Total Posts:39|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Liberal ignorance/denial has become dangerous

brontoraptor
Posts: 11,685
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/14/2016 11:45:20 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
Liberals are in Denial about Islam to the point they themselves, their opinions, and their defense of Islam have become a threat to the United States and the West.

-----

Fight for Allah: "And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers," (Quran 2:191).

-----

9/11 First Trade Center collapses

http://youtu.be...

San Bernardino Mass Shooting

http://youtu.be...

-----

Paris Attacks

http://youtu.be...

http://youtu.be...

http://youtu.be...

-----

"Rape Jihad" of Cologne

http://youtu.be...

http://youtu.be...

Taharrush, Islamic rape game where outside ring of Muslim men keep outsiders confused and distracted while the inner circle of men push the female down and mass rape her in the "chaos".

http://youtu.be...

http://youtu.be...

-----

Philadelphia cop ambushed by armed Muslim and shot "in the name of Allah".

http://youtu.be...

-----

Boston Marathon Bombing

http://youtu.be...

-----

July 7, London Bombing

http://youtu.be...

-----

"Oklahoma: Woman Beheaded"

http://youtu.be...

-----

"Fort Hood Shooting"

http://youtu.be...

http://youtu.be...

-----

'Islamic terrorists have relied on particular warped interpretations of the tenets of the Quran and the Hadith, citing these scriptures to justify violent tactics including mass murder, genocide, child molestation and slavery."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org...

-----

The Qur'an tells Muslims to kill and go to war to fight for Islam: Quran, chapters (Surahs) 9:5, 2:191, 2:193, 3:118, 4:75, 76, 5:33, 8:12, 8:65, 9:73, 123, 33:60-62.

-----

Beheading: "When thy Lord inspired the angels, (saying): I am with you. So make those who believe stand firm. I will throw fear into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Then smite the necks and smite of them each finger. 13That is because they opposed Allah and His messenger. Whoso opposeth Allah and His messenger, (for him) lo! Allah is severe in punishment," (Quran 8:12).

Slay non-muslims: "Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful," (Quran 9:5).
Allah urges war: "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination," (Quran 9:73).
Allah urges war: "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness; and know that Allah is with those who guard (against evil)," (Quran 9:123).
Allah urges killing: " . . . the hypocrites and those in whose hearts is a disease and the agitators in the city do not desist . . . 61Cursed: wherever they are found they shall be seized and murdered, a (horrible) murdering. 62(Such has been) the course of Allah with respect to those who have gone before; and you shall not find any change in the course of Allah, (Quran 33:60-62).
Beheading: "Now when ye meet in battle those who disbelieve, then it is smiting of the necks until, when ye have routed them, then making fast of bonds; and afterward either grace or ransom till the war lay down its burdens . . . " (Quran 47:4).
Allah loves those who fight for him: "Truly Allah loves those who fight in His Cause in battle array, as if they were a solid cemented structure," (Quran 61:4).

-----

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, ex Muslim has stated that there is no moderate vs extremist Islam. There is just Islam.

-----

"Islam is not a race...Islam is simply a set of beliefs, and it is not 'Islamophobic' to say Islam is incompatible with liberal democracy."
-Ayaan Hirsi Ali, ex Muslim

"Islam is not a religion of peace. It's a political theory of conquest that seeks domination by any means it can."
-Ayaan Hirsi Ali

"It gives a legitimate basis for abuse, so that the perpetrators feel no shame and are not hounded by their conscience."
-Ayaan Hirsi Ali

"Adolph Hitler got his values from Islam"

http://youtu.be...

"Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers -already, you see, the world had already fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing Christianity! -then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism [Islam], that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so."
-Adolph Hitler

"The only religion and prophet I respect are Mohamedism (Islam) and Mohammed."
-Adolph Hitler
"What Donald Trump is doing is representing the absolute heartbreak, and anger, and frustration at a government gone mad."

http://youtu.be...
slo1
Posts: 4,308
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/15/2016 2:27:58 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
The entire problem with your theory is that it assumes all Muslims support a literal interpretation of the Koran.

You think a billion plus Muslims would like to behead you. That is not true and foreign policy should reflect that fact.

I'll give you this, comparatively to any major religion it has the highest percentage of its members believing in vile inhumane bs, however all religions have their radical fundamentalists who would have no qualms about setting up a theocracy. The republicans even have their share.
Death23
Posts: 779
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/15/2016 5:57:46 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
From 1995 to 2014, there have been 3,264 deaths in the United States from terrorism ( https://goo.gl... ) and 785,195 deaths from automobile accidents. ( https://goo.gl... ) The ratio is over 240 to 1. Yet, we launch this whole "war on terror" and spend all this blood and treasure to try to fix the terrorism problem. Misplaced priorities? I think so.
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/15/2016 6:00:15 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
Every single attack (of self defense mind you) on the US has been political, not religious.
Emmarie
Posts: 1,907
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/15/2016 6:11:10 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/15/2016 5:57:46 AM, Death23 wrote:
From 1995 to 2014, there have been 3,264 deaths in the United States from terrorism ( https://goo.gl... ) and 785,195 deaths from automobile accidents. ( https://goo.gl... ) The ratio is over 240 to 1. Yet, we launch this whole "war on terror" and spend all this blood and treasure to try to fix the terrorism problem. Misplaced priorities? I think so.

clearly we need to ban cars
vortex86
Posts: 559
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/15/2016 9:50:44 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/15/2016 5:57:46 AM, Death23 wrote:
From 1995 to 2014, there have been 3,264 deaths in the United States from terrorism ( https://goo.gl... ) and 785,195 deaths from automobile accidents. ( https://goo.gl... ) The ratio is over 240 to 1. Yet, we launch this whole "war on terror" and spend all this blood and treasure to try to fix the terrorism problem. Misplaced priorities? I think so.

Not to minimize your point, but you have to realize the emphasis in combating it obviously significantly reduces it. Not to mention the impact of those deaths versus an accidental automobile death. We are fortunate enough to live in a country where we don't live in constant fear of attacks like some other less fortunate countries that accept that as the norm.
Objectivity
Posts: 1,073
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/15/2016 12:10:26 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/15/2016 6:00:15 AM, smelisox wrote:
Every single attack (of self defense mind you) on the US has been political, not religious.

keep drinking the kool aid lol
RookieApologist
Posts: 469
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/15/2016 2:19:02 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/15/2016 1:14:44 PM, UtherPenguin wrote:
So much wrong in this OP I don't even know where to start.

So then why bother posting?

One thing to note is that "terrorism" is not the enemy. It is a tactic which the enemy uses. The US, starting with the Bush administration and certainly continued by the Obama administration, has mislabeled the enemy from the start. Calling this a war on "terror" is akin to calling World War II a war on "kamikazes".

Further, there are plenty of terror groups in the world that we are NOT fighting, since they have not attacked us. So then it is not a war on "terror" at all. Alas, we cannot go to war against a tactic or strategy. We go to war against an enemy. Until the administration (whoever that may be at the time) realizes this, we will continue to fight the wrong war and continue to fail to make significant advances (I won't claim we are winning or losing).

I do not understand why this concept is so difficult to grasp in both the Executive and Legislative Branches. Is the President not well within his right and power to ask Congress to declare war on ISIS - an actual enemy and not a tactic?

Further, all of the pundits who claim that "radical Islam" is the enemy are also misinformed. Again, "radical Islam" is not an enemy in itself, even though its tenets certainly breed enemies. The enemy is who results from radical Islamic teaching and practice, i.e. ISIS, Al Queda, etc.

Until we (and the rest of the world) realize we cannot wage war against a tactic or a particular ideology, we will continue to fail to defeat the enemy. We only need look to history. In World War II, did we declare war against Fascism? No, we declared war against Germany. Did we declare war against kamikazes? No, we declared war against Japan. In Vietnam, did we declare war against North Vietnam? No, we didn't declare war at all. We tried to fight "communism", which is an ideology, not an actual enemy. And the results speak for themselves, just like they are now.

Identifying the enemy is the very start of waging a winnable war.
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 7:16:19 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/15/2016 12:10:26 PM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/15/2016 6:00:15 AM, smelisox wrote:
Every single attack (of self defense mind you) on the US has been political, not religious.

keep drinking the kool aid lol

Name a single one.

-Pearl Harbour: Political
-9/11: Political
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 7:17:30 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/15/2016 2:19:02 PM, RookieApologist wrote:
At 3/15/2016 1:14:44 PM, UtherPenguin wrote:
So much wrong in this OP I don't even know where to start.

So then why bother posting?

One thing to note is that "terrorism" is not the enemy. It is a tactic which the enemy uses. The US, starting with the Bush administration and certainly continued by the Obama administration, has mislabeled the enemy from the start. Calling this a war on "terror" is akin to calling World War II a war on "kamikazes".

Further, there are plenty of terror groups in the world that we are NOT fighting, since they have not attacked us. So then it is not a war on "terror" at all. Alas, we cannot go to war against a tactic or strategy. We go to war against an enemy. Until the administration (whoever that may be at the time) realizes this, we will continue to fight the wrong war and continue to fail to make significant advances (I won't claim we are winning or losing).

I do not understand why this concept is so difficult to grasp in both the Executive and Legislative Branches. Is the President not well within his right and power to ask Congress to declare war on ISIS - an actual enemy and not a tactic?

Further, all of the pundits who claim that "radical Islam" is the enemy are also misinformed. Again, "radical Islam" is not an enemy in itself, even though its tenets certainly breed enemies. The enemy is who results from radical Islamic teaching and practice, i.e. ISIS, Al Queda, etc.

Until we (and the rest of the world) realize we cannot wage war against a tactic or a particular ideology, we will continue to fail to defeat the enemy. We only need look to history. In World War II, did we declare war against Fascism? No, we declared war against Germany. Did we declare war against kamikazes? No, we declared war against Japan. In Vietnam, did we declare war against North Vietnam? No, we didn't declare war at all. We tried to fight "communism", which is an ideology, not an actual enemy. And the results speak for themselves, just like they are now.

Identifying the enemy is the very start of waging a winnable war.

You didn't declare war against Germany at all, you cowards.
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,205
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 11:39:27 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 7:17:30 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/15/2016 2:19:02 PM, RookieApologist wrote:
At 3/15/2016 1:14:44 PM, UtherPenguin wrote:
So much wrong in this OP I don't even know where to start.

So then why bother posting?

One thing to note is that "terrorism" is not the enemy. It is a tactic which the enemy uses. The US, starting with the Bush administration and certainly continued by the Obama administration, has mislabeled the enemy from the start. Calling this a war on "terror" is akin to calling World War II a war on "kamikazes".

Further, there are plenty of terror groups in the world that we are NOT fighting, since they have not attacked us. So then it is not a war on "terror" at all. Alas, we cannot go to war against a tactic or strategy. We go to war against an enemy. Until the administration (whoever that may be at the time) realizes this, we will continue to fight the wrong war and continue to fail to make significant advances (I won't claim we are winning or losing).

I do not understand why this concept is so difficult to grasp in both the Executive and Legislative Branches. Is the President not well within his right and power to ask Congress to declare war on ISIS - an actual enemy and not a tactic?

Further, all of the pundits who claim that "radical Islam" is the enemy are also misinformed. Again, "radical Islam" is not an enemy in itself, even though its tenets certainly breed enemies. The enemy is who results from radical Islamic teaching and practice, i.e. ISIS, Al Queda, etc.

Until we (and the rest of the world) realize we cannot wage war against a tactic or a particular ideology, we will continue to fail to defeat the enemy. We only need look to history. In World War II, did we declare war against Fascism? No, we declared war against Germany. Did we declare war against kamikazes? No, we declared war against Japan. In Vietnam, did we declare war against North Vietnam? No, we didn't declare war at all. We tried to fight "communism", which is an ideology, not an actual enemy. And the results speak for themselves, just like they are now.

Identifying the enemy is the very start of waging a winnable war.

You didn't declare war against Germany at all, you cowards.

https://en.wikipedia.org...(1941)

But, whatevs.
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,205
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 11:41:19 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
Full text, since the link doesn't seem to want to paste right.

On December 11, 1941, the United States Congress declared war upon Germany (Pub.L. 77"331, Sess. 1, ch. 564, 55 Stat. 796), hours after Germany declared war on the United States following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.[1]
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
Objectivity
Posts: 1,073
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 11:44:22 AM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 7:16:19 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/15/2016 12:10:26 PM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/15/2016 6:00:15 AM, smelisox wrote:
Every single attack (of self defense mind you) on the US has been political, not religious.

keep drinking the kool aid lol

Name a single one.

-Pearl Harbour: Political
-9/11: Political

9/11 was both political and religious, to deny that it was religious in any way or form is ridiculous.
RookieApologist
Posts: 469
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 12:14:22 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 11:41:19 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:
Full text, since the link doesn't seem to want to paste right.

On December 11, 1941, the United States Congress declared war upon Germany (Pub.L. 77"331, Sess. 1, ch. 564, 55 Stat. 796), hours after Germany declared war on the United States following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.[1]

Not sure what this is even supposed to mean or why it was posted. If it was to make me aware of the last time war was declared, I already knew that. I don't see the relevance.
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,205
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 12:17:05 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 12:14:22 PM, RookieApologist wrote:
At 3/16/2016 11:41:19 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:
Full text, since the link doesn't seem to want to paste right.

On December 11, 1941, the United States Congress declared war upon Germany (Pub.L. 77"331, Sess. 1, ch. 564, 55 Stat. 796), hours after Germany declared war on the United States following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.[1]

Not sure what this is even supposed to mean or why it was posted. If it was to make me aware of the last time war was declared, I already knew that. I don't see the relevance.

It was a reply to Smile above whom asserted the US didn't declare war on Germany.
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 12:31:06 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 11:44:22 AM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/16/2016 7:16:19 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/15/2016 12:10:26 PM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/15/2016 6:00:15 AM, smelisox wrote:
Every single attack (of self defense mind you) on the US has been political, not religious.

keep drinking the kool aid lol

Name a single one.

-Pearl Harbour: Political
-9/11: Political

9/11 was both political and religious, to deny that it was religious in any way or form is ridiculous.

Osama Bin Laden didn't give a toss what goes on in the US. It was purely and utterly political, since the US invaded his homeland and betrayed him.
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 12:31:56 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 12:17:05 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 3/16/2016 12:14:22 PM, RookieApologist wrote:
At 3/16/2016 11:41:19 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:
Full text, since the link doesn't seem to want to paste right.

On December 11, 1941, the United States Congress declared war upon Germany (Pub.L. 77"331, Sess. 1, ch. 564, 55 Stat. 796), hours after Germany declared war on the United States following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.[1]

Not sure what this is even supposed to mean or why it was posted. If it was to make me aware of the last time war was declared, I already knew that. I don't see the relevance.

It was a reply to Smile above whom asserted the US didn't declare war on Germany.

And you proved me right, Germany declared war on the US.

You don't declare war twice. It's not some kind of polite agreement where you fanny about waiting for someone else to declare it. Once it's declared, both parties are at war.
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,205
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 12:44:47 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 12:31:56 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 12:17:05 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 3/16/2016 12:14:22 PM, RookieApologist wrote:
At 3/16/2016 11:41:19 AM, FaustianJustice wrote:
Full text, since the link doesn't seem to want to paste right.

On December 11, 1941, the United States Congress declared war upon Germany (Pub.L. 77"331, Sess. 1, ch. 564, 55 Stat. 796), hours after Germany declared war on the United States following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.[1]

Not sure what this is even supposed to mean or why it was posted. If it was to make me aware of the last time war was declared, I already knew that. I don't see the relevance.

It was a reply to Smile above whom asserted the US didn't declare war on Germany.

And you proved me right, Germany declared war on the US.

And then the US declared war on Germany.

You don't declare war twice. It's not some kind of polite agreement where you fanny about waiting for someone else to declare it. Once it's declared, both parties are at war.

No kidding, its not an agreement at all. Which means when ONE country declares it, it doesn't drag another one into it automatically. Is that how you feel war works?
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,205
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 12:46:35 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 12:31:06 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 11:44:22 AM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/16/2016 7:16:19 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/15/2016 12:10:26 PM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/15/2016 6:00:15 AM, smelisox wrote:
Every single attack (of self defense mind you) on the US has been political, not religious.

keep drinking the kool aid lol

Name a single one.

-Pearl Harbour: Political
-9/11: Political

9/11 was both political and religious, to deny that it was religious in any way or form is ridiculous.

Osama Bin Laden didn't give a toss what goes on in the US. It was purely and utterly political, since the US invaded his homeland and betrayed him.

The US invaded Saudi Arabia?
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
Objectivity
Posts: 1,073
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 2:17:33 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 12:31:06 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 11:44:22 AM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/16/2016 7:16:19 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/15/2016 12:10:26 PM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/15/2016 6:00:15 AM, smelisox wrote:
Every single attack (of self defense mind you) on the US has been political, not religious.

keep drinking the kool aid lol

Name a single one.

-Pearl Harbour: Political
-9/11: Political

9/11 was both political and religious, to deny that it was religious in any way or form is ridiculous.

Osama Bin Laden didn't give a toss what goes on in the US. It was purely and utterly political, since the US invaded his homeland and betrayed him.

What? The US didn't invade Iraq or Afghanistan until after 9/11.
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 2:32:32 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 12:46:35 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 3/16/2016 12:31:06 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 11:44:22 AM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/16/2016 7:16:19 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/15/2016 12:10:26 PM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/15/2016 6:00:15 AM, smelisox wrote:
Every single attack (of self defense mind you) on the US has been political, not religious.

keep drinking the kool aid lol

Name a single one.

-Pearl Harbour: Political
-9/11: Political

9/11 was both political and religious, to deny that it was religious in any way or form is ridiculous.

Osama Bin Laden didn't give a toss what goes on in the US. It was purely and utterly political, since the US invaded his homeland and betrayed him.

The US invaded Saudi Arabia?

Afghanistan.
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 2:33:12 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 2:17:33 PM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/16/2016 12:31:06 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 11:44:22 AM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/16/2016 7:16:19 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/15/2016 12:10:26 PM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/15/2016 6:00:15 AM, smelisox wrote:
Every single attack (of self defense mind you) on the US has been political, not religious.

keep drinking the kool aid lol

Name a single one.

-Pearl Harbour: Political
-9/11: Political

9/11 was both political and religious, to deny that it was religious in any way or form is ridiculous.

Osama Bin Laden didn't give a toss what goes on in the US. It was purely and utterly political, since the US invaded his homeland and betrayed him.

What? The US didn't invade Iraq or Afghanistan until after 9/11.

Yes they did.
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 2:39:00 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
Hell, Saudi Arabia too apparently:

"After the 1991 Gulf war, the US maintained a presence of 5,000 troops stationed in Saudi Arabia."
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,205
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 2:44:53 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 2:32:32 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 12:46:35 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 3/16/2016 12:31:06 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 11:44:22 AM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/16/2016 7:16:19 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/15/2016 12:10:26 PM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/15/2016 6:00:15 AM, smelisox wrote:
Every single attack (of self defense mind you) on the US has been political, not religious.

keep drinking the kool aid lol

Name a single one.

-Pearl Harbour: Political
-9/11: Political

9/11 was both political and religious, to deny that it was religious in any way or form is ridiculous.

Osama Bin Laden didn't give a toss what goes on in the US. It was purely and utterly political, since the US invaded his homeland and betrayed him.

The US invaded Saudi Arabia?

Afghanistan.

Afghanistan is not his homeland. Saudi Arabia is his homeland.
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 2:49:34 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 2:44:53 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 3/16/2016 2:32:32 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 12:46:35 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 3/16/2016 12:31:06 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 11:44:22 AM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/16/2016 7:16:19 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/15/2016 12:10:26 PM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/15/2016 6:00:15 AM, smelisox wrote:
Every single attack (of self defense mind you) on the US has been political, not religious.

keep drinking the kool aid lol

Name a single one.

-Pearl Harbour: Political
-9/11: Political

9/11 was both political and religious, to deny that it was religious in any way or form is ridiculous.

Osama Bin Laden didn't give a toss what goes on in the US. It was purely and utterly political, since the US invaded his homeland and betrayed him.

The US invaded Saudi Arabia?

Afghanistan.

Afghanistan is not his homeland. Saudi Arabia is his homeland.

Oh no, they invaded Afghanistan but I wasn't saying that was his homeland. His homeland was all the middle-east, whatever artificial borders they've put down.
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,205
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 2:54:17 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 2:49:34 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 2:44:53 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 3/16/2016 2:32:32 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 12:46:35 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 3/16/2016 12:31:06 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 11:44:22 AM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/16/2016 7:16:19 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/15/2016 12:10:26 PM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/15/2016 6:00:15 AM, smelisox wrote:
Every single attack (of self defense mind you) on the US has been political, not religious.

keep drinking the kool aid lol

Name a single one.

-Pearl Harbour: Political
-9/11: Political

9/11 was both political and religious, to deny that it was religious in any way or form is ridiculous.

Osama Bin Laden didn't give a toss what goes on in the US. It was purely and utterly political, since the US invaded his homeland and betrayed him.

The US invaded Saudi Arabia?

Afghanistan.

Afghanistan is not his homeland. Saudi Arabia is his homeland.

Oh no, they invaded Afghanistan but I wasn't saying that was his homeland. His homeland was all the middle-east, whatever artificial borders they've put down.

Yeah, I am sure Kuwaitis consider Bin Laden a real kinsmen... Pakistan embraced him with open arms. Ticker-tape parades n' such.
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 2:58:04 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 2:54:17 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 3/16/2016 2:49:34 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 2:44:53 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 3/16/2016 2:32:32 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 12:46:35 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 3/16/2016 12:31:06 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 11:44:22 AM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/16/2016 7:16:19 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/15/2016 12:10:26 PM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/15/2016 6:00:15 AM, smelisox wrote:
Every single attack (of self defense mind you) on the US has been political, not religious.

keep drinking the kool aid lol

Name a single one.

-Pearl Harbour: Political
-9/11: Political

9/11 was both political and religious, to deny that it was religious in any way or form is ridiculous.

Osama Bin Laden didn't give a toss what goes on in the US. It was purely and utterly political, since the US invaded his homeland and betrayed him.

The US invaded Saudi Arabia?

Afghanistan.

Afghanistan is not his homeland. Saudi Arabia is his homeland.

Oh no, they invaded Afghanistan but I wasn't saying that was his homeland. His homeland was all the middle-east, whatever artificial borders they've put down.

Yeah, I am sure Kuwaitis consider Bin Laden a real kinsmen... Pakistan embraced him with open arms. Ticker-tape parades n' such.

This is why no one likes americans.
FaustianJustice
Posts: 6,205
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/16/2016 3:02:04 PM
Posted: 8 months ago
At 3/16/2016 2:58:04 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 2:54:17 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 3/16/2016 2:49:34 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 2:44:53 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 3/16/2016 2:32:32 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 12:46:35 PM, FaustianJustice wrote:
At 3/16/2016 12:31:06 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/16/2016 11:44:22 AM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/16/2016 7:16:19 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 3/15/2016 12:10:26 PM, Objectivity wrote:
At 3/15/2016 6:00:15 AM, smelisox wrote:
Every single attack (of self defense mind you) on the US has been political, not religious.

keep drinking the kool aid lol

Name a single one.

-Pearl Harbour: Political
-9/11: Political

9/11 was both political and religious, to deny that it was religious in any way or form is ridiculous.

Osama Bin Laden didn't give a toss what goes on in the US. It was purely and utterly political, since the US invaded his homeland and betrayed him.

The US invaded Saudi Arabia?

Afghanistan.

Afghanistan is not his homeland. Saudi Arabia is his homeland.

Oh no, they invaded Afghanistan but I wasn't saying that was his homeland. His homeland was all the middle-east, whatever artificial borders they've put down.

Yeah, I am sure Kuwaitis consider Bin Laden a real kinsmen... Pakistan embraced him with open arms. Ticker-tape parades n' such.

This is why no one likes americans.

Because we don't tolerate Bullsh!t? You not liking where you moved your goal posts to, or not realizing how utterly asinine the words coming out of your mouth were at the time you typed them doesn't constitute a failure on my end.
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...