Total Posts:21|Showing Posts:1-21
Jump to topic:

Bilderberg 2013 Agenda Disclosed!

GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2013 1:17:35 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
The Bilderberg Group plans to discuss:

- Civil unrest following economic downturn

- Controlling the internet and flow of information

- Smart cities (surveillance technocracies with telephone poles that listen to your conversations)

- etc.

Watch the video to get the low down from Paul Joseph Watson.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Eitan_Zohar
Posts: 2,697
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2013 2:05:24 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
Why is this bad? What exactly do the Illuminati plan that is so evil? If they want to unite the world under their government, why should I want to stop it?
"It is my ambition to say in ten sentences what others say in a whole book."
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2013 2:20:40 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 5/13/2013 2:05:24 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Why is this bad? What exactly do the Illuminati plan that is so evil? If they want to unite the world under their government, why should I want to stop it?

Are these rhetorical or are you that ignorant?

- Centralized power is bad

- They plan to control the world's resources

- They plan to create 1984 meets Brave New World. That's not speculation, that's admitted on record.

- They plan to use global warming hoax to initiate global governance and a carbon tax. Admitted and published on record by the Club of Rome (arm of the Illuminati).

- They plan to eliminate all property rights, restrict access to rural and suburb areas forcing everyone into hobbit homes inside dense cities "for the Earth" per Agenda 21.

- Mass surveillance state, no privacy.

- They will impose a transhumanist technocracy where they plan to merge with machines to be a separate superior race to rule over us. We will also enter transhumanist slavery, but only to dumb us down not empower us.

- There will be a world central bank which will be a global version of the Federal Reserve with fiat, unbacked paper currency where they parasite off of us with market manipulations and artificial interest rates.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2013 3:54:42 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
Bilderberg is merging with Google under the stewardship of Google CEO Eric Schmidt, a regular Bilderberg attendee. Google"s annual Zeitgeist conference, which has been based at the Grove since 2007, immediately precedes the Bilderberg Group conference by a matter of days.

Backed up by prior research, we were able to confirm in conversations with hotel managers and others that the Grove is now a central base for Google"s agenda to control the global political and technological landscape.

The talk in the Grove is not of Bilderberg, that is barely a footnote, the real excitement centers around Google Zeitgeist, which was described by the London Independent as, "a cuddlier version of the Bilderberg Group, the supposedly shadowy network of financiers that holds a private annual assembly, recast in the image of our new tech masters."

Bilderberg is indeed being recast as "Google-Berg" " partly because of efforts on behalf of activists to tear away the veil of Bilderberg"s much cherished secrecy, and partly as a means of re-branding authoritarian, undemocratic secret gatherings of elites as trendy, liberal, feel-good philanthropic-style forums like Google Zeitgeist and TED.

http://www.infowars.com...
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Agent_Orange
Posts: 2,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2013 4:27:45 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 5/13/2013 2:20:40 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 5/13/2013 2:05:24 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Why is this bad? What exactly do the Illuminati plan that is so evil? If they want to unite the world under their government, why should I want to stop it?

Are these rhetorical or are you that ignorant?

- Centralized power is bad

- They plan to control the world's resources

- They plan to create 1984 meets Brave New World. That's not speculation, that's admitted on record.

- They plan to use global warming hoax to initiate global governance and a carbon tax. Admitted and published on record by the Club of Rome (arm of the Illuminati).

- They plan to eliminate all property rights, restrict access to rural and suburb areas forcing everyone into hobbit homes inside dense cities "for the Earth" per Agenda 21.

- Mass surveillance state, no privacy.

- They will impose a transhumanist technocracy where they plan to merge with machines to be a separate superior race to rule over us. We will also enter transhumanist slavery, but only to dumb us down not empower us.

- There will be a world central bank which will be a global version of the Federal Reserve with fiat, unbacked paper currency where they parasite off of us with market manipulations and artificial interest rates.

I love it when you jump the shark, it is truly a work of art.
#BlackLivesMatter
Wnope
Posts: 6,924
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2013 7:53:26 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 5/13/2013 1:17:35 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:


The Bilderberg Group plans to discuss:

- Civil unrest following economic downturn

- Controlling the internet and flow of information

- Smart cities (surveillance technocracies with telephone poles that listen to your conversations)

- etc.

Watch the video to get the low down from Paul Joseph Watson.

So....they're going to discuss the most important issues for global finance...and you're shocked?

If they talked about the Holocaust, would you assume they're trying to put forward revisionism?
Wnope
Posts: 6,924
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2013 7:58:34 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 5/13/2013 3:54:42 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
Bilderberg is merging with Google under the stewardship of Google CEO Eric Schmidt, a regular Bilderberg attendee. Google"s annual Zeitgeist conference, which has been based at the Grove since 2007, immediately precedes the Bilderberg Group conference by a matter of days.

Backed up by prior research, we were able to confirm in conversations with hotel managers and others that the Grove is now a central base for Google"s agenda to control the global political and technological landscape.

The talk in the Grove is not of Bilderberg, that is barely a footnote, the real excitement centers around Google Zeitgeist, which was described by the London Independent as, "a cuddlier version of the Bilderberg Group, the supposedly shadowy network of financiers that holds a private annual assembly, recast in the image of our new tech masters."

Bilderberg is indeed being recast as "Google-Berg" " partly because of efforts on behalf of activists to tear away the veil of Bilderberg"s much cherished secrecy, and partly as a means of re-branding authoritarian, undemocratic secret gatherings of elites as trendy, liberal, feel-good philanthropic-style forums like Google Zeitgeist and TED.

http://www.infowars.com...

Did you read the Info link?

"For conspiracy theorists, the conference, staged by the search engine giant, which reported a 60 per cent surge in earnings to $2.89bn this year, is a cuddlier version of the Bilderberg Group, the supposedly shadowy network of financiers that holds a private annual assembly, recast in the image of our new tech masters."

"Jealousy may account for some of the suspicion directed at the Grove gathering. Real insiders know that Britain's power brokers won't be found at Zeitgeist " they are assembling today at the RHS Chelsea Flower Show."

Wanna know what kind of world powers were there?

"Zeitgeist attendees, who included acoustic singer-songwriter Ed Sheeran, Jamal Edwards, a 21-year-old online music entrepreneur from Acton, and fashion designer Dame Vivienne Westwood, did gain an insight into Europe's debt crisis from George Papandreous, the former Greek Prime Minister."

"Lily Cole used Zeitgeist to launch a new "social giving" network, impossible.com, with Jimmy Wales, the Wikipedia co-founder, as her "angel investor". The model said the site, based around a gifting economy concept, would "translate social media relationships into actually valuable relations for good"."

"The conference's aim, to capture the "spirit of the times", also allowed for entertaining diversions such as Jon Snow, the Channel 4 News presenter, who posited a gender gap between programme guests " female experts undersell their expertise, while men offer opinions whatever the subject"
Magic8000
Posts: 975
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2013 9:35:57 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 5/13/2013 1:17:35 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:


The Bilderberg Group plans to discuss:

- Civil unrest following economic downturn

- Controlling the internet and flow of information

- Smart cities (surveillance technocracies with telephone poles that listen to your conversations)

- etc.

Watch the video to get the low down from Paul Joseph Watson.

Same old conspiracy sh1t. Just like the last 5 years.
404 coherent debate topic not found. Please restart the debate with clear resolution.

"So Magic8000 believes Einstein was a proctologist who was persuaded by the Government and Hitler to fabricate the Theory of Relativity"- GWL-CPA
Eitan_Zohar
Posts: 2,697
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2013 9:44:35 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 5/13/2013 2:20:40 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 5/13/2013 2:05:24 PM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Why is this bad? What exactly do the Illuminati plan that is so evil? If they want to unite the world under their government, why should I want to stop it?

Are these rhetorical or are you that ignorant?

- Centralized power is bad

- They plan to control the world's resources

- They plan to create 1984 meets Brave New World. That's not speculation, that's admitted on record.

- They plan to use global warming hoax to initiate global governance and a carbon tax. Admitted and published on record by the Club of Rome (arm of the Illuminati).

- They plan to eliminate all property rights, restrict access to rural and suburb areas forcing everyone into hobbit homes inside dense cities "for the Earth" per Agenda 21.

- Mass surveillance state, no privacy.

- They will impose a transhumanist technocracy where they plan to merge with machines to be a separate superior race to rule over us. We will also enter transhumanist slavery, but only to dumb us down not empower us.

- There will be a world central bank which will be a global version of the Federal Reserve with fiat, unbacked paper currency where they parasite off of us with market manipulations and artificial interest rates.

I liiiike it. How do you join?
"It is my ambition to say in ten sentences what others say in a whole book."
drhead
Posts: 1,475
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2013 10:28:51 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
Geo, just because Infowars claims to have an "inside source" doesn't mean that they actually have a reliable inside source and aren't acting on confirmation bias. Why don't you understand this?
Wall of Fail

"You reject religion... calling it a sickness, to what ends??? Are you a Homosexual??" - Dogknox
"For me, Evolution is a zombie theory. I mean imaginary cartoons and wishful thinking support it?" - Dragonfang
"There are no mental health benefits of atheism. It is devoid of rational thinking and mental protection." - Gabrian
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2013 11:27:03 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
Here's the fleshed out list provided by Paul Joseph Watson:

- Targeting Iran"s nuclear processing facilities for destruction via air strikes within the next 3 years if Tehran refuses to give up its nuclear program.
- Prolonging the war in Syria by arming the rebels and overturning recent military victories by Assad"s forces.
- The threat of a global pandemic, caused in part by rising resistance to antibiotics, which given the role of some of the pharmaceutical companies represented at Bilderberg in "accidentally" releasing viruses is somewhat rich.
- The manufacturing revolution of 3D printing and ways to control it and prevent the democratization of production.
- So-called "cyber resilience," which means more state control over the Internet. There is much talk of "Digital Wildfires" " they are scared stiff about losing control over information dissemination.
- Setting up a Ministry of Truth for the Internet similar to that advocated by Bill Clinton. Controlling what can be published on the Internet.
- Advancing so-called "smart cities" that spy on every aspect of public behavior. Installing systems like Intellistreets that record street conversations. Rolling out the landscape of the technocracy.
- The threat caused to social stability by declining living standards and wealth.
- A desperate last gasp move to prevent Britain from leaving the EU and crushing the dream of a centralized European federation.
- More bailouts to prop up the euro.
- Minimal economic growth in 2013.
- Increasing the amount of power obtained by central banks under the guise of "bank reform".
- Organizing more aggressive powers of tax collection
- Managing a growing credit bubble that threatens runaway inflation in Europe.

http://www.infowars.com...
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Wnope
Posts: 6,924
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2013 11:49:33 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 5/13/2013 11:27:03 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
Here's the fleshed out list provided by Paul Joseph Watson:

- Targeting Iran"s nuclear processing facilities for destruction via air strikes within the next 3 years if Tehran refuses to give up its nuclear program.
- Prolonging the war in Syria by arming the rebels and overturning recent military victories by Assad"s forces.
- The threat of a global pandemic, caused in part by rising resistance to antibiotics, which given the role of some of the pharmaceutical companies represented at Bilderberg in "accidentally" releasing viruses is somewhat rich.
- The manufacturing revolution of 3D printing and ways to control it and prevent the democratization of production.
- So-called "cyber resilience," which means more state control over the Internet. There is much talk of "Digital Wildfires" " they are scared stiff about losing control over information dissemination.
- Setting up a Ministry of Truth for the Internet similar to that advocated by Bill Clinton. Controlling what can be published on the Internet.
- Advancing so-called "smart cities" that spy on every aspect of public behavior. Installing systems like Intellistreets that record street conversations. Rolling out the landscape of the technocracy.
- The threat caused to social stability by declining living standards and wealth.
- A desperate last gasp move to prevent Britain from leaving the EU and crushing the dream of a centralized European federation.
- More bailouts to prop up the euro.
- Minimal economic growth in 2013.
- Increasing the amount of power obtained by central banks under the guise of "bank reform".
- Organizing more aggressive powers of tax collection
- Managing a growing credit bubble that threatens runaway inflation in Europe.

http://www.infowars.com...

So you quoted the EXACT SAME article I just showed had a completely bogus link?

Nice Geo. Really Nice.
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/14/2013 1:41:26 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 5/13/2013 11:49:33 PM, Wnope wrote:
So you quoted the EXACT SAME article I just showed had a completely bogus link?

Nice Geo. Really Nice.

The London Independent is not bogus. You haven't refuted jacksh!t. And I know what your quarrel is and it's utter nonsense.

http://www.independent.co.uk...
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Wnope
Posts: 6,924
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/14/2013 4:25:43 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 5/14/2013 1:41:26 AM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 5/13/2013 11:49:33 PM, Wnope wrote:
So you quoted the EXACT SAME article I just showed had a completely bogus link?

Nice Geo. Really Nice.

The London Independent is not bogus. You haven't refuted jacksh!t. And I know what your quarrel is and it's utter nonsense.

http://www.independent.co.uk...

Infowar is bogus because the article they use as a source explicitly argues against a conspiracy interpretation calling it all but moronic.
drhead
Posts: 1,475
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/14/2013 7:57:54 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
Plus, do you even know what a technocracy is? By what you've said so far, I don't think you do.
Wall of Fail

"You reject religion... calling it a sickness, to what ends??? Are you a Homosexual??" - Dogknox
"For me, Evolution is a zombie theory. I mean imaginary cartoons and wishful thinking support it?" - Dragonfang
"There are no mental health benefits of atheism. It is devoid of rational thinking and mental protection." - Gabrian
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/14/2013 10:32:53 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 5/14/2013 4:25:43 AM, Wnope wrote:
Infowar is bogus because the article they use as a source explicitly argues against a conspiracy interpretation calling it all but moronic.

That means nothing. Why can't they cite sources that disagree with them?

Btw, there were dozens of hyperlinks, not just one.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
drhead
Posts: 1,475
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/14/2013 12:14:23 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 5/14/2013 10:32:53 AM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 5/14/2013 4:25:43 AM, Wnope wrote:
Infowar is bogus because the article they use as a source explicitly argues against a conspiracy interpretation calling it all but moronic.

That means nothing. Why can't they cite sources that disagree with them?

Btw, there were dozens of hyperlinks, not just one.

What they did would be sort of like me saying "Oh, I'm so sure that 9/11 was a conspiracy by the government. After all, Geo said it, so it has to be right" in a facetious manner, then you citing that as evidence that you're right. In both cases, it is clear that the statement was not intended to be taken seriously.
Wall of Fail

"You reject religion... calling it a sickness, to what ends??? Are you a Homosexual??" - Dogknox
"For me, Evolution is a zombie theory. I mean imaginary cartoons and wishful thinking support it?" - Dragonfang
"There are no mental health benefits of atheism. It is devoid of rational thinking and mental protection." - Gabrian
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/14/2013 12:27:16 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 5/14/2013 12:14:23 PM, drhead wrote:
At 5/14/2013 10:32:53 AM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 5/14/2013 4:25:43 AM, Wnope wrote:
Infowar is bogus because the article they use as a source explicitly argues against a conspiracy interpretation calling it all but moronic.

That means nothing. Why can't they cite sources that disagree with them?

Btw, there were dozens of hyperlinks, not just one.

What they did would be sort of like me saying "Oh, I'm so sure that 9/11 was a conspiracy by the government. After all, Geo said it, so it has to be right" in a facetious manner, then you citing that as evidence that you're right. In both cases, it is clear that the statement was not intended to be taken seriously.

Except it wasn't facetious. The London Independent is very pro-conspiracism, they said the Rothschilds are puppet masters. So in the article they said "conspiracy theorists say" just to cover their butts.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
drhead
Posts: 1,475
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/14/2013 1:22:42 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 5/14/2013 12:27:16 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 5/14/2013 12:14:23 PM, drhead wrote:
At 5/14/2013 10:32:53 AM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 5/14/2013 4:25:43 AM, Wnope wrote:
Infowar is bogus because the article they use as a source explicitly argues against a conspiracy interpretation calling it all but moronic.

That means nothing. Why can't they cite sources that disagree with them?

Btw, there were dozens of hyperlinks, not just one.

What they did would be sort of like me saying "Oh, I'm so sure that 9/11 was a conspiracy by the government. After all, Geo said it, so it has to be right" in a facetious manner, then you citing that as evidence that you're right. In both cases, it is clear that the statement was not intended to be taken seriously.

Except it wasn't facetious. The London Independent is very pro-conspiracism, they said the Rothschilds are puppet masters. So in the article they said "conspiracy theorists say" just to cover their butts.

So how many conspiracy theorists have to cite each other before their claims become true?

And since when does agreeing with one conspiracy theory equate to being a reliable source on all conspiracy theories?

In addition, you haven't told me what you think a "technocracy" is, since you seem to have such a low opinion of it.
Wall of Fail

"You reject religion... calling it a sickness, to what ends??? Are you a Homosexual??" - Dogknox
"For me, Evolution is a zombie theory. I mean imaginary cartoons and wishful thinking support it?" - Dragonfang
"There are no mental health benefits of atheism. It is devoid of rational thinking and mental protection." - Gabrian
Wnope
Posts: 6,924
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/14/2013 5:47:39 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 5/14/2013 12:27:16 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 5/14/2013 12:14:23 PM, drhead wrote:
At 5/14/2013 10:32:53 AM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 5/14/2013 4:25:43 AM, Wnope wrote:
Infowar is bogus because the article they use as a source explicitly argues against a conspiracy interpretation calling it all but moronic.

That means nothing. Why can't they cite sources that disagree with them?

Btw, there were dozens of hyperlinks, not just one.

What they did would be sort of like me saying "Oh, I'm so sure that 9/11 was a conspiracy by the government. After all, Geo said it, so it has to be right" in a facetious manner, then you citing that as evidence that you're right. In both cases, it is clear that the statement was not intended to be taken seriously.

Except it wasn't facetious. The London Independent is very pro-conspiracism, they said the Rothschilds are puppet masters. So in the article they said "conspiracy theorists say" just to cover their butts.

Did you read the article? They spend the entire time making fun of conspiracists and how ridiculous the concept is.

It's not a "cover" its the theme of the article. How people like you are ridiculous for this interpretation.
drhead
Posts: 1,475
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/14/2013 7:47:22 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
By the way, Geo, I'm still waiting for you to define "technocracy" and "transhumanism". Since you're attacking a form of government that I think has merit and an intellectual movement that I hold very dearly and deeming them as nothing but a plot to take over the world, I thought you might have a list of well-thought-out complaints. Please don't disappoint me and tell me you don't really have anything against them beyond the fact that an Infowars article said them like they were a bad thing.
Wall of Fail

"You reject religion... calling it a sickness, to what ends??? Are you a Homosexual??" - Dogknox
"For me, Evolution is a zombie theory. I mean imaginary cartoons and wishful thinking support it?" - Dragonfang
"There are no mental health benefits of atheism. It is devoid of rational thinking and mental protection." - Gabrian