Total Posts:16|Showing Posts:1-16
Jump to topic:

Obama threw UK under the bus.

Greyparrot
Posts: 17,197
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/24/2016 10:14:41 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
With empty threats of favoring the EU over the UK in trade deals, throwing UK to the back of the que.

Now that BREXIT is real, Obama is telling his surrogates to stand down, and start chanting the "moving foward" mantra....

disgusting.
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
Rukado
Posts: 527
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/24/2016 10:34:29 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Obama wanted bigger government to win, so he discouraged the UK exit. But, now what the deal is done, there's no more reason for Obama to discourage the UK exit.
Chloe8
Posts: 3,355
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/24/2016 11:23:25 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/24/2016 10:34:29 PM, Rukado wrote:
Obama wanted bigger government to win, so he discouraged the UK exit. But, now what the deal is done, there's no more reason for Obama to discourage the UK exit.

Yes he looks like an idiot in my opinion now he has admitted relations with the UK will not be damaged by brexit. It was obvious at the time that the claim about us going to the back of the que was no more than baseless scaremongering. What kind of idiot would actually believe that a country the size of the USA is incapable of negotiating two trade deals simultaneously. I expect the UK to conclude a trade deal with the USA within 5 years. I doubt the 27 member states in the EU will ever agree on a trade deal with the USA.
Greyparrot
Posts: 17,197
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/24/2016 11:35:54 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/24/2016 11:23:25 PM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/24/2016 10:34:29 PM, Rukado wrote:
Obama wanted bigger government to win, so he discouraged the UK exit. But, now what the deal is done, there's no more reason for Obama to discourage the UK exit.

Yes he looks like an idiot in my opinion now he has admitted relations with the UK will not be damaged by brexit. It was obvious at the time that the claim about us going to the back of the que was no more than baseless scaremongering. What kind of idiot would actually believe that a country the size of the USA is incapable of negotiating two trade deals simultaneously. I expect the UK to conclude a trade deal with the USA within 5 years. I doubt the 27 member states in the EU will ever agree on a trade deal with the USA.

Good thing the UK liberals are way smarter than USA liberals. Obama is worshipped over here...
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
Greyparrot
Posts: 17,197
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/24/2016 11:37:32 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/24/2016 11:23:25 PM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/24/2016 10:34:29 PM, Rukado wrote:
Obama wanted bigger government to win, so he discouraged the UK exit. But, now what the deal is done, there's no more reason for Obama to discourage the UK exit.

Yes he looks like an idiot in my opinion now he has admitted relations with the UK will not be damaged by brexit. It was obvious at the time that the claim about us going to the back of the que was no more than baseless scaremongering. What kind of idiot would actually believe that a country the size of the USA is incapable of negotiating two trade deals simultaneously. I expect the UK to conclude a trade deal with the USA within 5 years. I doubt the 27 member states in the EU will ever agree on a trade deal with the USA.

Also, Trump will easily do it in his first year.
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
Chloe8
Posts: 3,355
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/25/2016 12:07:00 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/24/2016 11:37:32 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/24/2016 11:23:25 PM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/24/2016 10:34:29 PM, Rukado wrote:
Obama wanted bigger government to win, so he discouraged the UK exit. But, now what the deal is done, there's no more reason for Obama to discourage the UK exit.

Yes he looks like an idiot in my opinion now he has admitted relations with the UK will not be damaged by brexit. It was obvious at the time that the claim about us going to the back of the que was no more than baseless scaremongering. What kind of idiot would actually believe that a country the size of the USA is incapable of negotiating two trade deals simultaneously. I expect the UK to conclude a trade deal with the USA within 5 years. I doubt the 27 member states in the EU will ever agree on a trade deal with the USA.

Also, Trump will easily do it in his first year.

A trade deal with the UK or the EU?

I think Clinton will probably win.
Greyparrot
Posts: 17,197
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/25/2016 12:22:23 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/25/2016 12:07:00 AM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/24/2016 11:37:32 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/24/2016 11:23:25 PM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/24/2016 10:34:29 PM, Rukado wrote:
Obama wanted bigger government to win, so he discouraged the UK exit. But, now what the deal is done, there's no more reason for Obama to discourage the UK exit.

Yes he looks like an idiot in my opinion now he has admitted relations with the UK will not be damaged by brexit. It was obvious at the time that the claim about us going to the back of the que was no more than baseless scaremongering. What kind of idiot would actually believe that a country the size of the USA is incapable of negotiating two trade deals simultaneously. I expect the UK to conclude a trade deal with the USA within 5 years. I doubt the 27 member states in the EU will ever agree on a trade deal with the USA.

Also, Trump will easily do it in his first year.

A trade deal with the UK or the EU?

I think Clinton will probably win.

both. and Hillary doesn't have a prayer.
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
Chloe8
Posts: 3,355
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/25/2016 7:18:38 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/25/2016 12:22:23 AM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/25/2016 12:07:00 AM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/24/2016 11:37:32 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/24/2016 11:23:25 PM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/24/2016 10:34:29 PM, Rukado wrote:
Obama wanted bigger government to win, so he discouraged the UK exit. But, now what the deal is done, there's no more reason for Obama to discourage the UK exit.

Yes he looks like an idiot in my opinion now he has admitted relations with the UK will not be damaged by brexit. It was obvious at the time that the claim about us going to the back of the que was no more than baseless scaremongering. What kind of idiot would actually believe that a country the size of the USA is incapable of negotiating two trade deals simultaneously. I expect the UK to conclude a trade deal with the USA within 5 years. I doubt the 27 member states in the EU will ever agree on a trade deal with the USA.

Also, Trump will easily do it in his first year.

A trade deal with the UK or the EU?

I think Clinton will probably win.

both. and Hillary doesn't have a prayer.

Maybe he would quickly sign trade deals but I doubt he could agree one with the EU in just one year. To get 27 other countries to agree would probably mean he had rushed into a deal that didn't actually benefit the USA that much and only benefited the EU. I reckon Clinton will win, let's see what happens!
slo1
Posts: 5,193
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/25/2016 12:40:43 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/24/2016 11:37:32 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/24/2016 11:23:25 PM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/24/2016 10:34:29 PM, Rukado wrote:
Obama wanted bigger government to win, so he discouraged the UK exit. But, now what the deal is done, there's no more reason for Obama to discourage the UK exit.

Yes he looks like an idiot in my opinion now he has admitted relations with the UK will not be damaged by brexit. It was obvious at the time that the claim about us going to the back of the que was no more than baseless scaremongering. What kind of idiot would actually believe that a country the size of the USA is incapable of negotiating two trade deals simultaneously. I expect the UK to conclude a trade deal with the USA within 5 years. I doubt the 27 member states in the EU will ever agree on a trade deal with the USA.

Also, Trump will easily do it in his first year.

I can see the love in your eyes.

When you dress up and greet him at the door and he hits you despite the fine diner you made don't come here to cry about it.
Greyparrot
Posts: 17,197
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/25/2016 2:11:55 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/25/2016 7:18:38 AM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/25/2016 12:22:23 AM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/25/2016 12:07:00 AM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/24/2016 11:37:32 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/24/2016 11:23:25 PM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/24/2016 10:34:29 PM, Rukado wrote:
Obama wanted bigger government to win, so he discouraged the UK exit. But, now what the deal is done, there's no more reason for Obama to discourage the UK exit.

Yes he looks like an idiot in my opinion now he has admitted relations with the UK will not be damaged by brexit. It was obvious at the time that the claim about us going to the back of the que was no more than baseless scaremongering. What kind of idiot would actually believe that a country the size of the USA is incapable of negotiating two trade deals simultaneously. I expect the UK to conclude a trade deal with the USA within 5 years. I doubt the 27 member states in the EU will ever agree on a trade deal with the USA.

Also, Trump will easily do it in his first year.

A trade deal with the UK or the EU?

I think Clinton will probably win.

both. and Hillary doesn't have a prayer.

Maybe he would quickly sign trade deals but I doubt he could agree one with the EU in just one year. To get 27 other countries to agree would probably mean he had rushed into a deal that didn't actually benefit the USA that much and only benefited the EU. I reckon Clinton will win, let's see what happens!

When negotiating from a position of power, the only bottleneck is the USA and the special interests of the USA....I'm pretty confident in my prediction, and I stand by it.
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
Skepsikyma
Posts: 9,138
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/25/2016 2:22:31 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/25/2016 2:11:55 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/25/2016 7:18:38 AM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/25/2016 12:22:23 AM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/25/2016 12:07:00 AM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/24/2016 11:37:32 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/24/2016 11:23:25 PM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/24/2016 10:34:29 PM, Rukado wrote:
Obama wanted bigger government to win, so he discouraged the UK exit. But, now what the deal is done, there's no more reason for Obama to discourage the UK exit.

Yes he looks like an idiot in my opinion now he has admitted relations with the UK will not be damaged by brexit. It was obvious at the time that the claim about us going to the back of the que was no more than baseless scaremongering. What kind of idiot would actually believe that a country the size of the USA is incapable of negotiating two trade deals simultaneously. I expect the UK to conclude a trade deal with the USA within 5 years. I doubt the 27 member states in the EU will ever agree on a trade deal with the USA.

Also, Trump will easily do it in his first year.

A trade deal with the UK or the EU?

I think Clinton will probably win.

both. and Hillary doesn't have a prayer.

Maybe he would quickly sign trade deals but I doubt he could agree one with the EU in just one year. To get 27 other countries to agree would probably mean he had rushed into a deal that didn't actually benefit the USA that much and only benefited the EU. I reckon Clinton will win, let's see what happens!

When negotiating from a position of power, the only bottleneck is the USA and the special interests of the USA....I'm pretty confident in my prediction, and I stand by it.

Yeah, they're not going to drag a their feet on any deal with the US. We're the largest consumer market in the world (three times bigger than China in second place), and the EU is now even more dependent on us (and our British allies =P) for defense against Russian power projection, especially when you take into account the EU's recent eastward expansion.
"See now Oblivion shimmering all around us, its very tranquility deadlier than tempest. How little all our keels have troubled it."
- Lord Dunsany -

"Over her head the stars, the thoughts of God in the heavens,
Shone on the eyes of man, who had ceased to marvel and worship"
- Henry Longfellow -

"We enjoy, we see nothing by direct vision; but only by reflection, and in anatomical dismemberment."
- Thomas Carlyle -
inferno
Posts: 11,284
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/25/2016 2:34:25 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/24/2016 10:14:41 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
With empty threats of favoring the EU over the UK in trade deals, throwing UK to the back of the que.

Now that BREXIT is real, Obama is telling his surrogates to stand down, and start chanting the "moving foward" mantra....

disgusting.

No The UK was already under the bus before Obama even got started.
Chloe8
Posts: 3,355
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2016 2:47:35 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/25/2016 2:11:55 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/25/2016 7:18:38 AM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/25/2016 12:22:23 AM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/25/2016 12:07:00 AM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/24/2016 11:37:32 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/24/2016 11:23:25 PM, Chloe8 wrote:
At 6/24/2016 10:34:29 PM, Rukado wrote:
Obama wanted bigger government to win, so he discouraged the UK exit. But, now what the deal is done, there's no more reason for Obama to discourage the UK exit.

Yes he looks like an idiot in my opinion now he has admitted relations with the UK will not be damaged by brexit. It was obvious at the time that the claim about us going to the back of the que was no more than baseless scaremongering. What kind of idiot would actually believe that a country the size of the USA is incapable of negotiating two trade deals simultaneously. I expect the UK to conclude a trade deal with the USA within 5 years. I doubt the 27 member states in the EU will ever agree on a trade deal with the USA.

Also, Trump will easily do it in his first year.

A trade deal with the UK or the EU?

I think Clinton will probably win.

both. and Hillary doesn't have a prayer.

Maybe he would quickly sign trade deals but I doubt he could agree one with the EU in just one year. To get 27 other countries to agree would probably mean he had rushed into a deal that didn't actually benefit the USA that much and only benefited the EU. I reckon Clinton will win, let's see what happens!

When negotiating from a position of power, the only bottleneck is the USA and the special interests of the USA....I'm pretty confident in my prediction, and I stand by it.

The EU is not easy to negotiate with. Even though the USA is the biggest court in the negotiations the other 27 will bicker and argue over any little thing that might not suit them specifically. Trump would have to take his time to make sure the deal was beneficial to the USA. The EU won't rush into anything unless the USA fails to look after its own interests and signs a deal that does not really serve its national interest and just favours the EU disproportionately.
Greyparrot
Posts: 17,197
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2016 4:13:10 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/26/2016 2:47:35 PM, Chloe8 wrote:

The EU is not easy to negotiate with. Even though the USA is the biggest court in the negotiations the other 27 will bicker and argue over any little thing that might not suit them specifically. Trump would have to take his time to make sure the deal was beneficial to the USA. The EU won't rush into anything unless the USA fails to look after its own interests and signs a deal that does not really serve its national interest and just favours the EU disproportionately.

I suppose then what Obama said was the exact opposite in reality, that the EU is going to have to wait in the back of the que, not the UK... :D
I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations.
A singular development of cat communications
That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection,
For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.
Chloe8
Posts: 3,355
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2016 4:39:45 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/26/2016 4:13:10 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 6/26/2016 2:47:35 PM, Chloe8 wrote:

The EU is not easy to negotiate with. Even though the USA is the biggest court in the negotiations the other 27 will bicker and argue over any little thing that might not suit them specifically. Trump would have to take his time to make sure the deal was beneficial to the USA. The EU won't rush into anything unless the USA fails to look after its own interests and signs a deal that does not really serve its national interest and just favours the EU disproportionately.

I suppose then what Obama said was the exact opposite in reality, that the EU is going to have to wait in the back of the que, not the UK... :D

The EU is happy to be at the back of the que. They are so busy with their internal squabbling they forget the rest of the world exists. A trade deal between the UK and the USA will be a formality compared to a USA- EU deal.
brontoraptor
Posts: 11,685
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2016 9:57:32 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/24/2016 10:14:41 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
With empty threats of favoring the EU over the UK in trade deals, throwing UK to the back of the que.

Now that BREXIT is real, Obama is telling his surrogates to stand down, and start chanting the "moving foward" mantra....

disgusting.

At least we got the first black president(who is whiter than most white people) out of the way.
"What Donald Trump is doing is representing the absolute heartbreak, and anger, and frustration at a government gone mad."

http://youtu.be...