Total Posts:16|Showing Posts:1-16
Jump to topic:

Clinton reminding me why I dislike her.

TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2016 7:23:25 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
I am not naive, I expected her to breakout the negative messing at some point. I also don't have an issue with Chelsea Clinton doing some of the dirty work, she is an adult now, and I fully expect to be seeing a lot of her in the coming months. What I do mind is her using the low-information tack that know from... others.

There are places to attack Sanders. Talking about healthcare, a subject Clinton should (and does) know well, she either is dishonest or purposely misleading. Yea, its the nature of this sort of politics, but it is not what I want from my party. Its the sort of trolling that Trump does. It is beneath her, but she does it anyway.

Simply put. She exhausted my Clinton good will in 2008. I defend and love Bill forever. I don't have to love the spouse.

http://www.usnews.com...
kevin24018
Posts: 3,008
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2016 7:35:33 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/13/2016 7:23:25 PM, TBR wrote:
I am not naive, I expected her to breakout the negative messing at some point. I also don't have an issue with Chelsea Clinton doing some of the dirty work, she is an adult now, and I fully expect to be seeing a lot of her in the coming months. What I do mind is her using the low-information tack that know from... others.

There are places to attack Sanders. Talking about healthcare, a subject Clinton should (and does) know well, she either is dishonest or purposely misleading. Yea, its the nature of this sort of politics, but it is not what I want from my party. Its the sort of trolling that Trump does. It is beneath her, but she does it anyway.

Simply put. She exhausted my Clinton good will in 2008. I defend and love Bill forever. I don't have to love the spouse.

http://www.usnews.com...

wow I'm surprised since the upcoming races where predicted to be close I guess it was a tactical decision to gain more support, seems very strange to try and see if that approach works this close to the key dates because you are now committed and can't really back off without it being used against you. I think it will either put her on top or will be an epic fail, either way I only see it getting worse from here on out (the attacks). Will be interesting to see if she gains more thralls.
BobTheRocket2 wrote:
Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what, it's going to knock over the pieces, crap all over the board, and strut around like it's victorious.

"Beware the engineers of society, I say, who would make everyone in all the world equal. Opportunity should be equal, must be equal, but achievement must remain individual.
- Drizzt Do'Urden"
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2016 7:42:04 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/13/2016 7:35:33 PM, kevin24018 wrote:
At 1/13/2016 7:23:25 PM, TBR wrote:
I am not naive, I expected her to breakout the negative messing at some point. I also don't have an issue with Chelsea Clinton doing some of the dirty work, she is an adult now, and I fully expect to be seeing a lot of her in the coming months. What I do mind is her using the low-information tack that know from... others.

There are places to attack Sanders. Talking about healthcare, a subject Clinton should (and does) know well, she either is dishonest or purposely misleading. Yea, its the nature of this sort of politics, but it is not what I want from my party. Its the sort of trolling that Trump does. It is beneath her, but she does it anyway.

Simply put. She exhausted my Clinton good will in 2008. I defend and love Bill forever. I don't have to love the spouse.

http://www.usnews.com...

wow I'm surprised since the upcoming races where predicted to be close I guess it was a tactical decision to gain more support, seems very strange to try and see if that approach works this close to the key dates because you are now committed and can't really back off without it being used against you. I think it will either put her on top or will be an epic fail, either way I only see it getting worse from here on out (the attacks). Will be interesting to see if she gains more thralls.

I have seen on the political forms a general twitchy supporter base. They are getting concerned, and I have seen a fair number change profiles for Sanders from Clinton.
Greyparrot
Posts: 15,704
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2016 7:42:10 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/13/2016 7:23:25 PM, TBR wrote:
I am not naive, I expected her to breakout the negative messing at some point. I also don't have an issue with Chelsea Clinton doing some of the dirty work, she is an adult now, and I fully expect to be seeing a lot of her in the coming months. What I do mind is her using the low-information tack that know from... others.

There are places to attack Sanders. Talking about healthcare, a subject Clinton should (and does) know well, she either is dishonest or purposely misleading. Yea, its the nature of this sort of politics, but it is not what I want from my party. Its the sort of trolling that Trump does. It is beneath her, but she does it anyway.

Simply put. She exhausted my Clinton good will in 2008. I defend and love Bill forever. I don't have to love the spouse.

http://www.usnews.com...

I actually love Bill too.
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
EndarkenedRationalist
Posts: 14,201
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2016 7:46:07 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
While Sanders is my top choice, I think we do have to acknowledge the reality that Clinton will win. Which is a shame. I'd vote for Jeb and possibly even Rubio before Clinton.
kevin24018
Posts: 3,008
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2016 7:58:50 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/13/2016 7:46:07 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
While Sanders is my top choice, I think we do have to acknowledge the reality that Clinton will win. Which is a shame. I'd vote for Jeb and possibly even Rubio before Clinton.

yeah I agree I will vote for anyone else.
BobTheRocket2 wrote:
Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what, it's going to knock over the pieces, crap all over the board, and strut around like it's victorious.

"Beware the engineers of society, I say, who would make everyone in all the world equal. Opportunity should be equal, must be equal, but achievement must remain individual.
- Drizzt Do'Urden"
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2016 7:59:49 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/13/2016 7:46:07 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
While Sanders is my top choice, I think we do have to acknowledge the reality that Clinton will win. Which is a shame. I'd vote for Jeb and possibly even Rubio before Clinton.

I will vote Clinton when/if the time comes. She is very competent. I just don't like her very much. Well, not at all really.
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2016 8:06:38 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/13/2016 7:23:25 PM, TBR wrote:
I am not naive, I expected her to breakout the negative messing at some point. I also don't have an issue with Chelsea Clinton doing some of the dirty work, she is an adult now, and I fully expect to be seeing a lot of her in the coming months. What I do mind is her using the low-information tack that know from... others.

There are places to attack Sanders. Talking about healthcare, a subject Clinton should (and does) know well, she either is dishonest or purposely misleading. Yea, its the nature of this sort of politics, but it is not what I want from my party. Its the sort of trolling that Trump does. It is beneath her, but she does it anyway.

Simply put. She exhausted my Clinton good will in 2008. I defend and love Bill forever. I don't have to love the spouse.

http://www.usnews.com...

WOW is she getting chewed-up on reddit.

It may have worked, I don't know, but my current read is this is blowing-up for Clinton.
1harderthanyouthink
Posts: 13,419
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2016 11:04:01 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/13/2016 8:06:38 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/13/2016 7:23:25 PM, TBR wrote:
I am not naive, I expected her to breakout the negative messing at some point. I also don't have an issue with Chelsea Clinton doing some of the dirty work, she is an adult now, and I fully expect to be seeing a lot of her in the coming months. What I do mind is her using the low-information tack that know from... others.

There are places to attack Sanders. Talking about healthcare, a subject Clinton should (and does) know well, she either is dishonest or purposely misleading. Yea, its the nature of this sort of politics, but it is not what I want from my party. Its the sort of trolling that Trump does. It is beneath her, but she does it anyway.

Simply put. She exhausted my Clinton good will in 2008. I defend and love Bill forever. I don't have to love the spouse.

http://www.usnews.com...

WOW is she getting chewed-up on reddit.

It may have worked, I don't know, but my current read is this is blowing-up for Clinton.

If it did, that's outstanding.
"It's awfully considerate of you to think of me here,
And I'm much obliged to you for making it clear - that I'm not here."

-Syd Barrett

DDO Risk King
imabench
Posts: 21,493
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2016 11:33:39 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/13/2016 8:06:38 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/13/2016 7:23:25 PM, TBR wrote:
I am not naive, I expected her to breakout the negative messing at some point. I also don't have an issue with Chelsea Clinton doing some of the dirty work, she is an adult now, and I fully expect to be seeing a lot of her in the coming months. What I do mind is her using the low-information tack that know from... others.

There are places to attack Sanders. Talking about healthcare, a subject Clinton should (and does) know well, she either is dishonest or purposely misleading. Yea, its the nature of this sort of politics, but it is not what I want from my party. Its the sort of trolling that Trump does. It is beneath her, but she does it anyway.

Simply put. She exhausted my Clinton good will in 2008. I defend and love Bill forever. I don't have to love the spouse.

http://www.usnews.com...

WOW is she getting chewed-up on reddit.

It may have worked, I don't know, but my current read is this is blowing-up for Clinton.

Bernie's fanbase reminds me of Ron Paul's in that it only seems to exist on the internet. If Reddit is tearing Hillary a new one for something that she didnt even say then I wouldnt be too worried about it. Im willing to bet anyone who gives a sh** about what Chelsea said here were already going to vote against Hillary when the time came. Unless this sways Hillary supporters into not voting for her, which I doubt will happen, then I dont see this being a big deal at all
Latest person to get trolled to death by Imabench: http://www.debate.org...

7/14/16 = The Presidency Dies

DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015
Midnight1131
Posts: 1,646
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/14/2016 12:58:54 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/13/2016 7:46:07 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
While Sanders is my top choice, I think we do have to acknowledge the reality that Clinton will win. Which is a shame. I'd vote for Jeb and possibly even Rubio before Clinton.

Sanders will have a pretty good chance once he wins New Hampshire [likely], and Iowa [very possible.]
#GaryJohnson2016
#TaxationisTheft
#TheftisTaxation
Midnight1131
Posts: 1,646
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/14/2016 1:00:22 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/13/2016 8:06:38 PM, TBR wrote:
WOW is she getting chewed-up on reddit.

It may have worked, I don't know, but my current read is this is blowing-up for Clinton.

/r/politics should be renamed /r/sanders, that sub's been doing this for months now. Literally every insignificant story about Sanders gets upvoted to the front page.
#GaryJohnson2016
#TaxationisTheft
#TheftisTaxation
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/14/2016 1:24:56 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/13/2016 11:33:39 PM, imabench wrote:
At 1/13/2016 8:06:38 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/13/2016 7:23:25 PM, TBR wrote:
I am not naive, I expected her to breakout the negative messing at some point. I also don't have an issue with Chelsea Clinton doing some of the dirty work, she is an adult now, and I fully expect to be seeing a lot of her in the coming months. What I do mind is her using the low-information tack that know from... others.

There are places to attack Sanders. Talking about healthcare, a subject Clinton should (and does) know well, she either is dishonest or purposely misleading. Yea, its the nature of this sort of politics, but it is not what I want from my party. Its the sort of trolling that Trump does. It is beneath her, but she does it anyway.

Simply put. She exhausted my Clinton good will in 2008. I defend and love Bill forever. I don't have to love the spouse.

http://www.usnews.com...

WOW is she getting chewed-up on reddit.

It may have worked, I don't know, but my current read is this is blowing-up for Clinton.

Bernie's fanbase reminds me of Ron Paul's in that it only seems to exist on the internet. If Reddit is tearing Hillary a new one for something that she didnt even say then I wouldnt be too worried about it. Im willing to bet anyone who gives a sh** about what Chelsea said here were already going to vote against Hillary when the time came. Unless this sways Hillary supporters into not voting for her, which I doubt will happen, then I dont see this being a big deal at all

I don't know about that. On a well traveled democratic site I frequent, I see lots of new Sanders supporters, people switching from Clinton, and a he11 of a lot of blowback from this one.
imabench
Posts: 21,493
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/14/2016 1:29:59 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/14/2016 1:24:56 AM, TBR wrote:
At 1/13/2016 11:33:39 PM, imabench wrote:
At 1/13/2016 8:06:38 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/13/2016 7:23:25 PM, TBR wrote:
I am not naive, I expected her to breakout the negative messing at some point. I also don't have an issue with Chelsea Clinton doing some of the dirty work, she is an adult now, and I fully expect to be seeing a lot of her in the coming months. What I do mind is her using the low-information tack that know from... others.

There are places to attack Sanders. Talking about healthcare, a subject Clinton should (and does) know well, she either is dishonest or purposely misleading. Yea, its the nature of this sort of politics, but it is not what I want from my party. Its the sort of trolling that Trump does. It is beneath her, but she does it anyway.

Simply put. She exhausted my Clinton good will in 2008. I defend and love Bill forever. I don't have to love the spouse.

http://www.usnews.com...

WOW is she getting chewed-up on reddit.

It may have worked, I don't know, but my current read is this is blowing-up for Clinton.

Bernie's fanbase reminds me of Ron Paul's in that it only seems to exist on the internet. If Reddit is tearing Hillary a new one for something that she didnt even say then I wouldnt be too worried about it. Im willing to bet anyone who gives a sh** about what Chelsea said here were already going to vote against Hillary when the time came. Unless this sways Hillary supporters into not voting for her, which I doubt will happen, then I dont see this being a big deal at all

I don't know about that. On a well traveled democratic site I frequent,

Does it rhyme with 'shm-emocratic underground' ?

I see lots of new Sanders supporters, people switching from Clinton, and a he11 of a lot of blowback from this one.
Latest person to get trolled to death by Imabench: http://www.debate.org...

7/14/16 = The Presidency Dies

DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/14/2016 2:04:53 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/14/2016 1:29:59 AM, imabench wrote:
At 1/14/2016 1:24:56 AM, TBR wrote:
At 1/13/2016 11:33:39 PM, imabench wrote:
At 1/13/2016 8:06:38 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/13/2016 7:23:25 PM, TBR wrote:
I am not naive, I expected her to breakout the negative messing at some point. I also don't have an issue with Chelsea Clinton doing some of the dirty work, she is an adult now, and I fully expect to be seeing a lot of her in the coming months. What I do mind is her using the low-information tack that know from... others.

There are places to attack Sanders. Talking about healthcare, a subject Clinton should (and does) know well, she either is dishonest or purposely misleading. Yea, its the nature of this sort of politics, but it is not what I want from my party. Its the sort of trolling that Trump does. It is beneath her, but she does it anyway.

Simply put. She exhausted my Clinton good will in 2008. I defend and love Bill forever. I don't have to love the spouse.

http://www.usnews.com...

WOW is she getting chewed-up on reddit.

It may have worked, I don't know, but my current read is this is blowing-up for Clinton.

Bernie's fanbase reminds me of Ron Paul's in that it only seems to exist on the internet. If Reddit is tearing Hillary a new one for something that she didnt even say then I wouldnt be too worried about it. Im willing to bet anyone who gives a sh** about what Chelsea said here were already going to vote against Hillary when the time came. Unless this sways Hillary supporters into not voting for her, which I doubt will happen, then I dont see this being a big deal at all

I don't know about that. On a well traveled democratic site I frequent,

Does it rhyme with 'shm-emocratic underground' ?

I see lots of new Sanders supporters, people switching from Clinton, and a he11 of a lot of blowback from this one.

Yup.