Total Posts:15|Showing Posts:1-15
Jump to topic:

What Liberals think about the Amtrak crash?

AdamEsk
Posts: 203
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/16/2015 2:05:39 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Due to a tough semester in school, I have been out of the political loop for about a month. I read about an Amtrak derailing in Philadelphia, and I noticed something about Liberals blaming the Republican House for cutting its funding. Can someone explain how this is more their fault than the driver himself? How can they tie this incident to a lack of funding towards infrastructure?
Khaos_Mage
Posts: 23,214
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/16/2015 2:18:40 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/16/2015 2:05:39 PM, AdamEsk wrote:
Due to a tough semester in school, I have been out of the political loop for about a month. I read about an Amtrak derailing in Philadelphia, and I noticed something about Liberals blaming the Republican House for cutting its funding. Can someone explain how this is more their fault than the driver himself? How can they tie this incident to a lack of funding towards infrastructure?

More funding = higher pay = better drivers
Was the issue the driver or the track? If the latter, the funding issue should be obvious.
My work here is, finally, done.
AdamEsk
Posts: 203
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/16/2015 2:38:02 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
More funding = higher pay = better drivers
Was the issue the driver or the track? If the latter, the funding issue should be obvious.

Interesting point with the higher pay = better drivers, but hasn't it been confirmed that he was rounding the curve far too fast?
Khaos_Mage
Posts: 23,214
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/16/2015 2:44:57 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/16/2015 2:38:02 PM, AdamEsk wrote:
More funding = higher pay = better drivers
Was the issue the driver or the track? If the latter, the funding issue should be obvious.

Interesting point with the higher pay = better drivers, but hasn't it been confirmed that he was rounding the curve far too fast?

I have no idea.
And that is a true point, but one that is more of a talking point than anything else. Kind of like the better pay = better teachers. It doesn't pan out.
My work here is, finally, done.
AdamEsk
Posts: 203
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/16/2015 3:11:46 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
I have no idea.
And that is a true point, but one that is more of a talking point than anything else. Kind of like the better pay = better teachers. It doesn't pan out.

What is your opinion on that? Do you think the government should fund public schools more? What if the government backed out and allowed private schools to take over on education? I don't think I am experienced enough to know for sure, but I would assume if you left education to the free enterprise system, private schooling would fix that problem substantially.
Greyparrot
Posts: 16,153
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/16/2015 6:38:26 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/16/2015 3:11:46 PM, AdamEsk wrote:
I have no idea.
And that is a true point, but one that is more of a talking point than anything else. Kind of like the better pay = better teachers. It doesn't pan out.

What is your opinion on that? Do you think the government should fund public schools more? What if the government backed out and allowed private schools to take over on education? I don't think I am experienced enough to know for sure, but I would assume if you left education to the free enterprise system, private schooling would fix that problem substantially.

The private sector would never take over amtrak
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
AdamEsk
Posts: 203
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/16/2015 6:46:54 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/16/2015 6:38:26 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 5/16/2015 3:11:46 PM, AdamEsk wrote:
I have no idea.
And that is a true point, but one that is more of a talking point than anything else. Kind of like the better pay = better teachers. It doesn't pan out.

What is your opinion on that? Do you think the government should fund public schools more? What if the government backed out and allowed private schools to take over on education? I don't think I am experienced enough to know for sure, but I would assume if you left education to the free enterprise system, private schooling would fix that problem substantially.

The private sector would never take over amtrak

Sorry. I got side tracked. I was talking about public education.
Skepsikyma
Posts: 9,001
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/16/2015 7:02:58 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/16/2015 2:05:39 PM, AdamEsk wrote:
Due to a tough semester in school, I have been out of the political loop for about a month. I read about an Amtrak derailing in Philadelphia, and I noticed something about Liberals blaming the Republican House for cutting its funding. Can someone explain how this is more their fault than the driver himself? How can they tie this incident to a lack of funding towards infrastructure?

I live in Philly, and it's all just bloviating. The train was rounding the corner at double the normal speed limit. There was already a solution in place; a sensor system which would automatically correct speeds to keep them within speed limits. That system hadn't been put online yet when the crash occurred, so it was just really bad timing + human error. Paying people more doesn't make them perfect; that's dumb.

Accidents happened. This one really sucked. We've already fixed it. The end.
"See now Oblivion shimmering all around us, its very tranquility deadlier than tempest. How little all our keels have troubled it."
- Lord Dunsany -

"Over her head the stars, the thoughts of God in the heavens,
Shone on the eyes of man, who had ceased to marvel and worship"
- Henry Longfellow -

"We enjoy, we see nothing by direct vision; but only by reflection, and in anatomical dismemberment."
- Thomas Carlyle -
AdamEsk
Posts: 203
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/16/2015 7:07:14 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/16/2015 7:02:58 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 5/16/2015 2:05:39 PM, AdamEsk wrote:
Due to a tough semester in school, I have been out of the political loop for about a month. I read about an Amtrak derailing in Philadelphia, and I noticed something about Liberals blaming the Republican House for cutting its funding. Can someone explain how this is more their fault than the driver himself? How can they tie this incident to a lack of funding towards infrastructure?

I live in Philly, and it's all just bloviating. The train was rounding the corner at double the normal speed limit. There was already a solution in place; a sensor system which would automatically correct speeds to keep them within speed limits. That system hadn't been put online yet when the crash occurred, so it was just really bad timing + human error. Paying people more doesn't make them perfect; that's dumb.

Accidents happened. This one really sucked. We've already fixed it. The end.

I agree. I was confused on why the GOP was being blamed for a random tragedy.
Greyparrot
Posts: 16,153
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/16/2015 9:03:40 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/16/2015 7:07:14 PM, AdamEsk wrote:
At 5/16/2015 7:02:58 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 5/16/2015 2:05:39 PM, AdamEsk wrote:
Due to a tough semester in school, I have been out of the political loop for about a month. I read about an Amtrak derailing in Philadelphia, and I noticed something about Liberals blaming the Republican House for cutting its funding. Can someone explain how this is more their fault than the driver himself? How can they tie this incident to a lack of funding towards infrastructure?

I live in Philly, and it's all just bloviating. The train was rounding the corner at double the normal speed limit. There was already a solution in place; a sensor system which would automatically correct speeds to keep them within speed limits. That system hadn't been put online yet when the crash occurred, so it was just really bad timing + human error. Paying people more doesn't make them perfect; that's dumb.

Accidents happened. This one really sucked. We've already fixed it. The end.

I agree. I was confused on why the GOP was being blamed for a random tragedy.

Scapegoats and diversions. Don't you know politics by now?
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
AdamEsk
Posts: 203
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/16/2015 11:11:48 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/16/2015 9:03:40 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 5/16/2015 7:07:14 PM, AdamEsk wrote:
At 5/16/2015 7:02:58 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 5/16/2015 2:05:39 PM, AdamEsk wrote:
Due to a tough semester in school, I have been out of the political loop for about a month. I read about an Amtrak derailing in Philadelphia, and I noticed something about Liberals blaming the Republican House for cutting its funding. Can someone explain how this is more their fault than the driver himself? How can they tie this incident to a lack of funding towards infrastructure?

I live in Philly, and it's all just bloviating. The train was rounding the corner at double the normal speed limit. There was already a solution in place; a sensor system which would automatically correct speeds to keep them within speed limits. That system hadn't been put online yet when the crash occurred, so it was just really bad timing + human error. Paying people more doesn't make them perfect; that's dumb.

Accidents happened. This one really sucked. We've already fixed it. The end.

I agree. I was confused on why the GOP was being blamed for a random tragedy.

Scapegoats and diversions. Don't you know politics by now?

They always do this. I was just confused on how they could possibly politicize this.
briantheliberal
Posts: 722
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/16/2015 11:50:52 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/16/2015 2:05:39 PM, AdamEsk wrote:
Due to a tough semester in school, I have been out of the political loop for about a month. I read about an Amtrak derailing in Philadelphia, and I noticed something about Liberals blaming the Republican House for cutting its funding. Can someone explain how this is more their fault than the driver himself? How can they tie this incident to a lack of funding towards infrastructure?

I fail to see what this tragedy has to do with liberals, conservatives, or politics in general.
16kadams
Posts: 10,527
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2015 12:52:27 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/16/2015 6:11:45 PM, YYW wrote:
I think that politicizing tragedies is unethically opportunistic and unacceptable.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
slo1
Posts: 5,087
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2015 9:59:59 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/16/2015 7:07:14 PM, AdamEsk wrote:
At 5/16/2015 7:02:58 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 5/16/2015 2:05:39 PM, AdamEsk wrote:
Due to a tough semester in school, I have been out of the political loop for about a month. I read about an Amtrak derailing in Philadelphia, and I noticed something about Liberals blaming the Republican House for cutting its funding. Can someone explain how this is more their fault than the driver himself? How can they tie this incident to a lack of funding towards infrastructure?

I live in Philly, and it's all just bloviating. The train was rounding the corner at double the normal speed limit. There was already a solution in place; a sensor system which would automatically correct speeds to keep them within speed limits. That system hadn't been put online yet when the crash occurred, so it was just really bad timing + human error. Paying people more doesn't make them perfect; that's dumb.

Accidents happened. This one really sucked. We've already fixed it. The end.

I agree. I was confused on why the GOP was being blamed for a random tragedy.

it is not a random tragedy. The argument is that the GOP cut funding which slowed the deployment of the Positive Train Control system. PTC is deployed in a majority of rails in the north east, but it was not deployed in that part of the track where this accident happened. PTC would have slowed the train down and eliminated engineer error. One engineer is not enough redundancy to eliminate accidents such as this. PTC or deploying a two engineer system would greatly reduce accidents like this.

It however is not "random". It is a calculated risk and we know that without PTC and only one engineer these types of accidents will happen. That is why congress that mandated PTC on all rails including freight