Total Posts:50|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Same-sex marriage passes in MD

Microsuck
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 7:31:17 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
Hey all,

I just learned that my home state of Maryland just passed same-sex marriage. Thank you to my fellow Marylanders. Thanks to you, I can finally get married.
Wall of Fail

Devil worship much? - SD
Newsflash: Atheists do not believe in the Devil! - Me
Newsflash: I doesnt matter if you think you do or not.....You do - SD

"you [imabench] are very naive and so i do not consider your opinions as having any merit. you must still be in highschool" - falconduler
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 7:33:10 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
But seriously cool.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
blameworthy
Posts: 431
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 7:34:27 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 7:31:17 AM, Microsuck wrote:
Hey all,

I just learned that my home state of Maryland just passed same-sex marriage. Thank you to my fellow Marylanders. Thanks to you, I can finally get married.

You should be thanking the liberals and reward them with your vote next time. The Republicans did not aid you in your quest for marriage.

I voted for Obama because Romney is garbage.
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 7:38:22 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 7:34:27 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 7:31:17 AM, Microsuck wrote:
Hey all,

I just learned that my home state of Maryland just passed same-sex marriage. Thank you to my fellow Marylanders. Thanks to you, I can finally get married.

You should be thanking the liberals and reward them with your vote next time. The Republicans did not aid you in your quest for marriage.

I voted for Obama because Romney is garbage.

gtfo.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
blameworthy
Posts: 431
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 7:46:07 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 7:38:22 AM, OberHerr wrote:
At 11/7/2012 7:34:27 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 7:31:17 AM, Microsuck wrote:
Hey all,

I just learned that my home state of Maryland just passed same-sex marriage. Thank you to my fellow Marylanders. Thanks to you, I can finally get married.

You should be thanking the liberals and reward them with your vote next time. The Republicans did not aid you in your quest for marriage.

I voted for Obama because Romney is garbage.

gtfo.

Oh, I am sorry, did the Republicans push for SSM or did they strive to block it at every turn?
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 7:57:36 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
Well, it's a state issue.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
blameworthy
Posts: 431
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:00:14 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 7:57:36 AM, 16kadams wrote:
Well, it's a state issue.

Yes, permitting people to have a right to marry is a state's issue. Tyranny by the state governments is acceptable because the Constitution does not ban it.

The homosexuals should leave all the conservative states so that the average IQ can drop by 50 points.
Microsuck
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:03:39 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 8:00:14 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 7:57:36 AM, 16kadams wrote:
Well, it's a state issue.

Yes, permitting people to have a right to marry is a state's issue. Tyranny by the state governments is acceptable because the Constitution does not ban it.

The homosexuals should leave all the conservative states so that the average IQ can drop by 50 points.

1. 16kadams is correct. The constitution does not give marriage to the federal gov't; therefore it is automatically left to the states. However, I do not believe the government should be in marriage. I believe it should be left to each individual.

2. If homosexuals leave the conservative states, the conservative states could get even more oppressive. Moreover, that kinda defeats the purpose.
Wall of Fail

Devil worship much? - SD
Newsflash: Atheists do not believe in the Devil! - Me
Newsflash: I doesnt matter if you think you do or not.....You do - SD

"you [imabench] are very naive and so i do not consider your opinions as having any merit. you must still be in highschool" - falconduler
blameworthy
Posts: 431
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:07:26 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 8:03:39 AM, Microsuck wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:00:14 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 7:57:36 AM, 16kadams wrote:
Well, it's a state issue.

Yes, permitting people to have a right to marry is a state's issue. Tyranny by the state governments is acceptable because the Constitution does not ban it.

The homosexuals should leave all the conservative states so that the average IQ can drop by 50 points.


1. 16kadams is correct. The constitution does not give marriage to the federal gov't; therefore it is automatically left to the states. However, I do not believe the government should be in marriage. I believe it should be left to each individual.

The Constitution does not say that all powers not granted to the Federal government go to the states.

Text of the 10th Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Republicans conveniently cut off the final portion of the quote to advocate state tyranny. Marriage is a human right that does not belong to the state, and the federal government is not violating any state's rights by ensuring that states cannot discriminate because the state does not have a right to do so in the first place.
2. If homosexuals leave the conservative states, the conservative states could get even more oppressive. Moreover, that kinda defeats the purpose.

Why should they care? They can move to liberal states and live meaningful lives while the conservative states sink into oblivion.
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:07:38 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 8:00:14 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 7:57:36 AM, 16kadams wrote:
Well, it's a state issue.

Yes, permitting people to have a right to marry is a state's issue. Tyranny by the state governments is acceptable because the Constitution does not ban it.

The homosexuals should leave all the conservative states so that the average IQ can drop by 50 points.

You sound very foolish. I doubt you are more intelligent then ANY of the active conservative forum posters and debaters. You seem like a guy that doesn't research his opinion, he assumes certian facts but forgets they have a rebuttal. Most active members know my opinion on the issue--I don't have time currently so I might rehash it later. But the arguments you like using are fully emotional with little rational basis.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
blameworthy
Posts: 431
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:07:51 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 8:07:26 AM, yoda878 wrote:
Yes good for you and now we just need plural marriage next!

What is wrong with polygamy?
blameworthy
Posts: 431
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:08:39 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 8:07:38 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:00:14 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 7:57:36 AM, 16kadams wrote:
Well, it's a state issue.

Yes, permitting people to have a right to marry is a state's issue. Tyranny by the state governments is acceptable because the Constitution does not ban it.

The homosexuals should leave all the conservative states so that the average IQ can drop by 50 points.

You sound very foolish. I doubt you are more intelligent then ANY of the active conservative forum posters and debaters. You seem like a guy that doesn't research his opinion, he assumes certian facts but forgets they have a rebuttal. Most active members know my opinion on the issue--I don't have time currently so I might rehash it later. But the arguments you like using are fully emotional with little rational basis.

Thank you for your hypocrisy. You resorted to an ad homimen attack in order to claim that my arguments were irrational.
yoda878
Posts: 902
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:09:39 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 8:07:51 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:07:26 AM, yoda878 wrote:
Yes good for you and now we just need plural marriage next!

What is wrong with polygamy?

Nothing except that its against the law
Me
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:09:51 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 8:08:39 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:07:38 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:00:14 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 7:57:36 AM, 16kadams wrote:
Well, it's a state issue.

Yes, permitting people to have a right to marry is a state's issue. Tyranny by the state governments is acceptable because the Constitution does not ban it.

The homosexuals should leave all the conservative states so that the average IQ can drop by 50 points.

You sound very foolish. I doubt you are more intelligent then ANY of the active conservative forum posters and debaters. You seem like a guy that doesn't research his opinion, he assumes certian facts but forgets they have a rebuttal. Most active members know my opinion on the issue--I don't have time currently so I might rehash it later. But the arguments you like using are fully emotional with little rational basis.

Thank you for your hypocrisy. You resorted to an ad homimen attack in order to claim that my arguments were irrational.

It's a rational observation I have obtained from watching your posts.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
TheAntidoter
Posts: 4,323
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:10:25 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 8:08:39 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:07:38 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:00:14 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 7:57:36 AM, 16kadams wrote:
Well, it's a state issue.

Yes, permitting people to have a right to marry is a state's issue. Tyranny by the state governments is acceptable because the Constitution does not ban it.

The homosexuals should leave all the conservative states so that the average IQ can drop by 50 points.

You sound very foolish. I doubt you are more intelligent then ANY of the active conservative forum posters and debaters. You seem like a guy that doesn't research his opinion, he assumes certian facts but forgets they have a rebuttal. Most active members know my opinion on the issue--I don't have time currently so I might rehash it later. But the arguments you like using are fully emotional with little rational basis.

Thank you for your hypocrisy. You resorted to an ad homimen attack in order to claim that my arguments were irrational.
Would it be hypocritical to say you are welcome too?
Affinity: Fire
Class: Human
Abilities: ????

Nac.

WOAH, COLORED FONT!
emj32
Posts: 111
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:12:18 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 8:07:38 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:00:14 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 7:57:36 AM, 16kadams wrote:
Well, it's a state issue.

Yes, permitting people to have a right to marry is a state's issue. Tyranny by the state governments is acceptable because the Constitution does not ban it.

The homosexuals should leave all the conservative states so that the average IQ can drop by 50 points.

You sound very foolish. I doubt you are more intelligent then ANY of the active conservative forum posters and debaters. You seem like a guy that doesn't research his opinion, he assumes certian facts but forgets they have a rebuttal. Most active members know my opinion on the issue--I don't have time currently so I might rehash it later. But the arguments you like using are fully emotional with little rational basis.

Only problem 16k, most of the conservatives living in the south aren't nearly as smart as you, or the other active conservative posters on this website. So their reasons for being against same-sex marriage are, unfortunately, less-rational and less-logical than yours. So if the homosexuals did leave the deep south, i wouldn't be all too surprised if the average IQ dropped a little.
blameworthy
Posts: 431
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:15:36 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 8:09:39 AM, yoda878 wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:07:51 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:07:26 AM, yoda878 wrote:
Yes good for you and now we just need plural marriage next!

What is wrong with polygamy?

Nothing except that its against the law

So polygamy should be illegal because it is against the law?

Haha, you must be a dumb conservative.
yoda878
Posts: 902
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:19:19 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 8:15:36 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:09:39 AM, yoda878 wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:07:51 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:07:26 AM, yoda878 wrote:
Yes good for you and now we just need plural marriage next!

What is wrong with polygamy?

Nothing except that its against the law

So polygamy should be illegal because it is against the law?

Haha, you must be a dumb conservative.

Your an idiot..... The only thing wrong is that its against the law. I never said that it should be so. My goodness!
Me
blameworthy
Posts: 431
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:20:06 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 8:19:19 AM, yoda878 wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:15:36 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:09:39 AM, yoda878 wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:07:51 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:07:26 AM, yoda878 wrote:
Yes good for you and now we just need plural marriage next!

What is wrong with polygamy?

Nothing except that its against the law

So polygamy should be illegal because it is against the law?

Haha, you must be a dumb conservative.

Your an idiot..... The only thing wrong is that its against the law. I never said that it should be so. My goodness!

You made a sarcastic comment that indicated that it should be illegal. Surely you must have reasons for this.
AlwaysMoreThanYou
Posts: 2,900
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:20:10 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 8:15:36 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:09:39 AM, yoda878 wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:07:51 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:07:26 AM, yoda878 wrote:
Yes good for you and now we just need plural marriage next!

What is wrong with polygamy?

Nothing except that its against the law

So polygamy should be illegal because it is against the law?

Haha, you must be a dumb conservative.

Did anyone say there was something wrong with polygamy?
'When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come.' - John 16:13
blameworthy
Posts: 431
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:20:40 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 8:09:51 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:08:39 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:07:38 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:00:14 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 7:57:36 AM, 16kadams wrote:
Well, it's a state issue.

Yes, permitting people to have a right to marry is a state's issue. Tyranny by the state governments is acceptable because the Constitution does not ban it.

The homosexuals should leave all the conservative states so that the average IQ can drop by 50 points.

You sound very foolish. I doubt you are more intelligent then ANY of the active conservative forum posters and debaters. You seem like a guy that doesn't research his opinion, he assumes certian facts but forgets they have a rebuttal. Most active members know my opinion on the issue--I don't have time currently so I might rehash it later. But the arguments you like using are fully emotional with little rational basis.

Thank you for your hypocrisy. You resorted to an ad homimen attack in order to claim that my arguments were irrational.

It's a rational observation I have obtained from watching your posts.

You had time to post an ad hominem attack but no time to discuss the real wording of the tenth amendment.
yoda878
Posts: 902
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 8:22:50 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 8:20:06 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:19:19 AM, yoda878 wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:15:36 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:09:39 AM, yoda878 wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:07:51 AM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 8:07:26 AM, yoda878 wrote:
Yes good for you and now we just need plural marriage next!

What is wrong with polygamy?

Nothing except that its against the law

So polygamy should be illegal because it is against the law?

Haha, you must be a dumb conservative.

Your an idiot..... The only thing wrong is that its against the law. I never said that it should be so. My goodness!

You made a sarcastic comment that indicated that it should be illegal. Surely you must have reasons for this.

Did you hear me say it? No! You have to hear sarcasm. Tell me why it is not ok that I want to legalize plural marriage? Why does that have to sarcastic?
Me
phantom
Posts: 6,774
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 11:35:25 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
Voted for it :)
"Music is a zen-like ecstatic state where you become the new man of the future, the Nietzschean merger of Apollo and Dionysus." Ray Manzarek (The Doors)
blameworthy
Posts: 431
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 12:11:34 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 11:42:16 AM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 11/7/2012 7:57:36 AM, 16kadams wrote:
Well, it's a state issue.

This.

Why is this a state issue? Give me one rational reason that state governements should be able to strip people of freedom of marriage.
blameworthy
Posts: 431
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 12:12:35 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
I think it is high time for the blue states to stop bankrolling the red states. We should split the country and put an embargo into place on red states. Their GDP will crash and they can live in their swamps.
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2012 6:25:04 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/7/2012 12:11:34 PM, blameworthy wrote:
At 11/7/2012 11:42:16 AM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 11/7/2012 7:57:36 AM, 16kadams wrote:
Well, it's a state issue.

This.

Why is this a state issue? Give me one rational reason that state governements should be able to strip people of freedom of marriage.

Can you give me one reason the government should be able to take away anything from us?
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-