Total Posts:26|Showing Posts:1-26
Jump to topic:

Trump is a master troll

Skepsikyma
Posts: 8,866
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 5:09:13 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 5:05:27 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
http://imgur.com...

He's like Anne Coulter's Sith apprentice.
"See now Oblivion shimmering all around us, its very tranquility deadlier than tempest. How little all our keels have troubled it. Time in its deeps swims like a monstrous whale; and, like a whale, feeds on the littlest things -- small tunes and little unskilled songs of the olden, golden evenings -- and anon turneth whale-like to overthrow whole ships."
- Lord Dunsany -

"We enjoy, we see nothing by direct vision; but only by reflection, and in anatomical dismemberment."
- Thomas Carlyle -
xus00HAY
Posts: 1,485
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 5:12:29 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
The Pope said Trump was not a Christian, because Christians don't build walls. Trumps reply Vatican city is 100% surrounded by walls.

BTW, Pope Francis, Bernie is the one who is not a Christian, get your facts straight.
dylancatlow
Posts: 12,804
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 5:15:37 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 5:12:29 AM, xus00HAY wrote:
The Pope said Trump was not a Christian, because Christians don't build walls. Trumps reply Vatican city is 100% surrounded by walls.

BTW, Pope Francis, Bernie is the one who is not a Christian, get your facts straight.

Lol, I saw that. They're not just any walls either, but like the most exclusive we-don't-want-you-peasant-in-here walls ever.
1harderthanyouthink
Posts: 13,408
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 5:24:04 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
Making the internet great again.
"It's awfully considerate of you to think of me here,
And I'm much obliged to you for making it clear - that I'm not here."

-Syd Barrett

DDO Risk King
dylancatlow
Posts: 12,804
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 5:35:46 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
To be fair to the Pope, it's not like he had much choice in the matter. I'm sure the walls have been there for centuries. If it was up to him, he might very well have decided against putting them up. In any case, it's different when we're talking about arguably the most important religious figure alive, who obviously needs to be protected from assassins and such.
Greyparrot
Posts: 15,668
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 1:22:49 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 5:35:46 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
To be fair to the Pope, it's not like he had much choice in the matter. I'm sure the walls have been there for centuries. If it was up to him, he might very well have decided against putting them up. In any case, it's different when we're talking about arguably the most important religious figure alive, who obviously needs to be protected from assassins and such.

That's the point. It's ok to protect the elites, but screw the riffraff.
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
dylancatlow
Posts: 12,804
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 5:52:10 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 1:22:49 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:35:46 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
To be fair to the Pope, it's not like he had much choice in the matter. I'm sure the walls have been there for centuries. If it was up to him, he might very well have decided against putting them up. In any case, it's different when we're talking about arguably the most important religious figure alive, who obviously needs to be protected from assassins and such.

That's the point. It's ok to protect the elites, but screw the riffraff.

Well, part of the reason that elites like the pope receive greater protection than the average person is that they are bigger targets. Plus their death would be more significant in geopolitical terms.
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 5:56:09 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 5:05:27 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
http://imgur.com...

Are you sure that's him? I thought his twitter account was REALDonaldTrump or something like that.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 6:19:44 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 5:12:29 AM, xus00HAY wrote:
The Pope said Trump was not a Christian, because Christians don't build walls. Trumps reply Vatican city is 100% surrounded by walls.

BTW, Pope Francis, Bernie is the one who is not a Christian, get your facts straight.

No. That is not what the pope said. He said it was not christian, not that Trump was not a christian.
dylancatlow
Posts: 12,804
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 6:33:35 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 5:56:09 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:05:27 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
http://imgur.com...

Are you sure that's him? I thought his twitter account was REALDonaldTrump or something like that.

Crap I think you're right. Who bought the domain then?
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 6:36:44 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 6:19:44 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:12:29 AM, xus00HAY wrote:
The Pope said Trump was not a Christian, because Christians don't build walls. Trumps reply Vatican city is 100% surrounded by walls.

BTW, Pope Francis, Bernie is the one who is not a Christian, get your facts straight.

No. That is not what the pope said. He said it was not christian, not that Trump was not a christian.

Actually, the pope's words were, "A person who only thinks about building walls... is not Christian." He indeed directly suggested that Trump is not a Christian (pending of course his benefit of the doubt). . . that's what his statement plainly conveys and how everyone has understood it.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 6:45:42 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 6:36:44 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:19:44 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:12:29 AM, xus00HAY wrote:
The Pope said Trump was not a Christian, because Christians don't build walls. Trumps reply Vatican city is 100% surrounded by walls.

BTW, Pope Francis, Bernie is the one who is not a Christian, get your facts straight.

No. That is not what the pope said. He said it was not christian, not that Trump was not a christian.

Actually, the pope's words were, "A person who only thinks about building walls... is not Christian." He indeed directly suggested that Trump is not a Christian (pending of course his benefit of the doubt). . . that's what his statement plainly conveys and how everyone has understood it.

You have added the "A christian" he said "not christian". The actions, not the man.
Greyparrot
Posts: 15,668
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 6:48:53 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 1:22:49 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:35:46 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
To be fair to the Pope, it's not like he had much choice in the matter. I'm sure the walls have been there for centuries. If it was up to him, he might very well have decided against putting them up. In any case, it's different when we're talking about arguably the most important religious figure alive, who obviously needs to be protected from assassins and such.

That's the point. It's ok to protect the elites, but screw the riffraff.

They should also allow anyone to be a citizen of Vatican City, not just people that work for the Holy See.

Vatican City has no bridges, only walls. A fortress of elites. Screw the riffraff.
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 6:57:47 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 6:48:53 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/19/2016 1:22:49 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:35:46 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
To be fair to the Pope, it's not like he had much choice in the matter. I'm sure the walls have been there for centuries. If it was up to him, he might very well have decided against putting them up. In any case, it's different when we're talking about arguably the most important religious figure alive, who obviously needs to be protected from assassins and such.

That's the point. It's ok to protect the elites, but screw the riffraff.

They should also allow anyone to be a citizen of Vatican City, not just people that work for the Holy See.

Vatican City has no bridges, only walls. A fortress of elites. Screw the riffraff.

Vatican City is like 100 acres. Bit tough to take in too many.
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 6:59:01 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 6:45:42 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:36:44 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:19:44 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:12:29 AM, xus00HAY wrote:
The Pope said Trump was not a Christian, because Christians don't build walls. Trumps reply Vatican city is 100% surrounded by walls.

BTW, Pope Francis, Bernie is the one who is not a Christian, get your facts straight.

No. That is not what the pope said. He said it was not christian, not that Trump was not a christian.

Actually, the pope's words were, "A person who only thinks about building walls... is not Christian." He indeed directly suggested that Trump is not a Christian (pending of course his benefit of the doubt). . . that's what his statement plainly conveys and how everyone has understood it.

You have added the "A christian" he said "not christian". The actions, not the man.

You're not paying attention to the grammatical logic of the statement. The simplest reduction of sentence reads "A Person ... is not Christian." The adjective christian is modifying the 'person' himself, not his actions or his words. The presence or absence of the article is irrelevant to the meaning.

And even if it were, the direct translation featured in this CNN video inserts the article. This statement wasn't delivered in English.
(http://www.nytimes.com...)

And like I said, there's pretty much unanimous agreement that the pope was adverting to Trump's christianity -- the only source of doubt being his qualification toward the end that he would extend the benefit of the doubt. Your interpretation is just incorrect.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 7:07:42 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
And frankly the word 'interpretation' is rather charitable in this context. What you're offering is a reading of what the pope said. By the conventions of English grammar, your reading is just categorically incorrect.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Greyparrot
Posts: 15,668
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 7:19:41 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 6:57:47 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:48:53 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/19/2016 1:22:49 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:35:46 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
To be fair to the Pope, it's not like he had much choice in the matter. I'm sure the walls have been there for centuries. If it was up to him, he might very well have decided against putting them up. In any case, it's different when we're talking about arguably the most important religious figure alive, who obviously needs to be protected from assassins and such.

That's the point. It's ok to protect the elites, but screw the riffraff.

They should also allow anyone to be a citizen of Vatican City, not just people that work for the Holy See.

Vatican City has no bridges, only walls. A fortress of elites. Screw the riffraff.

Vatican City is like 100 acres. Bit tough to take in too many.

They take in zero people that don't work for the holy see. The epitome of elitism. And you thought America was elite for teaching English to immigrants....
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 7:25:50 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 7:19:41 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:57:47 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:48:53 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/19/2016 1:22:49 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:35:46 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
To be fair to the Pope, it's not like he had much choice in the matter. I'm sure the walls have been there for centuries. If it was up to him, he might very well have decided against putting them up. In any case, it's different when we're talking about arguably the most important religious figure alive, who obviously needs to be protected from assassins and such.

That's the point. It's ok to protect the elites, but screw the riffraff.

They should also allow anyone to be a citizen of Vatican City, not just people that work for the Holy See.

Vatican City has no bridges, only walls. A fortress of elites. Screw the riffraff.

Vatican City is like 100 acres. Bit tough to take in too many.

They take in zero people that don't work for the holy see. The epitome of elitism. And you thought America was elite for teaching English to immigrants....

I really couldn't care less about what the Vatican does, but I do think its silly to try to shame them because a country the size of a postage stamp is not known for accepting immigrants.

"But but.... What about YOU..." Please...
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 7:30:12 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 6:59:01 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:45:42 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:36:44 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:19:44 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:12:29 AM, xus00HAY wrote:
The Pope said Trump was not a Christian, because Christians don't build walls. Trumps reply Vatican city is 100% surrounded by walls.

BTW, Pope Francis, Bernie is the one who is not a Christian, get your facts straight.

No. That is not what the pope said. He said it was not christian, not that Trump was not a christian.

Actually, the pope's words were, "A person who only thinks about building walls... is not Christian." He indeed directly suggested that Trump is not a Christian (pending of course his benefit of the doubt). . . that's what his statement plainly conveys and how everyone has understood it.

You have added the "A christian" he said "not christian". The actions, not the man.

You're not paying attention to the grammatical logic of the statement. The simplest reduction of sentence reads "A Person ... is not Christian." The adjective christian is modifying the 'person' himself, not his actions or his words. The presence or absence of the article is irrelevant to the meaning.

And even if it were, the direct translation featured in this CNN video inserts the article. This statement wasn't delivered in English.
(http://www.nytimes.com...)

And like I said, there's pretty much unanimous agreement that the pope was adverting to Trump's christianity -- the only source of doubt being his qualification toward the end that he would extend the benefit of the doubt. Your interpretation is just incorrect.

Like the discussion of Vatican city, I don't really care. Trump is not a Christian, he is not behaving as a christian, not living by the Gospels, not following the teachings of Christ. Say it any way you like, he is a complete and total a$$.
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 7:34:01 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 7:30:12 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:59:01 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:45:42 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:36:44 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:19:44 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:12:29 AM, xus00HAY wrote:
The Pope said Trump was not a Christian, because Christians don't build walls. Trumps reply Vatican city is 100% surrounded by walls.

BTW, Pope Francis, Bernie is the one who is not a Christian, get your facts straight.

No. That is not what the pope said. He said it was not christian, not that Trump was not a christian.

Actually, the pope's words were, "A person who only thinks about building walls... is not Christian." He indeed directly suggested that Trump is not a Christian (pending of course his benefit of the doubt). . . that's what his statement plainly conveys and how everyone has understood it.

You have added the "A christian" he said "not christian". The actions, not the man.

You're not paying attention to the grammatical logic of the statement. The simplest reduction of sentence reads "A Person ... is not Christian." The adjective christian is modifying the 'person' himself, not his actions or his words. The presence or absence of the article is irrelevant to the meaning.

And even if it were, the direct translation featured in this CNN video inserts the article. This statement wasn't delivered in English.
(http://www.nytimes.com...)

And like I said, there's pretty much unanimous agreement that the pope was adverting to Trump's christianity -- the only source of doubt being his qualification toward the end that he would extend the benefit of the doubt. Your interpretation is just incorrect.

Like the discussion of Vatican city, I don't really care. Trump is not a Christian, he is not behaving as a christian, not living by the Gospels, not following the teachings of Christ. Say it any way you like, he is a complete and total a$$.

lol well of course, you and I are in total agreement on that point.

However, the argument you were defending was that the pope did not question Trump's faith -- which he very clearly did. I'm assuming this is a concession, then?
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Greyparrot
Posts: 15,668
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 7:37:56 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 7:25:50 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 7:19:41 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:57:47 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:48:53 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/19/2016 1:22:49 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:35:46 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
To be fair to the Pope, it's not like he had much choice in the matter. I'm sure the walls have been there for centuries. If it was up to him, he might very well have decided against putting them up. In any case, it's different when we're talking about arguably the most important religious figure alive, who obviously needs to be protected from assassins and such.

That's the point. It's ok to protect the elites, but screw the riffraff.

They should also allow anyone to be a citizen of Vatican City, not just people that work for the Holy See.

Vatican City has no bridges, only walls. A fortress of elites. Screw the riffraff.

Vatican City is like 100 acres. Bit tough to take in too many.

They take in zero people that don't work for the holy see. The epitome of elitism. And you thought America was elite for teaching English to immigrants....

I really couldn't care less about what the Pope does, but I do think its silly to try to shame them because a country the size of a postage stamp is not known for accepting immigrants.

I agree.
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 7:43:10 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 7:34:01 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2016 7:30:12 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:59:01 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:45:42 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:36:44 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2016 6:19:44 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:12:29 AM, xus00HAY wrote:
The Pope said Trump was not a Christian, because Christians don't build walls. Trumps reply Vatican city is 100% surrounded by walls.

BTW, Pope Francis, Bernie is the one who is not a Christian, get your facts straight.

No. That is not what the pope said. He said it was not christian, not that Trump was not a christian.

Actually, the pope's words were, "A person who only thinks about building walls... is not Christian." He indeed directly suggested that Trump is not a Christian (pending of course his benefit of the doubt). . . that's what his statement plainly conveys and how everyone has understood it.

You have added the "A christian" he said "not christian". The actions, not the man.

You're not paying attention to the grammatical logic of the statement. The simplest reduction of sentence reads "A Person ... is not Christian." The adjective christian is modifying the 'person' himself, not his actions or his words. The presence or absence of the article is irrelevant to the meaning.

And even if it were, the direct translation featured in this CNN video inserts the article. This statement wasn't delivered in English.
(http://www.nytimes.com...)

And like I said, there's pretty much unanimous agreement that the pope was adverting to Trump's christianity -- the only source of doubt being his qualification toward the end that he would extend the benefit of the doubt. Your interpretation is just incorrect.

Like the discussion of Vatican city, I don't really care. Trump is not a Christian, he is not behaving as a christian, not living by the Gospels, not following the teachings of Christ. Say it any way you like, he is a complete and total a$$.

lol well of course, you and I are in total agreement on that point.

However, the argument you were defending was that the pope did not question Trump's faith -- which he very clearly did. I'm assuming this is a concession, then?

If you like it is a concession. Reading the quote vs hearing it, sure. Either way, if we were to ask the Pope to clarify, the distinction is only a matter to Christians who make a big deal out of this sort of thing. I hear many Christians saying so and so is not a real Christian. I think the correct response is, they are not behaving as Christians, not that they are NOT Christians.
dylancatlow
Posts: 12,804
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 7:54:50 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 6:19:44 PM, TBR wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:12:29 AM, xus00HAY wrote:
The Pope said Trump was not a Christian, because Christians don't build walls. Trumps reply Vatican city is 100% surrounded by walls.

BTW, Pope Francis, Bernie is the one who is not a Christian, get your facts straight.

No. That is not what the pope said. He said it was not christian, not that Trump was not a christian.

Is the distinction that one is a set of moral values and the other is a thing you call yourself?
1Percenter
Posts: 820
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 8:53:08 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 5:35:46 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
To be fair to the Pope, it's not like he had much choice in the matter. I'm sure the walls have been there for centuries. If it was up to him, he might very well have decided against putting them up. In any case, it's different when we're talking about arguably the most important religious figure alive, who obviously needs to be protected from assassins and such.

Ironically, the Vatican City walls were built in 846 by Pope Leo IV after St. Peter's Basilica was sacked by Muslim raiders.
Greyparrot
Posts: 15,668
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2016 11:07:00 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2016 8:53:08 PM, 1Percenter wrote:
At 2/19/2016 5:35:46 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
To be fair to the Pope, it's not like he had much choice in the matter. I'm sure the walls have been there for centuries. If it was up to him, he might very well have decided against putting them up. In any case, it's different when we're talking about arguably the most important religious figure alive, who obviously needs to be protected from assassins and such.

Ironically, the Vatican City walls were built in 846 by Pope Leo IV after St. Peter's Basilica was sacked by Muslim raiders.

Real Christians build bridges and turn the other Basilica, not build walls....
http://biblehub.com...
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.