Total Posts:24|Showing Posts:1-24
Jump to topic:

Poll says Sanders is near even nationally

1harderthanyouthink
Posts: 13,615
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/5/2016 2:44:08 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
http://www.quinnipiac.edu...

Well, I'm very interested in what the next few releases say. This is a dramatic shift. If true, people are dead wrong about Sanders having no chance after not winning Iowa.
"It's the PUPPY IN THE SKY!" -TBR's kid

DDO Risk King
Greyparrot
Posts: 17,589
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/5/2016 2:44:43 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/5/2016 2:44:08 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu...

Well, I'm very interested in what the next few releases say. This is a dramatic shift. If true, people are dead wrong about Sanders having no chance after not winning Iowa.

Bern it up!
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
Greyparrot
Posts: 17,589
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/5/2016 2:55:16 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/5/2016 2:47:21 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
The margin of error was +/- 4.5%.

Is Hillary still claiming her supporters have all the energy?
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Posts: 12,398
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/5/2016 2:55:51 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/5/2016 2:44:08 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu...

Well, I'm very interested in what the next few releases say. This is a dramatic shift. If true, people are dead wrong about Sanders having no chance after not winning Iowa.

Niceeeeeeeeeeeee.

#Feelthebern

Have you seen any polls beyond New Hampshire? This is certainly wonderful progress, though obviously I'm a bit skeptical of a head-to-head national matchup (Romney and Obama were polling about even, too). The theory, as I've heard it espoused by Clinton people, is that she's going to get her behind handed to her in NH and then rebound and take every state from there. I'd love if there were confirmation to the contrary.
~ResponsiblyIrresponsible

DDO's Economics Messiah
stealspell
Posts: 980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/5/2016 3:04:27 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/5/2016 2:44:08 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu...

Well, I'm very interested in what the next few releases say. This is a dramatic shift. If true, people are dead wrong about Sanders having no chance after not winning Iowa.

America is feeling the Bern :)
Mikal
Posts: 11,676
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/5/2016 3:06:35 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/5/2016 2:44:08 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu...

Well, I'm very interested in what the next few releases say. This is a dramatic shift. If true, people are dead wrong about Sanders having no chance after not winning Iowa.

Clinton trails Rubio 48 - 41 percent;
1harderthanyouthink
Posts: 13,615
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/5/2016 3:18:53 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/5/2016 3:06:35 PM, Mikal wrote:
At 2/5/2016 2:44:08 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu...

Well, I'm very interested in what the next few releases say. This is a dramatic shift. If true, people are dead wrong about Sanders having no chance after not winning Iowa.

Clinton trails Rubio 48 - 41 percent;

I noticed.
"It's the PUPPY IN THE SKY!" -TBR's kid

DDO Risk King
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/5/2016 3:29:40 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/5/2016 2:44:08 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu...

Well, I'm very interested in what the next few releases say. This is a dramatic shift. If true, people are dead wrong about Sanders having no chance after not winning Iowa.

Yea, it was BSH1 I was talking to about this. He seemed convinced that her "win"* was going to translate into poll numbers.
1harderthanyouthink
Posts: 13,615
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/5/2016 3:31:11 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/5/2016 3:29:40 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/5/2016 2:44:08 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu...

Well, I'm very interested in what the next few releases say. This is a dramatic shift. If true, people are dead wrong about Sanders having no chance after not winning Iowa.

Yea, it was BSH1 I was talking to about this. He seemed convinced that her "win"* was going to translate into poll numbers.

I didn't think it'd shift the field any more in her favor than it already was.
"It's the PUPPY IN THE SKY!" -TBR's kid

DDO Risk King
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/5/2016 3:35:05 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/5/2016 3:31:11 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 2/5/2016 3:29:40 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/5/2016 2:44:08 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu...

Well, I'm very interested in what the next few releases say. This is a dramatic shift. If true, people are dead wrong about Sanders having no chance after not winning Iowa.

Yea, it was BSH1 I was talking to about this. He seemed convinced that her "win"* was going to translate into poll numbers.

I didn't think it'd shift the field any more in her favor than it already was.

I am sticking with my prediction that Sanders gets squished super Tuesday, but Sanders is so much stronger than I could ever have hoped for.
xus00HAY
Posts: 1,526
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/6/2016 4:34:24 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
IN the caucus the local republicans made believe they were democrat and voted for Bernie. When a pollster asks them they say they will vote for Sanders.
Why.
Sanders is Jewish.
The GOP does not believe the majority will vote for a Jewish president.
When there was a Jew nominated for vice president, he lost, even though he got more votes that his opponent.
Bigots like to vote.
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/6/2016 5:07:37 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/6/2016 4:34:24 AM, xus00HAY wrote:
IN the caucus the local republicans made believe they were democrat and voted for Bernie. When a pollster asks them they say they will vote for Sanders.
Why.
Sanders is Jewish.
The GOP does not believe the majority will vote for a Jewish president.
When there was a Jew nominated for vice president, he lost, even though he got more votes that his opponent.
Bigots like to vote.

Ypu do know that you cant vote in the primary outside your party right? I mean, you are talking abput Iowa, right?
Greyparrot
Posts: 17,589
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/6/2016 5:30:14 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/5/2016 3:35:05 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/5/2016 3:31:11 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 2/5/2016 3:29:40 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/5/2016 2:44:08 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu...

Well, I'm very interested in what the next few releases say. This is a dramatic shift. If true, people are dead wrong about Sanders having no chance after not winning Iowa.

Yea, it was BSH1 I was talking to about this. He seemed convinced that her "win"* was going to translate into poll numbers.

I didn't think it'd shift the field any more in her favor than it already was.

I am sticking with my prediction that Sanders gets squished super Tuesday, but Sanders is so much stronger than I could ever have hoped for.

You will feel the Bern too.
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/6/2016 5:32:23 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/6/2016 5:30:14 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/5/2016 3:35:05 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/5/2016 3:31:11 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 2/5/2016 3:29:40 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/5/2016 2:44:08 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu...

Well, I'm very interested in what the next few releases say. This is a dramatic shift. If true, people are dead wrong about Sanders having no chance after not winning Iowa.

Yea, it was BSH1 I was talking to about this. He seemed convinced that her "win"* was going to translate into poll numbers.

I didn't think it'd shift the field any more in her favor than it already was.

I am sticking with my prediction that Sanders gets squished super Tuesday, but Sanders is so much stronger than I could ever have hoped for.

You will feel the Bern too.

worse slogan since 'you eon't switch horses midstream'
Greyparrot
Posts: 17,589
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/6/2016 5:43:56 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/6/2016 5:32:23 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/6/2016 5:30:14 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/5/2016 3:35:05 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/5/2016 3:31:11 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 2/5/2016 3:29:40 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/5/2016 2:44:08 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu...

Well, I'm very interested in what the next few releases say. This is a dramatic shift. If true, people are dead wrong about Sanders having no chance after not winning Iowa.

Yea, it was BSH1 I was talking to about this. He seemed convinced that her "win"* was going to translate into poll numbers.

I didn't think it'd shift the field any more in her favor than it already was.

I am sticking with my prediction that Sanders gets squished super Tuesday, but Sanders is so much stronger than I could ever have hoped for.

You will feel the Bern too.

worse slogan since 'you don't switch horses midstream'

Nothing wrong with unhitching the Hillary horse. I agree.
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
Vox_Veritas
Posts: 7,251
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/6/2016 6:52:12 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
You see, those people who think Sanders has less of a chance of winning than Hillary because of his far left beliefs are probably wrong. Since the beginning of the 21st century the American public has undergone a radical shift to the Left. Like experts didn't anticipate the large appeal of a far right candidate like Trump the experts are failing to anticipate the even larger appeal of a far left candidate such as Bernie Sanders.
If he gets the nomination he will probably become president. Give me Hillary any day.
Call me Vox, the Resident Contrarian of debate.org.

The DDO Blog:
https://debatedotorg.wordpress.com...

#drinkthecoffeenotthekoolaid
EndarkenedRationalist
Posts: 14,201
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/6/2016 7:37:29 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/6/2016 6:52:12 PM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
You see, those people who think Sanders has less of a chance of winning than Hillary because of his far left beliefs are probably wrong. Since the beginning of the 21st century the American public has undergone a radical shift to the Left. Like experts didn't anticipate the large appeal of a far right candidate like Trump the experts are failing to anticipate the even larger appeal of a far left candidate such as Bernie Sanders.
If he gets the nomination he will probably become president. Give me Hillary any day.

No. Just no. It's easy to look at the changing social attitudes as evidence of America shifting to the left, but that's not indicative of reality.

http://www.politico.com...
Greyparrot
Posts: 17,589
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/6/2016 7:43:36 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/6/2016 6:52:12 PM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
You see, those people who think Sanders has less of a chance of winning than Hillary because of his far left beliefs are probably wrong. Since the beginning of the 21st century the American public has undergone a radical shift to the Left. Like experts didn't anticipate the large appeal of a far right candidate like Trump the experts are failing to anticipate the even larger appeal of a far left candidate such as Bernie Sanders.
If he gets the nomination he will probably become president. Give me Hillary any day.

Man I am so sick of this Hillaryesque "slowly boiling the frog" mentality. Either take the frog out of the pot with Trump, or blow the damn frog up with Bernie. Tired of watching that damn frog simmer slowly.
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
Vox_Veritas
Posts: 7,251
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/6/2016 8:14:11 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/6/2016 7:43:36 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/6/2016 6:52:12 PM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
You see, those people who think Sanders has less of a chance of winning than Hillary because of his far left beliefs are probably wrong. Since the beginning of the 21st century the American public has undergone a radical shift to the Left. Like experts didn't anticipate the large appeal of a far right candidate like Trump the experts are failing to anticipate the even larger appeal of a far left candidate such as Bernie Sanders.
If he gets the nomination he will probably become president. Give me Hillary any day.

Man I am so sick of this Hillaryesque "slowly boiling the frog" mentality. Either take the frog out of the pot with Trump, or blow the damn frog up with Bernie. Tired of watching that damn frog simmer slowly.

What does that even mean?
Call me Vox, the Resident Contrarian of debate.org.

The DDO Blog:
https://debatedotorg.wordpress.com...

#drinkthecoffeenotthekoolaid
triangle.128k
Posts: 4,580
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/6/2016 8:37:09 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/5/2016 2:44:08 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu...

Well, I'm very interested in what the next few releases say. This is a dramatic shift. If true, people are dead wrong about Sanders having no chance after not winning Iowa.

I can't wait when this is our new national anthem: https://www.youtube.com...
imabench
Posts: 21,909
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/6/2016 9:52:12 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/6/2016 8:14:11 PM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
At 2/6/2016 7:43:36 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/6/2016 6:52:12 PM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
You see, those people who think Sanders has less of a chance of winning than Hillary because of his far left beliefs are probably wrong. Since the beginning of the 21st century the American public has undergone a radical shift to the Left. Like experts didn't anticipate the large appeal of a far right candidate like Trump the experts are failing to anticipate the even larger appeal of a far left candidate such as Bernie Sanders.
If he gets the nomination he will probably become president. Give me Hillary any day.

Man I am so sick of this Hillaryesque "slowly boiling the frog" mentality. Either take the frog out of the pot with Trump, or blow the damn frog up with Bernie. Tired of watching that damn frog simmer slowly.

What does that even mean?

its a hysterical way of saying YOLO
DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015
imabench
Posts: 21,909
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/6/2016 9:54:02 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/5/2016 2:44:08 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu...

Well, I'm very interested in what the next few releases say. This is a dramatic shift. If true, people are dead wrong about Sanders having no chance after not winning Iowa.

Id prefer seeing at least 3 polls make the same conclusion rather than just one

http://www.realclearpolitics.com...

3 polls all conducted from 2/2 to 2/4, and two of them have Clinton up by 18 over Bernie, the last one being just 2 over Bernie, and that being the only one you cite
DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015