Total Posts:103|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

The biased left

Mirza
Posts: 16,992
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 9:50:29 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
It takes only half of anyone's brain activity to notice how ridiculous CNN's attempt to put Obama in positive highlight is. Giuliani recently criticzed Obama for his incompetence in well, everything -- Particularly the economy and Libya. On the economy part, some blogger from CNN noted that:

"With new numbers showing the unemployment rate had ticked up to 7.9%, Giuliani said the Obama administration should be "ashamed of themselves" for framing the figure as a positive sign. Giuliani, however, did not mention that 171,000 jobs were added last month"more than economists were expecting." http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...

Of course not! Who mentions that 171,000 jobs were created when another 170,000 were lost? It's 1,000 net jobs. What an idiotic attempt to cover-up what is obvious. Obama doesn't know how to create jobs. He doesn't know how to add one job without making another go lost. Only the radical left (progressives, liberals, and some nutcases) have the courage to support such an idiotic administration.

Biden will probably run for president in 2016. If Romney wins, they could battle it out like Obama and Romney are now. If Obama wins, it might be an Obama-Biden ideology running America until 2025. Horrid thought, Ma'ams.
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 9:52:13 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
some of the CNN pundits tried to paint Obama as angry and belligerent after the 2nd debate. They aren't bias. They aren't left wing. Don't criticize them every time they say something you don't like. Get over it.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Nur-Ab-Sal
Posts: 1,637
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 9:52:45 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 9:52:13 PM, 000ike wrote:
some of the CNN pundits tried to paint Obama as angry and belligerent after the 2nd debate. They aren't bias. They aren't left wing. Don't criticize them every time they say something you don't like. Get over it.

what
Genesis I. And God created man to his own image: to the image of God he created him: male and female he created them.
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 9:55:06 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 9:52:45 PM, Nur-Ab-Sal wrote:
At 11/3/2012 9:52:13 PM, 000ike wrote:
some of the CNN pundits tried to paint Obama as angry and belligerent after the 2nd debate. They aren't bias. They aren't left wing. Don't criticize them every time they say something you don't like. Get over it.

what

http://www.comscoredatamine.com...

CNN, 55% independent. MSNBC 39% independent. FOX 20% independent.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Mirza
Posts: 16,992
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 9:56:00 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 9:52:13 PM, 000ike wrote:
some of the CNN pundits tried to paint Obama as angry and belligerent after the 2nd debate.
Chris Matthews made a huge rant against Obama in the first debate, and you will find no person who likes him more than Chris. That doesn't mean he has no blatantly obvious bias toward him.

They aren't bias.
Yes they are, and you know it very well. Don't cover it up! It's right before you call the jerks on MSNBC unbiased.

They aren't left wing.
Correct. Most of their bloggers spitting on Romney is not bias.

Don't criticize them every time they say something you don't like. Get over it.
I respect CNN and their news coverage in many ways. But when they side with the left so much in such critical times, I'd be an idiot not to call them biased. They need to know that Obama is wrecking America, and does little of what he promised. He is a liar, fraud, hypocrite, and everything else that points toward incompetence. Nobody should support him.
Nur-Ab-Sal
Posts: 1,637
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 9:56:47 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 9:55:06 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 11/3/2012 9:52:45 PM, Nur-Ab-Sal wrote:
At 11/3/2012 9:52:13 PM, 000ike wrote:
some of the CNN pundits tried to paint Obama as angry and belligerent after the 2nd debate. They aren't bias. They aren't left wing. Don't criticize them every time they say something you don't like. Get over it.

what

http://www.comscoredatamine.com...

CNN, 55% independent. MSNBC 39% independent. FOX 20% independent.

Just from experience, I can tell CNN is left-wing. Closer to center than, say, MSNBC or Fox, but still left-wing. Perhaps that's just right-wing bias talking. I don't know.
Genesis I. And God created man to his own image: to the image of God he created him: male and female he created them.
Mirza
Posts: 16,992
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 9:57:06 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 9:56:00 PM, Mirza wrote:
They aren't left wing.
Correct. Most of their bloggers spitting on Romney is not bias.
Left-wing bias intended in the wording, sir.
Frederick53
Posts: 1,037
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 9:57:22 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
CNN definitely has an extreme socially liberal bias. They're utterly vague when it comes to economics and when it comes to foreign policy they're neoconservative warmongers.
In 1975, the Second Vietnam War began -1Historygenius

Like no wonder that indian dude rejected you.- Darkkermit to royalpaladin

Social Darwinism is a justification- 1Historygenius

Equal opportunity exists, so there is no problem- EvanK
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 9:58:00 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 9:56:47 PM, Nur-Ab-Sal wrote:
At 11/3/2012 9:55:06 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 11/3/2012 9:52:45 PM, Nur-Ab-Sal wrote:
At 11/3/2012 9:52:13 PM, 000ike wrote:
some of the CNN pundits tried to paint Obama as angry and belligerent after the 2nd debate. They aren't bias. They aren't left wing. Don't criticize them every time they say something you don't like. Get over it.

what

http://www.comscoredatamine.com...

CNN, 55% independent. MSNBC 39% independent. FOX 20% independent.

Just from experience, I can tell CNN is left-wing. Closer to center than, say, MSNBC or Fox, but still left-wing. Perhaps that's just right-wing bias talking. I don't know.

I think it is too. CNN has said things I didn't like before, you don't see me starting threads about it.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
imabench
Posts: 21,220
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 9:58:50 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
*sees name of the thread on the horizon, steers ship away from it*
Kevin24018 : "He's just so mean it makes me want to ball up my fists and stamp on the ground"
Geogeer: "Nobody is dumb enough to become my protege."

7/14/16 = The Presidency Dies

DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 9:59:30 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 9:56:00 PM, Mirza wrote:
At 11/3/2012 9:52:13 PM, 000ike wrote:
some of the CNN pundits tried to paint Obama as angry and belligerent after the 2nd debate.
Chris Matthews made a huge rant against Obama in the first debate, and you will find no person who likes him more than Chris. That doesn't mean he has no blatantly obvious bias toward him.

They aren't bias.
Yes they are, and you know it very well. Don't cover it up! It's right before you call the jerks on MSNBC unbiased.

They aren't left wing.
Correct. Most of their bloggers spitting on Romney is not bias.

Don't criticize them every time they say something you don't like. Get over it.
I respect CNN and their news coverage in many ways. But when they side with the left so much in such critical times, I'd be an idiot not to call them biased. They need to know that Obama is wrecking America, and does little of what he promised. He is a liar, fraud, hypocrite, and everything else that points toward incompetence. Nobody should support him.

so any news station that doesn't exonerate Romney and reject Obama is bias. Ok.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Frederick53
Posts: 1,037
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:02:46 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 9:57:22 PM, Frederick53 wrote:
CNN definitely has an extreme socially liberal bias. They're utterly vague when it comes to economics and when it comes to foreign policy they're neoconservative warmongers.

Thoughts? I feel like that pretty much ends this whole argument...
In 1975, the Second Vietnam War began -1Historygenius

Like no wonder that indian dude rejected you.- Darkkermit to royalpaladin

Social Darwinism is a justification- 1Historygenius

Equal opportunity exists, so there is no problem- EvanK
Mirza
Posts: 16,992
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:05:35 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 9:59:30 PM, 000ike wrote:
so any news station that doesn't exonerate Romney and reject Obama is bias. Ok.
Romney isn't the incompetent president. He isn't the biggest liar of the century. He knows how to create jobs. He doesn't introduce the worst rolls of regulations ever. He doesn't destroy the major manufacturers of jobs. He doesn't fail at protecting lives of diplomats. He isn't a major fraud.

Obama fits every negative description above. Criticizing him is the correct path to walk along. When Fox News criticizes him, that's great. Even if they're ideologically biased, they're telling the truth about him. CNN not being able to point out simple facts (such as 1,000 jobs being created and not 171,000), this is outrageous. Even if they're hardcore leftists once in a while, they should distinguish between truth and falsehood.
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:07:48 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:05:35 PM, Mirza wrote:
At 11/3/2012 9:59:30 PM, 000ike wrote:
so any news station that doesn't exonerate Romney and reject Obama is bias. Ok.
Romney isn't the incompetent president. He isn't the biggest liar of the century. He knows how to create jobs. He doesn't introduce the worst rolls of regulations ever. He doesn't destroy the major manufacturers of jobs. He doesn't fail at protecting lives of diplomats. He isn't a major fraud.

Obama fits every negative description above. Criticizing him is the correct path to walk along. When Fox News criticizes him, that's great. Even if they're ideologically biased, they're telling the truth about him. CNN not being able to point out simple facts (such as 1,000 jobs being created and not 171,000), this is outrageous. Even if they're hardcore leftists once in a while, they should distinguish between truth and falsehood.

You've all given me my fair share of insult and backlash for being unwaveringly stubborn and unreasonable sometimes in my political opinions. Can you please do the same thing for this guy?

Can Mirza be known as the conservative version of the partisan hack? because he really is, and I'm really tired of hearing this nonsense.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
JaxsonRaine
Posts: 3,606
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:08:46 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:07:48 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 11/3/2012 10:05:35 PM, Mirza wrote:
At 11/3/2012 9:59:30 PM, 000ike wrote:
so any news station that doesn't exonerate Romney and reject Obama is bias. Ok.
Romney isn't the incompetent president. He isn't the biggest liar of the century. He knows how to create jobs. He doesn't introduce the worst rolls of regulations ever. He doesn't destroy the major manufacturers of jobs. He doesn't fail at protecting lives of diplomats. He isn't a major fraud.

Obama fits every negative description above. Criticizing him is the correct path to walk along. When Fox News criticizes him, that's great. Even if they're ideologically biased, they're telling the truth about him. CNN not being able to point out simple facts (such as 1,000 jobs being created and not 171,000), this is outrageous. Even if they're hardcore leftists once in a while, they should distinguish between truth and falsehood.

You've all given me my fair share of insult and backlash for being unwaveringly stubborn and unreasonable sometimes in my political opinions. Can you please do the same thing for this guy?

Can Mirza be known as the conservative version of the partisan hack? because he really is, and I'm really tired of hearing this nonsense.

I thought I was the conservative version of the partisan hack?
twocupcakes: 15 = 13
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:10:44 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:08:46 PM, JaxsonRaine wrote:
At 11/3/2012 10:07:48 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 11/3/2012 10:05:35 PM, Mirza wrote:
At 11/3/2012 9:59:30 PM, 000ike wrote:
so any news station that doesn't exonerate Romney and reject Obama is bias. Ok.
Romney isn't the incompetent president. He isn't the biggest liar of the century. He knows how to create jobs. He doesn't introduce the worst rolls of regulations ever. He doesn't destroy the major manufacturers of jobs. He doesn't fail at protecting lives of diplomats. He isn't a major fraud.

Obama fits every negative description above. Criticizing him is the correct path to walk along. When Fox News criticizes him, that's great. Even if they're ideologically biased, they're telling the truth about him. CNN not being able to point out simple facts (such as 1,000 jobs being created and not 171,000), this is outrageous. Even if they're hardcore leftists once in a while, they should distinguish between truth and falsehood.

You've all given me my fair share of insult and backlash for being unwaveringly stubborn and unreasonable sometimes in my political opinions. Can you please do the same thing for this guy?

Can Mirza be known as the conservative version of the partisan hack? because he really is, and I'm really tired of hearing this nonsense.

I thought I was the conservative version of the partisan hack?

You told me that you've criticized some conservatives and don't supposedly treat Romney like he's sacrosanct, so why would that be so?
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Mirza
Posts: 16,992
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:11:59 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:07:48 PM, 000ike wrote:
You've all given me my fair share of insult and backlash for being unwaveringly stubborn and unreasonable sometimes in my political opinions. Can you please do the same thing for this guy?
Great response! Since you dropped my arguments, it must mean that you concede to Obama being incompetent, a liar, fraud, hypocrite, job-destroyer, radical socialist, among a few other nutcase descriptions! That solves our disputes.
JaxsonRaine
Posts: 3,606
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:12:27 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:10:44 PM, 000ike wrote:
You told me that you've criticized some conservatives and don't supposedly treat Romney like he's sacrosanct, so why would that be so?

WHOA! Ike replied to me!

Because you said so.
twocupcakes: 15 = 13
Frederick53
Posts: 1,037
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:12:32 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:05:35 PM, Mirza wrote:
At 11/3/2012 9:59:30 PM, 000ike wrote:
so any news station that doesn't exonerate Romney and reject Obama is bias. Ok.
Romney isn't the incompetent president. He isn't the biggest liar of the century. He knows how to create jobs. He doesn't introduce the worst rolls of regulations ever. He doesn't destroy the major manufacturers of jobs. He doesn't fail at protecting lives of diplomats. He isn't a major fraud.

Obama fits every negative description above. Criticizing him is the correct path to walk along. When Fox News criticizes him, that's great. Even if they're ideologically biased, they're telling the truth about him. CNN not being able to point out simple facts (such as 1,000 jobs being created and not 171,000), this is outrageous. Even if they're hardcore leftists once in a while, they should distinguish between truth and falsehood.

That's really unrealistic. You expect them to just flat out denounce one political candidate in favor of the other? You're literally advocating for bias.
In 1975, the Second Vietnam War began -1Historygenius

Like no wonder that indian dude rejected you.- Darkkermit to royalpaladin

Social Darwinism is a justification- 1Historygenius

Equal opportunity exists, so there is no problem- EvanK
JaxsonRaine
Posts: 3,606
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:12:53 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:11:59 PM, Mirza wrote:
At 11/3/2012 10:07:48 PM, 000ike wrote:
You've all given me my fair share of insult and backlash for being unwaveringly stubborn and unreasonable sometimes in my political opinions. Can you please do the same thing for this guy?
Great response! Since you dropped my arguments, it must mean that you concede to Obama being incompetent, a liar, fraud, hypocrite, job-destroyer, radical socialist, among a few other nutcase descriptions! That solves our disputes.

I see what you did there.
twocupcakes: 15 = 13
Mirza
Posts: 16,992
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:14:55 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:12:32 PM, Frederick53 wrote:
That's really unrealistic. You expect them to just flat out denounce one political candidate in favor of the other? You're literally advocating for bias.
No, I don't. I believe Romney did well as a businessman and governor, and that regardless of his faults, his record is far better than Obama's. Try again.
Frederick53
Posts: 1,037
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:20:57 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:14:55 PM, Mirza wrote:
At 11/3/2012 10:12:32 PM, Frederick53 wrote:
That's really unrealistic. You expect them to just flat out denounce one political candidate in favor of the other? You're literally advocating for bias.
No, I don't. I believe Romney did well as a businessman and governor, and that regardless of his faults, his record is far better than Obama's. Try again.

I'm ready to step back and acknowledge my bias, but you're clearly not. You're entire argument is based around your biased view that Romney is just BETTER than Obama. Regardless of my left wing bias, I can tell you that Romney and Obama are not very different from each other when it comes to competency and the way that they'd run the country. I really don't care for either of them, even though I agree with Obama's social stances.
In 1975, the Second Vietnam War began -1Historygenius

Like no wonder that indian dude rejected you.- Darkkermit to royalpaladin

Social Darwinism is a justification- 1Historygenius

Equal opportunity exists, so there is no problem- EvanK
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:22:42 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:14:40 PM, blameworthy wrote:
List of Trolls
1. imabench
2. 000ike
3. Mirza

I wouldn't use trolls, maybe something alone the line as "uproarious, rowdy members of the site," lol.
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
Mirza
Posts: 16,992
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:24:53 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:20:57 PM, Frederick53 wrote:
I'm ready to step back and acknowledge my bias, but you're clearly not.
You can prove my alleged bias only if you point out my faults. Have I claimed something against Obama that is obviously false? Have I been consistently dishonest about my claims? If so, call me whatever you wish.

You're
Your* -- English class over. Go home kids!

entire argument is based around your biased view that Romney is just BETTER than Obama.
I said countless things just in this threads that fit ONLY Obama and NOT Romney. That's not simply saying one is better than the other, full stop here. That's saying one is better than the other because of their respective records. Learn the difference.

Regardless of my left wing bias, I can tell you that Romney and Obama are not very different from each other when it comes to competency and the way that they'd run the country. I really don't care for either of them, even though I agree with Obama's social stances.
Good for you.
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:26:05 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:20:57 PM, Frederick53 wrote:
At 11/3/2012 10:14:55 PM, Mirza wrote:
At 11/3/2012 10:12:32 PM, Frederick53 wrote:
That's really unrealistic. You expect them to just flat out denounce one political candidate in favor of the other? You're literally advocating for bias.
No, I don't. I believe Romney did well as a businessman and governor, and that regardless of his faults, his record is far better than Obama's. Try again.

I'm ready to step back and acknowledge my bias, but you're clearly not. You're entire argument is based around your biased view that Romney is just BETTER than Obama. Regardless of my left wing bias, I can tell you that Romney and Obama are not very different from each other when it comes to competency and the way that they'd run the country. I really don't care for either of them, even though I agree with Obama's social stances.

don't bother with this one. He's stubborn and annoying. I'll let America deal with him soundly on tuesday night.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Mirza
Posts: 16,992
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:29:17 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:26:05 PM, 000ike wrote:
I'll let America deal with him
By announcing who the next president is going to be? I have to visit the toilet immediately. Too much fear to discharge.
JaxsonRaine
Posts: 3,606
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:30:39 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:26:05 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 11/3/2012 10:20:57 PM, Frederick53 wrote:
At 11/3/2012 10:14:55 PM, Mirza wrote:
At 11/3/2012 10:12:32 PM, Frederick53 wrote:
That's really unrealistic. You expect them to just flat out denounce one political candidate in favor of the other? You're literally advocating for bias.
No, I don't. I believe Romney did well as a businessman and governor, and that regardless of his faults, his record is far better than Obama's. Try again.

I'm ready to step back and acknowledge my bias, but you're clearly not. You're entire argument is based around your biased view that Romney is just BETTER than Obama. Regardless of my left wing bias, I can tell you that Romney and Obama are not very different from each other when it comes to competency and the way that they'd run the country. I really don't care for either of them, even though I agree with Obama's social stances.

don't bother with this one. He's stubborn and annoying. I'll let America deal with him soundly on tuesday night.

What will you do if Romney wins, Ike?
twocupcakes: 15 = 13
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:30:54 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:29:17 PM, Mirza wrote:
At 11/3/2012 10:26:05 PM, 000ike wrote:
I'll let America deal with him
By announcing who the next president is going to be? I have to visit the toilet immediately. Too much fear to discharge.

I'm not sure what this is...but I think it was supposed to be an insult, so I'll just leave it to collapse under its own self-evident failure.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/3/2012 10:32:03 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/3/2012 10:30:39 PM, JaxsonRaine wrote:
At 11/3/2012 10:26:05 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 11/3/2012 10:20:57 PM, Frederick53 wrote:
At 11/3/2012 10:14:55 PM, Mirza wrote:
At 11/3/2012 10:12:32 PM, Frederick53 wrote:
That's really unrealistic. You expect them to just flat out denounce one political candidate in favor of the other? You're literally advocating for bias.
No, I don't. I believe Romney did well as a businessman and governor, and that regardless of his faults, his record is far better than Obama's. Try again.

I'm ready to step back and acknowledge my bias, but you're clearly not. You're entire argument is based around your biased view that Romney is just BETTER than Obama. Regardless of my left wing bias, I can tell you that Romney and Obama are not very different from each other when it comes to competency and the way that they'd run the country. I really don't care for either of them, even though I agree with Obama's social stances.

don't bother with this one. He's stubborn and annoying. I'll let America deal with him soundly on tuesday night.

What will you do if Romney wins, Ike?

I'll leave DDO or I'll change my avatar to a pro-Romney campaign sign. Which would you prefer?...assuming you're going to do the same, should the reverse occur.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault