Total Posts:121|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Repository of Reptilian Evidence

GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:17:08 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Since so many people have asked for evidence of Reptilians, I have decided to reveal my own repository of Reptilian research that I compiled a while back.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
http://www.crystalinks.com...
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
http://www.reptilianagenda.com...
http://www.reptoids.com...
http://www.panspermia.org...

http://www.davidicke.com...
http://www.luisprada.com...
http://www.reptilianagenda.com...

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
http://ufoexperiences.blogspot.com...

http://www.freewebs.com...
http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr...
http://www.freewebs.com...
http://www.thewatcherfiles.com...
http://www.thewatcherfiles.com...
http://www.redicecreations.com...
http://www.reptoids.com...
http://www.illuminati-news.com...
http://reptoids.50megs.com...
http://illuminati-news.com...

http://www.youtube.com... /watch?v=SxvQF6oBQYk
http://www.youtube.com... /watch?v=rFWdfahbUSg
http://www.youtube.com... /watch?v=yKW1JNEwP94
http://www.youtube.com... /watch?v=TmXmzskz1qI
http://www.youtube.com... /watch?v=A0TVJmPn9OM
http://www.youtube.com... /watch?v=CXKjo5hP_HA
http://www.youtube.com... /watch?v=ckOOrWYXuY0
http://www.youtube.com... /watch?v=kv2l93v4v0g
http://www.youtube.com... /watch?v=kqsU-KnI-ac

The research of Dr Arthur David Horn, a former professor of biological anthropology at Colorado State University in Fort Collins and PhD graduate of Yale University wrote a book called Humanity's Extraterrestrial Origins detailing the evidence that the human race was created here by Reptilian aliens.

Direct evidence is defined as "testimony/other proof which expressly or straight-forwardly proves the existence of a fact. Direct evidence is evidence which, if believed, proves the existence of the fact in issue without inference or presumption. It is evidence which comes from one who speaks directly of his or her own knowledge on the main or ultimate fact to be proved, or who saw or heard the factual matters which are the subject of the testimony."

List of direct evidence:

Disclosure Project - "We have over 400 government, military, and intelligence community witnesses testifying to their direct, personal, first hand experience with UFOs, ETs, ET technology, and the cover-up that keeps this information secret." - disclosureproject.org

Others with direct contact / witness:

Arizona Wilder (Illuminati sex slave mind control victim)
Phil Schneider (Federal Deep Underground Military Base employee)
Alex Collier
Peggy Kane
Stewart Swerdlow (Victim/Insider of Montauk Project)
Cathy O' Brien (Illuminati sex slave)
Treee
Svali (Illuminist)
Leo Zagami (Illuminist)
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:25:03 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Lolwitnesses.

Geo, play some mafia, I'd love to see your epistemology fail at it ^_^.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:29:09 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:25:03 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
Lolwitnesses.

Geo, play some mafia, I'd love to see your epistemology fail at it ^_^.

That was Wikipedia's definition of "direct evidence."
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:30:27 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
...And?

If I give you wikipedia's definition of penis, are you going to suck one?
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
TheSkeptic
Posts: 1,362
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:31:45 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Nothing surprising - all your evidence is a compilation of testimonies and hasty speculation; why am I not surprised that every conspiracy theory shares the same epistemological history?
Rezzealaux
Posts: 2,251
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:33:41 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:31:45 PM, TheSkeptic wrote:
Nothing surprising - all your evidence is a compilation of testimonies and hasty speculation; why am I not surprised that every conspiracy theory shares the same epistemological history?

This post looks like a hasty speculation to me.
: If you weren't new here, you'd know not to feed me such attention. This is like an orgasm in my brain right now. *hehe, my name is in a title, hehe* (http://www.debate.org...)

Just in case I get into some BS with FREEDO again about how he's NOT a narcissist.

"The law is there to destroy evil under the constitutional government."
So... what's there to destroy evil inside of and above the constitutional government?
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:34:22 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:31:45 PM, TheSkeptic wrote:
Nothing surprising - all your evidence is a compilation of testimonies and hasty speculation; why am I not surprised that every conspiracy theory shares the same epistemological history?

Wrong. One link has photographic evidence of a shape-shifting Reptilian. Another link describes a person who witnessed a Reptilian, and passed a polygraph test.

Also, a PhD biologist from Yale wrote a book detailing evidence of Reptilian origins of humanity.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Rezzealaux
Posts: 2,251
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:37:53 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:34:22 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
and passed a polygraph test.

I don't think polygraph tests only trigger when a person says something they don't actually believe. If a person observed something and he/she identified it as a Reptilian, doesn't the polygraph not go off if they testified "I saw a Reptilian"?
: If you weren't new here, you'd know not to feed me such attention. This is like an orgasm in my brain right now. *hehe, my name is in a title, hehe* (http://www.debate.org...)

Just in case I get into some BS with FREEDO again about how he's NOT a narcissist.

"The law is there to destroy evil under the constitutional government."
So... what's there to destroy evil inside of and above the constitutional government?
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:38:14 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:34:22 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 3/30/2010 8:31:45 PM, TheSkeptic wrote:
Nothing surprising - all your evidence is a compilation of testimonies and hasty speculation; why am I not surprised that every conspiracy theory shares the same epistemological history?

Wrong. One link has photographic evidence of a shape-shifting Reptilian. Another link describes a person who witnessed a Reptilian, and passed a polygraph test.
Polygraph tests aren't supposed to test for someone who believes their own crap due to insanity or the similar effects of just being a good enough liar to eventually believe yourself, and they aren't even good at what they ARE supposed to do.


Also, a PhD biologist from Yale wrote a book detailing evidence of Reptilian origins of humanity.
You mean evidence that reptiles evolved into mammals, of which eventually a human was one variety? That doesn't establish reptilian humanoids. Anyway, ad authoritatem.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Rezzealaux
Posts: 2,251
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:38:51 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:37:53 PM, Rezzealaux wrote:
At 3/30/2010 8:34:22 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
and passed a polygraph test.

I think [NOT "I don't think"] polygraph tests only trigger when a person says something they don't actually believe. If a person observed something and he/she identified it as a Reptilian, doesn't the polygraph not go off if they testified "I saw a Reptilian"?

major fixed.
: If you weren't new here, you'd know not to feed me such attention. This is like an orgasm in my brain right now. *hehe, my name is in a title, hehe* (http://www.debate.org...)

Just in case I get into some BS with FREEDO again about how he's NOT a narcissist.

"The law is there to destroy evil under the constitutional government."
So... what's there to destroy evil inside of and above the constitutional government?
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:39:06 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Add stupidity to the list of things polygraphs don't test for of course.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:41:58 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:38:14 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
At 3/30/2010 8:34:22 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 3/30/2010 8:31:45 PM, TheSkeptic wrote:
Nothing surprising - all your evidence is a compilation of testimonies and hasty speculation; why am I not surprised that every conspiracy theory shares the same epistemological history?

Wrong. One link has photographic evidence of a shape-shifting Reptilian. Another link describes a person who witnessed a Reptilian, and passed a polygraph test.
Polygraph tests aren't supposed to test for someone who believes their own crap due to insanity or the similar effects of just being a good enough liar to eventually believe yourself, and they aren't even good at what they ARE supposed to do.



Also, a PhD biologist from Yale wrote a book detailing evidence of Reptilian origins of humanity.
You mean evidence that reptiles evolved into mammals, of which eventually a human was one variety? That doesn't establish reptilian humanoids. Anyway, ad authoritatem.

Ad authoritatem because it doesn't prove it, yes. But it DOES lend credibility because it is his specialization and he is a scholar.

A summary of what the biologist said:

"Purely on the weight of evidence and his own experience, he is now convinced that humanity was seeded by extraterrestrials and that a reptilian race has controlled the planet for thousands of years and continues to do so today. This is my own view, although I have taken a very different life path to reach those same conclusions. Dr Horn s research is detailed in his excellent book, Humanity s Extraterrestrial Origins1 in which he suggests that the ones the Sumerian Tablets call the Anunnaki are this reptile race, another point with which we agree. The famed British astrophysicist, Fred Hoyle, told a London press conference as long ago as 1971 that the world was controlled by a force which could manifest in many forms. They are everywhere, he told astonished journalists, in the sky, in the sea and on the Earth... He said that they controlled humanity through the mind." - David Icke
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:43:10 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:41:50 PM, Koopin wrote:
Your youtubes all failed.

No, I purposely listed them as links. I didn't want 10 YouTube videos to clutter the page.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
TheSkeptic
Posts: 1,362
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:44:03 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Ad authoritatem because it doesn't prove it, yes. But it DOES lend credibility because it is his specialization and he is a scholar.

Alright, then by the same standard the consensus of every other legitimate professor massively outweighs this. Congrats, you have defeated your own point :)

And by hasty speculation, it also includes the examination of photos. I guarantee that if you take the photos to a group of specialists they can pick out the faults in it. It will either be a poor image of something we already know, or a fraud.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:45:02 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:41:58 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 3/30/2010 8:38:14 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
At 3/30/2010 8:34:22 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 3/30/2010 8:31:45 PM, TheSkeptic wrote:
Nothing surprising - all your evidence is a compilation of testimonies and hasty speculation; why am I not surprised that every conspiracy theory shares the same epistemological history?

Wrong. One link has photographic evidence of a shape-shifting Reptilian. Another link describes a person who witnessed a Reptilian, and passed a polygraph test.
Polygraph tests aren't supposed to test for someone who believes their own crap due to insanity or the similar effects of just being a good enough liar to eventually believe yourself, and they aren't even good at what they ARE supposed to do.



Also, a PhD biologist from Yale wrote a book detailing evidence of Reptilian origins of humanity.
You mean evidence that reptiles evolved into mammals, of which eventually a human was one variety? That doesn't establish reptilian humanoids. Anyway, ad authoritatem.

Ad authoritatem because it doesn't prove it, yes. But it DOES lend credibility because it is his specialization and he is a scholar.

A summary of what the biologist said:

"Purely on the weight of evidence and his own experience, he is now convinced that humanity was seeded by extraterrestrials
Extraterrestriality has nothing to do with any real scientific specialties.

The famed British astrophysicist, Fred Hoyle, told a London press conference as long ago as 1971 that the world was controlled by a force which could manifest in many forms. They are everywhere, he told astonished journalists, in the sky, in the sea and on the Earth... He said that they controlled humanity through the mind." - David Icke
Do you not realize that this is a contradiction?
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Rezzealaux
Posts: 2,251
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:46:34 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:41:58 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
A summary of what the biologist said:

"Purely on the weight of evidence and his own experience, he is now convinced that humanity was seeded by extraterrestrials and that a reptilian race has controlled the planet for thousands of years and continues to do so today.

I don't have anything against David Icke or the Reptilian theory externally, but it internally doesn't make much sense to me. If the claim is that reptilians seeded humanity specifically, that does not explain why scientists can find a sufficient link to substantiate a theory saying that man evolved from apes. Unless of course, these reptilians are such genius biotech guys that they can splice the gene that perfectly. Now if that isn't the case, then the seeding must've been done a hell of a long time before that. So, why "thousands", and not "millions"?
: If you weren't new here, you'd know not to feed me such attention. This is like an orgasm in my brain right now. *hehe, my name is in a title, hehe* (http://www.debate.org...)

Just in case I get into some BS with FREEDO again about how he's NOT a narcissist.

"The law is there to destroy evil under the constitutional government."
So... what's there to destroy evil inside of and above the constitutional government?
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:47:21 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:37:19 PM, Nags wrote:
I feel bad for you, Geo.

Not really though. It's just embarrassing.

Why does a conspiracy theorist get this reaction yet it is conventional wisdom believed by 90% of the world that men walk on water and space daddies reside in the sky?

I know you personally disagree with religion, but you think it is quite commonplace to hold Christian beliefs. So what's with the double standard.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:49:36 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:46:34 PM, Rezzealaux wrote:
At 3/30/2010 8:41:58 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
A summary of what the biologist said:

"Purely on the weight of evidence and his own experience, he is now convinced that humanity was seeded by extraterrestrials and that a reptilian race has controlled the planet for thousands of years and continues to do so today.

I don't have anything against David Icke or the Reptilian theory externally, but it internally doesn't make much sense to me. If the claim is that reptilians seeded humanity specifically, that does not explain why scientists can find a sufficient link to substantiate a theory saying that man evolved from apes. Unless of course, these reptilians are such genius biotech guys that they can splice the gene that perfectly. Now if that isn't the case, then the seeding must've been done a hell of a long time before that. So, why "thousands", and not "millions"?

The Sumerian tablets say the Reptilian Annunaki were master geneticists.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Xer
Posts: 7,776
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:50:45 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:47:21 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
Why does a conspiracy theorist get this reaction yet it is conventional wisdom believed by 90% of the world that men walk on water and space daddies reside in the sky?

Honestly, that sounds much more plausible than your theory about shape-shifting reptilians controlling Earth. I still think both groups are nuts, though.

I know you personally disagree with religion, but you think it is quite commonplace to hold Christian beliefs. So what's with the double standard.

I feel bad for people who believe in Christianity and other religions too. You just astound me that you can see all the problems with religion but you can't see the problems with David Icke-ism. The man has literally brainwashed you to a point where you will never come back. It's akin to believing that a man once elected now can talk to God and is infallible (the Pope). It's just silliness.
Xer
Posts: 7,776
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:55:53 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:53:26 PM, Puck wrote:
K, so I clicked one at random.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

Fail. :(

The photographs above depict reptilian visual configurations that have been deemed accurate by one individual who has had contact with them.

Fail, indeed.
Volkov
Posts: 9,765
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:56:15 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
I've gotta say, Geo, I spent about 10 minutes going through some, and I found none too convincing, either full of unverifiable testimony or shaky subjective interpretation.

I'm willing to debate you on it, though. Granted, I don't know if you'd want to take such a position - I have a feeling not only the site, but the evidence, is against you.
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 8:58:09 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:50:45 PM, Nags wrote:
At 3/30/2010 8:47:21 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
Why does a conspiracy theorist get this reaction yet it is conventional wisdom believed by 90% of the world that men walk on water and space daddies reside in the sky?

Honestly, that sounds much more plausible than your theory about shape-shifting reptilians controlling Earth. I still think both groups are nuts, though.

Alien life; plausible and scientifically sound. God; not even found anywhere near science. Alien life intervening; there are accounts of it every day. God intervening; none to be found.

I know you personally disagree with religion, but you think it is quite commonplace to hold Christian beliefs. So what's with the double standard.

I feel bad for people who believe in Christianity and other religions too. You just astound me that you can see all the problems with religion but you can't see the problems with David Icke-ism. The man has literally brainwashed you to a point where you will never come back. It's akin to believing that a man once elected now can talk to God and is infallible (the Pope). It's just silliness.

David Icke says, "I let the information guide me, not preconceived ideas." I see nothing wrong with formulating theories based on facts and evidence cause that's what he does. All of his books are heavily sourced and filled with facts and evidence, and based on that, he comes to conclusions. You can come to a different conclusion than him, but the basis of facts and evidence are irrefutable.

And he himself is against ALL "isms." He said that if you can put a name to what you believe, you have fire-walled off your mind to all knowledge.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Xer
Posts: 7,776
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 9:00:59 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 8:58:09 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
Alien life; plausible and scientifically sound. God; not even found anywhere near science. Alien life intervening; there are accounts of it every day. God intervening; none to be found.

Alien life is possible. Alien life intervening and accounts of it every day is non-existent. I've heard much better arguments for God than for shape-shifting Reptilians.

David Icke

Stopped reading here. Like I said, you're been brainwashed.
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 9:02:18 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 9:00:59 PM, Nags wrote:
At 3/30/2010 8:58:09 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
David Icke

Stopped reading here. Like I said, you're been brainwashed.

Sheer ignorance. When faced from a sound argument, you run away like a coward. How about you respond or acknowledge what I said.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Volkov
Posts: 9,765
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 9:03:38 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 9:00:59 PM, Nags wrote:
Alien life is possible. Alien life intervening and accounts of it every day is non-existent.

Well, not necessarily. There's no supportive proof of aliens who interfere in our specie's affairs, but if you grant that alien life is possible, well, it isn't necessarily a big stretch to say they know we're here, and meddling, considering the relatively high number of UFO cases that have yet to find any explanation by either civil governments or investigators...
Puck
Posts: 6,457
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 9:04:54 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 3/30/2010 9:02:18 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 3/30/2010 9:00:59 PM, Nags wrote:
At 3/30/2010 8:58:09 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
David Icke

Stopped reading here. Like I said, you're been brainwashed.

Sheer ignorance. When faced from a sound argument, you run away like a coward. How about you respond or acknowledge what I said.

The whole point of disagreement here, is what you and others consider valid and indicative of facts and evidence, is different.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/30/2010 9:06:22 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Why does a conspiracy theorist get this reaction yet it is conventional wisdom believed by 90% of the world that men walk on water
Suction cups are fun!

and space daddies reside in the sky?
They got laid on earth, didn't use condoms, went on to be astronauts?
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.