Total Posts:21|Showing Posts:1-21
Jump to topic:

Was 9/11 an inside job?

Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/6/2015 12:33:19 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
I'm not dignifying that youtube video with another view that they will undoubtedly use to say how many people watch and support, so please just outline your reasons as to why so that they can be addressed.
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/6/2015 1:03:22 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 11/6/2015 12:07:22 AM, LiberalProlifer wrote:
I think it is, and here is proof: https://www.youtube.com...

Well, atleast this is not an abortion thread.

The only thing I can say to this is. Please please please join another party. I would rather lose election after election than have any association with this!
LiberalProlifer
Posts: 803
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/6/2015 1:23:09 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 11/6/2015 1:03:22 AM, TBR wrote:
At 11/6/2015 12:07:22 AM, LiberalProlifer wrote:
I think it is, and here is proof: https://www.youtube.com...

Well, atleast this is not an abortion thread.

The only thing I can say to this is. Please please please join another party. I would rather lose election after election than have any association with this!

You don't have the right to dictate what I post. I have the right to free speech. Your trolling stops now. What do you have to say about 9/11?
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/6/2015 1:42:10 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
You don't have the right to dictate what I post. I have the right to free speech. Your trolling stops now. What do you have to say about 9/11?

Wow. Where on earth did that come from. Where have I ever implied I did?

What do I have to say about 9/11? Well it is a date? If you remove the slash it's the emergency number is the US. What else...
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/6/2015 1:55:18 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 11/6/2015 1:23:09 AM, LiberalProlifer wrote:
At 11/6/2015 1:03:22 AM, TBR wrote:
At 11/6/2015 12:07:22 AM, LiberalProlifer wrote:
I think it is, and here is proof: https://www.youtube.com...

Well, atleast this is not an abortion thread.

The only thing I can say to this is. Please please please join another party. I would rather lose election after election than have any association with this!

You don't have the right to dictate what I post. I have the right to free speech. Your trolling stops now. What do you have to say about 9/11?

1) right to free speech means the government cannot restrict your speech. It does not apply to a privately owned website.
2) anyone can say whatever they want about your views. They have the same protections (or with private property, lack of protection) that you do.
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
TheProphett
Posts: 520
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/6/2015 1:57:00 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 11/6/2015 12:07:22 AM, LiberalProlifer wrote:
I think it is, and here is proof: https://www.youtube.com...

Incompetence is real.
Topics I would like to debate: https://docs.google.com...

Epic Quotes:

She's a cunning linguist, but I'm a master debater - Austin Powers


Economic Forum Revival Co-Leader

If you are interested in starting a political journal for the site, please contact me.
Fly
Posts: 2,045
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/6/2015 2:16:38 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
No, it wasn't:

http://mobile.news.com.au...

(Although on-point, the above link is not comprehensive-- by a long way)
"You don't have a right to be a jerk."
--Religion Forum's hypocrite extraordinaire serving up lulz
imabench
Posts: 21,219
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/6/2015 3:12:57 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 11/6/2015 12:12:42 AM, Ore_Ele wrote:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...
Kevin24018 : "He's just so mean it makes me want to ball up my fists and stamp on the ground"
Geogeer: "Nobody is dumb enough to become my protege."

7/14/16 = The Presidency Dies

DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015
dylancatlow
Posts: 12,245
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2015 1:10:59 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
I like how even the most basic 9-11 conspiracy claims don't check out. Take the claim that the towers fell at free fall speed. Anyone who looks at the video footage can see that this isn't true; it takes a full twenty seconds for the North Tower to fully collapse from the point of impact. Only the debris and dust fell at free fall speed (because it wasn't attached to anything), which makes it look like the towers fell at free fall speed. If you look closely, you'll see that the building lags behind.

I also don't see how they reconcile the demolition hypothesis with the fact that the towers collapsed at the point of impact. Are we supposed to believe that the explosives Bush supposedly planted would survive the impact of the plane, and could still be used to destroy the tower? I mean common. It's clear that that damage caused by the plane caused the collapse. The top of one of the towers (I forget which) even tilted as it fell. That can only be explained by the uneven damage caused by the plane, not explosives "hidden in the basement", especially considering that no one could have known ahead of time where the planes would hit.
imabench
Posts: 21,219
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2015 3:30:49 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 11/7/2015 1:10:59 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
I like how even the most basic 9-11 conspiracy claims don't check out. Take the claim that the towers fell at free fall speed. Anyone who looks at the video footage can see that this isn't true; it takes a full twenty seconds for the North Tower to fully collapse from the point of impact. Only the debris and dust fell at free fall speed (because it wasn't attached to anything), which makes it look like the towers fell at free fall speed. If you look closely, you'll see that the building lags behind.

I also don't see how they reconcile the demolition hypothesis with the fact that the towers collapsed at the point of impact. Are we supposed to believe that the explosives Bush supposedly planted would survive the impact of the plane, and could still be used to destroy the tower? I mean common. It's clear that that damage caused by the plane caused the collapse. The top of one of the towers (I forget which) even tilted as it fell. That can only be explained by the uneven damage caused by the plane, not explosives "hidden in the basement", especially considering that no one could have known ahead of time where the planes would hit.

Completely random question, who was it that actually said the quote in your signature because that really made me LOL
Kevin24018 : "He's just so mean it makes me want to ball up my fists and stamp on the ground"
Geogeer: "Nobody is dumb enough to become my protege."

7/14/16 = The Presidency Dies

DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015
dylancatlow
Posts: 12,245
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2015 6:54:40 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 11/7/2015 3:30:49 AM, imabench wrote:
At 11/7/2015 1:10:59 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
I like how even the most basic 9-11 conspiracy claims don't check out. Take the claim that the towers fell at free fall speed. Anyone who looks at the video footage can see that this isn't true; it takes a full twenty seconds for the North Tower to fully collapse from the point of impact. Only the debris and dust fell at free fall speed (because it wasn't attached to anything), which makes it look like the towers fell at free fall speed. If you look closely, you'll see that the building lags behind.

I also don't see how they reconcile the demolition hypothesis with the fact that the towers collapsed at the point of impact. Are we supposed to believe that the explosives Bush supposedly planted would survive the impact of the plane, and could still be used to destroy the tower? I mean common. It's clear that that damage caused by the plane caused the collapse. The top of one of the towers (I forget which) even tilted as it fell. That can only be explained by the uneven damage caused by the plane, not explosives "hidden in the basement", especially considering that no one could have known ahead of time where the planes would hit.

Completely random question, who was it that actually said the quote in your signature because that really made me LOL

I found it on Lawrence Krauss' Twitter page.
imabench
Posts: 21,219
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2015 7:25:45 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 11/7/2015 6:54:40 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
At 11/7/2015 3:30:49 AM, imabench wrote:
At 11/7/2015 1:10:59 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
I like how even the most basic 9-11 conspiracy claims don't check out. Take the claim that the towers fell at free fall speed. Anyone who looks at the video footage can see that this isn't true; it takes a full twenty seconds for the North Tower to fully collapse from the point of impact. Only the debris and dust fell at free fall speed (because it wasn't attached to anything), which makes it look like the towers fell at free fall speed. If you look closely, you'll see that the building lags behind.

I also don't see how they reconcile the demolition hypothesis with the fact that the towers collapsed at the point of impact. Are we supposed to believe that the explosives Bush supposedly planted would survive the impact of the plane, and could still be used to destroy the tower? I mean common. It's clear that that damage caused by the plane caused the collapse. The top of one of the towers (I forget which) even tilted as it fell. That can only be explained by the uneven damage caused by the plane, not explosives "hidden in the basement", especially considering that no one could have known ahead of time where the planes would hit.

Completely random question, who was it that actually said the quote in your signature because that really made me LOL

I found it on Lawrence Krauss' Twitter page.

Wasn't familiar with that guy but I am now. Thanks!
Kevin24018 : "He's just so mean it makes me want to ball up my fists and stamp on the ground"
Geogeer: "Nobody is dumb enough to become my protege."

7/14/16 = The Presidency Dies

DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015
dylancatlow
Posts: 12,245
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/7/2015 11:58:50 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 11/7/2015 7:25:45 AM, imabench wrote:
At 11/7/2015 6:54:40 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
At 11/7/2015 3:30:49 AM, imabench wrote:
At 11/7/2015 1:10:59 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
I like how even the most basic 9-11 conspiracy claims don't check out. Take the claim that the towers fell at free fall speed. Anyone who looks at the video footage can see that this isn't true; it takes a full twenty seconds for the North Tower to fully collapse from the point of impact. Only the debris and dust fell at free fall speed (because it wasn't attached to anything), which makes it look like the towers fell at free fall speed. If you look closely, you'll see that the building lags behind.

I also don't see how they reconcile the demolition hypothesis with the fact that the towers collapsed at the point of impact. Are we supposed to believe that the explosives Bush supposedly planted would survive the impact of the plane, and could still be used to destroy the tower? I mean common. It's clear that that damage caused by the plane caused the collapse. The top of one of the towers (I forget which) even tilted as it fell. That can only be explained by the uneven damage caused by the plane, not explosives "hidden in the basement", especially considering that no one could have known ahead of time where the planes would hit.

Completely random question, who was it that actually said the quote in your signature because that really made me LOL

I found it on Lawrence Krauss' Twitter page.

Wasn't familiar with that guy but I am now. Thanks!

I dislike him.
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/8/2015 12:31:56 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
I dislike him.

He can be a jerk, but I have no issues with what he says. His presentation is aggressive, confrontational, and lacking the subtlety of others, but he is very capable.
Wylted
Posts: 21,167
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/8/2015 12:38:16 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 11/6/2015 12:07:22 AM, LiberalProlifer wrote:
I think it is, and here is proof: https://www.youtube.com...

All the prof I need is in "cui Bono" you're dam right it's an inside job
LiberalProlifer
Posts: 803
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/8/2015 2:12:13 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 11/8/2015 12:38:16 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 11/6/2015 12:07:22 AM, LiberalProlifer wrote:
I think it is, and here is proof: https://www.youtube.com...

All the prof I need is in "cui Bono" you're dam right it's an inside job

Do you think there will be justice?
Wylted
Posts: 21,167
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/8/2015 11:02:17 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 11/8/2015 2:12:13 AM, LiberalProlifer wrote:
At 11/8/2015 12:38:16 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 11/6/2015 12:07:22 AM, LiberalProlifer wrote:
I think it is, and here is proof: https://www.youtube.com...

All the prof I need is in "cui Bono" you're dam right it's an inside job

Do you think there will be justice?

There is no such thing as karma, and no afterlife. If there is no justice on Earth, than justice will not be seen. It will go unpunished, without some revolt by the people, that destroys this government.