Total Posts:19|Showing Posts:1-19
Jump to topic:

Lord Jacob Rothschild > Rubio, Rand, Romney

GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/18/2012 10:13:56 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Marco Rubio and Rand Paul didn't have the decency to even address the journalists asking them questions about Bilderbeg, they just ignored their existence and kept walking. Lord Jacob Rothschild gets confronted about the New World Order and he actually talks with them.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
BennyW
Posts: 698
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 4:06:43 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
Interesting how he continued to talk to them even after initially trying to get away. I wonder what he was about to say in the end.
You didn't build that-Obama
It's pretty lazy to quote things you disagree with, call it stupid and move on, rather than arguing with the person. -000ike
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 9:55:43 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/19/2012 4:06:43 AM, BennyW wrote:
Interesting how he continued to talk to them even after initially trying to get away. I wonder what he was about to say in the end.

Keep watching the vid til the end, they show it.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 9:59:25 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/19/2012 7:42:12 AM, TheOrator wrote:
It's not exactly unheard of to ignore the papparazi or pesky journalists :P

Rand Paul on two different occasions was asked some questions and he answered, but once Bilderberg was brought up he starts running away and ignoring. Marco Rubio was at a press event where questions were welcomed, he just ran away 3 times in a row.

Cowards who can't even attempt to justify their own actions, at least Rothschild has a spine and faces it.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Lickdafoot
Posts: 5,599
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 10:34:45 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
that is interesting. lol, he just nervously laughs at them the whole time...

one video that stuck with me was when this guy gets tased at a press conference for asking john kerry about the skull and crossbones. kerry even tells the gaurds that he would answer, but that doesn't stop them. i think it's very telling about how willingly people will do whatever they see necessary in order to keep things in line.
WAKE UP AND READ THIS: http://www.debate.org...
tBoonePickens
Posts: 3,266
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 10:38:37 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/19/2012 7:42:12 AM, TheOrator wrote:
It's not exactly unheard of to ignore the papparazi or pesky journalists :P

Yeah, especially when they are trying to ask you questions about tin-foil-hat-conspiracies!
WOS
: At 10/3/2012 4:28:52 AM, Wallstreetatheist wrote:
: Without nothing existing, you couldn't have something.
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 11:11:21 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/19/2012 10:38:37 AM, tBoonePickens wrote:
At 7/19/2012 7:42:12 AM, TheOrator wrote:
It's not exactly unheard of to ignore the papparazi or pesky journalists :P

Yeah, especially when they are trying to ask you questions about tin-foil-hat-conspiracies!

It's not a tinfoil hat conspiracy when the people being confronted actually attended the Bilderberg meeting or in Rands case, endorsing a Bilderberger.

You can't dismiss someone as crazy when you know that you are a member of said organization and they ask about the meetings you attended.

If you deny that the Bilderberg Group exists you are a fvckin idiot and should be placed in a mental institution for extreme cases. Bottom line.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
tBoonePickens
Posts: 3,266
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 11:24:42 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/19/2012 11:11:21 AM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 7/19/2012 10:38:37 AM, tBoonePickens wrote:
At 7/19/2012 7:42:12 AM, TheOrator wrote:
It's not exactly unheard of to ignore the papparazi or pesky journalists :P
Yeah, especially when they are trying to ask you questions about tin-foil-hat-conspiracies!
It's not a tinfoil hat conspiracy when the people being confronted actually attended the Bilderberg meeting or in Rands case, endorsing a Bilderberger.
Strawman; that there's a Bilderberg meeting is not the conspiracy.

You can't dismiss someone as crazy when you know that you are a member of said organization and they ask about the meetings you attended.
Strawman; that there's a Bilderberg organization is not the conspiracy.

If you deny that the Bilderberg Group exists you are a fvckin idiot and should be placed in a mental institution for extreme cases. Bottom line.
See above. Ad hominems, the sign of a brilliant mind at work!
WOS
: At 10/3/2012 4:28:52 AM, Wallstreetatheist wrote:
: Without nothing existing, you couldn't have something.
Wnope
Posts: 6,924
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 11:32:23 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
You're ignoring basic politics. The very act of answering the question "Were you a Bilderberger?" turns it into a more important news segment than it otherwise would be. Essentially, answering the question will fan flames to a subject which is completely lose-lose (it would mean a shift in focus to the candidate's personal life instead of attacking his opponent).

This is true regardless of whether or not they were part of the organization.
BennyW
Posts: 698
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 11:49:27 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/19/2012 11:24:42 AM, tBoonePickens wrote:
At 7/19/2012 11:11:21 AM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 7/19/2012 10:38:37 AM, tBoonePickens wrote:
At 7/19/2012 7:42:12 AM, TheOrator wrote:
It's not exactly unheard of to ignore the papparazi or pesky journalists :P
Yeah, especially when they are trying to ask you questions about tin-foil-hat-conspiracies!
It's not a tinfoil hat conspiracy when the people being confronted actually attended the Bilderberg meeting or in Rands case, endorsing a Bilderberger.
Strawman; that there's a Bilderberg meeting is not the conspiracy.

You can't dismiss someone as crazy when you know that you are a member of said organization and they ask about the meetings you attended.
Strawman; that there's a Bilderberg organization is not the conspiracy.

If you deny that the Bilderberg Group exists you are a fvckin idiot and should be placed in a mental institution for extreme cases. Bottom line.
See above. Ad hominems, the sign of a brilliant mind at work!

It was at one point, they used to deny such a group even existed, now they acknowledge it but keep everything about it hush hush.
You didn't build that-Obama
It's pretty lazy to quote things you disagree with, call it stupid and move on, rather than arguing with the person. -000ike
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 12:00:07 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/19/2012 11:24:42 AM, tBoonePickens wrote:
At 7/19/2012 11:11:21 AM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
It's not a tinfoil hat conspiracy when the people being confronted actually attended the Bilderberg meeting or in Rands case, endorsing a Bilderberger.
Strawman; that there's a Bilderberg meeting is not the conspiracy.

Yes it is. Back in the day, the elites used to deny it's existence, if I'm not mistaken, even Rush Limbaugh several years back denied it existed.

A group of the most powerful people in the world, getting together to have a meeting behind closed doors with no media reporting allowed on what goes on in there, yes, THAT is the very definition of a conspiracy. So no, it's not a strawman. You suggested that merely asking about Bilderberg membership or acknowledging its existence is tinfoil hat conspiracy.

Also, the question was simply "can you comment on your attendance of the Bilderberg Group?" If it's so good and obviously prestigious, why isn't he like "hell yeah I spoke at the Bilderberg meeting b!tches, I'm doin great things with their cooperation!"

You can't dismiss someone as crazy when you know that you are a member of said organization and they ask about the meetings you attended.
Strawman; that there's a Bilderberg organization is not the conspiracy.

Not a strawman. I described politicians being asked about their membership with Bilderberg and acknowledging its existence and you said that that equals to asking tinfoil hat conspiracy.

If you deny that the Bilderberg Group exists you are a fvckin idiot and should be placed in a mental institution for extreme cases. Bottom line.
See above. Ad hominems, the sign of a brilliant mind at work!

Your mind is an enslaved, fried mind cooked to order to be served on the platter of the globalist Leviathans.

.
.
.
.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 12:06:04 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/19/2012 11:32:23 AM, Wnope wrote:
You're ignoring basic politics. The very act of answering the question "Were you a Bilderberger?" turns it into a more important news segment than it otherwise would be. Essentially, answering the question will fan flames to a subject which is completely lose-lose (it would mean a shift in focus to the candidate's personal life instead of attacking his opponent).

This is true regardless of whether or not they were part of the organization.

1. Why aren't they proud of the Bilderberg Group? I thought you guys believe it's just a think tank coming together for a humanitarian effort. Ah, you don't think that after a second thought, you fail.

2. Politicians get asked tough questions all the time on common issues that get people fired up and backlash, then repeated and criticized on the news. Why won't they answer when asked about their "great global humanitarian efforts"?

.
.
.
.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 12:11:15 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
3. Attending the Bilderberg Group is not ones personal life, attending Bilderberg is political activity.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 2:08:06 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/19/2012 1:33:24 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
Geo, don't you support the NWO and the Illuminati?

The Illuminati is a love/hate sort of thing. The New World Order, I'm entirely opposed to it.

.
.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 5:27:09 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Wnope has been silenced and effectively refuted.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
PARADIGM_L0ST
Posts: 6,958
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 5:32:01 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 7/19/2012 9:59:25 AM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 7/19/2012 7:42:12 AM, TheOrator wrote:
It's not exactly unheard of to ignore the papparazi or pesky journalists :P

Rand Paul on two different occasions was asked some questions and he answered, but once Bilderberg was brought up he starts running away and ignoring. Marco Rubio was at a press event where questions were welcomed, he just ran away 3 times in a row.

Cowards who can't even attempt to justify their own actions, at least Rothschild has a spine and faces it.:

If they ignored it, it's probably because loaded questions like that are so absurd it would be like asking you about cyclone activity on Mars. Ummmm, what???
"Have you ever considered suicide? If not, please do." -- Mouthwash (to Inferno)
PARADIGM_L0ST
Posts: 6,958
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/19/2012 5:40:02 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
1. Why aren't they proud of the Bilderberg Group? I thought you guys believe it's just a think tank coming together for a humanitarian effort. Ah, you don't think that after a second thought, you fail.:

Because I'm sure the attendants of Bilderberg are painfully aware of the stigma attached to it. Any answer, as Wnope eloquently stated, simply fans the flames even more.

People like you already have in your mind what it is, so that no answer will suffice but the one you've imagined in your mind. That, of course, is not how science or truth operates. This is exactly what creationists do; they create a thesis in their mind and then look for ways to prove that thesis true. That, of course, is completely opposite of how science works, which goes where the evidence leads and based on that evidence, formulates their thesis.

2. Politicians get asked tough questions all the time on common issues that get people fired up and backlash, then repeated and criticized on the news. Why won't they answer when asked about their "great global humanitarian efforts"?:

There's no point. Again, as Wnope elucidated, it's a lose/lose proposition. Acknowledging anything about Bilderberg simply bolsters conspiracy theorists. "Aha, they admit it exists!"

They're manipulative, loaded questions, Geo.
"Have you ever considered suicide? If not, please do." -- Mouthwash (to Inferno)