Total Posts:9|Showing Posts:1-9
Jump to topic:

Obama to send 1,500 troops to Iraq.

Vox_Veritas
Posts: 7,086
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2014 8:49:45 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/7/2014 8:08:49 PM, SitaraMusica wrote:
Your thoughts? I think this is a major blunder for a few reasons. Over intervention helped to create the problem in the first place.

It's good, I think. But frankly, I don't think it'll be enough.
Call me Vox, the Resident Contrarian of debate.org.

The DDO Blog:
https://debatedotorg.wordpress.com...

#drinkthecoffeenotthekoolaid
SitaraMusica
Posts: 1,060
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2014 9:29:05 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/7/2014 8:49:45 PM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
At 11/7/2014 8:08:49 PM, SitaraMusica wrote:
Your thoughts? I think this is a major blunder for a few reasons. Over intervention helped to create the problem in the first place.

It's good, I think. But frankly, I don't think it'll be enough.

What do you think should happen?
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,240
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2014 11:41:55 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/7/2014 8:08:49 PM, SitaraMusica wrote:
Your thoughts? I think this is a major blunder for a few reasons. Over intervention helped to create the problem in the first place.

Its not a blunder if we can get a hard and fast trade agreement out of it. We protect you (Iraq) with an new extended Status of Forces Agreement, and we get cheaper oil, or whatever other major exports Iraq sells that we use. We should have done that in Libya, too.
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
SitaraMusica
Posts: 1,060
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2014 11:47:15 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/7/2014 11:41:55 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 11/7/2014 8:08:49 PM, SitaraMusica wrote:
Your thoughts? I think this is a major blunder for a few reasons. Over intervention helped to create the problem in the first place.

Its not a blunder if we can get a hard and fast trade agreement out of it. We protect you (Iraq) with an new extended Status of Forces Agreement, and we get cheaper oil, or whatever other major exports Iraq sells that we use. We should have done that in Libya, too.

I disagree. I feel like all of this intervention is causing people to hate us. I oppose war unless it is self defense.
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,240
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2014 11:52:58 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/7/2014 11:47:15 PM, SitaraMusica wrote:
At 11/7/2014 11:41:55 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 11/7/2014 8:08:49 PM, SitaraMusica wrote:
Your thoughts? I think this is a major blunder for a few reasons. Over intervention helped to create the problem in the first place.

Its not a blunder if we can get a hard and fast trade agreement out of it. We protect you (Iraq) with an new extended Status of Forces Agreement, and we get cheaper oil, or whatever other major exports Iraq sells that we use. We should have done that in Libya, too.

I disagree. I feel like all of this intervention is causing people to hate us. I oppose war unless it is self defense.

If its a trade agreement, its not 'intervention'. Serviced rendered for payment.
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
SitaraMusica
Posts: 1,060
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2014 11:58:06 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/7/2014 11:52:58 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 11/7/2014 11:47:15 PM, SitaraMusica wrote:
At 11/7/2014 11:41:55 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 11/7/2014 8:08:49 PM, SitaraMusica wrote:
Your thoughts? I think this is a major blunder for a few reasons. Over intervention helped to create the problem in the first place.

Its not a blunder if we can get a hard and fast trade agreement out of it. We protect you (Iraq) with an new extended Status of Forces Agreement, and we get cheaper oil, or whatever other major exports Iraq sells that we use. We should have done that in Libya, too.

I disagree. I feel like all of this intervention is causing people to hate us. I oppose war unless it is self defense.

If its a trade agreement, its not 'intervention'. Serviced rendered for payment.
Thank you for getting back to me on this. I just oppose most wars because I feel it is wrong unless it is self defense. :)
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,240
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/8/2014 12:03:11 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/7/2014 11:58:06 PM, SitaraMusica wrote:
At 11/7/2014 11:52:58 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 11/7/2014 11:47:15 PM, SitaraMusica wrote:
At 11/7/2014 11:41:55 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 11/7/2014 8:08:49 PM, SitaraMusica wrote:
Your thoughts? I think this is a major blunder for a few reasons. Over intervention helped to create the problem in the first place.

Its not a blunder if we can get a hard and fast trade agreement out of it. We protect you (Iraq) with an new extended Status of Forces Agreement, and we get cheaper oil, or whatever other major exports Iraq sells that we use. We should have done that in Libya, too.

I disagree. I feel like all of this intervention is causing people to hate us. I oppose war unless it is self defense.

If its a trade agreement, its not 'intervention'. Serviced rendered for payment.
Thank you for getting back to me on this. I just oppose most wars because I feel it is wrong unless it is self defense. :)

I agree. War is a very complicated an encompassing thing. To frequently, such gets waged for the wrong reasons without consideration of the future. Such also is waged for good reasons, too, but typically, those are quickly shown in individual circumstance.
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
SitaraMusica
Posts: 1,060
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/8/2014 12:16:55 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/8/2014 12:03:11 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 11/7/2014 11:58:06 PM, SitaraMusica wrote:
At 11/7/2014 11:52:58 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 11/7/2014 11:47:15 PM, SitaraMusica wrote:
At 11/7/2014 11:41:55 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 11/7/2014 8:08:49 PM, SitaraMusica wrote:
Your thoughts? I think this is a major blunder for a few reasons. Over intervention helped to create the problem in the first place.

Its not a blunder if we can get a hard and fast trade agreement out of it. We protect you (Iraq) with an new extended Status of Forces Agreement, and we get cheaper oil, or whatever other major exports Iraq sells that we use. We should have done that in Libya, too.

I disagree. I feel like all of this intervention is causing people to hate us. I oppose war unless it is self defense.

If its a trade agreement, its not 'intervention'. Serviced rendered for payment.
Thank you for getting back to me on this. I just oppose most wars because I feel it is wrong unless it is self defense. :)

I agree. War is a very complicated an encompassing thing. To frequently, such gets waged for the wrong reasons without consideration of the future. Such also is waged for good reasons, too, but typically, those are quickly shown in individual circumstance.
Thank you for clarifying. I now agree. :)