Total Posts:30|Showing Posts:1-30
Jump to topic:

Conservapedia on Liberals

Diqiucun_Cunmin
Posts: 2,710
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 12:56:21 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...

And their page on Keynes, lol. (I know you've seen that. :P)

Liberapedia is terribly biased, but still better than Conservapedia, which is totally crazy.

http://liberapedia.wikia.com...
The thing is, I hate relativism. I hate relativism more than I hate everything else, excepting, maybe, fibreglass powerboats... What it overlooks, to put it briefly and crudely, is the fixed structure of human nature. - Jerry Fodor

Don't be a stat cynic:
http://www.debate.org...

Response to conservative views on deforestation:
http://www.debate.org...

Topics I'd like to debate (not debating ATM): http://tinyurl.com...
TN05
Posts: 4,492
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.
Death23
Posts: 781
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.
Fkkize
Posts: 2,149
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 3:29:50 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
"Liberalism and Bestiality" lol, such an informative website.
: At 7/2/2016 3:05:07 PM, Rational_Thinker9119 wrote:
:
: space contradicts logic
Skepsikyma
Posts: 8,280
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 5:05:16 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 12:56:21 PM, Diqiucun_Cunmin wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...

And their page on Keynes, lol. (I know you've seen that. :P)

Liberapedia is terribly biased, but still better than Conservapedia, which is totally crazy.

http://liberapedia.wikia.com...

Haha.

http://liberapedia.wikia.com...

"Seriously the Right wing in the United States is:

Further to the right than Mainstream America."

https://sp.yimg.com...
"The Collectivist experiment is thoroughly suited (in appearance at least) to the Capitalist society which it proposes to replace. It works with the existing machinery of Capitalism, talks and thinks in the existing terms of Capitalism, appeals to just those appetites which Capitalism has aroused, and ridicules as fantastic and unheard-of just those things in society the memory of which Capitalism has killed among men wherever the blight of it has spread."
- Hilaire Belloc -
Fly
Posts: 2,045
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.
"You don't have a right to be a jerk."
--Religion Forum's hypocrite extraordinaire serving up lulz
Death23
Posts: 781
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.
TN05
Posts: 4,492
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:15:09 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

It casts doubt among among anything that isn't liberal atheism.
Fly
Posts: 2,045
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:22:39 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 7:15:09 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

It casts doubt among among anything that isn't liberal atheism.

True that. Hence the "rational" moniker.
"You don't have a right to be a jerk."
--Religion Forum's hypocrite extraordinaire serving up lulz
TN05
Posts: 4,492
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:39:17 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 7:22:39 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:15:09 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

It casts doubt among among anything that isn't liberal atheism.

True that. Hence the "rational" moniker.

And there's the typical liberal problem - assuming liberalism is reality, and assuming atheism is the truth.
Double_R
Posts: 4,886
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:51:53 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Anyone who is incapable of describing their oppositions views in a positive light demonstrates just how ignorant they are on the issues they take sides in, and thus have no business writing a page explaining to others what their opposition believes.
Fly
Posts: 2,045
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 8:58:40 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 7:39:17 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:22:39 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:15:09 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

It casts doubt among among anything that isn't liberal atheism.

True that. Hence the "rational" moniker.

And there's the typical liberal problem - assuming liberalism is reality, and assuming atheism is the truth.

Ironically, you assume these are mere assumptions, although I would not phrase these concepts as you just did...
"You don't have a right to be a jerk."
--Religion Forum's hypocrite extraordinaire serving up lulz
Fly
Posts: 2,045
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 9:04:22 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 7:51:53 PM, Double_R wrote:
Anyone who is incapable of describing their oppositions views in a positive light demonstrates just how ignorant they are on the issues they take sides in, and thus have no business writing a page explaining to others what their opposition believes.

While there are certainly pros and cons in equal measure to both conservatism and liberalism as ideologies, they are quite farcical in practice as manifested by the major political parties in the US in particular. A capricious electorate and corporate marketing are largely to blame.

In practice, politics is little more than professional grandstanding and trolling.
"You don't have a right to be a jerk."
--Religion Forum's hypocrite extraordinaire serving up lulz
Fly
Posts: 2,045
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??
"You don't have a right to be a jerk."
--Religion Forum's hypocrite extraordinaire serving up lulz
UndeniableReality
Posts: 1,897
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 10:11:37 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 7:51:53 PM, Double_R wrote:
Anyone who is incapable of describing their oppositions views in a positive light demonstrates just how ignorant they are on the issues they take sides in, and thus have no business writing a page explaining to others what their opposition believes.

Please put this on billboards everywhere.
Death23
Posts: 781
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.
Fly
Posts: 2,045
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."
"You don't have a right to be a jerk."
--Religion Forum's hypocrite extraordinaire serving up lulz
Death23
Posts: 781
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".
Fly
Posts: 2,045
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 12:11:59 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".

Ironically, (a lot of irony here on DDO) you are being far more demanding than I am. There is a rather large distinction between civility and servility, and you seem to demand the latter whereas only the former should be expected.
"You don't have a right to be a jerk."
--Religion Forum's hypocrite extraordinaire serving up lulz
Death23
Posts: 781
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 12:40:55 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/13/2015 12:11:59 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".

Ironically, (a lot of irony here on DDO) you are being far more demanding than I am. There is a rather large distinction between civility and servility, and you seem to demand the latter whereas only the former should be expected.

Note that I demanded nothing.
Fly
Posts: 2,045
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 12:44:02 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/13/2015 12:40:55 AM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:11:59 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".

Ironically, (a lot of irony here on DDO) you are being far more demanding than I am. There is a rather large distinction between civility and servility, and you seem to demand the latter whereas only the former should be expected.

Note that I demanded nothing.

Yes, sir. Whatever you say, sir.
"You don't have a right to be a jerk."
--Religion Forum's hypocrite extraordinaire serving up lulz
Death23
Posts: 781
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 1:18:26 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/13/2015 12:44:02 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:40:55 AM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:11:59 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".

Ironically, (a lot of irony here on DDO) you are being far more demanding than I am. There is a rather large distinction between civility and servility, and you seem to demand the latter whereas only the former should be expected.

Note that I demanded nothing.

Yes, sir. Whatever you say, sir.

You're a good boy. Here you go:

http://i.huffpost.com...
Fly
Posts: 2,045
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 1:30:39 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/13/2015 1:18:26 AM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:44:02 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:40:55 AM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:11:59 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".

Ironically, (a lot of irony here on DDO) you are being far more demanding than I am. There is a rather large distinction between civility and servility, and you seem to demand the latter whereas only the former should be expected.

Note that I demanded nothing.

Yes, sir. Whatever you say, sir.

You're a good boy. Here you go:

http://i.huffpost.com...

Treat... yum!
"You don't have a right to be a jerk."
--Religion Forum's hypocrite extraordinaire serving up lulz
Envisage
Posts: 3,646
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 7:53:30 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...

The liberal equivilent isn't much (any) better. Why does it seem that nobody can represent the opposition's views fairly?
Greyparrot
Posts: 14,288
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 9:02:48 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/13/2015 7:53:30 AM, Envisage wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...

The liberal equivilent isn't much (any) better. Why does it seem that nobody can represent the opposition's views fairly?

If a politician can get you into the "good cop, bad cop" mentality you'll believe and do anything they say.
Diqiucun_Cunmin
Posts: 2,710
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 9:13:38 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 7/13/2015 7:53:30 AM, Envisage wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...

The liberal equivilent isn't much (any) better. Why does it seem that nobody can represent the opposition's views fairly?

The liberal is somewhat better... at least they don't believe in young earth creationism, lol. They're still horribly biased, though.
The thing is, I hate relativism. I hate relativism more than I hate everything else, excepting, maybe, fibreglass powerboats... What it overlooks, to put it briefly and crudely, is the fixed structure of human nature. - Jerry Fodor

Don't be a stat cynic:
http://www.debate.org...

Response to conservative views on deforestation:
http://www.debate.org...

Topics I'd like to debate (not debating ATM): http://tinyurl.com...