Total Posts:30|Showing Posts:1-30
Jump to topic:

Conservapedia on Liberals

UtherPenguin
Posts: 4,017
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD
Man with one chopstick go hungry
-Siddhartha Gautama
Greyparrot
Posts: 18,454
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 12:50:25 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Gee, I wonder who is really getting screwed by this good cop, bad cop routine?
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
Diqiucun_Cunmin
Posts: 2,753
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 12:56:21 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...

And their page on Keynes, lol. (I know you've seen that. :P)

Liberapedia is terribly biased, but still better than Conservapedia, which is totally crazy.

http://liberapedia.wikia.com...
I think it is well established that the only reason aliens come to earth is to slice up cows and examine inside peoples' bottoms. Unless you are a cow or suffer haemerrhoids I don't think there is anything to worry about from aliens. - keithprosser

Don't be a stat cynic:
http://www.debate.org...

Response to conservative views on deforestation:
http://www.debate.org...

Topics I'd like to debate (not debating ATM): http://tinyurl.com...
TN05
Posts: 4,680
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.
Make Debate.org Great Again!
Death23
Posts: 1,041
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.
Skepsikyma
Posts: 9,343
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 5:05:16 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 12:56:21 PM, Diqiucun_Cunmin wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...

And their page on Keynes, lol. (I know you've seen that. :P)

Liberapedia is terribly biased, but still better than Conservapedia, which is totally crazy.

http://liberapedia.wikia.com...

Haha.

http://liberapedia.wikia.com...

"Seriously the Right wing in the United States is:

Further to the right than Mainstream America."

https://sp.yimg.com...
"See now Oblivion shimmering all around us, its very tranquility deadlier than tempest. How little all our keels have troubled it."
- Lord Dunsany -

"The darkness drops again but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? "
- W. B. Yeats -

Virtutem videant intabescantque relicta
Fly
Posts: 2,848
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.
"Put up or shut up" time-- my debate with Yassine:

http://www.debate.org...
Death23
Posts: 1,041
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.
TN05
Posts: 4,680
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:15:09 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

It casts doubt among among anything that isn't liberal atheism.
Make Debate.org Great Again!
Fly
Posts: 2,848
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:22:39 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:15:09 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

It casts doubt among among anything that isn't liberal atheism.

True that. Hence the "rational" moniker.
"Put up or shut up" time-- my debate with Yassine:

http://www.debate.org...
TN05
Posts: 4,680
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:39:17 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:22:39 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:15:09 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

It casts doubt among among anything that isn't liberal atheism.

True that. Hence the "rational" moniker.

And there's the typical liberal problem - assuming liberalism is reality, and assuming atheism is the truth.
Make Debate.org Great Again!
Double_R
Posts: 4,886
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 7:51:53 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Anyone who is incapable of describing their oppositions views in a positive light demonstrates just how ignorant they are on the issues they take sides in, and thus have no business writing a page explaining to others what their opposition believes.
Fly
Posts: 2,848
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 8:58:40 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:39:17 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:22:39 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:15:09 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

It casts doubt among among anything that isn't liberal atheism.

True that. Hence the "rational" moniker.

And there's the typical liberal problem - assuming liberalism is reality, and assuming atheism is the truth.

Ironically, you assume these are mere assumptions, although I would not phrase these concepts as you just did...
"Put up or shut up" time-- my debate with Yassine:

http://www.debate.org...
Fly
Posts: 2,848
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 9:04:22 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:51:53 PM, Double_R wrote:
Anyone who is incapable of describing their oppositions views in a positive light demonstrates just how ignorant they are on the issues they take sides in, and thus have no business writing a page explaining to others what their opposition believes.

While there are certainly pros and cons in equal measure to both conservatism and liberalism as ideologies, they are quite farcical in practice as manifested by the major political parties in the US in particular. A capricious electorate and corporate marketing are largely to blame.

In practice, politics is little more than professional grandstanding and trolling.
"Put up or shut up" time-- my debate with Yassine:

http://www.debate.org...
Fly
Posts: 2,848
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??
"Put up or shut up" time-- my debate with Yassine:

http://www.debate.org...
UndeniableReality
Posts: 1,897
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 10:11:37 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 7:51:53 PM, Double_R wrote:
Anyone who is incapable of describing their oppositions views in a positive light demonstrates just how ignorant they are on the issues they take sides in, and thus have no business writing a page explaining to others what their opposition believes.

Please put this on billboards everywhere.
Death23
Posts: 1,041
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.
Fly
Posts: 2,848
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."
"Put up or shut up" time-- my debate with Yassine:

http://www.debate.org...
Death23
Posts: 1,041
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".
Fly
Posts: 2,848
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 12:11:59 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".

Ironically, (a lot of irony here on DDO) you are being far more demanding than I am. There is a rather large distinction between civility and servility, and you seem to demand the latter whereas only the former should be expected.
"Put up or shut up" time-- my debate with Yassine:

http://www.debate.org...
Death23
Posts: 1,041
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 12:40:55 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2015 12:11:59 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".

Ironically, (a lot of irony here on DDO) you are being far more demanding than I am. There is a rather large distinction between civility and servility, and you seem to demand the latter whereas only the former should be expected.

Note that I demanded nothing.
Fly
Posts: 2,848
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 12:44:02 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2015 12:40:55 AM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:11:59 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".

Ironically, (a lot of irony here on DDO) you are being far more demanding than I am. There is a rather large distinction between civility and servility, and you seem to demand the latter whereas only the former should be expected.

Note that I demanded nothing.

Yes, sir. Whatever you say, sir.
"Put up or shut up" time-- my debate with Yassine:

http://www.debate.org...
Death23
Posts: 1,041
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 1:18:26 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2015 12:44:02 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:40:55 AM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:11:59 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".

Ironically, (a lot of irony here on DDO) you are being far more demanding than I am. There is a rather large distinction between civility and servility, and you seem to demand the latter whereas only the former should be expected.

Note that I demanded nothing.

Yes, sir. Whatever you say, sir.

You're a good boy. Here you go:

http://i.huffpost.com...
Fly
Posts: 2,848
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 1:30:39 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2015 1:18:26 AM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:44:02 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:40:55 AM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/13/2015 12:11:59 AM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:58:59 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:45:27 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:21:44 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 10:04:40 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:13:30 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 7:09:17 PM, Fly wrote:
At 7/12/2015 2:46:39 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 1:38:46 PM, TN05 wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:42:47 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
I'm wondering what Liberapedia has to say about Conservatives XD

The liberal equivalent is RationalWiki. It's just as insane, just the other way around.

After reading this:

http://rationalwiki.org...

I tend to agree with you.

What about that summation is "insane" and why?

RationalWiki also casts great doubt upon tarot card reading, astrology, psychics, etc. Hardly the stuff that insanity is made of.

Nobody said the summation was insane.

Oh... you will have to explain where I connected the dots inaccurately then-- a poster said RW was "just as insane," and you supplied a link to a paragraph from RW with your conclusion: "I tend to agree with you." Wha??

I don't have to explain anything to you.

And that is why you are called "Death."

I'll give you an explanation if you ask for one rather than asserting that "[I] have to explain".

Ironically, (a lot of irony here on DDO) you are being far more demanding than I am. There is a rather large distinction between civility and servility, and you seem to demand the latter whereas only the former should be expected.

Note that I demanded nothing.

Yes, sir. Whatever you say, sir.

You're a good boy. Here you go:

http://i.huffpost.com...

Treat... yum!
"Put up or shut up" time-- my debate with Yassine:

http://www.debate.org...
Greyparrot
Posts: 18,454
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 3:28:09 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2015 1:30:39 AM, Fly wrote:

Yes, sir. Whatever you say, sir.

You're a good boy. Here you go:

http://i.huffpost.com...

Treat... yum!

It's poisoned.
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
Envisage
Posts: 3,648
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 7:53:30 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...

The liberal equivilent isn't much (any) better. Why does it seem that nobody can represent the opposition's views fairly?
Greyparrot
Posts: 18,454
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 9:02:48 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2015 7:53:30 AM, Envisage wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...

The liberal equivilent isn't much (any) better. Why does it seem that nobody can represent the opposition's views fairly?

If a politician can get you into the "good cop, bad cop" mentality you'll believe and do anything they say.
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
Diqiucun_Cunmin
Posts: 2,753
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/13/2015 9:13:38 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 7/13/2015 7:53:30 AM, Envisage wrote:
At 7/12/2015 11:41:02 AM, UtherPenguin wrote:
They weren't even subtle with their anti-liberal biases:

http://www.conservapedia.com...

The liberal equivilent isn't much (any) better. Why does it seem that nobody can represent the opposition's views fairly?

The liberal is somewhat better... at least they don't believe in young earth creationism, lol. They're still horribly biased, though.
I think it is well established that the only reason aliens come to earth is to slice up cows and examine inside peoples' bottoms. Unless you are a cow or suffer haemerrhoids I don't think there is anything to worry about from aliens. - keithprosser

Don't be a stat cynic:
http://www.debate.org...

Response to conservative views on deforestation:
http://www.debate.org...

Topics I'd like to debate (not debating ATM): http://tinyurl.com...