Total Posts:14|Showing Posts:1-14
Jump to topic:

Kim Davis.

LiberalProlifer
Posts: 803
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/4/2015 11:34:55 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Kim Davis is the religious conservative who tried to force her beliefs on other people and played the victim when other people asserted their rights. https://www.youtube.com...
xus00HAY
Posts: 1,393
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/6/2015 2:32:08 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
Dont click that link people , if it was put there by a troll like LiberalProlifer it is probably a virus
Hayd
Posts: 4,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/6/2015 3:23:58 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/4/2015 11:34:55 PM, LiberalProlifer wrote:
Kim Davis is the religious conservative who tried to force her beliefs on other people and played the victim when other people asserted their rights. https://www.youtube.com...

Lol shes been married 4 times and cheated on one of her husbands, which is against biblical law, yet she uses it to deny others their rights, when it says nothing in the bible that you can't let gays marry, it says you should kill them, if she really believed in her god thats what she should be doing, but shes a biatch so...
Wylted
Posts: 21,167
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/6/2015 7:01:54 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/6/2015 3:23:58 AM, Hayd wrote:
At 10/4/2015 11:34:55 PM, LiberalProlifer wrote:
Kim Davis is the religious conservative who tried to force her beliefs on other people and played the victim when other people asserted their rights. https://www.youtube.com...

Lol shes been married 4 times and cheated on one of her husbands, which is against biblical law, yet she uses it to deny others their rights, when it says nothing in the bible that you can't let gays marry, it says you should kill them, if she really believed in her god thats what she should be doing, but shes a biatch so...

She can't kill gays, because she'd be arrested. The government is persecuting her for her religious beliefs in multiple ways.
LiberalProlifer
Posts: 803
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/6/2015 8:09:53 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/6/2015 3:23:58 AM, Hayd wrote:
At 10/4/2015 11:34:55 PM, LiberalProlifer wrote:
Kim Davis is the religious conservative who tried to force her beliefs on other people and played the victim when other people asserted their rights. https://www.youtube.com...

Lol shes been married 4 times and cheated on one of her husbands, which is against biblical law, yet she uses it to deny others their rights, when it says nothing in the bible that you can't let gays marry, it says you should kill them, if she really believed in her god thats what she should be doing, but shes a biatch so...

Exactly. Well said.
Hayd
Posts: 4,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/6/2015 9:57:58 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/6/2015 7:01:54 AM, Wylted wrote:
She can't kill gays, because she'd be arrested. The government is persecuting her for her religious beliefs in multiple ways.
She can't deny people marriage licenses, because she'd be arrested. She is persecuting gays for who they are.
Wylted
Posts: 21,167
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/7/2015 6:43:30 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/6/2015 9:57:58 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 10/6/2015 7:01:54 AM, Wylted wrote:
She can't kill gays, because she'd be arrested. The government is persecuting her for her religious beliefs in multiple ways.
She can't deny people marriage licenses, because she'd be arrested. She is persecuting gays for who they are.

That really has nothing to do with the fact that if she kills gays, she'll be arrested. Thanks for taking this off topic though
Hayd
Posts: 4,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/7/2015 1:29:25 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/7/2015 6:43:30 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 10/6/2015 9:57:58 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 10/6/2015 7:01:54 AM, Wylted wrote:
She can't kill gays, because she'd be arrested. The government is persecuting her for her religious beliefs in multiple ways.
She can't deny people marriage licenses, because she'd be arrested. She is persecuting gays for who they are.

That really has nothing to do with the fact that if she kills gays, she'll be arrested. Thanks for taking this off topic though

She is using her bible as a reason to deny gay's marriage licenses. Yet it does not say anything in the bible about not being allowed to distribute marriage licenses. What it does say about gays is to kill them.
Wylted
Posts: 21,167
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/7/2015 2:47:20 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/7/2015 1:29:25 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 10/7/2015 6:43:30 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 10/6/2015 9:57:58 PM, Hayd wrote:
At 10/6/2015 7:01:54 AM, Wylted wrote:
She can't kill gays, because she'd be arrested. The government is persecuting her for her religious beliefs in multiple ways.
She can't deny people marriage licenses, because she'd be arrested. She is persecuting gays for who they are.

That really has nothing to do with the fact that if she kills gays, she'll be arrested. Thanks for taking this off topic though

She is using her bible as a reason to deny gay's marriage licenses. Yet it does not say anything in the bible about not being allowed to distribute marriage licenses. What it does say about gays is to kill them.

That's true, and you still seem lost
xus00HAY
Posts: 1,393
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2015 3:54:42 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
The other issue here is they claim this has something to do with equal rights, This is false.
Gay people already have an equal right to marry. In general the laws on 2 consenting adults of the opposite sex. The laws don't say anything about a person's sexual orientation. Gays may say that they don't want to marry someone of the opposite sex, does this mean that we have the right to marry anybody we want ? the supreme court thinks we do. Well we don't, this is a privilege only gays have. Somebody got the idea that almost everybody in the world has been wrong for the past few thousands of years. They have expected that 2 people of the opposite sex be in a marriage. Some judges think those people were wrong so they chose to ignore the part about "of the opposite sex".
Don't sign those licenses Kim, not even if the supreme court orders you to. That court is full of bull**** !
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,235
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/8/2015 4:12:01 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 10/8/2015 3:54:42 AM, xus00HAY wrote:
The other issue here is they claim this has something to do with equal rights, This is false.
Gay people already have an equal right to marry. In general the laws on 2 consenting adults of the opposite sex. The laws don't say anything about a person's sexual orientation.

Because it shouldn't have to, and is understood as a person's choice of mate.

Gays may say that they don't want to marry someone of the opposite sex, does this mean that we have the right to marry anybody we want ?

Its assumed, yes.

the supreme court thinks we do. Well we don't, this is a privilege only gays have.

And apparently that would mean you don't have the right to marry a person of the preference you want, then.

Somebody got the idea that almost everybody in the world has been wrong for the past few thousands of years. They have expected that 2 people of the opposite sex be in a marriage. Some judges think those people were wrong so they chose to ignore the part about "of the opposite sex".

Because its not relevant.

Don't sign those licenses Kim, not even if the supreme court orders you to. That court is full of bull**** !

Mm. Yes, please, continue to enforce your religious views in place of the law of the land. Who cares about that pesky first amendment and all, every one knows it was supposed to mean you have the right to whatever religion the government officials want to enforce...
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
xus00HAY
Posts: 1,393
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/10/2015 8:21:10 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
"does this mean that we have the right to marry anybody we want ?

Its assumed, yes."
So if you are gay you have the right to marry anyone you want, but if you are straight, you don't have this right. If that person of the opposite sex you want to marry is younger that the age required by the law in your state, you don't have a right to marry them. If said person is old enough, but already married to somebody else you don't have a right to marry them. If this person is your brother or sister, you can't marry them in my state.
Don't even get me started on the other person must consent to marry you.
xus00HAY
Posts: 1,393
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/10/2015 8:36:10 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
iF you are straight, and you want to marry someone, you have to be approved of by her parents and dozens of other people.
This usually means you must have a decent job, are likable, responsible, and you are not some kind of a nut job, and you are not currently serving a term of incarceration. In general, if you need her , than it's not right, because she can do better than you.

Oh, you think you don't need any of that to marry her? Well that's because you are a bum, decent people think you need all that stuff!