Total Posts:16|Showing Posts:1-16
Unarmed black person killed...AGAIN!
Posts: 825
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/8/2015 4:40:08 PM Posted: 3 years ago An unarmed black man was was killed. While he was laying on the ground, he was not resisting the pigs, cough, police. The person filming this was threatened by cops. People have the right to film government employees. Here is my link: https://www.youtube.com...
|
Posts: 4,343
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/8/2015 5:26:52 PM Posted: 3 years ago At 4/8/2015 4:40:08 PM, LiberalProlifer wrote: I agree with you that this is shameful. |
Posts: 10,539
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/8/2015 6:35:07 PM Posted: 3 years ago wtf
https://www.youtube.com... https://rekonomics.wordpress.com... "A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross |
Posts: 24,912
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/8/2015 9:51:33 PM Posted: 3 years ago At 4/8/2015 4:40:08 PM, LiberalProlifer wrote: First, it appears the dog killed him, although, I am not watching the video, as I don't like that channel. Second, there are laws in some states about filming police officers, so, no, it is not a right. Why do you think it is? Regardless, I am not sure how I feel on the subject. On one hand, keeping them in check is a good thing; however, it can compromise investigations and amateur video is rarely the whole story. At least the noble sheep provides us warm sweaters. All your hides would provide are coward pants. - Dick Solomon "I call albatross!" - seventhprofessor |
Posts: 825
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/8/2015 10:00:42 PM Posted: 3 years ago At 4/8/2015 5:26:52 PM, ford_prefect wrote:At 4/8/2015 4:40:08 PM, LiberalProlifer wrote: Thank you. The corruption in governmental corruption breaks my heart. |
Posts: 7,570
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/8/2015 10:05:05 PM Posted: 3 years ago Sometimes I wonder if I can be shot like this one day.
Like.. if I'm stopped and show someone my badge yet they don't believe me. People who I've called as mafia DP1: TUF, and YYW |
Posts: 4,227
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/9/2015 4:37:53 AM Posted: 3 years ago At 4/8/2015 10:00:42 PM, LiberalProlifer wrote:At 4/8/2015 5:26:52 PM, ford_prefect wrote:At 4/8/2015 4:40:08 PM, LiberalProlifer wrote: Guilty as charged Ashton |
Posts: 25,968
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/9/2015 5:33:20 AM Posted: 3 years ago At 4/8/2015 9:51:33 PM, Khaos_Mage wrote:At 4/8/2015 4:40:08 PM, LiberalProlifer wrote: I can't tell what's going on, but I think you're wrong about filming the police. It's a right in every state as far as I know, and just generally a good ideal, even if they are wearing body cams, the reason being is that a lot of times, body cam footage isn't released to the public. |
Posts: 25,968
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/9/2015 5:34:20 AM Posted: 3 years ago At 4/8/2015 10:00:42 PM, LiberalProlifer wrote:At 4/8/2015 5:26:52 PM, ford_prefect wrote:At 4/8/2015 4:40:08 PM, LiberalProlifer wrote: Yeah, but you're a liberal and want more government. I am not sure how somebody can ethically say government is corrupt, while als asking for more government. |
Posts: 25,968
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/9/2015 5:35:16 AM Posted: 3 years ago At 4/8/2015 10:05:05 PM, YamaVonKarma wrote: You're 15 years old, I doubt you have a badge. |
Posts: 7,570
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/9/2015 6:49:59 AM Posted: 3 years ago At 4/9/2015 5:35:16 AM, Wylted wrote:At 4/8/2015 10:05:05 PM, YamaVonKarma wrote: No. But I will in a few years time. People who I've called as mafia DP1: TUF, and YYW |
Posts: 25,968
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/9/2015 6:58:25 AM Posted: 3 years ago At 4/9/2015 6:49:59 AM, YamaVonKarma wrote:At 4/9/2015 5:35:16 AM, Wylted wrote:At 4/8/2015 10:05:05 PM, YamaVonKarma wrote: Well, have fun violating people's civil rights. |
Posts: 24,912
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/9/2015 7:39:15 AM Posted: 3 years ago At 4/9/2015 5:33:20 AM, Wylted wrote:At 4/8/2015 9:51:33 PM, Khaos_Mage wrote:At 4/8/2015 4:40:08 PM, LiberalProlifer wrote: Police filming themselves =/= public filming them. As I've said, it can compromise an investigation, and if it is a right, then I can use that footage as I want, like posting it on youtube or facebook. At least the noble sheep provides us warm sweaters. All your hides would provide are coward pants. - Dick Solomon "I call albatross!" - seventhprofessor |
Posts: 25,968
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/9/2015 7:45:26 AM Posted: 3 years ago At 4/9/2015 7:39:15 AM, Khaos_Mage wrote:At 4/9/2015 5:33:20 AM, Wylted wrote:At 4/8/2015 9:51:33 PM, Khaos_Mage wrote:At 4/8/2015 4:40:08 PM, LiberalProlifer wrote: That's what I don't get. How in the world could it possibly compromise an investigation? When they hold back film, it just feels like a cover up to me. I've contacted a few police departments requesting footage, they supposedly had, on these types of events which they don't release, and I'venever gotten a single straight answer as to how it would compromise an investigation. Even the police don't seem to buy that crap in a lot of situations. They seem to feel just as betrayed as the public when the chief or media relations, say no comment in regard to these "ongoing investigations", into police brutality. |
Posts: 24,912
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/9/2015 8:10:15 AM Posted: 3 years ago At 4/9/2015 7:45:26 AM, Wylted wrote:1. Details that are not to be released may be overheard and, thus, released. (e.g. a serial killer leaves a calling card)At 4/9/2015 7:39:15 AM, Khaos_Mage wrote:At 4/9/2015 5:33:20 AM, Wylted wrote:At 4/8/2015 9:51:33 PM, Khaos_Mage wrote:At 4/8/2015 4:40:08 PM, LiberalProlifer wrote: 2. Officer's faces are filmed which could cause problems if they, at a later date, go undercover. 3. Vigilante justice (or criminal intent) can result if a suspect's information is known prematurely. 4. If the suspect is a minor, it is wholly illegal to be "reporting" information that identifies them specifically. How's that off the top of my head? There are reasons cameras are not allowed in courtrooms, and those reasons would logically extend to police at crime scenes.
Or they don't understand. Do you know how many times police have told me there is no exception to the seatbelt law, even though there are seven listed in the law explicitly? At least the noble sheep provides us warm sweaters. All your hides would provide are coward pants. - Dick Solomon "I call albatross!" - seventhprofessor |
Posts: 25,968
Add as Friend Challenge to a Debate Send a Message |
4/9/2015 8:37:28 AM Posted: 3 years ago At 4/9/2015 8:10:15 AM, Khaos_Mage wrote:At 4/9/2015 7:45:26 AM, Wylted wrote:1. Details that are not to be released may be overheard and, thus, released. (e.g. a serial killer leaves a calling card)At 4/9/2015 7:39:15 AM, Khaos_Mage wrote:At 4/9/2015 5:33:20 AM, Wylted wrote:At 4/8/2015 9:51:33 PM, Khaos_Mage wrote:At 4/8/2015 4:40:08 PM, LiberalProlifer wrote: Unfortunately, there is a Supreme Court ruling that police do not have to understand the law to enforce it. |