Total Posts:51|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Nuke Iran asap?

Teapartyisbae
Posts: 32
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/27/2015 9:53:50 PM
Posted: 11 months ago
Just wanting to know what all of you think about just eliminating the issue. Even in the middle east we could just blow up all of the holy land and they would have to find something else to fight over.
MaxSterling
Posts: 62
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/27/2015 9:57:45 PM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/27/2015 9:53:50 PM, Teapartyisbae wrote:
Just wanting to know what all of you think about just eliminating the issue. Even in the middle east we could just blow up all of the holy land and they would have to find something else to fight over.

Something else to fight over like: How best to dismantle america after it nuked billions of people?
"But why do you want REVENGE?!"

"I HAVE REASONS!!!!!"
MaxSterling
Posts: 62
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/27/2015 9:58:26 PM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/27/2015 9:57:45 PM, MaxSterling wrote:
At 12/27/2015 9:53:50 PM, Teapartyisbae wrote:
Just wanting to know what all of you think about just eliminating the issue. Even in the middle east we could just blow up all of the holy land and they would have to find something else to fight over.

Something else to fight over like: How best to dismantle america after it nuked billions of people?

Millions, rather
"But why do you want REVENGE?!"

"I HAVE REASONS!!!!!"
Teapartyisbae
Posts: 32
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/27/2015 10:10:15 PM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/27/2015 9:58:26 PM, MaxSterling wrote:
At 12/27/2015 9:57:45 PM, MaxSterling wrote:
At 12/27/2015 9:53:50 PM, Teapartyisbae wrote:
Just wanting to know what all of you think about just eliminating the issue. Even in the middle east we could just blow up all of the holy land and they would have to find something else to fight over.

Something else to fight over like: How best to dismantle america after it nuked billions of people?

Millions, rather

Yeah that could actually work.
Yassine
Posts: 2,617
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/27/2015 11:17:23 PM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/27/2015 9:53:50 PM, Teapartyisbae wrote:
Just wanting to know what all of you think about just eliminating the issue. Even in the middle east we could just blow up all of the holy land and they would have to find something else to fight over.

- Ooooor, we can gather you & all those who wish to nuke others into one place, & make your wish come true, nuke you, & get rid of the desire to nuke others in one sweep.
Current Debates:

Islam is not a religion of peace vs. @ Lutonator:
* http://www.debate.org...
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,205
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/27/2015 11:28:41 PM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/27/2015 9:58:26 PM, MaxSterling wrote:
At 12/27/2015 9:57:45 PM, MaxSterling wrote:
At 12/27/2015 9:53:50 PM, Teapartyisbae wrote:
Just wanting to know what all of you think about just eliminating the issue. Even in the middle east we could just blow up all of the holy land and they would have to find something else to fight over.

Something else to fight over like: How best to dismantle america after it nuked billions of people?

Millions, rather

Good question. Lets see how well that last dismantling went after we nuked some one.

Hm.

Not so hot. And that was one country whom was arguably actually "at war" with us. Now, lets take a peek see at how well Iran behaves itself. Lets honestly ask ourselves how well they might get along with nuclear capability, vs not having nuclear capability?

Again, answer honestly: is the world safe with Iran as it is, nuclear ambition and all?

Is it safer with America as it is now, or with Iran as it is now?
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
IntellectVsSpirit5000
Posts: 1,266
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/27/2015 11:39:47 PM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/27/2015 9:53:50 PM, Teapartyisbae wrote:
Just wanting to know what all of you think about just eliminating the issue. Even in the middle east we could just blow up all of the holy land and they would have to find something else to fight over.

Lol
Yassine
Posts: 2,617
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/27/2015 11:40:15 PM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/27/2015 11:28:41 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:

Good question. Lets see how well that last dismantling went after we nuked some one.

Hm.


Not so hot. And that was one country whom was arguably actually "at war" with us. Now, lets take a peek see at how well Iran behaves itself. Lets honestly ask ourselves how well they might get along with nuclear capability, vs not having nuclear capability?

Again, answer honestly: is the world safe with Iran as it is, nuclear ambition and all?

Is it safer with America as it is now, or with Iran as it is now?

- Which world are you talking about? The world would be much safer if America & its likes didn't exist.
Current Debates:

Islam is not a religion of peace vs. @ Lutonator:
* http://www.debate.org...
Teapartyisbae
Posts: 32
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/27/2015 11:53:11 PM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/27/2015 11:17:23 PM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/27/2015 9:53:50 PM, Teapartyisbae wrote:
Just wanting to know what all of you think about just eliminating the issue. Even in the middle east we could just blow up all of the holy land and they would have to find something else to fight over.

- Ooooor, we can gather you & all those who wish to nuke others into one place, & make your wish come true, nuke you, & get rid of the desire to nuke others in one sweep.

Dang you're good.
Yassine
Posts: 2,617
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 12:10:26 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/27/2015 11:53:11 PM, Teapartyisbae wrote:
At 12/27/2015 11:17:23 PM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/27/2015 9:53:50 PM, Teapartyisbae wrote:
Just wanting to know what all of you think about just eliminating the issue. Even in the middle east we could just blow up all of the holy land and they would have to find something else to fight over.

- Ooooor, we can gather you & all those who wish to nuke others into one place, & make your wish come true, nuke you, & get rid of the desire to nuke others in one sweep.

Dang you're good.

- Just part of my job.
Current Debates:

Islam is not a religion of peace vs. @ Lutonator:
* http://www.debate.org...
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,205
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 12:37:49 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/27/2015 11:40:15 PM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/27/2015 11:28:41 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:

Good question. Lets see how well that last dismantling went after we nuked some one.

Hm.


Not so hot. And that was one country whom was arguably actually "at war" with us. Now, lets take a peek see at how well Iran behaves itself. Lets honestly ask ourselves how well they might get along with nuclear capability, vs not having nuclear capability?

Again, answer honestly: is the world safe with Iran as it is, nuclear ambition and all?

Is it safer with America as it is now, or with Iran as it is now?

- Which world are you talking about? The world would be much safer if America & its likes didn't exist.

I guess it depends on the sort of world you are interested, then. ;)
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
Yassine
Posts: 2,617
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 12:39:36 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 12:37:49 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 12/27/2015 11:40:15 PM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/27/2015 11:28:41 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:

Good question. Lets see how well that last dismantling went after we nuked some one.

Hm.


Not so hot. And that was one country whom was arguably actually "at war" with us. Now, lets take a peek see at how well Iran behaves itself. Lets honestly ask ourselves how well they might get along with nuclear capability, vs not having nuclear capability?

Again, answer honestly: is the world safe with Iran as it is, nuclear ambition and all?

Is it safer with America as it is now, or with Iran as it is now?

- Which world are you talking about? The world would be much safer if America & its likes didn't exist.

I guess it depends on the sort of world you are interested, then. ;)

- It's a matter of perspective. Your enemies are not necessarily my enemies. That much is pretty obvious.
Current Debates:

Islam is not a religion of peace vs. @ Lutonator:
* http://www.debate.org...
IntellectVsSpirit5000
Posts: 1,266
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 12:58:03 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 12:39:36 AM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/28/2015 12:37:49 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 12/27/2015 11:40:15 PM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/27/2015 11:28:41 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:

Good question. Lets see how well that last dismantling went after we nuked some one.

Hm.


Not so hot. And that was one country whom was arguably actually "at war" with us. Now, lets take a peek see at how well Iran behaves itself. Lets honestly ask ourselves how well they might get along with nuclear capability, vs not having nuclear capability?

Again, answer honestly: is the world safe with Iran as it is, nuclear ambition and all?

Is it safer with America as it is now, or with Iran as it is now?

- Which world are you talking about? The world would be much safer if America & its likes didn't exist.

I guess it depends on the sort of world you are interested, then. ;)

- It's a matter of perspective. Your enemies are not necessarily my enemies. That much is pretty obvious.

Kill the infidels, lie to unbelievers, and conquer the world for Allah and Islam in the name of the prophet right Yassine?
Yassine
Posts: 2,617
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 1:11:01 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 12:58:03 AM, IntellectVsSpirit5000 wrote:
At 12/28/2015 12:39:36 AM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/28/2015 12:37:49 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 12/27/2015 11:40:15 PM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/27/2015 11:28:41 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:

Good question. Lets see how well that last dismantling went after we nuked some one.

Hm.


Not so hot. And that was one country whom was arguably actually "at war" with us. Now, lets take a peek see at how well Iran behaves itself. Lets honestly ask ourselves how well they might get along with nuclear capability, vs not having nuclear capability?

Again, answer honestly: is the world safe with Iran as it is, nuclear ambition and all?

Is it safer with America as it is now, or with Iran as it is now?

- Which world are you talking about? The world would be much safer if America & its likes didn't exist.

I guess it depends on the sort of world you are interested, then. ;)

- It's a matter of perspective. Your enemies are not necessarily my enemies. That much is pretty obvious.

Kill the infidels, lie to unbelievers, and conquer the world for Allah and Islam in the name of the prophet right Yassine?

- I wasn't talking about your fictitious enemies.
Current Debates:

Islam is not a religion of peace vs. @ Lutonator:
* http://www.debate.org...
mc9
Posts: 1,033
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 1:52:10 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/27/2015 9:53:50 PM, Teapartyisbae wrote:
Just wanting to know what all of you think about just eliminating the issue. Even in the middle east we could just blow up all of the holy land and they would have to find something else to fight over.

Horrible idea
Teapartyisbae
Posts: 32
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 2:02:20 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 1:52:10 AM, mc9 wrote:
At 12/27/2015 9:53:50 PM, Teapartyisbae wrote:
Just wanting to know what all of you think about just eliminating the issue. Even in the middle east we could just blow up all of the holy land and they would have to find something else to fight over.

Horrible idea

Might be but it happens.
IntellectVsSpirit5000
Posts: 1,266
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 2:09:26 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 1:11:01 AM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/28/2015 12:58:03 AM, IntellectVsSpirit5000 wrote:
At 12/28/2015 12:39:36 AM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/28/2015 12:37:49 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 12/27/2015 11:40:15 PM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/27/2015 11:28:41 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:

Good question. Lets see how well that last dismantling went after we nuked some one.

Hm.


Not so hot. And that was one country whom was arguably actually "at war" with us. Now, lets take a peek see at how well Iran behaves itself. Lets honestly ask ourselves how well they might get along with nuclear capability, vs not having nuclear capability?

Again, answer honestly: is the world safe with Iran as it is, nuclear ambition and all?

Is it safer with America as it is now, or with Iran as it is now?

- Which world are you talking about? The world would be much safer if America & its likes didn't exist.

I guess it depends on the sort of world you are interested, then. ;)

- It's a matter of perspective. Your enemies are not necessarily my enemies. That much is pretty obvious.

Kill the infidels, lie to unbelievers, and conquer the world for Allah and Islam in the name of the prophet right Yassine?

- I wasn't talking about your fictitious enemies.

Kill me, the infidel right Yassine? Kill us all right? The homosexuals, the Americans, the dogs and the cats, right?
Yassine
Posts: 2,617
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 2:10:21 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 2:09:26 AM, IntellectVsSpirit5000 wrote:
At 12/28/2015 1:11:01 AM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/28/2015 12:58:03 AM, IntellectVsSpirit5000 wrote:
At 12/28/2015 12:39:36 AM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/28/2015 12:37:49 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 12/27/2015 11:40:15 PM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/27/2015 11:28:41 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:

Good question. Lets see how well that last dismantling went after we nuked some one.

Hm.


Not so hot. And that was one country whom was arguably actually "at war" with us. Now, lets take a peek see at how well Iran behaves itself. Lets honestly ask ourselves how well they might get along with nuclear capability, vs not having nuclear capability?

Again, answer honestly: is the world safe with Iran as it is, nuclear ambition and all?

Is it safer with America as it is now, or with Iran as it is now?

- Which world are you talking about? The world would be much safer if America & its likes didn't exist.

I guess it depends on the sort of world you are interested, then. ;)

- It's a matter of perspective. Your enemies are not necessarily my enemies. That much is pretty obvious.

Kill the infidels, lie to unbelievers, and conquer the world for Allah and Islam in the name of the prophet right Yassine?

- I wasn't talking about your fictitious enemies.

Kill me, the infidel right Yassine? Kill us all right? The homosexuals, the Americans, the dogs and the cats, right?

- Case in point.
Current Debates:

Islam is not a religion of peace vs. @ Lutonator:
* http://www.debate.org...
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,205
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 2:12:54 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 12:39:36 AM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/28/2015 12:37:49 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 12/27/2015 11:40:15 PM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/27/2015 11:28:41 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:

Good question. Lets see how well that last dismantling went after we nuked some one.

Hm.


Not so hot. And that was one country whom was arguably actually "at war" with us. Now, lets take a peek see at how well Iran behaves itself. Lets honestly ask ourselves how well they might get along with nuclear capability, vs not having nuclear capability?

Again, answer honestly: is the world safe with Iran as it is, nuclear ambition and all?

Is it safer with America as it is now, or with Iran as it is now?

- Which world are you talking about? The world would be much safer if America & its likes didn't exist.

I guess it depends on the sort of world you are interested, then. ;)

- It's a matter of perspective. Your enemies are not necessarily my enemies.

Yet.

The current nature of the rogue factions in the mid east are chaotic. Iran sympathizes with them, as do a handful of other nations that are really only a few instances of civil unrest to get into a state in which Syria finds itself. Thus breeds more chaos, and more acts that are done in the name of Islam, against Islam, and with Islam. Depending upon who you think your enemies are.
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
mc9
Posts: 1,033
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 2:28:26 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 2:02:20 AM, Teapartyisbae wrote:
At 12/28/2015 1:52:10 AM, mc9 wrote:
At 12/27/2015 9:53:50 PM, Teapartyisbae wrote:
Just wanting to know what all of you think about just eliminating the issue. Even in the middle east we could just blow up all of the holy land and they would have to find something else to fight over.

Horrible idea

Might be but it happens.

Oh wait you didn't mean that?
Yassine
Posts: 2,617
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 2:29:44 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 2:12:54 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:

Yet.

- Never. We belong to different geo-politico-historico-religious realities.

The current nature of the rogue factions in the mid east are chaotic. Iran sympathizes with them, as do a handful of other nations that are really only a few instances of civil unrest to get into a state in which Syria finds itself. Thus breeds more chaos, and more acts that are done in the name of Islam, against Islam, and with Islam. Depending upon who you think your enemies are.

- Every polity ultimately seeks its own interests. & there are tons of those all over the place. War is chaos my friend.
Current Debates:

Islam is not a religion of peace vs. @ Lutonator:
* http://www.debate.org...
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,205
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 2:32:39 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 2:29:44 AM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/28/2015 2:12:54 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:

Yet.

- Never. We belong to different geo-politico-historico-religious realities.

Mm. You know reality is not tinted by Geo etc etc, right? All that is a reaction to people. People, in this particular instance whom have decided to behave rather irrationally.

The current nature of the rogue factions in the mid east are chaotic. Iran sympathizes with them, as do a handful of other nations that are really only a few instances of civil unrest to get into a state in which Syria finds itself. Thus breeds more chaos, and more acts that are done in the name of Islam, against Islam, and with Islam. Depending upon who you think your enemies are.

- Every polity ultimately seeks its own interests. & there are tons of those all over the place. War is chaos my friend.

And in this instance, the religion of "Islam" seems to be the source of both.

But, I am sure that is a very different reality in which you live in. I am sure the peoples of England and France thought the same thing, but... well... chaos and all.
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
Yassine
Posts: 2,617
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 2:39:41 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 2:32:39 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:

Mm. You know reality is not tinted by Geo etc etc, right? All that is a reaction to people. People, in this particular instance whom have decided to behave rather irrationally.

- Wat?

And in this instance, the religion of "Islam" seems to be the source of both.

- Both what?

But, I am sure that is a very different reality in which you live in. I am sure the peoples of England and France thought the same thing, but... well... chaos and all.

- Wat?
Current Debates:

Islam is not a religion of peace vs. @ Lutonator:
* http://www.debate.org...
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,205
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 2:44:43 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 2:39:41 AM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/28/2015 2:32:39 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:

Mm. You know reality is not tinted by Geo etc etc, right? All that is a reaction to people. People, in this particular instance whom have decided to behave rather irrationally.

- Wat?

And in this instance, the religion of "Islam" seems to be the source of both.

- Both what?

But, I am sure that is a very different reality in which you live in. I am sure the peoples of England and France thought the same thing, but... well... chaos and all.

- Wat?

"What"?

Take a count as to how many countries in the mid east including the ones in the mid east that have been wronged by terrorism on behalf of Islam, terrorists sponsored by Islamo-theocracies.

What? "Wat"?

Do you see where the world's militaries are concentrating on? Is it the US? Wat? Is it the Mid East? Wat? Is that due to Atheism, Christianity, or Islam?

Wat?

I look forward to the day when by unfortunate stupidity some random Islamo-terrorist does something to kill a few dozen Chinese nationals some where in China. Nothing brings the world together like taking down rabid dogs.
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
Yassine
Posts: 2,617
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 2:53:27 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 2:44:43 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:


Take a count as to how many countries in the mid east including the ones in the mid east that have been wronged by terrorism on behalf of Islam, terrorists sponsored by Islamo-theocracies.

- I don't know how is that any relevant to us not sharing the same enemies. But, since you brought it up, what do you think they call Islamist terrorists in the Muslim world?! They call them 'terrorists'. Period.

Do you see where the world's militaries are concentrating on? Is it the US? Wat? Is it the Mid East? Wat? Is that due to Atheism, Christianity, or Islam?

- I said, "both what?". Regardless, to answer your question, it's about politics, not Islam. Just a few decades back, for decades, 1000 times more military concentration was happening in Europe. Was that due to Christianity? Atheism?

I look forward to the day when by unfortunate stupidity some random Islamo-terrorist does something to kill a few dozen Chinese nationals some where in China. Nothing brings the world together like taking down rabid dogs.

- They don't really care about China at this point; China isn't invading & plundering the Muslim world. Yet, I don't how any of this is relevant to what I said.
Current Debates:

Islam is not a religion of peace vs. @ Lutonator:
* http://www.debate.org...
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,205
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 2:59:22 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 2:53:27 AM, Yassine wrote:
At 12/28/2015 2:44:43 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:


Take a count as to how many countries in the mid east including the ones in the mid east that have been wronged by terrorism on behalf of Islam, terrorists sponsored by Islamo-theocracies.

- I don't know how is that any relevant to us not sharing the same enemies. But, since you brought it up, what do you think they call Islamist terrorists in the Muslim world?! They call them 'terrorists'. Period.

... is there a competing variety? ;)

Do you see where the world's militaries are concentrating on? Is it the US? Wat? Is it the Mid East? Wat? Is that due to Atheism, Christianity, or Islam?

- I said, "both what?". Regardless, to answer your question, it's about politics, not Islam. Just a few decades back, for decades, 1000 times more military concentration was happening in Europe. Was that due to Christianity? Atheism?

Neither, which prompts the question as to just how toxic this religion is if its militarized adherents inspire that variety of response.

I look forward to the day when by unfortunate stupidity some random Islamo-terrorist does something to kill a few dozen Chinese nationals some where in China. Nothing brings the world together like taking down rabid dogs.

- They don't really care about China at this point;

AKA "yet".

China isn't invading & plundering the Muslim world.

Because the Muslim world hasn't decided to do something directed against their civilian population.

Yet, I don't how any of this is relevant to what I said.

"Wat" is relevant to what, exactly?
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
Yassine
Posts: 2,617
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 3:07:01 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 2:59:22 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:

... is there a competing variety? ;)

- You don't expect "terrorists" to be called "Muslim terrorists" in Muslim land, do you!

Neither, which prompts the question as to just how toxic this religion is if its militarized adherents inspire that variety of response.

- A question much more pertinent when such response is 1,000 times mightier!

AKA "yet".

- You should be more concerned with the US & its imperialistic tendencies. A US-China clash isn't that far fetched.

Because the Muslim world hasn't decided to do something directed against their civilian population.

- That's an argument against you. But, I bet you didn't realise it.

"Wat" is relevant to what, exactly?

- Read previous posts.
Current Debates:

Islam is not a religion of peace vs. @ Lutonator:
* http://www.debate.org...
AbuJarir
Posts: 91
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 3:37:37 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
I'd love to destroy Iran, but not with nuclear WMDs for Allah(SWT) hates them. Iran must pay for it's crimes in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Balushistan. And I pray nearly every day for a divine punishment on Khomeini, Hamas , Assad, and Putin and all their supporters.
Teapartyisbae
Posts: 32
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 3:55:53 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 3:37:37 AM, AbuJarir wrote:
I'd love to destroy Iran, but not with nuclear WMDs for Allah(SWT) hates them. Iran must pay for it's crimes in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Balushistan. And I pray nearly every day for a divine punishment on Khomeini, Hamas , Assad, and Putin and all their supporters.

Nukes would be easier but I'm open to ideas. We could try waterboarding or some other sort of inhumane torture.
Teapartyisbae
Posts: 32
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/28/2015 4:00:00 AM
Posted: 11 months ago
At 12/28/2015 2:28:26 AM, mc9 wrote:
At 12/28/2015 2:02:20 AM, Teapartyisbae wrote:
At 12/28/2015 1:52:10 AM, mc9 wrote:
At 12/27/2015 9:53:50 PM, Teapartyisbae wrote:
Just wanting to know what all of you think about just eliminating the issue. Even in the middle east we could just blow up all of the holy land and they would have to find something else to fight over.

Horrible idea

Might be but it happens.

Oh wait you didn't mean that?

Nah I think I'm just a troll. I'm a very conservative one too 😁