Total Posts:9|Showing Posts:1-9
Jump to topic:

FBI: Reality Is Not Real

GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/18/2013 5:55:16 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
View the photos the FBI says you should ignore and dismiss. The Infowars reporters were on scene getting the scoop. They also cooperated with Anonymous.

Alex Jones exposed the patsy they were gonna roll out and so they had to switch patsies. Their first patsy was seen standing by the Navy Seals Blackwater ops captured on camera, that stopped them in their tracks.

Even people who hate Alex Jones are giving him props for his groundbreaking investigation.

http://www.infowars.com...
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
glassplotful
Posts: 52
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/18/2013 6:18:46 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
Responding to the Infowars article itself:

The FBI has attempted to blacklist photos

What evidence does Infowars have that the FBI has attempted to blacklist photos?

"other photos will not be deemed credible."


This wasn't the full FBI quote. Here is what they said:

"The photos and videos are posted for the public and media to use, review, and publicize. For clarity, these images should be the only ones and I emphasize the only ones the public should view to assist us. Other photos should not be deemed credible and they unnecessarily divert the public's attention in the wrong direction and create undue work for vital law enforcement resources."

This seems like a reasonable explanation to me. It seems like the FBI wants to focus on their two primary suspects right now. This is what a normal law enforcement agency does when they have primary suspects.

As Infowars has documented over the last two days, photos taken from the scene of the blast show numerous individuals wearing identical clothing while carrying heavy black backpacks, talking into cellphones.

But how many of them dropped a backpack on the ground right at the explosion site shortly before the explosion? The FBI has these two individuals as prime suspects for a reason. Where did the FBI say that they would completely disregard all other possible suspects? Right now, it looks like they're focused on these two. If these two suspects turn out to be innocent, they'll take a further look and consider more people as suspects.

and in one case placing one of the backpacks on the ground.


Where is the evidence? Does Infowars have a photo/video of this?

confronted by two large men at the end of the conference.

Where is the evidence?

In not only ignoring but aggressively attempting to discredit the photos showing men who are likely employees of the private security firm Craft International

They're not discrediting photos. They're only focusing on photos to do with the prime suspects at the moment. Also, where is the evidence of these Craft International employees?

As for the pictures:

A few Seals on the scene beforehand is not evidence of a conspiracy. Is a person who happens to be a Seal not allowed to live a normal life? These supposed Seals are not suspects because they weren't the ones who dropped the backpack off. That's the key to who's the prime suspect(s) here. The Seals never did anything suspicious so far as we know.
Sidewalker
Posts: 3,713
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2013 5:52:59 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/24/2013 12:43:22 AM, 1Percenter wrote:
The irony...

http://www.salon.com...

You can't deny reality, this post is clearly evidence that 1Percenter is part of the conspiracy theory to make the conspiracy theories look like a conspiracy theory against conspiracy theories.
"It is one of the commonest of mistakes to consider that the limit of our power of perception is also the limit of all there is to perceive." " C. W. Leadbeater
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2013 1:12:08 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/24/2013 12:43:22 AM, 1Percenter wrote:
The irony...

tttp://www.salon.com...

The last time they tried to connect a shooter to Alex Jones, it turned out they only visited Infowars to rant against him, he hated Alex Jones.

These guys probably only like Infowars because they expose our bad foreign policy.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Nidhogg
Posts: 503
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2013 2:39:20 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
Once again, SEAL logos are no proof of being a SEAL. I personally own a US Armed Forces Southwest Asia t-shirt inherited from a relative, but that doesn't mean I am in the Armed Forces. This proves literally nothing. Also, why the fvck would the FBI hire FULLY UNIFORMED security personnel displaying large identifying marks to detonate a bomb in the middle of a crowd of thousands of potential witnesses. Also, SEAL teams 3 and 5 are both not the most favourable special forces to have for this event as they are combat ops and not explosives specialists. An Army demo crew would be suspicious, but the SEALs are not a demo crew. The backpacks they hold are never dropped in any of infowars' photos. Most likely they are a private security detail which was on scene at the bombing, which is by no means out of place at a major sporting event with a huge crowd.

Finally, why the hell does Alex Jones show pictures of security REACTING TO THE BOMB AND DIRECTING PEOPLE. How is this not a normal reaction when a FVCKING BOMB JUST EXPLODED at the event they were assigned to secure?
Ridiculously Photogenic Debater

DDO's most mediocre member since at least a year ago
Nidhogg
Posts: 503
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2013 2:41:13 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/24/2013 1:12:08 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 4/24/2013 12:43:22 AM, 1Percenter wrote:
The irony...

tttp://www.salon.com...

The last time they tried to connect a shooter to Alex Jones, it turned out they only visited Infowars to rant against him, he hated Alex Jones.

These guys probably only like Infowars because they expose our bad foreign policy.

If these brothers wished to commit acts of terror against the US, then InfoWars' tales of a brutal police state and constant surveillance would have certainly served as a good justification to them.
Ridiculously Photogenic Debater

DDO's most mediocre member since at least a year ago
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2013 3:22:27 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/24/2013 2:41:13 PM, Nidhogg wrote:
These guys probably only like Infowars because they expose our bad foreign policy.

If these brothers wished to commit acts of terror against the US, then InfoWars' tales of a brutal police state and constant surveillance would have certainly served as a good justification to them.

Alex Jones is PRO-America. Didn't you hear him go 1776 on Piers Morgan? Alex Jones literally worships George Washington. He praises America all the time.

He says all the time, "this is not our government!" Alex Jones is not against our United States government, he is against the globalists who hijacked America.

Alex Jones' Infowars NOT ONCE ever said to bomb innocents or marathon runners. Alex Jones directs his anger at David Rockefeller, not marathons. You are a moron.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Double_R
Posts: 4,886
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2013 3:22:26 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/24/2013 3:22:27 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
He says all the time, "this is not our government!" Alex Jones is not against our United States government, he is against the globalists who hijacked America.

How exactly does gaining majority support of the American people through elections count as "hijacking"? Or is it your belief that our elections are all rigged?