is this "new" Bush in politics at all?

He gave a speech at the Republican National Convention when he was 12, he campaigned for both Herbert Walker Bush and George W. Bush. He's also served in the military like many leaders have done in their past.

I'd say yes.

But has he held office of any kind?
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 4:24:21 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 4:05:14 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 7/16/2012 3:54:24 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 7/16/2012 3:27:07 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
Is this "new" Bush in politics at all?

He gave a speech at the Republican National Convention when he was 12, he campaigned for both Herbert Walker Bush and George W. Bush. He's also served in the military like many leaders have done in their past.

I'd say yes.

But has he held office of any kind?

He's part of the Hispanic Republicans of Texas Political Action Committee.

He also revealed that Barbara Bush gave him tips on how to live his first 30 years of life in order to become President.

.
.
.
.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
ConservativePolitico
Posts: 8,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 4:25:49 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 4:24:21 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 7/16/2012 4:05:14 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 7/16/2012 3:54:24 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 7/16/2012 3:27:07 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
Is this "new" Bush in politics at all?

He gave a speech at the Republican National Convention when he was 12, he campaigned for both Herbert Walker Bush and George W. Bush. He's also served in the military like many leaders have done in their past.

I'd say yes.

But has he held office of any kind?

He's part of the Hispanic Republicans of Texas Political Action Committee.

He also revealed that Barbara Bush gave him tips on how to live his first 30 years of life in order to become President.




.
.
.
.

Interesting.
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 4:33:28 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
George P. Bush: http://en.m.wikipedia.org...
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
ConservativePolitico
Posts: 8,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 6:15:42 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 4:33:28 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
George P. Bush: http://en.m.wikipedia.org...

I guess he still has time to get into office at some point but if you're theory about him wanting to be President or something similar is correct he'll need to jump into a high public office pretty fast here. If not then he's got no chance.

The Bushes are shaping up to be the GOP Kennedy family.
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 6:23:49 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Only if Jeb became president instead
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
Contra
Posts: 3,941
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 6:33:30 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 12:25:53 PM, THE_OPINIONATOR wrote:
I would take a Bush over Mr.Obama anyday, atleast Bush didn't force health care down our throats.

Typical conservative victim-response. I don't know why conservatives have much of their ideology centered around being a victim when they dominate the political scene pretty much.
"The solution [for Republicans] is to admit that Bush was a bad president, stop this racist homophobic stuff, stop trying to give most of the tax cuts to the rich, propose a real alternative to Obamacare that actually works, and propose smart free market solutions to our economic problems." - Distraff

"Americans are better off in a dynamic, free-enterprise-based economy that fosters economic growth, opportunity and upward mobility." - Paul Ryan
Contra
Posts: 3,941
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 6:34:48 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 3:35:53 PM, RoyLatham wrote:
"I'd vote for a can of orange juice over Obama." - Mark Levin

Me too.

A can of orange juice wouldn't of killed Osama bin Laden, or save the economy.

Just saying.
"The solution [for Republicans] is to admit that Bush was a bad president, stop this racist homophobic stuff, stop trying to give most of the tax cuts to the rich, propose a real alternative to Obamacare that actually works, and propose smart free market solutions to our economic problems." - Distraff

"Americans are better off in a dynamic, free-enterprise-based economy that fosters economic growth, opportunity and upward mobility." - Paul Ryan
jat93
Posts: 1,440
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/16/2012 6:46:17 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/16/2012 12:25:53 PM, THE_OPINIONATOR wrote:
I would take a Bush over Mr.Obama anyday, atleast Bush didn't force health care down our throats.

Medicare Part D, anyone?

http://nhregister.com...

"In 2006, President George W. Bush's Medicare Part D drug coverage went into effect for seniors and disabled people on Medicare.

Included in this legislation is a penalty for anyone who does not purchase this Part D coverage when they first become eligible. This penalty accrues every month until the individual is forced to apply for Medicare Part D coverage. This, over a period of time, could amount to a very large and unmanageable sum for individuals on a fixed income."

Also, read the following article, entitled "Still paying the price of the Bush legacy", which describes how "When Republicans last controlled both chambers of Congress and the presidency during the Bush administration, they didn't use their power to limit government, but to drastically expand it. By far, the most offensive example of their disregard for small government principles was the passage of the Medicare prescription drug plan. This law represented the largest expansion of entitlements since Lyndon Johnson's Great Society, meaning that it will continue to add to our deficits in perpetuity. Furthermore, the administration made no attempt to pay for it by cutting spending elsewhere in the budget."

The article - http://washingtonexaminer.com...

This begs the question, where were all the Obamacare opponents when Medicare Part D was being passed? The answer is that most of them were right there, cheering it on. Republicans and most "conservatives" seem not to care about big government/socialism when its done under a Republican administration.