Total Posts:23|Showing Posts:1-23
Jump to topic:

help me find my political party

LaissezFaire
Posts: 2,050
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 9:51:25 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 9:45:34 PM, Loserboi wrote:
I don't know which one i fit into

Hard to tell from your profile. But both major parties are almost exactly the same anyway, so it doesn't really matter.
Should we subsidize education?
http://www.debate.org...

http://mises.org...

http://lewrockwell.com...

http://antiwar.com...

: At 6/22/2011 6:57:23 PM, el-badgero wrote:
: i didn't like [Obama]. he was the only black dude in moneygall yet he claimed to be home. obvious liar is obvious liar. i bet him and bin laden are bumfvcking right now.
Loserboi
Posts: 1,232
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 9:54:10 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 9:51:25 PM, LaissezFaire wrote:
At 10/12/2010 9:45:34 PM, Loserboi wrote:
I don't know which one i fit into

Hard to tell from your profile. But both major parties are almost exactly the same anyway, so it doesn't really matter.

Then how come they disagree so much
LaissezFaire
Posts: 2,050
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 10:02:43 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 9:54:10 PM, Loserboi wrote:
At 10/12/2010 9:51:25 PM, LaissezFaire wrote:
At 10/12/2010 9:45:34 PM, Loserboi wrote:
I don't know which one i fit into

Hard to tell from your profile. But both major parties are almost exactly the same anyway, so it doesn't really matter.

Then how come they disagree so much

They don't. They sometimes have different rhetoric, but they have essentially the same policies.
Should we subsidize education?
http://www.debate.org...

http://mises.org...

http://lewrockwell.com...

http://antiwar.com...

: At 6/22/2011 6:57:23 PM, el-badgero wrote:
: i didn't like [Obama]. he was the only black dude in moneygall yet he claimed to be home. obvious liar is obvious liar. i bet him and bin laden are bumfvcking right now.
Loserboi
Posts: 1,232
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 10:18:57 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 10:11:09 PM, Rockylightning wrote:
don't choose a party. Parties corrupt. Pick and choose what you believe. I like to call this, cafeteria politics.

but you yourself chose the communist party.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 11:39:26 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Do you hate freedom?

Yes you do. Help request denied.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Loserboi
Posts: 1,232
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 11:43:53 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 11:39:26 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
Do you hate freedom?

Yes you do. Help request denied.

LOL this is not for hw ragnar i am seriously curious about this.
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/12/2010 11:48:19 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 9:54:10 PM, Loserboi wrote:
At 10/12/2010 9:51:25 PM, LaissezFaire wrote:
At 10/12/2010 9:45:34 PM, Loserboi wrote:
I don't know which one i fit into

Hard to tell from your profile. But both major parties are almost exactly the same anyway, so it doesn't really matter.

Then how come they disagree so much

"There's two parties: The Big Government Republicans and the Big Government Democrats." -- Ron Paul
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
J.Kenyon
Posts: 4,194
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2010 12:04:04 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 11:50:29 PM, Loserboi wrote:
do liberal republicans exists? or are they just basically democrats?

Lindsey Graham, John McCain, Olympia Snow, Susan Collins...
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2010 12:26:26 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 11:43:53 PM, Loserboi wrote:
At 10/12/2010 11:39:26 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
Do you hate freedom?

Yes you do. Help request denied.

LOL this is not for hw ragnar
Of course it's not. It's for killing, the only purpose anyone can have for picking a political party. Political parties are institutions which pool resources in order to decide who to kill.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
FREEDO
Posts: 21,057
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2010 12:33:05 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/13/2010 12:31:28 AM, Loserboi wrote:
http://www.debate.org...

You're a moderate but closer to a Democrat than Republican. You are neither though.
GRAND POOBAH OF DDO

fnord
Loserboi
Posts: 1,232
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2010 12:35:51 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/13/2010 12:33:05 AM, FREEDO wrote:
At 10/13/2010 12:31:28 AM, Loserboi wrote:
http://www.debate.org...

You're a moderate but closer to a Democrat than Republican. You are neither though.

oOo interesting
Sieben
Posts: 2,736
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2010 6:14:07 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
Take the quick anarchist test:

Should there be an aggressive monopoly on final arbitration?

Take the libertarian test:

Should the initiation of force and theft be outlawed?

If you answer "yes, maybe", but aren't sure about their pragmatism (for example, theft might be good to help poor people), then you are a philosophical anarcho-libertarian, and should probably spend more time working out the logistics of political systems (how democracy works, how monarchy works, how anarchy works etc).
Things that are so interesting:

http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2010 9:09:41 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 11:48:19 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 10/12/2010 9:54:10 PM, Loserboi wrote:
At 10/12/2010 9:51:25 PM, LaissezFaire wrote:
At 10/12/2010 9:45:34 PM, Loserboi wrote:
I don't know which one i fit into

Hard to tell from your profile. But both major parties are almost exactly the same anyway, so it doesn't really matter.

Then how come they disagree so much

"There's two parties: The Big Government Republicans and the Big Government Democrats." -- Ron Paul


Who is a Republican.
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
innomen
Posts: 10,052
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2010 12:32:18 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 10/12/2010 11:50:29 PM, Loserboi wrote:
do liberal republicans exists? or are they just basically democrats?

They're fairly indigenous to New England. Supposedly socially liberal and fiscal conservatives.
JimProfit
Posts: 63
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/21/2010 2:51:27 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
Parties are good if you want something to do, and ever plan to run for office. You'll need a party then. Even if it's third party support... But especially the two major parties. I think the problem with people is they can't pick a party because the parties are so deceptive. Let me clear it up for you.

Democrats=Liberal Fascist Party.
This isn't to be mean, it's just the truth. Democrats are in every sense of the word, liberal fascists. They have liberal social policeis. But do it in a very authoritarian way. They're warmongers just like republicans, they believe in keysian economics to uplift buisnesses hoping they'll improve job growth, they even have a totaltarian view of using Acorn to corrupt the voting count or use black panthers to intimidate the voters is okay as long as it's for good intentions.

Republicans=Imperialism Party.
The republicans entire philosophy revolves around unbriddled capitalism. It doesn't want to help buisnesses like the democrats. Just tax them less, and let them run wild like they're deer or something... Republicans also insist on war after war after war, because it helps their capitalist cronies. Republicans seek to expand, conquer, dominate, and glorify the entrepenuer. This is basically objectivism. Sure, they don't whine nearly as much about Christians and social populists. But you know what? What do they ACTUALLY do about those issues? Nothing. It's none of their concern. If anything, they're smarter then objectivists. Who keep that hushy-hush, and let those foolish Christian right voters come to them!!!

Libertarians=Feudalism Party.
Whats the difference between feudalism and imperialism? Well, with less government comes more finances of the rich having to go to private security to enforce the law. Where as a republican world would be a constant warfare state to conquer more land and plant it's flag over it whilest an elite few make profits. (Thats already happening anyway) A libertarian society would look more like capitalism cannot expand beyond it's own country, not because it's regulated, but because there is constant infighting. Do you know why libertarians have a non-force principle? Because they don't want you sticking a gun to their head after they give you an unlivable wage, charge you exorbent rent for being black, try to forclose on your house by force, and watch you die in the street because you can't afford healthcare. This social darwinist mess is like republicans on crack. Because they even went ahead and stripped it of the thin layer of social conservatism. Do you honest expect heroine addicts and pedophiles to make good workers? Let alone when they're overworked, underpaid, and dying from toxic exposure because there's no safety regulations??? My worst fear isn't so much the dead and tired masses, but the fact it'll be much like the internet. Alot of gated communities for the rich. Slum ghettos for the poor. And heavy, HEAVY moderation... Every internet forum runs like a libertarian society would. Where the bourgoise makes all the rules, and uses secret private security force, (IE: moderators) to find culprits of dissent and erase them. (Ban them) What makes this worse, is so many people are taken in by libertarinism, that there would not be a workers revolution. And the proletariat would just love his ball&chain. Covet it as if it was a badge of honor. And that makes this party the sickest of all.

Green Party=Liberal Socialist Party.
There's nothing green about the green party. Do you know what green means? It means earth politics. This is a party that wholly supports liberal drug use, abortions, and all that other stuff your mommy and daddy wouldn't like because oooh! You're such a REBEL!!! Defending crap that's already legal!!! Do these idiots realize that most of the birth control and narcotics they'd allow would and are polluting the water and killing off the fish? Ofcourse not. Because they're too busy with their heads up their postiriors. That, and they expect people to work to redistribute the wealth. Who's going to want to work to pay a progressive income tax to a bunch of crackwhores? This is what Vladmir Lenin called "an infantile disorder". IE: All liberal leftwingers are retards.

Constitution Party=The Christian Confederacy Party.
It's definitelly a contradiction interms. How can you be so socially conservative and "states rights"? That doesn't make any bit of sense. Lets say they ban abortion in Florida, but it's legal in Georgia. What's a three hour drive going to hurt??? I suppose though when both your bases have been completely abandoned by the two party monopoly, beggers can't be choosy. Or the fact that the whole Christians=social populism thing is TOTAL FABRICATION... but that's another story. The point is, unless you support very VERY vehemet states rights or are an uber Christian. This party ain't for you. Frankly I think it's the stupidest thing ever... Because why do we have a constituion if states can just ignore it? Shouldn't the federal government enforce those first nine ammendments? Should Californa be able to pass an assault rifle ban whilest Texas doesn't have the ban? Shouldn't the law be enforced equally upon all states? It's such a hyperbole of twisted messages. You either respect the ammendments, or you don't. One thing is saying each state should be able to make up it's own mind on laws and budget, another thing is saying you adhere first and foremost to the rights documented in the constitution, then letting states interput them however they feel like.

National Socialist Movement=Durphurp.
Nazis. You know... even the nazis in this country are a bit soft. They've cut down on eugenics and wanted forced abortions, massive deportation by force, etc. And are moreso just reasonable nationalists with a bias opinion toward whites... It's pretty sad when the nazi party is making the most sense.
Caramel
Posts: 855
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/21/2010 10:17:28 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
Jimprofit I like what you have to say so far (particularly about immoral libertarians), but anyone can throw stones. Defending your own principles is quite a bit harder.
no comment