Total Posts:4|Showing Posts:1-4
Jump to topic:

Political policy scenario. What would you do?

Wylted
Posts: 21,204
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/14/2016 3:38:07 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Here is the scenario, please go as much into the philosophical reasons for your choice as possible:

Let's say that a policy decision is in front of you. Saying yes to this policy will improve the status quo, but saying yes to the policy will take society further from your ideal vision. Should you prioritize your vision which may never happen or the gaurunteed improvement upon the status quo?
The-Voice-of-Truth
Posts: 8,337
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/14/2016 3:40:12 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/14/2016 3:38:07 PM, Wylted wrote:
Here is the scenario, please go as much into the philosophical reasons for your choice as possible:

Let's say that a policy decision is in front of you. Saying yes to this policy will improve the status quo, but saying yes to the policy will take society further from your ideal vision. Should you prioritize your vision which may never happen or the gaurunteed improvement upon the status quo?

According to any given person, their views do advance the status quo. So, I would say both.
Donald invictus, deliver and be tart and huge by narrow.

"Especially so, but considering the nature of nuclear warheads, it's probably more like atomic annihilation than triple homicide." -Yours Truly

Vaarka swung his sword at the mod. However, since I am now incorporeal, he ends up accidentally striking the entire American landmass (It's a REALLY bastard sword), destroying both continents. Spiders are now at 50% of capacity.
Wylted
Posts: 21,204
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/14/2016 4:49:42 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/14/2016 3:40:12 PM, The-Voice-of-Truth wrote:
At 1/14/2016 3:38:07 PM, Wylted wrote:
Here is the scenario, please go as much into the philosophical reasons for your choice as possible:

Let's say that a policy decision is in front of you. Saying yes to this policy will improve the status quo, but saying yes to the policy will take society further from your ideal vision. Should you prioritize your vision which may never happen or the gaurunteed improvement upon the status quo?

According to any given person, their views do advance the status quo. So, I would say both.

What if you can't have both? I think a single payer system is better than the status quo, and also that the beat possible policies would be completely libertarian there would be laws that allowed for tons of competition. Now a single payer simultaneously improves the status quo while also taking us further from a system that is better than both the status quo and the proposed improvement upon the status quo
The-Voice-of-Truth
Posts: 8,337
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/14/2016 4:52:22 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/14/2016 4:49:42 PM, Wylted wrote:
At 1/14/2016 3:40:12 PM, The-Voice-of-Truth wrote:
At 1/14/2016 3:38:07 PM, Wylted wrote:
Here is the scenario, please go as much into the philosophical reasons for your choice as possible:

Let's say that a policy decision is in front of you. Saying yes to this policy will improve the status quo, but saying yes to the policy will take society further from your ideal vision. Should you prioritize your vision which may never happen or the gaurunteed improvement upon the status quo?

According to any given person, their views do advance the status quo. So, I would say both.

What if you can't have both? I think a single payer system is better than the status quo, and also that the beat possible policies would be completely libertarian there would be laws that allowed for tons of competition. Now a single payer simultaneously improves the status quo while also taking us further from a system that is better than both the status quo and the proposed improvement upon the status quo

If I couldn't have both, then I would pursue the decision that would change the status quo, not advance it. But you see, according to my views, I am advancing the status quo, so really, no matter what decision I make, I am advancing the status quo.
Donald invictus, deliver and be tart and huge by narrow.

"Especially so, but considering the nature of nuclear warheads, it's probably more like atomic annihilation than triple homicide." -Yours Truly

Vaarka swung his sword at the mod. However, since I am now incorporeal, he ends up accidentally striking the entire American landmass (It's a REALLY bastard sword), destroying both continents. Spiders are now at 50% of capacity.