Total Posts:8|Showing Posts:1-8
Jump to topic:

Obama Increased Competition Executive Order

vortex86
Posts: 873
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/15/2016 1:48:51 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
https://www.yahoo.com...

Legitimate plan to thwart quasi-monopolies? Or perhaps a backdoor into more government control of businesses?

I'm not sure how effective they will be at increasing competition, but the example given was spot on (cable providers). However, stifling of quasi-monopolies thus far has been pretty inadequate (Airline Industry comes to mind). I will hope for the best.

We will see what comes of this. Any thoughts?
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/15/2016 2:25:14 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/15/2016 1:48:51 PM, vortex86 wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com...

Legitimate plan to thwart quasi-monopolies? Or perhaps a backdoor into more government control of businesses?

I'm not sure how effective they will be at increasing competition, but the example given was spot on (cable providers). However, stifling of quasi-monopolies thus far has been pretty inadequate (Airline Industry comes to mind). I will hope for the best.

We will see what comes of this. Any thoughts?

You do know he is not even in the top ten of total EO by presidents. He will not beat Bush before leaving, and come NO WHERE near Reagan.
vortex86
Posts: 873
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/15/2016 2:27:15 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/15/2016 2:25:14 PM, TBR wrote:
At 4/15/2016 1:48:51 PM, vortex86 wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com...

Legitimate plan to thwart quasi-monopolies? Or perhaps a backdoor into more government control of businesses?

I'm not sure how effective they will be at increasing competition, but the example given was spot on (cable providers). However, stifling of quasi-monopolies thus far has been pretty inadequate (Airline Industry comes to mind). I will hope for the best.

We will see what comes of this. Any thoughts?

You do know he is not even in the top ten of total EO by presidents. He will not beat Bush before leaving, and come NO WHERE near Reagan.

How is this relevant? I was talking about a specific EO not his number of EOs
Greyparrot
Posts: 21,510
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/15/2016 3:12:37 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/15/2016 2:27:15 PM, vortex86 wrote:
At 4/15/2016 2:25:14 PM, TBR wrote:
At 4/15/2016 1:48:51 PM, vortex86 wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com...

Legitimate plan to thwart quasi-monopolies? Or perhaps a backdoor into more government control of businesses?

I'm not sure how effective they will be at increasing competition, but the example given was spot on (cable providers). However, stifling of quasi-monopolies thus far has been pretty inadequate (Airline Industry comes to mind). I will hope for the best.

We will see what comes of this. Any thoughts?

You do know he is not even in the top ten of total EO by presidents. He will not beat Bush before leaving, and come NO WHERE near Reagan.

How is this relevant? I was talking about a specific EO not his number of EOs

That was truly a spastic response to the OP, even for TBR.
imabench
Posts: 21,947
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/15/2016 5:40:38 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/15/2016 3:12:37 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 4/15/2016 2:27:15 PM, vortex86 wrote:
At 4/15/2016 2:25:14 PM, TBR wrote:
At 4/15/2016 1:48:51 PM, vortex86 wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com...

Legitimate plan to thwart quasi-monopolies? Or perhaps a backdoor into more government control of businesses?

I'm not sure how effective they will be at increasing competition, but the example given was spot on (cable providers). However, stifling of quasi-monopolies thus far has been pretty inadequate (Airline Industry comes to mind). I will hope for the best.

We will see what comes of this. Any thoughts?

You do know he is not even in the top ten of total EO by presidents. He will not beat Bush before leaving, and come NO WHERE near Reagan.

How is this relevant? I was talking about a specific EO not his number of EOs

That was truly a spastic response to the OP, even for TBR.

I think the title of the thread itself may have been a little misleading to TBR about the actual conversation that was intended. "Increase Competition Executive Order" could easily be misconstrued to insinuate that Obama is making many executive orders to the point that he is now competing with other past presidents regarding how many times he makes executive orders, or in other words, how much he has increased competition.
DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015

Internet Missing Person Alert: Angsty teen with daddy issues who is a failed horse rapist and also may be a cross-dresser. If spotted, please contact your local animal control or whatever disease-control organization is close by so they may return the species back to its garbage container habitat.
vortex86
Posts: 873
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/15/2016 5:49:30 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/15/2016 5:40:38 PM, imabench wrote:
At 4/15/2016 3:12:37 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 4/15/2016 2:27:15 PM, vortex86 wrote:
At 4/15/2016 2:25:14 PM, TBR wrote:
At 4/15/2016 1:48:51 PM, vortex86 wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com...

Legitimate plan to thwart quasi-monopolies? Or perhaps a backdoor into more government control of businesses?

I'm not sure how effective they will be at increasing competition, but the example given was spot on (cable providers). However, stifling of quasi-monopolies thus far has been pretty inadequate (Airline Industry comes to mind). I will hope for the best.

We will see what comes of this. Any thoughts?

You do know he is not even in the top ten of total EO by presidents. He will not beat Bush before leaving, and come NO WHERE near Reagan.

How is this relevant? I was talking about a specific EO not his number of EOs

That was truly a spastic response to the OP, even for TBR.

I think the title of the thread itself may have been a little misleading to TBR about the actual conversation that was intended. "Increase Competition Executive Order" could easily be misconstrued to insinuate that Obama is making many executive orders to the point that he is now competing with other past presidents regarding how many times he makes executive orders, or in other words, how much he has increased competition.

That's the great thing about the body of a post you can get further insight beyond the title. I realize if you suggest a person only reads the title and then posts that would be very telling.
Greyparrot
Posts: 21,510
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/15/2016 6:53:33 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/15/2016 6:01:51 PM, vortex86 wrote:
No one has any opinions on this EO though? Positive or negative?

I think it's amazing how well Obama can tiptoe around the concept of deregulation, without actually saying that particular trigger word.

He truly knows how to moderate his speech.