Total Posts:30|Showing Posts:1-30
Jump to topic:

Conservapedia on Liberals

UtherPenguin
Posts: 4,087
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...
I bear witness that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad (peace and blessing be upon him) is his messenger.
-GreyParrot
UtherPenguin
Posts: 4,087
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD
I bear witness that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad (peace and blessing be upon him) is his messenger.
-GreyParrot
Greyparrot
Posts: 20,921
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 12:50:25 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Gee, I wonder who is really getting screwed by this good cop, bad cop routine?
Crying about how much the Trump wall is going to cost is like a heroin addict complaining about how much the needles cost.
Diqiucun_Cunmin
Posts: 2,762
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 12:56:21 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...

And their page on Keynes, lol. (I know you've seen that. :P)

Liberapedia is terribly biased, but still better than Conservapedia, which is totally crazy.

http://liberapedia.wikia.com...
I think it is well established that the only reason aliens come to earth is to slice up cows and examine inside peoples' bottoms. Unless you are a cow or suffer haemerrhoids I don't think there is anything to worry about from aliens. - keithprosser

Don't be a stat cynic:
http://www.debate.org...

Response to conservative views on deforestation:
http://www.debate.org...

Topics I'd like to debate (not debating ATM): http://tinyurl.com...
TN05
Posts: 4,796
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.
We, homo sapiens of the planet Earth, are the people of Debate.org, an online debating website owned by Juggle, and will aspire to increase the quality of debates, polls, mafia on said website, to be sufficient, meeting high standards of success and satisfaction in all areas, to consider it as "great", or superb and spectacular, again for the first time in years
Death23
Posts: 1,217
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.
Skepsikyma
Posts: 9,578
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 5:05:16 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 12:56:21 PM, Diqiucun_Cunmin wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...

And their page on Keynes, lol. (I know you've seen that. :P)

Liberapedia is terribly biased, but still better than Conservapedia, which is totally crazy.

http://liberapedia.wikia.com...

Haha.

http://liberapedia.wikia.com...

"Seriously the Right wing in the United States is:

Further to the right than Mainstream America."

https://sp.yimg.com...
"Partout ou vous verrez un autel, la se trouve la civilisation."
- Joseph de Maistre -

"Woe that I live in bitter days,
As God is setting like a sun
And in his place, as lord and slave,
Man raises forth his heinous throne."
- Translation of 'Rhyfel', by Hedd Wyn -

Virtutem videant intabescantque relicta
Fly
Posts: 3,171
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.
"I don"t have faith in faith
I don"t believe in belief
You can call me faithless
But I still cling to hope
And I believe in love
And that"s faith enough for me"
-Rush
Death23
Posts: 1,217
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.
TN05
Posts: 4,796
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:15:09 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

It casts doubt among among anything that isn't liberal atheism.
We, homo sapiens of the planet Earth, are the people of Debate.org, an online debating website owned by Juggle, and will aspire to increase the quality of debates, polls, mafia on said website, to be sufficient, meeting high standards of success and satisfaction in all areas, to consider it as "great", or superb and spectacular, again for the first time in years
Fly
Posts: 3,171
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:22:39 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:15:09 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

It casts doubt among among anything that isn't liberal atheism.

True that. Hence the "rational" moniker.
"I don"t have faith in faith
I don"t believe in belief
You can call me faithless
But I still cling to hope
And I believe in love
And that"s faith enough for me"
-Rush
TN05
Posts: 4,796
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:39:17 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:22:39 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:15:09 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

It casts doubt among among anything that isn't liberal atheism.

True that. Hence the "rational" moniker.

And there's the typical liberal problem - assuming liberalism is reality, and assuming atheism is the truth.
We, homo sapiens of the planet Earth, are the people of Debate.org, an online debating website owned by Juggle, and will aspire to increase the quality of debates, polls, mafia on said website, to be sufficient, meeting high standards of success and satisfaction in all areas, to consider it as "great", or superb and spectacular, again for the first time in years
Double_R
Posts: 4,939
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:51:53 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Anyone who is incapable of describing their oppositions views in a positive light demonstrates just how ignorant they are on the issues they take sides in, and thus have no business writing a page explaining to others what their opposition believes.
Fly
Posts: 3,171
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 8:58:40 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:39:17 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:22:39 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:15:09 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

It casts doubt among among anything that isn't liberal atheism.

True that. Hence the "rational" moniker.

And there's the typical liberal problem - assuming liberalism is reality, and assuming atheism is the truth.

Ironically, you assume these are mere assumptions, although I would not phrase these concepts as you just did...
"I don"t have faith in faith
I don"t believe in belief
You can call me faithless
But I still cling to hope
And I believe in love
And that"s faith enough for me"
-Rush
Fly
Posts: 3,171
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 9:04:22 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:51:53 PM, Double_R wrote:
Anyone who is incapable of describing their oppositions views in a positive light demonstrates just how ignorant they are on the issues they take sides in, and thus have no business writing a page explaining to others what their opposition believes.

While there are certainly pros and cons in equal measure to both conservatism and liberalism as ideologies, they are quite farcical in practice as manifested by the major political parties in the US in particular. A capricious electorate and corporate marketing are largely to blame.

In practice, politics is little more than professional grandstanding and trolling.
"I don"t have faith in faith
I don"t believe in belief
You can call me faithless
But I still cling to hope
And I believe in love
And that"s faith enough for me"
-Rush
Fly
Posts: 3,171
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??
"I don"t have faith in faith
I don"t believe in belief
You can call me faithless
But I still cling to hope
And I believe in love
And that"s faith enough for me"
-Rush
UndeniableReality
Posts: 1,897
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 10:11:37 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:51:53 PM, Double_R wrote:
Anyone who is incapable of describing their oppositions views in a positive light demonstrates just how ignorant they are on the issues they take sides in, and thus have no business writing a page explaining to others what their opposition believes.

Please put this on billboards everywhere.
Death23
Posts: 1,217
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.
Fly
Posts: 3,171
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."
"I don"t have faith in faith
I don"t believe in belief
You can call me faithless
But I still cling to hope
And I believe in love
And that"s faith enough for me"
-Rush
Death23
Posts: 1,217
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".
Fly
Posts: 3,171
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 12:11:59 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".

Ironically, (a lot of irony here on DDO) you are being far more demanding than I am. There is a rather large distinction between civility and servility, and you seem to demand the latter whereas only the former should be expected.
"I don"t have faith in faith
I don"t believe in belief
You can call me faithless
But I still cling to hope
And I believe in love
And that"s faith enough for me"
-Rush
Death23
Posts: 1,217
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 12:40:55 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2015 12:11:59 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".

Ironically, (a lot of irony here on DDO) you are being far more demanding than I am. There is a rather large distinction between civility and servility, and you seem to demand the latter whereas only the former should be expected.

Note that I demanded nothing.
Fly
Posts: 3,171
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 12:44:02 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2015 12:40:55 AM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:11:59 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".

Ironically, (a lot of irony here on DDO) you are being far more demanding than I am. There is a rather large distinction between civility and servility, and you seem to demand the latter whereas only the former should be expected.

Note that I demanded nothing.

Yes, sir. Whatever you say, sir.
"I don"t have faith in faith
I don"t believe in belief
You can call me faithless
But I still cling to hope
And I believe in love
And that"s faith enough for me"
-Rush
Death23
Posts: 1,217
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 1:18:26 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2015 12:44:02 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:40:55 AM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:11:59 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".

Ironically, (a lot of irony here on DDO) you are being far more demanding than I am. There is a rather large distinction between civility and servility, and you seem to demand the latter whereas only the former should be expected.

Note that I demanded nothing.

Yes, sir. Whatever you say, sir.

You're a good boy. Here you go:

http://i.huffpost.com...
Fly
Posts: 3,171
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 1:30:39 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2015 1:18:26 AM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:44:02 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:40:55 AM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:11:59 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".

Ironically, (a lot of irony here on DDO) you are being far more demanding than I am. There is a rather large distinction between civility and servility, and you seem to demand the latter whereas only the former should be expected.

Note that I demanded nothing.

Yes, sir. Whatever you say, sir.

You're a good boy. Here you go:

http://i.huffpost.com...

Treat... yum!
"I don"t have faith in faith
I don"t believe in belief
You can call me faithless
But I still cling to hope
And I believe in love
And that"s faith enough for me"
-Rush
Greyparrot
Posts: 20,921
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 3:28:09 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2015 1:30:39 AM, Fly wrote:

Yes, sir. Whatever you say, sir.

You're a good boy. Here you go:

http://i.huffpost.com...

Treat... yum!

It's poisoned.
Crying about how much the Trump wall is going to cost is like a heroin addict complaining about how much the needles cost.
Envisage
Posts: 3,880
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 7:53:30 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...

The liberal equivilent isn't much (any) better. Why does it seem that nobody can represent the opposition's views fairly?
Greyparrot
Posts: 20,921
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 9:02:48 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2015 7:53:30 AM, Envisage wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...

The liberal equivilent isn't much (any) better. Why does it seem that nobody can represent the opposition's views fairly?

If a politician can get you into the "good cop, bad cop" mentality you'll believe and do anything they say.
Crying about how much the Trump wall is going to cost is like a heroin addict complaining about how much the needles cost.
Diqiucun_Cunmin
Posts: 2,762
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 9:13:38 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2015 7:53:30 AM, Envisage wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...

The liberal equivilent isn't much (any) better. Why does it seem that nobody can represent the opposition's views fairly?

The liberal is somewhat better... at least they don't believe in young earth creationism, lol. They're still horribly biased, though.
I think it is well established that the only reason aliens come to earth is to slice up cows and examine inside peoples' bottoms. Unless you are a cow or suffer haemerrhoids I don't think there is anything to worry about from aliens. - keithprosser

Don't be a stat cynic:
http://www.debate.org...

Response to conservative views on deforestation:
http://www.debate.org...

Topics I'd like to debate (not debating ATM): http://tinyurl.com...