Total Posts:98|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Nazism And The Republican Party *

inferno
Posts: 10,556
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 10:20:10 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
Good evening ladies and gentlemen. It baffles my mind that some people would rather not believe the propaganda that is fueling the racism in the Republican
Party. You have a much better defintion of this when you listen to Conservative
talk radio, cable news, and other sources that spew hatred daily, but in a way
that is hard to discern by sheep. A few days ago, we had yet another mass shooting out in the Mid West. This time it was done by a former military turned
Nazi, as this has been the information disclosed by the media.
Although he has done a terrible deed at the sinkh there in Minnesota, you must understand the source of his anger. It comes from the fear of multi-culturalism
here in America and the populatory decline of Caucasians here in our country today.
When he expressed his disdain for apathy, he felt like he could create some sort
of act that would fuel the resentfulness and pride on the part of Nazis all around the world. The message was clear. We do not want you here, and this is our land you
are tresspassing upon. Why is this group so influential to the GOP.
See the link below. What do you think.

http://www.bartcop.com...
NixonianVolkswagen
Posts: 481
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 11:03:45 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
The Democrats are always trying to out or in maneuver their various factions. Part of Obama's "Republican obstructionist" narrative is, in my view, an attempt to outflank the more liberal elements within his own party. Eg: "I'm sorry Mr Kucinich, your healthcare perspective is impossible."

Republicans don't seem to self-police, if that's what you could call it, in this way. Neocons. lost favor when they became difficult to elect, but the only proper equivalent I can think of is that moderates ("RINOs"), seem to have bullseyes on their backs.
"There is an almost universal tendency, perhaps an inborn tendency, to suspect the good faith of a man who holds opinions that differ from our own opinions."

- Karl "Spartacus" Popper
inferno
Posts: 10,556
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 11:07:49 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 11:03:45 AM, NixonianVolkswagen wrote:
The Democrats are always trying to out or in maneuver their various factions. Part of Obama's "Republican obstructionist" narrative is, in my view, an attempt to outflank the more liberal elements within his own party. Eg: "I'm sorry Mr Kucinich, your healthcare perspective is impossible."

Republicans don't seem to self-police, if that's what you could call it, in this way. Neocons. lost favor when they became difficult to elect, but the only proper equivalent I can think of is that moderates ("RINOs"), seem to have bullseyes on their backs.

Nixon. There is no such thing as a RINO. That is a very disingenious term used by people who are afraid of fundamental truth. A spade is a spade, so call it what is.
Because if this nonsense was prvelent in the Liberal Establishment, I would not resort to such horrible and highly transparent words.
inferno
Posts: 10,556
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 11:08:30 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 11:07:49 AM, inferno wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:03:45 AM, NixonianVolkswagen wrote:
The Democrats are always trying to out or in maneuver their various factions. Part of Obama's "Republican obstructionist" narrative is, in my view, an attempt to outflank the more liberal elements within his own party. Eg: "I'm sorry Mr Kucinich, your healthcare perspective is impossible."

Republicans don't seem to self-police, if that's what you could call it, in this way. Neocons. lost favor when they became difficult to elect, but the only proper equivalent I can think of is that moderates ("RINOs"), seem to have bullseyes on their backs.

Nixon. There is no such thing as a RINO. That is a very disingenious term used by people who are afraid of fundamental truth. A spade is a spade, so call it what is.
Because if this nonsense was prvelent in the Liberal Establishment, I would not resort to such horrible and highly transparent words.

And for the record, there is no such thing as a LINO either. Get it right next time aorund. =)
NixonianVolkswagen
Posts: 481
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 11:22:51 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 11:07:49 AM, inferno wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:03:45 AM, NixonianVolkswagen wrote:
The Democrats are always trying to out or in maneuver their various factions. Part of Obama's "Republican obstructionist" narrative is, in my view, an attempt to outflank the more liberal elements within his own party. Eg: "I'm sorry Mr Kucinich, your healthcare perspective is impossible."

Republicans don't seem to self-police, if that's what you could call it, in this way. Neocons. lost favor when they became difficult to elect, but the only proper equivalent I can think of is that moderates ("RINOs"), seem to have bullseyes on their backs.

Nixon. There is no such thing as a RINO. That is a very disingenious term used by people who are afraid of fundamental truth. A spade is a spade, so call it what is.
Because if this nonsense was prvelent in the Liberal Establishment, I would not resort to such horrible and highly transparent words.

I'm confused, can you clarify this please? I can't tell from which direction you're disagreeing with me.
"There is an almost universal tendency, perhaps an inborn tendency, to suspect the good faith of a man who holds opinions that differ from our own opinions."

- Karl "Spartacus" Popper
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 11:35:14 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
The Nazi party are more inline with democrats than republicans
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 11:39:06 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
Republicans supported the civil rights act more then democrats...

And I am a conservative... My best freind is black, the other Mexican.

Herman Cain was the front runner at one point.

Condaleza rice is supported amongst conservatives.

Just because one person is racust doesn't mean the whole group of people is too. Also the shooter there was a liberal.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 11:40:33 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 11:35:14 AM, DanT wrote:
The Nazi party are more inline with democrats than republicans

How? I think they are unrelated to both.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
Contra
Posts: 3,941
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 11:59:31 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 11:35:14 AM, DanT wrote:
The Nazi party are more inline with democrats than republicans

Your childish if you really said that. Wow.
"The solution [for Republicans] is to admit that Bush was a bad president, stop this racist homophobic stuff, stop trying to give most of the tax cuts to the rich, propose a real alternative to Obamacare that actually works, and propose smart free market solutions to our economic problems." - Distraff

"Americans are better off in a dynamic, free-enterprise-based economy that fosters economic growth, opportunity and upward mobility." - Paul Ryan
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:28:25 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 11:40:33 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:35:14 AM, DanT wrote:
The Nazi party are more inline with democrats than republicans

How? I think they are unrelated to both.

I said more inline, I did not say they were the same thing (like the OP was saying about republicans)

Have you seen the Nazi platform?
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
Contra
Posts: 3,941
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:29:56 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 12:28:25 PM, DanT wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:40:33 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:35:14 AM, DanT wrote:
The Nazi party are more inline with democrats than republicans

How? I think they are unrelated to both.

I said more inline, I did not say they were the same thing (like the OP was saying about republicans)

Have you seen the Nazi platform?

Fascist. Which is authoritarian upper-right. The Keynesian aspects were leftist though.
"The solution [for Republicans] is to admit that Bush was a bad president, stop this racist homophobic stuff, stop trying to give most of the tax cuts to the rich, propose a real alternative to Obamacare that actually works, and propose smart free market solutions to our economic problems." - Distraff

"Americans are better off in a dynamic, free-enterprise-based economy that fosters economic growth, opportunity and upward mobility." - Paul Ryan
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:34:31 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 12:29:56 PM, Contra wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:28:25 PM, DanT wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:40:33 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:35:14 AM, DanT wrote:
The Nazi party are more inline with democrats than republicans

How? I think they are unrelated to both.

I said more inline, I did not say they were the same thing (like the OP was saying about republicans)

Have you seen the Nazi platform?

Fascist. Which is authoritarian upper-right. The Keynesian aspects were leftist though.

Trolololololololol.
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
twocupcakes
Posts: 2,748
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:41:20 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
I always thought that fascists were extreme right wing whereas communists were extreme left wing. So, Hitler would be more in line with republicans and Stalin would be more in line with democrats. But, in general I don't really think the ideologies are that comparable.
NixonianVolkswagen
Posts: 481
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:42:34 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 12:34:31 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:29:56 PM, Contra wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:28:25 PM, DanT wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:40:33 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:35:14 AM, DanT wrote:
The Nazi party are more inline with democrats than republicans

How? I think they are unrelated to both.

I said more inline, I did not say they were the same thing (like the OP was saying about republicans)

Have you seen the Nazi platform?

Fascist. Which is authoritarian upper-right. The Keynesian aspects were leftist though.

Trolololololololol.

In what sense isn't this true?
"There is an almost universal tendency, perhaps an inborn tendency, to suspect the good faith of a man who holds opinions that differ from our own opinions."

- Karl "Spartacus" Popper
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:44:14 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 12:41:20 PM, twocupcakes wrote:
I always thought that fascists were extreme right wing whereas communists were extreme left wing. So, Hitler would be more in line with republicans and Stalin would be more in line with democrats. But, in general I don't really think the ideologies are that comparable.

Fascism is very liberal. It's socialist. http://jonjayray.tripod.com...
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:48:09 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 11:59:31 AM, Contra wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:35:14 AM, DanT wrote:
The Nazi party are more inline with democrats than republicans

Your childish if you really said that. Wow.

You are the one who is acting childish, with that ad hominem attack.

The Nazis were against State rights, and pushed for centralization of the German Government.
The Nazi party advocated Green politics
The Nazi party advocated state funded construction projects
The Nazi party made labour day a national holiday
The Nazi party advocated a national workers union, in order to control the means of production, and grant the workers more benefits. (such as vacations and cruises)
The Nazi party advocated the confiscation of all "unearned income".
The Nazi party advocated the total confiscation of all war profits
The Nazi party advocated the nationalization of monopolies.
The Nazi party advocated redistribution of wealth from heavy industries
The Nazi party advocated increasing social-welfare for the elderly.
The Nazi party advocated the nationalization of land, and land reform.
The Nazi party advocated the criminalization, and execution of usurers, and profiteers
the Nazi party advocated a national public educational system.
The Nazi party advocated increases to the National healthcare
The Nazi party advocated child-labour laws
The Nazi party were against mercenaries
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:48:59 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 12:29:56 PM, Contra wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:28:25 PM, DanT wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:40:33 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:35:14 AM, DanT wrote:
The Nazi party are more inline with democrats than republicans

How? I think they are unrelated to both.

I said more inline, I did not say they were the same thing (like the OP was saying about republicans)

Have you seen the Nazi platform?

Fascist. Which is authoritarian upper-right. The Keynesian aspects were leftist though.

It's incomparable to both.
http://www.americannaziparty.com...

Vs

GOP http://whitehouse12.com...

DEM http://www.qnc.us...
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
Contra
Posts: 3,941
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:49:09 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 12:44:14 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:41:20 PM, twocupcakes wrote:
I always thought that fascists were extreme right wing whereas communists were extreme left wing. So, Hitler would be more in line with republicans and Stalin would be more in line with democrats. But, in general I don't really think the ideologies are that comparable.

Fascism is very liberal. It's socialist. http://jonjayray.tripod.com...

The Nazi Party used force to brutally kill all Socialists in the Night of Long Knives. And the nationalism aspect was authoritarian right wing.

Stalin was authoritarian, statist left wing.
"The solution [for Republicans] is to admit that Bush was a bad president, stop this racist homophobic stuff, stop trying to give most of the tax cuts to the rich, propose a real alternative to Obamacare that actually works, and propose smart free market solutions to our economic problems." - Distraff

"Americans are better off in a dynamic, free-enterprise-based economy that fosters economic growth, opportunity and upward mobility." - Paul Ryan
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:50:05 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 12:29:56 PM, Contra wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:28:25 PM, DanT wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:40:33 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:35:14 AM, DanT wrote:
The Nazi party are more inline with democrats than republicans

How? I think they are unrelated to both.

I said more inline, I did not say they were the same thing (like the OP was saying about republicans)

Have you seen the Nazi platform?

Fascist. Which is authoritarian upper-right. The Keynesian aspects were leftist though.

fascist were neither left nor right wing. They were third way, which means they are both left and right wing.
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:51:06 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 12:48:09 PM, DanT wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:59:31 AM, Contra wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:35:14 AM, DanT wrote:
The Nazi party are more inline with democrats than republicans

Your childish if you really said that. Wow.

You are the one who is acting childish, with that ad hominem attack.


The Nazis were against State rights, and pushed for centralization of the German Government.
The Nazi party advocated Green politics
The Nazi party advocated state funded construction projects
The Nazi party made labour day a national holiday
The Nazi party advocated a national workers union, in order to control the means of production, and grant the workers more benefits. (such as vacations and cruises)
The Nazi party advocated the confiscation of all "unearned income".
The Nazi party advocated the total confiscation of all war profits
The Nazi party advocated the nationalization of monopolies.
The Nazi party advocated redistribution of wealth from heavy industries
The Nazi party advocated increasing social-welfare for the elderly.
The Nazi party advocated the nationalization of land, and land reform.
The Nazi party advocated the criminalization, and execution of usurers, and profiteers
the Nazi party advocated a national public educational system.
The Nazi party advocated increases to the National healthcare
The Nazi party advocated child-labour laws
The Nazi party were against mercenaries
The Nazi party advocated stricter gun control laws
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:52:23 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 12:49:09 PM, Contra wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:44:14 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:41:20 PM, twocupcakes wrote:
I always thought that fascists were extreme right wing whereas communists were extreme left wing. So, Hitler would be more in line with republicans and Stalin would be more in line with democrats. But, in general I don't really think the ideologies are that comparable.

Fascism is very liberal. It's socialist. http://jonjayray.tripod.com...

The Nazi Party used force to brutally kill all Socialists in the Night of Long Knives. And the nationalism aspect was authoritarian right wing.

Stalin was authoritarian, statist left wing.

They hated socialists and communists, correct. But if you see the link they where very similar, just more overbearing.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:53:42 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 12:49:09 PM, Contra wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:44:14 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:41:20 PM, twocupcakes wrote:
I always thought that fascists were extreme right wing whereas communists were extreme left wing. So, Hitler would be more in line with republicans and Stalin would be more in line with democrats. But, in general I don't really think the ideologies are that comparable.

Fascism is very liberal. It's socialist. http://jonjayray.tripod.com...

The Nazi Party used force to brutally kill all Socialists in the Night of Long Knives. And the nationalism aspect was authoritarian right wing.

Stalin was authoritarian, statist left wing.

The Nazi party was not anti-socialist it was anti-marxisn and anti-capitalist.

Not all socialists are marxists, but all marxists are socialists. The Nazi party was an advocate of socialism, but was against Marxism. They favored National syndicalism.
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:54:21 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 12:52:23 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:49:09 PM, Contra wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:44:14 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:41:20 PM, twocupcakes wrote:
I always thought that fascists were extreme right wing whereas communists were extreme left wing. So, Hitler would be more in line with republicans and Stalin would be more in line with democrats. But, in general I don't really think the ideologies are that comparable.

Fascism is very liberal. It's socialist. http://jonjayray.tripod.com...

The Nazi Party used force to brutally kill all Socialists in the Night of Long Knives. And the nationalism aspect was authoritarian right wing.

Stalin was authoritarian, statist left wing.

They hated socialists and communists, correct. But if you see the link they where very similar, just more overbearing.

incorrect, they hated communists, but were pro-socialist.
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
Contra
Posts: 3,941
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:55:57 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 12:53:42 PM, DanT wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:49:09 PM, Contra wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:44:14 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:41:20 PM, twocupcakes wrote:
I always thought that fascists were extreme right wing whereas communists were extreme left wing. So, Hitler would be more in line with republicans and Stalin would be more in line with democrats. But, in general I don't really think the ideologies are that comparable.

Fascism is very liberal. It's socialist. http://jonjayray.tripod.com...

The Nazi Party used force to brutally kill all Socialists in the Night of Long Knives. And the nationalism aspect was authoritarian right wing.

Stalin was authoritarian, statist left wing.

The Nazi party was not anti-socialist it was anti-marxisn and anti-capitalist.

Not all socialists are marxists, but all marxists are socialists. The Nazi party was an advocate of socialism, but was against Marxism. They favored National syndicalism.

How is Marxism different than Socialism?
"The solution [for Republicans] is to admit that Bush was a bad president, stop this racist homophobic stuff, stop trying to give most of the tax cuts to the rich, propose a real alternative to Obamacare that actually works, and propose smart free market solutions to our economic problems." - Distraff

"Americans are better off in a dynamic, free-enterprise-based economy that fosters economic growth, opportunity and upward mobility." - Paul Ryan
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 12:57:52 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 12:51:06 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:48:09 PM, DanT wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:59:31 AM, Contra wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:35:14 AM, DanT wrote:
The Nazi party are more inline with democrats than republicans

Your childish if you really said that. Wow.

You are the one who is acting childish, with that ad hominem attack.


The Nazis were against State rights, and pushed for centralization of the German Government.
The Nazi party advocated Green politics
The Nazi party advocated state funded construction projects
The Nazi party made labour day a national holiday
The Nazi party advocated a national workers union, in order to control the means of production, and grant the workers more benefits. (such as vacations and cruises)
The Nazi party advocated the confiscation of all "unearned income".
The Nazi party advocated the total confiscation of all war profits
The Nazi party advocated the nationalization of monopolies.
The Nazi party advocated redistribution of wealth from heavy industries
The Nazi party advocated increasing social-welfare for the elderly.
The Nazi party advocated the nationalization of land, and land reform.
The Nazi party advocated the criminalization, and execution of usurers, and profiteers
the Nazi party advocated a national public educational system.
The Nazi party advocated increases to the National healthcare
The Nazi party advocated child-labour laws
The Nazi party were against mercenaries
The Nazi party advocated stricter gun control laws

Every tyrannical regime does.

"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!" - Adolph Hitler, 1935, on The Weapons Act of Nazi Germany
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
DanT
Posts: 5,693
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 1:00:47 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 12:55:57 PM, Contra wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:53:42 PM, DanT wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:49:09 PM, Contra wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:44:14 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:41:20 PM, twocupcakes wrote:
I always thought that fascists were extreme right wing whereas communists were extreme left wing. So, Hitler would be more in line with republicans and Stalin would be more in line with democrats. But, in general I don't really think the ideologies are that comparable.

Fascism is very liberal. It's socialist. http://jonjayray.tripod.com...

The Nazi Party used force to brutally kill all Socialists in the Night of Long Knives. And the nationalism aspect was authoritarian right wing.

Stalin was authoritarian, statist left wing.

The Nazi party was not anti-socialist it was anti-marxisn and anti-capitalist.

Not all socialists are marxists, but all marxists are socialists. The Nazi party was an advocate of socialism, but was against Marxism. They favored National syndicalism.

How is Marxism different than Socialism?

With Marxism there is no possessions, with socialism there is.
"Chemical weapons are no different than any other types of weapons."~Lordknukle
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 1:02:56 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 12:57:52 PM, DanT wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:51:06 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 8/8/2012 12:48:09 PM, DanT wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:59:31 AM, Contra wrote:
At 8/8/2012 11:35:14 AM, DanT wrote:
The Nazi party are more inline with democrats than republicans

Your childish if you really said that. Wow.

You are the one who is acting childish, with that ad hominem attack.


The Nazis were against State rights, and pushed for centralization of the German Government.
The Nazi party advocated Green politics
The Nazi party advocated state funded construction projects
The Nazi party made labour day a national holiday
The Nazi party advocated a national workers union, in order to control the means of production, and grant the workers more benefits. (such as vacations and cruises)
The Nazi party advocated the confiscation of all "unearned income".
The Nazi party advocated the total confiscation of all war profits
The Nazi party advocated the nationalization of monopolies.
The Nazi party advocated redistribution of wealth from heavy industries
The Nazi party advocated increasing social-welfare for the elderly.
The Nazi party advocated the nationalization of land, and land reform.
The Nazi party advocated the criminalization, and execution of usurers, and profiteers
the Nazi party advocated a national public educational system.
The Nazi party advocated increases to the National healthcare
The Nazi party advocated child-labour laws
The Nazi party were against mercenaries
The Nazi party advocated stricter gun control laws

Every tyrannical regime does.

"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!" - Adolph Hitler, 1935, on The Weapons Act of Nazi Germany

Sounds like the gun control rhetoric we hear today...
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
Frederick53
Posts: 1,037
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 1:04:06 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
I just saw the title and was like, "fvck no"
In 1975, the Second Vietnam War began -1Historygenius

Like no wonder that indian dude rejected you.- Darkkermit to royalpaladin

Social Darwinism is a justification- 1Historygenius

Equal opportunity exists, so there is no problem- EvanK
Frederick53
Posts: 1,037
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 1:04:53 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/8/2012 11:35:14 AM, DanT wrote:
The Nazi party are more inline with democrats than republicans

And then I saw this comment and was like, "fvck no"
In 1975, the Second Vietnam War began -1Historygenius

Like no wonder that indian dude rejected you.- Darkkermit to royalpaladin

Social Darwinism is a justification- 1Historygenius

Equal opportunity exists, so there is no problem- EvanK
JamesMadison
Posts: 381
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/8/2012 1:08:40 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Yes, the National German Socialist Worker's party was about as right wing as it sounds from the name.

I don't like it when people try to attach the other party to Nazis.

And, I don't understand why Democrats do it. Not to be a hypocrite, but I don't have a problem with Repubs pointing out that the Nazis were a group of anti wealth socialists who hated bankers and rich people.

In other words, they had a good deal in common with BO's reelection campaign.
As a general rule, you'll find that, when a conservative is talking about policy, history, economics, or something serious, liberals are nowhere to be found. But, as soon as a conservative mentions Obama's birthplace or personal life, liberals are everywhere, only to dissappear again when evidence enters the discussion.