Total Posts:24|Showing Posts:1-24
Jump to topic:

John Oliver: Brexit

1harderthanyouthink
Posts: 13,622
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.

He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)
Why?

DDO Risk King
Lsumichiganfan
Posts: 267
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 12:51:01 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.



He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

John Oliver doesn't tolerate bullcrap and sticks to the issues.That's what I like about him
Please vote on this debate: http://www.debate.org...
"You have displayed the political understanding of a tortoise thus far in this election" -Harder
Greyparrot
Posts: 18,469
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 1:00:16 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.



He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

Really hard to do any analysis of any message because comedians make a living off of strawmanning and parodying messengers without looking at the actual message.
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
1harderthanyouthink
Posts: 13,622
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 1:35:50 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 1:00:16 AM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.



He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

Really hard to do any analysis of any message because comedians make a living off of strawmanning and parodying messengers without looking at the actual message.

True, but Oliver tends to give statistics and existing laws and *then* makes fun of the position(s) he finds dumb.
Why?

DDO Risk King
Greyparrot
Posts: 18,469
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 1:36:45 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 1:35:50 AM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 1:00:16 AM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.



He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

Really hard to do any analysis of any message because comedians make a living off of strawmanning and parodying messengers without looking at the actual message.

True, but Oliver tends to give statistics and existing laws and *then* makes fun of the position(s) he finds dumb.

I dont want to sift through 14 minutes of comedy to find that.
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
1harderthanyouthink
Posts: 13,622
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 1:38:36 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 1:36:45 AM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/21/2016 1:35:50 AM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 1:00:16 AM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.



He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

Really hard to do any analysis of any message because comedians make a living off of strawmanning and parodying messengers without looking at the actual message.

True, but Oliver tends to give statistics and existing laws and *then* makes fun of the position(s) he finds dumb.

I dont want to sift through 14 minutes of comedy to find that.

Eh. It's funny, and informative for those who don't follow the issue.
Why?

DDO Risk King
twocupcakes
Posts: 3,420
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 2:21:48 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 1:35:50 AM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 1:00:16 AM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.



He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

Really hard to do any analysis of any message because comedians make a living off of strawmanning and parodying messengers without looking at the actual message.

True, but Oliver tends to give statistics and existing laws and *then* makes fun of the position(s) he finds dumb.

Oliver gives more statistics then Trump lol
lannan13
Posts: 23,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 4:36:24 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
I can't wait to see how this turns out. I'm currently doing a debate against Envisage on the subject.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-Lannan13'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

If the sky's the limit then why do we have footprints on the Moon? I'm shooting my aspirations for the stars.

"If you are going through hell, keep going." "Sir Winston Churchill

"No one can make you feel inferior without your consent." "Eleanor Roosevelt

Topics I want to debate. (http://tinyurl.com...)
tejretics
Posts: 6,800
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 11:50:24 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:

Awesome one.
"Where justice is denied, where poverty is enforced, where ignorance prevails, and where any one class is made to feel that society is an organized conspiracy to oppress, rob and degrade them, neither persons nor property will be safe." - Frederick Douglass

http://gotejas.com...
Skepsikyma
Posts: 9,343
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 1:21:45 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.

He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

The problem with this is that he doesn't show that the claims are 'bullsh!t', just exaggerated. And then ignores the fact that the other side is infamous for engaging in absurd hyperbole in order to make one side look crazy. Then goes through a slideshow of crazy people on the opposing side, and ignores the crazy on his own side.
"See now Oblivion shimmering all around us, its very tranquility deadlier than tempest. How little all our keels have troubled it."
- Lord Dunsany -

"The darkness drops again but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? "
- W. B. Yeats -

Virtutem videant intabescantque relicta
Greyparrot
Posts: 18,469
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 1:26:32 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 1:21:45 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.

He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

The problem with this is that he doesn't show that the claims are 'bullsh!t', just exaggerated. And then ignores the fact that the other side is infamous for engaging in absurd hyperbole in order to make one side look crazy. Then goes through a slideshow of crazy people on the opposing side, and ignores the crazy on his own side.

Good luck finding any substance at the center of that pile of......
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
Lsumichiganfan
Posts: 267
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 1:57:28 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 4:36:24 AM, lannan13 wrote:
I can't wait to see how this turns out. I'm currently doing a debate against Envisage on the subject.

I can't wait for that debate ethier I am currently undecided on the issue but leaning towards stay. I will be interested to hear arguments from both sides on the issue.
Please vote on this debate: http://www.debate.org...
"You have displayed the political understanding of a tortoise thus far in this election" -Harder
1harderthanyouthink
Posts: 13,622
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 2:28:59 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 1:21:45 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.

He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

The problem with this is that he doesn't show that the claims are 'bullsh!t', just exaggerated.

Which is a good sign of bullsh!t.
Why?

DDO Risk King
Skepsikyma
Posts: 9,343
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 2:29:23 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 1:26:32 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/21/2016 1:21:45 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.

He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

The problem with this is that he doesn't show that the claims are 'bullsh!t', just exaggerated. And then ignores the fact that the other side is infamous for engaging in absurd hyperbole in order to make one side look crazy. Then goes through a slideshow of crazy people on the opposing side, and ignores the crazy on his own side.

Good luck finding any substance at the center of that pile of......

It's naked propaganda, and both sides have it. It should never be mistaken as an intelligent, impartial take on the issue.
"See now Oblivion shimmering all around us, its very tranquility deadlier than tempest. How little all our keels have troubled it."
- Lord Dunsany -

"The darkness drops again but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? "
- W. B. Yeats -

Virtutem videant intabescantque relicta
Skepsikyma
Posts: 9,343
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 2:38:58 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 2:28:59 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 1:21:45 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.

He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

The problem with this is that he doesn't show that the claims are 'bullsh!t', just exaggerated.

Which is a good sign of bullsh!t.

No. 'Bullsh!t' implies false, not exaggerated. If I claim to have stabbed five people to death, and it turns out that one died of unrelated wounds, that doesn't mean that I haven't stabbed four people. The claim is exaggerated. The implication that Oliver makes is that the other side has no good arguments because he went after the most strident voices and found exaggerations. If we apply that same metric to his own side, we'd come to the opposite conclusion.

http://www.electomatic.com...
"See now Oblivion shimmering all around us, its very tranquility deadlier than tempest. How little all our keels have troubled it."
- Lord Dunsany -

"The darkness drops again but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? "
- W. B. Yeats -

Virtutem videant intabescantque relicta
1harderthanyouthink
Posts: 13,622
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 2:42:02 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 2:38:58 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:28:59 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 1:21:45 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.

He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

The problem with this is that he doesn't show that the claims are 'bullsh!t', just exaggerated.

Which is a good sign of bullsh!t.

No. 'Bullsh!t' implies false, not exaggerated. If I claim to have stabbed five people to death, and it turns out that one died of unrelated wounds, that doesn't mean that I haven't stabbed four people. The claim is exaggerated.

I mean...that claim is also false...
Why?

DDO Risk King
Skepsikyma
Posts: 9,343
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 2:45:40 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 2:42:02 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:38:58 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:28:59 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 1:21:45 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.

He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

The problem with this is that he doesn't show that the claims are 'bullsh!t', just exaggerated.

Which is a good sign of bullsh!t.

No. 'Bullsh!t' implies false, not exaggerated. If I claim to have stabbed five people to death, and it turns out that one died of unrelated wounds, that doesn't mean that I haven't stabbed four people. The claim is exaggerated.

I mean...that claim is also false...

...

But does that undermine me using that claim to show that I have stabbed numerous people? That is what Oliver is implying. That because he found a few regulations on that pillow list which don't apply, he can dismiss the entire argument, instead of saying 'oh, it's actually only this many' and continuing to engage regulation issues. It's designed to go straight to the limbic brain, so that the person associates the speaker with 'untrustworthy' and becomes hardened to any arguments which they might make.
"See now Oblivion shimmering all around us, its very tranquility deadlier than tempest. How little all our keels have troubled it."
- Lord Dunsany -

"The darkness drops again but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? "
- W. B. Yeats -

Virtutem videant intabescantque relicta
1harderthanyouthink
Posts: 13,622
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 2:58:26 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 2:45:40 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:42:02 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:38:58 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:28:59 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 1:21:45 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.

He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

The problem with this is that he doesn't show that the claims are 'bullsh!t', just exaggerated.

Which is a good sign of bullsh!t.

No. 'Bullsh!t' implies false, not exaggerated. If I claim to have stabbed five people to death, and it turns out that one died of unrelated wounds, that doesn't mean that I haven't stabbed four people. The claim is exaggerated.

I mean...that claim is also false...

...

But does that undermine me using that claim to show that I have stabbed numerous people? That is what Oliver is implying. That because he found a few regulations on that pillow list which don't apply, he can dismiss the entire argument, instead of saying 'oh, it's actually only this many' and continuing to engage regulation issues. It's designed to go straight to the limbic brain, so that the person associates the speaker with 'untrustworthy' and becomes hardened to any arguments which they might make.

That's true. Sometimes this is a worse effect of certain videos than others, though. Maybe this one was particularly bad.

I already thought the Leave Camp was on some bullsh!t (like a Tory saying Obama's opinion on trade deals "doesn't matter" when Obama said a trade deal if they leave will not come quickly, and everything Boris Johnson says).
Why?

DDO Risk King
Skepsikyma
Posts: 9,343
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 3:12:44 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 2:58:26 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:45:40 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:42:02 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:38:58 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:28:59 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 1:21:45 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.

He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

The problem with this is that he doesn't show that the claims are 'bullsh!t', just exaggerated.

Which is a good sign of bullsh!t.

No. 'Bullsh!t' implies false, not exaggerated. If I claim to have stabbed five people to death, and it turns out that one died of unrelated wounds, that doesn't mean that I haven't stabbed four people. The claim is exaggerated.

I mean...that claim is also false...

...

But does that undermine me using that claim to show that I have stabbed numerous people? That is what Oliver is implying. That because he found a few regulations on that pillow list which don't apply, he can dismiss the entire argument, instead of saying 'oh, it's actually only this many' and continuing to engage regulation issues. It's designed to go straight to the limbic brain, so that the person associates the speaker with 'untrustworthy' and becomes hardened to any arguments which they might make.

That's true. Sometimes this is a worse effect of certain videos than others, though. Maybe this one was particularly bad.

I already thought the Leave Camp was on some bullsh!t (like a Tory saying Obama's opinion on trade deals "doesn't matter" when Obama said a trade deal if they leave will not come quickly, and everything Boris Johnson says).

He might have been saying that, politically, it's not good for the Stay Camp. I was in Mexico shortly after that, and a lot of the people (>~70%) were British. All of the ones that I talked to were pretty apolitical, but they were almost all immensely p!ssed off by Obama saying that, and it pushed them more towards the Leave camp. At least five times when my sister and I said we were from America the person just opened with 'your President is a fvcking wanker.' Especially military veterans, who considered Afghanistan and Iraq to be American wars that Britain supported heavily because they saw Americans as strong allies. In their eyes, they fought for America, but America's president pretty much spat in their face and casually revoked the 'special ally' position which they bled for.

Honestly, that was probably one of Obama's sh!ttiest moments, and I'm not usually an Obama basher.
"See now Oblivion shimmering all around us, its very tranquility deadlier than tempest. How little all our keels have troubled it."
- Lord Dunsany -

"The darkness drops again but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? "
- W. B. Yeats -

Virtutem videant intabescantque relicta
1harderthanyouthink
Posts: 13,622
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 3:20:42 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 3:12:44 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:58:26 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:45:40 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:42:02 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:38:58 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:28:59 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 1:21:45 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/20/2016 8:36:33 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
Since whenever John Oliver does something on a big political issue, someone posts the link to the video in this forum - I thought I'd do it today.

He provides background for those who are unaware of the situation and referendum. I'm interested in hearing the thoughts for this video.

(In direct responses to the OP, add an "s" to the end of "http".)

The problem with this is that he doesn't show that the claims are 'bullsh!t', just exaggerated.

Which is a good sign of bullsh!t.

No. 'Bullsh!t' implies false, not exaggerated. If I claim to have stabbed five people to death, and it turns out that one died of unrelated wounds, that doesn't mean that I haven't stabbed four people. The claim is exaggerated.

I mean...that claim is also false...

...

But does that undermine me using that claim to show that I have stabbed numerous people? That is what Oliver is implying. That because he found a few regulations on that pillow list which don't apply, he can dismiss the entire argument, instead of saying 'oh, it's actually only this many' and continuing to engage regulation issues. It's designed to go straight to the limbic brain, so that the person associates the speaker with 'untrustworthy' and becomes hardened to any arguments which they might make.

That's true. Sometimes this is a worse effect of certain videos than others, though. Maybe this one was particularly bad.

I already thought the Leave Camp was on some bullsh!t (like a Tory saying Obama's opinion on trade deals "doesn't matter" when Obama said a trade deal if they leave will not come quickly, and everything Boris Johnson says).

He might have been saying that, politically, it's not good for the Stay Camp. I was in Mexico shortly after that, and a lot of the people (>~70%) were British. All of the ones that I talked to were pretty apolitical, but they were almost all immensely p!ssed off by Obama saying that, and it pushed them more towards the Leave camp. At least five times when my sister and I said we were from America the person just opened with 'your President is a fvcking wanker.' Especially military veterans, who considered Afghanistan and Iraq to be American wars that Britain supported heavily because they saw Americans as strong allies. In their eyes, they fought for America, but America's president pretty much spat in their face and casually revoked the 'special ally' position which they bled for.

Honestly, that was probably one of Obama's sh!ttiest moments, and I'm not usually an Obama basher.

It was a shitty thing to say straightforward in that way, but logistically what he said made sense. No one in their right mind would make a deal with a country that has 15% the GDP of another potential partner, when that other partner is the near-entirety of Europe.
Why?

DDO Risk King
Skepsikyma
Posts: 9,343
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 3:25:57 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 3:20:42 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 3:12:44 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:58:26 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:45:40 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:

...

But does that undermine me using that claim to show that I have stabbed numerous people? That is what Oliver is implying. That because he found a few regulations on that pillow list which don't apply, he can dismiss the entire argument, instead of saying 'oh, it's actually only this many' and continuing to engage regulation issues. It's designed to go straight to the limbic brain, so that the person associates the speaker with 'untrustworthy' and becomes hardened to any arguments which they might make.

That's true. Sometimes this is a worse effect of certain videos than others, though. Maybe this one was particularly bad.

I already thought the Leave Camp was on some bullsh!t (like a Tory saying Obama's opinion on trade deals "doesn't matter" when Obama said a trade deal if they leave will not come quickly, and everything Boris Johnson says).

He might have been saying that, politically, it's not good for the Stay Camp. I was in Mexico shortly after that, and a lot of the people (>~70%) were British. All of the ones that I talked to were pretty apolitical, but they were almost all immensely p!ssed off by Obama saying that, and it pushed them more towards the Leave camp. At least five times when my sister and I said we were from America the person just opened with 'your President is a fvcking wanker.' Especially military veterans, who considered Afghanistan and Iraq to be American wars that Britain supported heavily because they saw Americans as strong allies. In their eyes, they fought for America, but America's president pretty much spat in their face and casually revoked the 'special ally' position which they bled for.

Honestly, that was probably one of Obama's sh!ttiest moments, and I'm not usually an Obama basher.

It was a shitty thing to say straightforward in that way, but logistically what he said made sense. No one in their right mind would make a deal with a country that has 15% the GDP of another potential partner, when that other partner is the near-entirety of Europe.

Europe is almost entirely dependent on us for their geopolitical security through NATO. We would be setting the terms, not them. They have nothing to leverage us with that wouldn't end up in some sort of self-inflicted injury. We're also the largest consumer market in the world (well over three times as big as China, which is the runner-up), so that would make it even more stupid to injure trade.
"See now Oblivion shimmering all around us, its very tranquility deadlier than tempest. How little all our keels have troubled it."
- Lord Dunsany -

"The darkness drops again but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? "
- W. B. Yeats -

Virtutem videant intabescantque relicta
1harderthanyouthink
Posts: 13,622
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 3:27:28 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 3:25:57 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/21/2016 3:20:42 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 3:12:44 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:58:26 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:45:40 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:

...

But does that undermine me using that claim to show that I have stabbed numerous people? That is what Oliver is implying. That because he found a few regulations on that pillow list which don't apply, he can dismiss the entire argument, instead of saying 'oh, it's actually only this many' and continuing to engage regulation issues. It's designed to go straight to the limbic brain, so that the person associates the speaker with 'untrustworthy' and becomes hardened to any arguments which they might make.

That's true. Sometimes this is a worse effect of certain videos than others, though. Maybe this one was particularly bad.

I already thought the Leave Camp was on some bullsh!t (like a Tory saying Obama's opinion on trade deals "doesn't matter" when Obama said a trade deal if they leave will not come quickly, and everything Boris Johnson says).

He might have been saying that, politically, it's not good for the Stay Camp. I was in Mexico shortly after that, and a lot of the people (>~70%) were British. All of the ones that I talked to were pretty apolitical, but they were almost all immensely p!ssed off by Obama saying that, and it pushed them more towards the Leave camp. At least five times when my sister and I said we were from America the person just opened with 'your President is a fvcking wanker.' Especially military veterans, who considered Afghanistan and Iraq to be American wars that Britain supported heavily because they saw Americans as strong allies. In their eyes, they fought for America, but America's president pretty much spat in their face and casually revoked the 'special ally' position which they bled for.

Honestly, that was probably one of Obama's sh!ttiest moments, and I'm not usually an Obama basher.

It was a shitty thing to say straightforward in that way, but logistically what he said made sense. No one in their right mind would make a deal with a country that has 15% the GDP of another potential partner, when that other partner is the near-entirety of Europe.

Europe is almost entirely dependent on us for their geopolitical security through NATO. We would be setting the terms, not them. They have nothing to leverage us with that wouldn't end up in some sort of self-inflicted injury. We're also the largest consumer market in the world (well over three times as big as China, which is the runner-up), so that would make it even more stupid to injure trade.

We would also be setting terms with the UK if they left - even more so than the EU.
Why?

DDO Risk King
Skepsikyma
Posts: 9,343
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 3:31:16 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 3:27:28 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 3:25:57 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/21/2016 3:20:42 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 3:12:44 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:58:26 PM, 1harderthanyouthink wrote:
At 6/21/2016 2:45:40 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:

...

But does that undermine me using that claim to show that I have stabbed numerous people? That is what Oliver is implying. That because he found a few regulations on that pillow list which don't apply, he can dismiss the entire argument, instead of saying 'oh, it's actually only this many' and continuing to engage regulation issues. It's designed to go straight to the limbic brain, so that the person associates the speaker with 'untrustworthy' and becomes hardened to any arguments which they might make.

That's true. Sometimes this is a worse effect of certain videos than others, though. Maybe this one was particularly bad.

I already thought the Leave Camp was on some bullsh!t (like a Tory saying Obama's opinion on trade deals "doesn't matter" when Obama said a trade deal if they leave will not come quickly, and everything Boris Johnson says).

He might have been saying that, politically, it's not good for the Stay Camp. I was in Mexico shortly after that, and a lot of the people (>~70%) were British. All of the ones that I talked to were pretty apolitical, but they were almost all immensely p!ssed off by Obama saying that, and it pushed them more towards the Leave camp. At least five times when my sister and I said we were from America the person just opened with 'your President is a fvcking wanker.' Especially military veterans, who considered Afghanistan and Iraq to be American wars that Britain supported heavily because they saw Americans as strong allies. In their eyes, they fought for America, but America's president pretty much spat in their face and casually revoked the 'special ally' position which they bled for.

Honestly, that was probably one of Obama's sh!ttiest moments, and I'm not usually an Obama basher.

It was a shitty thing to say straightforward in that way, but logistically what he said made sense. No one in their right mind would make a deal with a country that has 15% the GDP of another potential partner, when that other partner is the near-entirety of Europe.

Europe is almost entirely dependent on us for their geopolitical security through NATO. We would be setting the terms, not them. They have nothing to leverage us with that wouldn't end up in some sort of self-inflicted injury. We're also the largest consumer market in the world (well over three times as big as China, which is the runner-up), so that would make it even more stupid to injure trade.

We would also be setting terms with the UK if they left - even more so than the EU.

Exactly. In fact, the more that the EU breaks up, the more of a negotiating bonus that we have. As long as NATO remains intact, we can maintain a geopolitical bloc while also increasing our own economic influence. Which is why part of me thinks that maybe Obama was being a chessmaster and trying to influence the BREXIT referendum towards leave, but that will always just be speculation.
"See now Oblivion shimmering all around us, its very tranquility deadlier than tempest. How little all our keels have troubled it."
- Lord Dunsany -

"The darkness drops again but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? "
- W. B. Yeats -

Virtutem videant intabescantque relicta
Greyparrot
Posts: 18,469
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/21/2016 5:44:23 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/21/2016 3:31:16 PM, Skepsikyma wrote:

Exactly. In fact, the more that the EU breaks up, the more of a negotiating bonus that we have. As long as NATO remains intact, we can maintain a geopolitical bloc while also increasing our own economic influence. Which is why part of me thinks that maybe Obama was being a chessmaster and trying to influence the BREXIT referendum towards leave, but that will always just be speculation.

Lol chessmaster? His agenda is not that far sighted. He wants the issue of problematic immigrants to go away so that Hillary can defeat Trump. It's not complicated.

Also, if BREXIT were to fail, I think it would be very interesting comeuppance for the UK as a Nation that once had an empire spanning the globe is now officially reduced to a semblance of a colony under the rule of the EU elites....
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.