Total Posts:70|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Feminist would deny women and men

Lookingatissues
Posts: 239
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.
brontoraptor
Posts: 11,685
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2016 4:15:48 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

Notice, women scream for equality in the workplace, yet do not want included in the draft, do not but rarely join the military, police force, join firefighting squadrons, work laboring jobs, etc.
"What Donald Trump is doing is representing the absolute heartbreak, and anger, and frustration at a government gone mad."

http://youtu.be...
Harikrish
Posts: 11,005
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2016 3:44:44 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 6/28/2016 4:15:48 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

Notice, women scream for equality in the workplace, yet do not want included in the draft, do not but rarely join the military, police force, join firefighting squadrons, work laboring jobs, etc.
You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only. You should read more and rely less on your own stupidity.
Peepette
Posts: 1,237
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2016 9:57:17 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature.

Please do describe how nature has assigned these roles, especially since we no longer live as hunter gathers or in agrarian culture?

As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex.

How is this the case today? We no longer live in the world of Ozzie and Harriet where dad is the sole breadwinner. It takes two incomes to keep a home and family. Is it not reasonable for a women in the working world have an expectation that her intellect and efforts be valued equally as a man"s? How does the man now build the shelter and protect the female? Does he chop down the trees and plane the wood himself? How does he protect the female? Is it from the marauding lion creeping into the village?

The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do.

A woman's role is to provide comfort and enhance the life of the male? She works all day, comes home, does house work, cares for children and also has to have a martini and slippers in hand when the man comes home? Only a woman can nurture and care for children? Mmm what is the father's role, just bring home the bacon and then turn on the TV while mom keeps the kids quiet?

The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

What is the male's role in life? What are the responsibilities? Have all males held up their end of "nature's" bargain? You cry that women are moving into the territory of men. What happened to the "real men"? I know only a few in existence. You know of the type I speak. The ones that take responsibility for support of their offspring and supportive of their spouses. The ones who didn't cheat or went looking for a younger model when the wife aged. The ones that didn't run away when the burdens of responsibility weighed heavy.

You claim that feminist are ugly women who can't find husbands. What a misogynistic outlook. You conclude this is the only goal for a woman, to find a husband. Being unattractive is prohibitive. Why would that be a goal? In reality such a goal, under your view of the "nature" of a woman is assuming more work and responsibility. She to raise children, keep house and do chores, while also contributing to finances as well as to wait on the husband hand and foot. I believe women seek partners in life with someone who will share the burdens and responsibilities. She can no longer just stay home with the kids.
Lookingatissues
Posts: 239
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2016 11:13:01 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 6/28/2016 3:44:44 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 4:15:48 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

Notice, women scream for equality in the workplace, yet do not want included in the draft, do not but rarely join the military, police force, join firefighting squadrons, work laboring jobs, etc.
You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only. You should read more and rely less on your own stupidity.
POSTED ".....You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."

lookingatheissues response to this statement below
"......Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."
The fact that women are found in all of these fields doesn't prove the appropriateness of females occupying positions in those fields in fact the very nature of females and their physical characteristics prove the opposite. The facts are that women in these different fields is strictly a matter of asserting political correctness and the feminists objectives above all other considerations effecting the ability of the country to function properly and effectively.For example, in a book by Robert Bork," Slouching Towards Gommorrah,"" He writes about the negative effects from the admission of women. Robert Knight draws on the sworn courtroom testimony of a west Point official that women cannot preform nearly as well as men and the men's training program has, for that reason, been downgraded. For example, men are no longer required to run carrying heavy weapons because women are unable to do that."
"Pregnancies due to sex during the preceding phase, Desert Shield, was the primary reason the non-deployment rate of women was many times higher than that of men when the troops were called to battle in Desert Storm."
" 61 percent of female cadets at West Point...failed the complete physical test, compared to 4.8 percent of men." "... it has been reported that navy ships have had to be recalled from missions because of the pregnancy of female sailors."

"James Q. Wilson writes," The military is to be used as a means for reforming society and not exclusively as the means of defending the country and our interests around the world."
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
John Adams, Feminists, political correctness, doesn't change the fact that because of the differences in females and males by nature's design, Political correctness, feminists can't change the physical conditions of the sexes.
brontoraptor
Posts: 11,685
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2016 11:15:48 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 6/28/2016 3:44:44 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 4:15:48 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

Notice, women scream for equality in the workplace, yet do not want included in the draft, do not but rarely join the military, police force, join firefighting squadrons, work laboring jobs, etc.
You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only. You should read more and rely less on your own stupidity.

And in the vast minority while being the majority of the population. Haven't mastered the English language I see.
"What Donald Trump is doing is representing the absolute heartbreak, and anger, and frustration at a government gone mad."

http://youtu.be...
Peepette
Posts: 1,237
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/29/2016 1:12:38 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 6/28/2016 11:13:01 PM, Lookingatissues wrote:
At 6/28/2016 3:44:44 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 4:15:48 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

Notice, women scream for equality in the workplace, yet do not want included in the draft, do not but rarely join the military, police force, join firefighting squadrons, work laboring jobs, etc.
You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only. You should read more and rely less on your own stupidity.
POSTED ".....You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."

lookingatheissues response to this statement below
"......Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."
The fact that women are found in all of these fields doesn't prove the appropriateness of females occupying positions in those fields in fact the very nature of females and their physical characteristics prove the opposite. The facts are that women in these different fields is strictly a matter of asserting political correctness and the feminists objectives above all other considerations effecting the ability of the country to function properly and effectively.For example, in a book by Robert Bork," Slouching Towards Gommorrah,"" He writes about the negative effects from the admission of women. Robert Knight draws on the sworn courtroom testimony of a west Point official that women cannot preform nearly as well as men and the men's training program has, for that reason, been downgraded. For example, men are no longer required to run carrying heavy weapons because women are unable to do that."

Bork has been sliced and diced over his views by numerous sociologist and political scientists as lacking vigor in understanding of the constitution and not fully flushing his causations to what he refers as the erosion of American culture. He proposed limiting free speech and advocated censorship. Wanted to amend the constitution to allow a super majority of congress to overrule supreme court rulings, essentially eliminating the check and balance of the system. He felt that the lack of taint on homosexuality drew people to it and bashed the education system on lessons concerning the persecution or social prejidices of minorities. The man's head was in the 40's and 50's.

"Pregnancies due to sex during the preceding phase, Desert Shield, was the primary reason the non-deployment rate of women was many times higher than that of men when the troops were called to battle in Desert Storm."

Gee wiz Shirlock who got these women pregnant, do they hold any responsibility?

" 61 percent of female cadets at West Point...failed the complete physical test, compared to 4.8 percent of men." "... it has been reported that navy ships have had to be recalled from missions because of the pregnancy of female sailors."

"James Q. Wilson writes," The military is to be used as a means for reforming society and not exclusively as the means of defending the country and our interests around the world."

Funny how the Isaeli's have no issue with women in the Massad forces
http://www.globes.co.il..., https://www.rt.com...

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
John Adams, Feminists, political correctness, doesn't change the fact that because of the differences in females and males by nature's design, Political correctness, feminists can't change the physical conditions of the sexes.
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/29/2016 1:54:25 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 6/28/2016 4:15:48 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

Notice, women scream for equality in the workplace, yet do not want included in the draft, do not but rarely join the military, police force, join firefighting squadrons, work laboring jobs, etc.

Yeah, I remember women saying "I am not for equality anymore." It was hilarious seeing those idiots get stuck with some male privilege.
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
Harikrish
Posts: 11,005
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/29/2016 12:16:00 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 6/28/2016 11:13:01 PM, Lookingatissues wrote:
At 6/28/2016 3:44:44 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 4:15:48 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

Notice, women scream for equality in the workplace, yet do not want included in the draft, do not but rarely join the military, police force, join firefighting squadrons, work laboring jobs, etc.
You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only. You should read more and rely less on your own stupidity.
POSTED ".....You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."

lookingatheissues response to this statement below
"......Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."
The fact that women are found in all of these fields doesn't prove the appropriateness of females occupying positions in those fields in fact the very nature of females and their physical characteristics prove the opposite. The facts are that women in these different fields is strictly a matter of asserting political correctness and the feminists objectives above all other considerations effecting the ability of the country to function properly and effectively.For example, in a book by Robert Bork," Slouching Towards Gommorrah,"" He writes about the negative effects from the admission of women. Robert Knight draws on the sworn courtroom testimony of a west Point official that women cannot preform nearly as well as men and the men's training program has, for that reason, been downgraded. For example, men are no longer required to run carrying heavy weapons because women are unable to do that."
"Pregnancies due to sex during the preceding phase, Desert Shield, was the primary reason the non-deployment rate of women was many times higher than that of men when the troops were called to battle in Desert Storm."
" 61 percent of female cadets at West Point...failed the complete physical test, compared to 4.8 percent of men." "... it has been reported that navy ships have had to be recalled from missions because of the pregnancy of female sailors."

"James Q. Wilson writes," The military is to be used as a means for reforming society and not exclusively as the means of defending the country and our interests around the world."
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
John Adams, Feminists, political correctness, doesn't change the fact that because of the differences in females and males by nature's design, Political correctness, feminists can't change the physical conditions of the sexes.

Why are you making a public display of your ignorance?

" Here's a list of the countries that allow women in front-line combat positions. In Europe: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania and Sweden. Elsewhere: Australia, Canada and New Zealand in the Anglosphere; plus Eritrea, Israel, and North Korea.
Harikrish
Posts: 11,005
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/29/2016 12:21:16 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 6/28/2016 11:15:48 PM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 6/28/2016 3:44:44 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 4:15:48 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

Notice, women scream for equality in the workplace, yet do not want included in the draft, do not but rarely join the military, police force, join firefighting squadrons, work laboring jobs, etc.
You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only. You should read more and rely less on your own stupidity.

And in the vast minority while being the majority of the population. Haven't mastered the English language I see.

The Bible was given to the Hebrews and Greeks. English was not a suitable language for even God. Count the number of English translations and you know why English is not a precise language. It takes many attempts to get it right.
Lookingatissues
Posts: 239
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/29/2016 5:09:44 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
lookingattheissues response to...Peepette
Peepette..." Bork has been sliced and diced over his views by numerous sociologist and political scientists as lacking vigor in understanding of the constitution and not fully flushing his causations to what he refers as the erosion of American culture..."
j25;The National Education Association donated $2.3 million to Democrats in 2008 and $2.2 million in 2010. and you say that "....Bork,,,a republican conservative..... has been sliced and diced over his views by numerous sociologist and political scientists

Read more: j25;http://dailycaller.com...

Peepette posted...Robert Bork, you claimed..."....Wanted to amend the constitution to allow a super majority of congress to overrule supreme court rulings, essentially eliminating the check and balance of the system
lookinattheissues "Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely"
j25;Lord Acton
A Court who's members are appointed for life and who's decisions aren't subject to being over ruled is is in effect an tyrannical Body.
England, for example, didn't think that the courts should be able to hand down decisions that couldn't be reviewed and overruled by another branch of government.
The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty is about the relationship between the Parliament and the courts. Is parliament supreme or the courts? As we have stated above, UK is known to have parliament supremacy,.... "Parliament has, under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and further that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament'.
j25;
Parliamentary sovereignty is the most important part of the UK constitution, it has been for a very long time. The UK is known to have an unwritten constitution, however, although, they do not exist in a single text, like other countries e.g. USA and Germany, large parts of the UK constitution is actually written down, most of it being statutes. "Therefore, the UK constitution is often described as "partly written and wholly unmodified'".
LAWTEACHER
j25;
America fought a war with the British because of the arbitary usurped powers of the king over it.
Because it is called "The Supreme Court,"instead "King," doesn't mean that it should have the ability to exert the powers of a King, unaccountable to anyone.
LAWTEACHER
Peepette posted "The man's head was in the 40's and 50's."
This then supposedly means that Robert Bork's thoughts are without merit.
Lookingatissues
Posts: 239
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/29/2016 5:09:45 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
lookingattheissues response to...Peepette
Peepette..." Bork has been sliced and diced over his views by numerous sociologist and political scientists as lacking vigor in understanding of the constitution and not fully flushing his causations to what he refers as the erosion of American culture..."
j25;The National Education Association donated $2.3 million to Democrats in 2008 and $2.2 million in 2010. and you say that "....Bork,,,a republican conservative..... has been sliced and diced over his views by numerous sociologist and political scientists

Read more: j25;http://dailycaller.com...

Peepette posted...Robert Bork, you claimed..."....Wanted to amend the constitution to allow a super majority of congress to overrule supreme court rulings, essentially eliminating the check and balance of the system
lookinattheissues "Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely"
j25;Lord Acton
A Court who's members are appointed for life and who's decisions aren't subject to being over ruled is is in effect an tyrannical Body.
England, for example, didn't think that the courts should be able to hand down decisions that couldn't be reviewed and overruled by another branch of government.
The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty is about the relationship between the Parliament and the courts. Is parliament supreme or the courts? As we have stated above, UK is known to have parliament supremacy,.... "Parliament has, under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and further that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament'.
j25;
Parliamentary sovereignty is the most important part of the UK constitution, it has been for a very long time. The UK is known to have an unwritten constitution, however, although, they do not exist in a single text, like other countries e.g. USA and Germany, large parts of the UK constitution is actually written down, most of it being statutes. "Therefore, the UK constitution is often described as "partly written and wholly unmodified'".
LAWTEACHER
j25;
America fought a war with the British because of the arbitary usurped powers of the king over it.
Because it is called "The Supreme Court,"instead "King," doesn't mean that it should have the ability to exert the powers of a King, unaccountable to anyone.
LAWTEACHER
Peepette posted "The man's head was in the 40's and 50's."
This then supposedly means that Robert Bork's thoughts are without merit.
Peepette
Posts: 1,237
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/29/2016 6:34:24 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 6/29/2016 5:09:45 PM, Lookingatissues wrote:
lookingattheissues response to...Peepette
Peepette..." Bork has been sliced and diced over his views by numerous sociologist and political scientists as lacking vigor in understanding of the constitution and not fully flushing his causations to what he refers as the erosion of American culture..."
j25;The National Education Association donated $2.3 million to Democrats in 2008 and $2.2 million in 2010. and you say that "....Bork,,,a republican conservative..... has been sliced and diced over his views by numerous sociologist and political scientists

Read more: j25;http://dailycaller.com...

And this article has what to do with Bork's views and the topic at hand?

Peepette posted...Robert Bork, you claimed..."....Wanted to amend the constitution to allow a super majority of congress to overrule supreme court rulings, essentially eliminating the check and balance of the system
lookinattheissues "Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely"

j25;Lord Acton
A Court who's members are appointed for life and who's decisions aren't subject to being over ruled is is in effect an tyrannical Body.

The system of checks and balances and the Supreme Court as a separate entity was purposely done so no government branch or party holding the majority could pass legislation in violation or misinterpretation of the Constitution. Appointments are made b y the Legislative branch of government and have the power to alter the size of the SC if they so choose. Without them being a an independent interpreter of the Constitution laws would be passed wily nilly by whoever held to power in the house and would sway from back and forth from one election to the next. The SC brings continuity of interpretation through various administrations.

But really what does this have to do with the topic "Feminist would deny women and men" I was merely pointing out Bork's views on American culture were backward, antiquated, having no merit.

Also, you failed to address a any question posed in my post #4

http://www.usconstitution.net...

England, for example, didn't think that the courts should be able to hand down decisions that couldn't be reviewed and overruled by another branch of government.
The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty is about the relationship between the Parliament and the courts. Is parliament supreme or the courts? As we have stated above, UK is known to have parliament supremacy,.... "Parliament has, under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and further that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament'.
j25;
Parliamentary sovereignty is the most important part of the UK constitution, it has been for a very long time. The UK is known to have an unwritten constitution, however, although, they do not exist in a single text, like other countries e.g. USA and Germany, large parts of the UK constitution is actually written down, most of it being statutes. "Therefore, the UK constitution is often described as "partly written and wholly unmodified'".

We do not have a parliamentary system of government. Again, how does any of this pertain to the topic at hand?

LAWTEACHER
j25;
America fought a war with the British because of the arbitary usurped powers of the king over it.
Because it is called "The Supreme Court,"instead "King," doesn't mean that it should have the ability to exert the powers of a King, unaccountable to anyone.
LAWTEACHER
Peepette posted "The man's head was in the 40's and 50's."
This then supposedly means that Robert Bork's thoughts are without merit.

I feel I have dispelled the credibility of his views on the erosion of American culture. There was clear reasoning why he failed to gain appointment to the SC in 1987. He was considered and "ideological extremist."
Lookingatissues
Posts: 239
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/29/2016 11:05:53 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
lookingattheissues....Attempting to appear naive about the connection in my pointing out that,"The National Education Association donated $2.3 million to Democrats in 2008 and $2.2 million in 2010 does you a disservice. We know that you can see the relationship between educators, donating the major portion of their Union dues to the democrat party.
Such progressive democrat educators as Ward Churchill and Elizabeth Warren, just two examples among many others who could have been listed. These "Sociologist and political scientists...." are the products of liberal democrat educators. It shouldn't come as a surprise then that democrats, these "....Sociologist and political scientists,..." shouldn't agree or like Robert Bork's Opinions.
Peepette posted..The system of checks and balances and the Supreme Court as a separate entity was purposely done so no government branch or party holding the majority could pass legislation in violation or misinterpretation of the Constitution.
You have explained what the intentions were of those who wrote the constitution but everyone is aware that Personal biases and political ideologies aren't left at the door of the Supreme Court by those seated on the Supreme Court. Its not a coincidence that presidents nominate those who share their ideologies and who would promote their political objectives. The proof that political ideologies are reflected in the decisions of Supreme court Justices is a recognized reality. You as well, in your comments about Robert Bork, "There was clear reasoning why he failed to gain appointment to the SC in 1987." He was considered and "ideological extremist....," acknowledged this fact that Supreme Court Justices have personal ideologies that effect their decisions.
If being an "ideological extremist was the reason why Robert Bork was "Borked,"then Ruth Bader Ginsburg "Special Counsel to the NAACP, Thurgood Marshall, attorney for the NAACP should have been rejected too for being ""ideological extremist..s."
You posted,"We do not have a parliamentary system of government. Again, how does any of this pertain to the topic at hand?
lookingattheissues response..."A Court who's members are appointed for life and who's decisions aren't subject to being over ruled is is in effect an tyrannical Body."
"England, for example, didn't think that the courts should be able to hand down decisions that couldn't be reviewed and overruled by another branch of government." Then I gave a example by showing that parliament in England "Parliament has, under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and further that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament'."
You posted,"Gee wiz Shirlock who got these women pregnant, do they hold any responsibility?" You are trying to obfuscate the issue here, the issues of importance is that common sense was discarded and political correctness,and feminist were allowed to carry out their agendas for the military. Those who were responsible for setting a policy that allowed women to be a part of a ships crew and decided that political correctness could overrule the laws of nature were the ones responsible for these females becoming pregnant. The laws of nature don't recognize Political correctness nor do men out to see for long periods of time think about "Politcal Correctness," nor do women, its became apparent.
Peepette
Posts: 1,237
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/30/2016 1:25:53 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
I get it you"re a conservative. All things that buck against your Ozzie and Harriet lifestyle where the man rules the home and white male privilege of the bygone era reigns is a liberal poisoning of the American culture. I"m a big fan of Elizabeth Warren BTW.

Robert Bork: A man who opposed a civil rights article requiring business to serve all races.
He objected to the overturning of a law banning contraceptives by stating that the Constitution has no guarentees for martial privacy.

He also bucked against SC decisions on gender equality. This was not a man what was deserving of being a SC judge.

If he had his way blacks would still be segrigated. Police would be busting down doors without warrents. We would have sex police and job opportunitiues for women would be limited to clerks in dress shops.

Putting women back in the home is not reality for most families. I've addressed this point before. There are some women who would prefer to stay home and raise their children full time. There"s nothing wrong with that if that"s is what is decided as best for a particular family. Unfortunately, most families can"t afford to do so; both parents have to work. And under these conditions it is a reasonalble expectation for women to receive equal pay to the same work perfomed.

Also in an age where divorce rates are high, an uneducated woman with little or no work experience would be destined to poverty unable to take care of herself and children after divorce.

I'm aware of the political ideologies of SC justices and Presidents. But, look at the fact that these are life time appointments where single vacancies occur in decades rather than in election cycles it creates a sense of continuity of rulings. What the Rep. legislative is doing now, not even showing up for nominee hearings stalling until after the elections is an historically unprecedented partisan stonewalling of the process. These people are not interested in the running of the government, only holding on to power. They are in effect behaving like a tyrannical body.

Oh yes the British way is soooo way better! Looking at how our parties don't get anything accomplished because the fight for power and looking after special interest from where their campaingen money flows, they have the clarity of mind and social consciousness to "do the right thing" in the interest of the American people. I don't buy it. The SC looks through the BS laws that get passed.

---"You are trying to obfuscate the issue here, the issues of importance is that common sense was discarded and political correctness,and feminist were allowed to carry out their agendas for the military" ---

This has nothing to do with PC. If women are physically and mentally capable to do the job, they should get the job, period. OH and these rules of nature that you go on about. You have yet to extrapolate or answer the questions I posed. See post #4. I'm waiting......... So PC got these women pregnant? I didn't know it had an anatomical organ to do the deed. Men at sea for long periods of time are excused from their actions and responsibilities if it results in a pregnant naval crew? Oh those poor men at sea.....boys will be boys I see. How deeply misogynistic.
Lookingatissues
Posts: 239
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/4/2016 3:07:11 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
, Peepette wrote:
Peepette posted ......... So PC got these women pregnant? I didn't know it had an anatomical organ to do the deed.
lookinattheissues response....political correctness is a "sociopolitical ideology," not "an anatomical organ..."
Political Correctness - definition of political correctness
politically correct adj. Abbr. PC Conforming to a particular sociopolitical ideology or point of view, especially to a liberal point of view concerned with promoting ...
www.thefreedictionary.com/political+correctness\l "
In all situations, when a results occurs ,either favorable or unfavorable, we have to apply the formula of "Cause and Effect," if we want to reach a conclusion as to why certain results were achieved.
Essay info writing guide
writing a cause and effect essay
1."Distinguish between cause and effect. To determine causes, ask, "Why did this happen?" To identify effects, ask, "What happened because of this?"
2."Cause and effect,
3."Cause, why did this happen," Women placed on navel vessels with men for long periods of time while at sea.
Effect: pregnancy of female sailors."
Mission of the Navy "The mission of the Navy is to maintain,train and equip combat-ready Naval forces capable of winning wars, deterring aggression and maintaining freedom of the seas.
No where in this declaration of the " Mission of the Navy," does it say,'The Mission of the navy is to promote and practice the policy of "political Correctness....." "Conforming to a particular sociopolitical ideology or point of view, especially to a liberal point of view ."
You posted,"I'm a big fan of Elizabeth Warren BTW"
By the way, .Is the Jack A## your parties symbol, and doesn't "pocahontas," Elizabeth Warren, also identify with that symbol.
You posted, "This has nothing to do with PC. (If women are physically) and mentally capable to do the job, they should get the job, period." You said,"If women are physically and mentally capable to do the job, they should get the job, period." Women have been proven they are not physically able to preform the duties required in training.
"Robert Knight draws on the sworn courtroom (testimony of a west Point official that women cannot preform nearly as well as men) and the men's training program has, for that reason, been downgraded. For example, men are no longer required to run carrying heavy weapons because women are unable to do that."
Peepette posted "..... it is a reasonalble expectation for women to receive equal pay to the same work perfomed.
lookingattheissues reply...There are reasons why some women don't receive the same pay as men do who are doing the same job.

/www.payscale.com/
"Why Women Earn Less than Men: A Result of Fewer Hours Worked per Week"
"......Another issue of not taking into account hours worked in the pay comparison is the proven trend that women with children work fewer hours per week than men with children. In other words, women may choose to work an 80% workweek (32 hours/week) and be paid an 80% salary for doing so."
"...we find the typical female pay is much closer to typical male pay than the oft quoted 77 cents to the dollar. "
Peepette posted "....All things that buck against your Ozzie and Harriet lifestyle where the man rules the home and white male privilege..." Oh, the old, "Ozzie and Harriet lifestyle, besmirched by liberated men and women who in a lot of cases aren't even married to one another but just living together as if they were. One big difference is that these couples children most likely came form a different male or female than the one that they are presently coupled up with. Unlike the situation with"Ozzie and Harriet ," the children and the mother knew who the father was.
Peepette
Posts: 1,237
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/4/2016 11:18:54 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/4/2016 3:07:11 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
, Peepette wrote:
Peepette posted ......... So PC got these women pregnant? I didn't know it had an anatomical organ to do the deed.
lookinattheissues response....political correctness is a "sociopolitical ideology," not "an anatomical organ..."
Political Correctness - definition of political correctness
politically correct adj. Abbr. PC Conforming to a particular sociopolitical ideology or point of view, especially to a liberal point of view concerned with promoting ...
www.thefreedictionary.com/political+correctness\l "
In all situations, when a results occurs ,either favorable or unfavorable, we have to apply the formula of "Cause and Effect," if we want to reach a conclusion as to why certain results were achieved.
Essay info writing guide
writing a cause and effect essay
1."Distinguish between cause and effect. To determine causes, ask, "Why did this happen?" To identify effects, ask, "What happened because of this?"
2."Cause and effect,
3."Cause, why did this happen," Women placed on navel vessels with men for long periods of time while at sea.
Effect: pregnancy of female sailors."

AGAIN! It takes two to tango, and it's funny how you ignor other statements I've made and NEVER answered any of my questions asked earlier in the thread. It appears you just want to spout off in attach on my statements. Men and women have sex, not just women alone. Both parties are responsible for the outcome.

Mission of the Navy "The mission of the Navy is to maintain,train and equip combat-ready Naval forces capable of winning wars, deterring aggression and maintaining freedom of the seas.
No where in this declaration of the " Mission of the Navy," does it say,'The Mission of the navy is to promote and practice the policy of "political Correctness....." "Conforming to a particular sociopolitical ideology or point of view, especially to a liberal point of view ."
You posted,"I'm a big fan of Elizabeth Warren BTW"
By the way, .Is the Jack A## your parties symbol, and doesn't "pocahontas," Elizabeth Warren, also identify with that symbol.

Pocahontas? You sound like Jack Arse Trump. Yep, I fully understand the page you are coming from. Keep women stupid pregnant and delivering a cocktail and slippers when you arrive home from a hard day of work. Divorce her when she ages and trade her in for a younger model. You'll fight every dime of child support. She'll live in a junky apartment with the kids (you don't want full custody, it will cramp your style with the new wifey) And because she has no education and stayed home to take of you for so many years is not qualified to work in a place other than fast food or retail for minimum wage. You're a grown man of 40? I wonder if your married or sourerly divorced. Even the mail order brides won't fit into your ideology of the bygone era.

You posted, "This has nothing to do with PC. (If women are physically) and mentally capable to do the job, they should get the job, period." You said,"If women are physically and mentally capable to do the job, they should get the job, period." Women have been proven they are not physically able to preform the duties required in training.
"Robert Knight draws on the sworn courtroom (testimony of a west Point official that women cannot preform nearly as well as men) and the men's training program has, for that reason, been downgraded. For example, men are no longer required to run carrying heavy weapons because women are unable to do that."

I have heard this argument from fellow misogonist over and over again ad nauseam as this being the SOLE source that women do not belong in the military. I counter that argument. Many industrialized countries do have women in the military. That's already been pointed out, but choose to ignore yet again.

http://www.nytimes.com...
http://www.nytimes.com...
http://www.usatoday.com...

Peepette posted "..... it is a reasonalble expectation for women to receive equal pay to the same work perfomed.
lookingattheissues reply...There are reasons why some women don't receive the same pay as men do who are doing the same job.

/www.payscale.com/
"Why Women Earn Less than Men: A Result of Fewer Hours Worked per Week"
"......Another issue of not taking into account hours worked in the pay comparison is the proven trend that women with children work fewer hours per week than men with children. In other words, women may choose to work an 80% workweek (32 hours/week) and be paid an 80% salary for doing so."
"...we find the typical female pay is much closer to typical male pay than the oft quoted 77 cents to the dollar. "

Same job, same hours, same pay. Hours worked per week are not at issue. Since women still have the brunt of childcare. I don't see a whole lot of dads taking time off to pick up kids at school when a child falls ill or taking them to a doctors when they have an appointment. If these responsibilities were equally shared women would have equal hours spent at work. Most of these child related responsibilities lay squarely on females.

Peepette posted "....All things that buck against your Ozzie and Harriet lifestyle where the man rules the home and white male privilege..." Oh, the old, "Ozzie and Harriet lifestyle, besmirched by liberated men and women who in a lot of cases aren't even married to one another but just living together as if they were. One big difference is that these couples children most likely came form a different male or female than the one that they are presently coupled up with. Unlike the situation with"Ozzie and Harriet ," the children and the mother knew who the father was.

Oh yes, all women are sluts and can't identify the father's of there children. More women bashing when it takes two to procreate. How about all the baby daddies who head for the hills when a woman gets pregnant; and get several women pregnant without responsibility toward rearing children? As of 2016 53% of babies born will be in wedlock. Are these women floozies as well? 90% of women with college educations have children once married. So it pays not to keep women dumb.
Lookingatissues
Posts: 239
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/7/2016 3:39:01 AM
Posted: 5 months ago
PEEPETTE replied...
"AGAIN! It takes two to tango,..." .
lookingattheissues reply: The question asked in this debate never was, Who's fault it was for having sex, a sexual union, "males and females," In establishing this fact we also established the fact that there is a natural mutual attraction between the sexes.
There is a formula in order for a fire to occurr which is helpful in explaining why it isn't logical for men and women to be confinded on military ships and posts for long periods of time and making it impractical for military purposes.
The symbol used to demonstrate the three things necessary for fire to ignite and burn is The "Triangle"
The three things represented by the triangle, to ignite a fire are," Fuel to burn."
Oxygen/ air.
Heat... Ignition temperature
Remove one of the three things and the fire won't ignite or continue to burn.
Remove women from men and women won't get pregnant.
PEEPETTE replied ....Pocahontas? You sound like Jack Arse Trump. Yep, I fully understand the page you are coming from.
lookingattheissues reply..... This tirade you just delivered sounds like it came directly from a Feminist ideologue and you are the recipient of America's educational institutions of which John Dewey, the father of modern education holds responsibility for.
A short time ago you used the phrase," White Male Privilege," another tell-tail give away that you indeed have bought into the feminist ideology and have been thoroughly indoctrinated by the government indoctrination centers in America called public educational institutions.
PEEPETTE ".... White Male Privilege..."I have to ask, were the girls not allowed to go to the same public schools that the boys went to, were girls not receiving the same lessons that the boys received at the same time in the same class rooms. Did the girls only receive instructions from female teachers and the boys only receive instructions from male teachers. How then, if males and females received the same lessons/ materials, at the same time from the same mix of the sexes as teachers how are the males thought by feminists to have been the beneficiaries of "White Male Privilege."
Feminists, instead of being appreciative that our forefathers, who were white males, established this great country in which both sexes had opportunities for them unavailable to them in any other country condemn them simply because they were "....White Males"
Were the roles played by women in History any less important because the women didn't receive the same honors in history as the men received, The answer has to be ,no, the women in history just had different roles because they were feminine. The very group of women, "feminists," who profess to be for women denigrate any women who would be happy in the role of a woman, wife, mother, and companion to a man.
PEEPETTE replied,"....I have heard this argument from fellow misogonist over and over again ad nauseam as this being the SOLE source that women do not belong in the military...."
Women in the military fill positions that men, by their physical male qualities, are better able to fill.
An example, a Crescent Wrench will work but a tool of the exact side works a lot better every time.
Robkwoods
Posts: 570
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/8/2016 12:56:09 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 6/29/2016 12:16:00 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 11:13:01 PM, Lookingatissues wrote:
At 6/28/2016 3:44:44 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 4:15:48 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

Notice, women scream for equality in the workplace, yet do not want included in the draft, do not but rarely join the military, police force, join firefighting squadrons, work laboring jobs, etc.
You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only. You should read more and rely less on your own stupidity.
POSTED ".....You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."

lookingatheissues response to this statement below
"......Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."
The fact that women are found in all of these fields doesn't prove the appropriateness of females occupying positions in those fields in fact the very nature of females and their physical characteristics prove the opposite. The facts are that women in these different fields is strictly a matter of asserting political correctness and the feminists objectives above all other considerations effecting the ability of the country to function properly and effectively.For example, in a book by Robert Bork," Slouching Towards Gommorrah,"" He writes about the negative effects from the admission of women. Robert Knight draws on the sworn courtroom testimony of a west Point official that women cannot preform nearly as well as men and the men's training program has, for that reason, been downgraded. For example, men are no longer required to run carrying heavy weapons because women are unable to do that."
"Pregnancies due to sex during the preceding phase, Desert Shield, was the primary reason the non-deployment rate of women was many times higher than that of men when the troops were called to battle in Desert Storm."
" 61 percent of female cadets at West Point...failed the complete physical test, compared to 4.8 percent of men." "... it has been reported that navy ships have had to be recalled from missions because of the pregnancy of female sailors."

"James Q. Wilson writes," The military is to be used as a means for reforming society and not exclusively as the means of defending the country and our interests around the world."
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
John Adams, Feminists, political correctness, doesn't change the fact that because of the differences in females and males by nature's design, Political correctness, feminists can't change the physical conditions of the sexes.

Why are you making a public display of your ignorance?

" Here's a list of the countries that allow women in front-line combat positions. In Europe: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania and Sweden. Elsewhere: Australia, Canada and New Zealand in the Anglosphere; plus Eritrea, Israel, and North Korea.

You truly are ignorant. What are their standards of performance compared to the U.S.? That is what he is saying; instead of requiring persons to meet a standard, REGARDLESS OF SEX, we have said if you are a woman you don't have to meet the highest standard.
Robkwoods
Posts: 570
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/8/2016 1:31:00 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/4/2016 11:18:54 PM, Peepette wrote:

AGAIN! It takes two to tango, and it's funny how you ignor other statements I've made and NEVER answered any of my questions asked earlier in the thread. It appears you just want to spout off in attach on my statements. Men and women have sex, not just women alone. Both parties are responsible for the outcome.

Actually not true. If I know that after intercourse I wont be able to walk for several days after; I should really be careful about that act. If I choose to willfully participate in that act it is 100% my fault or 99% if I decided to tell the other person. Either way, the responsibly is all mine.



Pocahontas? You sound like Jack Arse Trump. Yep, I fully understand the page you are coming from. Keep women stupid pregnant and delivering a cocktail and slippers when you arrive home from a hard day of work. Divorce her when she ages and trade her in for a younger model. You'll fight every dime of child support. She'll live in a junky apartment with the kids (you don't want full custody, it will cramp your style with the new wifey) And because she has no education and stayed home to take of you for so many years is not qualified to work in a place other than fast food or retail for minimum wage. You're a grown man of 40? I wonder if your married or sourerly divorced. Even the mail order brides won't fit into your ideology of the bygone era.

Doesn't sound like a bad deal, but your rambling is completely false. 70% of all divorce is initiated by women. Clearly women inherently don't want to make important decisions, seeing as they have been 50% of the population, and now are the majority voting body, but they are somehow systemically challenged. Makes some laws you dummies.

I have heard this argument from fellow misogonist over and over again ad nauseam as this being the SOLE source that women do not belong in the military. I counter that argument. Many industrialized countries do have women in the military. That's already been pointed out, but choose to ignore yet again.

http://www.nytimes.com...
http://www.nytimes.com...
http://www.usatoday.com...

Yay, misogyny. Disagreement does not equate to misogyny you dolt. Also thinking women are better suited to certain task is not misogyny, it is general common sense. The overwhelming majority of women do not handle violence the way men do. Enjoy...

http://www.returnofkings.com...

Same job, same hours, same pay. Hours worked per week are not at issue. Since women still have the brunt of childcare. I don't see a whole lot of dads taking time off to pick up kids at school when a child falls ill or taking them to a doctors when they have an appointment. If these responsibilities were equally shared women would have equal hours spent at work. Most of these child related responsibilities lay squarely on females.

And they should seeing as they gave birth to the child and are more adept at childcare than men. Also if they happen to find a good provider so they can do so without worry, BONUS!


Oh yes, all women are sluts and can't identify the father's of there children. More women bashing when it takes two to procreate. How about all the baby daddies who head for the hills when a woman gets pregnant; and get several women pregnant without responsibility toward rearing children? As of 2016 53% of babies born will be in wedlock. Are these women floozies as well? 90% of women with college educations have children once married. So it pays not to keep women dumb.

Yeah that is the definition of one. I already addressed your idiotic statement about it takes two. No, they are not all floozies, but they were told they could be like men with no additional consequences. Turns out that has been verifiably false.
Honestly college is a sham. Get a skill and turn it into something great, you don't need a 400K education for that. You don't learn how to build awesome furniture or custom motorcycles by going to school.

*sidenote* if you still believe the pay gap is due to sexism your are a willful idiot who is nothing more than a moral grandstanding narcissist.
slo1
Posts: 4,330
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/8/2016 1:37:55 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

The problem with using a "natural" argument is that there are environmental conditions that promotes matriarchal societies. These are usually in areas or time with very limited resources where many children would create too much competition. One example I recall the women had multiple husband's.

Nature has no role. The will to survive is very strong in animals and collections of organisms will adjust to maximize survival including resorting to catabolism.

You are right in that only women can give birth, but it is hardly a role which has to predetermine ones role in life. I think it is both wrong to advocate what a woman should choose period. Ultimately all choices are up to the individual. That argument is based upon individualism rather than genderism.
Harikrish
Posts: 11,005
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/8/2016 2:00:21 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/8/2016 12:56:09 PM, Robkwoods wrote:
At 6/29/2016 12:16:00 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 11:13:01 PM, Lookingatissues wrote:
At 6/28/2016 3:44:44 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 4:15:48 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

Notice, women scream for equality in the workplace, yet do not want included in the draft, do not but rarely join the military, police force, join firefighting squadrons, work laboring jobs, etc.
You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only. You should read more and rely less on your own stupidity.
POSTED ".....You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."

lookingatheissues response to this statement below
"......Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."
The fact that women are found in all of these fields doesn't prove the appropriateness of females occupying positions in those fields in fact the very nature of females and their physical characteristics prove the opposite. The facts are that women in these different fields is strictly a matter of asserting political correctness and the feminists objectives above all other considerations effecting the ability of the country to function properly and effectively.For example, in a book by Robert Bork," Slouching Towards Gommorrah,"" He writes about the negative effects from the admission of women. Robert Knight draws on the sworn courtroom testimony of a west Point official that women cannot preform nearly as well as men and the men's training program has, for that reason, been downgraded. For example, men are no longer required to run carrying heavy weapons because women are unable to do that."
"Pregnancies due to sex during the preceding phase, Desert Shield, was the primary reason the non-deployment rate of women was many times higher than that of men when the troops were called to battle in Desert Storm."
" 61 percent of female cadets at West Point...failed the complete physical test, compared to 4.8 percent of men." "... it has been reported that navy ships have had to be recalled from missions because of the pregnancy of female sailors."

"James Q. Wilson writes," The military is to be used as a means for reforming society and not exclusively as the means of defending the country and our interests around the world."
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
John Adams, Feminists, political correctness, doesn't change the fact that because of the differences in females and males by nature's design, Political correctness, feminists can't change the physical conditions of the sexes.

Why are you making a public display of your ignorance?

" Here's a list of the countries that allow women in front-line combat positions. In Europe: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania and Sweden. Elsewhere: Australia, Canada and New Zealand in the Anglosphere; plus Eritrea, Israel, and North Korea.

You truly are ignorant. What are their standards of performance compared to the U.S.? That is what he is saying; instead of requiring persons to meet a standard, REGARDLESS OF SEX, we have said if you are a woman you don't have to meet the highest standard.

America is behind women's rights compared to other developed countries. America is even behind in civil rights to minorities compared to other developed countries. Worst of all America is behind in education compared to other developed countries.
They even shut down the Trump University that was trying to stop this downward spiral.
Robkwoods
Posts: 570
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/8/2016 2:11:37 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/8/2016 1:37:55 PM, slo1 wrote:
The problem with using a "natural" argument is that there are environmental conditions that promotes matriarchal societies. These are usually in areas or time with very limited resources where many children would create too much competition. One example I recall the women had multiple husband's.

Nature has no role. The will to survive is very strong in animals and collections of organisms will adjust to maximize survival including resorting to catabolism.

You are right in that only women can give birth, but it is hardly a role which has to predetermine ones role in life. I think it is both wrong to advocate what a woman should choose period. Ultimately all choices are up to the individual. That argument is based upon individualism rather than genderism.

I both agree and disagree with your premise. Yes individualism!

BUT

That individualism tends to be wholly based on sex/gender. The decisions individuals tend to make are based from that foundation. There is a reason women like soft, smelly things and men like to blow sh*t up. The question is what came first... Society or Gender.
Robkwoods
Posts: 570
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/8/2016 2:20:49 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/8/2016 2:00:21 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 7/8/2016 12:56:09 PM, Robkwoods wrote:
At 6/29/2016 12:16:00 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 11:13:01 PM, Lookingatissues wrote:
At 6/28/2016 3:44:44 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 4:15:48 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

Notice, women scream for equality in the workplace, yet do not want included in the draft, do not but rarely join the military, police force, join firefighting squadrons, work laboring jobs, etc.
You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only. You should read more and rely less on your own stupidity.
POSTED ".....You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."

lookingatheissues response to this statement below
"......Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."
The fact that women are found in all of these fields doesn't prove the appropriateness of females occupying positions in those fields in fact the very nature of females and their physical characteristics prove the opposite. The facts are that women in these different fields is strictly a matter of asserting political correctness and the feminists objectives above all other considerations effecting the ability of the country to function properly and effectively.For example, in a book by Robert Bork," Slouching Towards Gommorrah,"" He writes about the negative effects from the admission of women. Robert Knight draws on the sworn courtroom testimony of a west Point official that women cannot preform nearly as well as men and the men's training program has, for that reason, been downgraded. For example, men are no longer required to run carrying heavy weapons because women are unable to do that."
"Pregnancies due to sex during the preceding phase, Desert Shield, was the primary reason the non-deployment rate of women was many times higher than that of men when the troops were called to battle in Desert Storm."
" 61 percent of female cadets at West Point...failed the complete physical test, compared to 4.8 percent of men." "... it has been reported that navy ships have had to be recalled from missions because of the pregnancy of female sailors."

"James Q. Wilson writes," The military is to be used as a means for reforming society and not exclusively as the means of defending the country and our interests around the world."
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
John Adams, Feminists, political correctness, doesn't change the fact that because of the differences in females and males by nature's design, Political correctness, feminists can't change the physical conditions of the sexes.

Why are you making a public display of your ignorance?

" Here's a list of the countries that allow women in front-line combat positions. In Europe: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania and Sweden. Elsewhere: Australia, Canada and New Zealand in the Anglosphere; plus Eritrea, Israel, and North Korea.

You truly are ignorant. What are their standards of performance compared to the U.S.? That is what he is saying; instead of requiring persons to meet a standard, REGARDLESS OF SEX, we have said if you are a woman you don't have to meet the highest standard.

America is behind women's rights compared to other developed countries. America is even behind in civil rights to minorities compared to other developed countries. Worst of all America is behind in education compared to other developed countries.
They even shut down the Trump University that was trying to stop this downward spiral.

Behind maybe in your dystopian view of the world.

America was the first to say all men are created equally. America fought a civil war over slavery. America voted for the 19th amendment, multiple times, light years before the suffragette movement.
America is a brand name for Freedom. No one is mass immigrating to Mexico. America is the greatest country in the world, and did so in under a 100 years of existence. Despite the unbelievable idiocy occurring within the borders today, the name still conjures immense pride.
Harikrish
Posts: 11,005
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/8/2016 2:55:57 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/8/2016 2:20:49 PM, Robkwoods wrote:
At 7/8/2016 2:00:21 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 7/8/2016 12:56:09 PM, Robkwoods wrote:
At 6/29/2016 12:16:00 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 11:13:01 PM, Lookingatissues wrote:
At 6/28/2016 3:44:44 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 4:15:48 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

Notice, women scream for equality in the workplace, yet do not want included in the draft, do not but rarely join the military, police force, join firefighting squadrons, work laboring jobs, etc.
You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only. You should read more and rely less on your own stupidity.
POSTED ".....You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."

lookingatheissues response to this statement below
"......Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."
The fact that women are found in all of these fields doesn't prove the appropriateness of females occupying positions in those fields in fact the very nature of females and their physical characteristics prove the opposite. The facts are that women in these different fields is strictly a matter of asserting political correctness and the feminists objectives above all other considerations effecting the ability of the country to function properly and effectively.For example, in a book by Robert Bork," Slouching Towards Gommorrah,"" He writes about the negative effects from the admission of women. Robert Knight draws on the sworn courtroom testimony of a west Point official that women cannot preform nearly as well as men and the men's training program has, for that reason, been downgraded. For example, men are no longer required to run carrying heavy weapons because women are unable to do that."
"Pregnancies due to sex during the preceding phase, Desert Shield, was the primary reason the non-deployment rate of women was many times higher than that of men when the troops were called to battle in Desert Storm."
" 61 percent of female cadets at West Point...failed the complete physical test, compared to 4.8 percent of men." "... it has been reported that navy ships have had to be recalled from missions because of the pregnancy of female sailors."

"James Q. Wilson writes," The military is to be used as a means for reforming society and not exclusively as the means of defending the country and our interests around the world."
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
John Adams, Feminists, political correctness, doesn't change the fact that because of the differences in females and males by nature's design, Political correctness, feminists can't change the physical conditions of the sexes.

Why are you making a public display of your ignorance?

" Here's a list of the countries that allow women in front-line combat positions. In Europe: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania and Sweden. Elsewhere: Australia, Canada and New Zealand in the Anglosphere; plus Eritrea, Israel, and North Korea.

You truly are ignorant. What are their standards of performance compared to the U.S.? That is what he is saying; instead of requiring persons to meet a standard, REGARDLESS OF SEX, we have said if you are a woman you don't have to meet the highest standard.

America is behind women's rights compared to other developed countries. America is even behind in civil rights to minorities compared to other developed countries. Worst of all America is behind in education compared to other developed countries.
They even shut down the Trump University that was trying to stop this downward spiral.

Behind maybe in your dystopian view of the world.

America was the first to say all men are created equally. America fought a civil war over slavery. America voted for the 19th amendment, multiple times, light years before the suffragette movement.
America is a brand name for Freedom. No one is mass immigrating to Mexico. America is the greatest country in the world, and did so in under a 100 years of existence. Despite the unbelievable idiocy occurring within the borders today, the name still conjures immense pride.

Listen to Trump.
America doesn't win anymore, America will be 21 trillion in debt, America is run by losers, he loves the poorly educated Americans and wants to win America back for them. America is no longer great or exceptional. He wants to make America great again. He will restart his Trump University to help Americans learn how to become successful.
Robkwoods
Posts: 570
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/8/2016 3:03:28 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/8/2016 2:55:57 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 7/8/2016 2:20:49 PM, Robkwoods wrote:
At 7/8/2016 2:00:21 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 7/8/2016 12:56:09 PM, Robkwoods wrote:
At 6/29/2016 12:16:00 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 11:13:01 PM, Lookingatissues wrote:
At 6/28/2016 3:44:44 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 4:15:48 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

Notice, women scream for equality in the workplace, yet do not want included in the draft, do not but rarely join the military, police force, join firefighting squadrons, work laboring jobs, etc.
You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only. You should read more and rely less on your own stupidity.
POSTED ".....You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."

lookingatheissues response to this statement below
"......Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."
The fact that women are found in all of these fields doesn't prove the appropriateness of females occupying positions in those fields in fact the very nature of females and their physical characteristics prove the opposite. The facts are that women in these different fields is strictly a matter of asserting political correctness and the feminists objectives above all other considerations effecting the ability of the country to function properly and effectively.For example, in a book by Robert Bork," Slouching Towards Gommorrah,"" He writes about the negative effects from the admission of women. Robert Knight draws on the sworn courtroom testimony of a west Point official that women cannot preform nearly as well as men and the men's training program has, for that reason, been downgraded. For example, men are no longer required to run carrying heavy weapons because women are unable to do that."
"Pregnancies due to sex during the preceding phase, Desert Shield, was the primary reason the non-deployment rate of women was many times higher than that of men when the troops were called to battle in Desert Storm."
" 61 percent of female cadets at West Point...failed the complete physical test, compared to 4.8 percent of men." "... it has been reported that navy ships have had to be recalled from missions because of the pregnancy of female sailors."

"James Q. Wilson writes," The military is to be used as a means for reforming society and not exclusively as the means of defending the country and our interests around the world."
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
John Adams, Feminists, political correctness, doesn't change the fact that because of the differences in females and males by nature's design, Political correctness, feminists can't change the physical conditions of the sexes.

Why are you making a public display of your ignorance?

" Here's a list of the countries that allow women in front-line combat positions. In Europe: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania and Sweden. Elsewhere: Australia, Canada and New Zealand in the Anglosphere; plus Eritrea, Israel, and North Korea.

You truly are ignorant. What are their standards of performance compared to the U.S.? That is what he is saying; instead of requiring persons to meet a standard, REGARDLESS OF SEX, we have said if you are a woman you don't have to meet the highest standard.

America is behind women's rights compared to other developed countries. America is even behind in civil rights to minorities compared to other developed countries. Worst of all America is behind in education compared to other developed countries.
They even shut down the Trump University that was trying to stop this downward spiral.

Behind maybe in your dystopian view of the world.

America was the first to say all men are created equally. America fought a civil war over slavery. America voted for the 19th amendment, multiple times, light years before the suffragette movement.
America is a brand name for Freedom. No one is mass immigrating to Mexico. America is the greatest country in the world, and did so in under a 100 years of existence. Despite the unbelievable idiocy occurring within the borders today, the name still conjures immense pride.

Listen to Trump.
America doesn't win anymore, America will be 21 trillion in debt, America is run by losers, he loves the poorly educated Americans and wants to win America back for them. America is no longer great or exceptional. He wants to make America great again. He will restart his Trump University to help Americans learn how to become successful.

Why? He is an idiot. Clinton is a political elite who is corrupt flaming garage heap of a person.

I am not voting for Trump, nor am I voting for Clinton. However, there is legitimate line of reasoning for choosing Trump.
Lookingatissues
Posts: 239
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/8/2016 3:11:57 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
What are their standards of performance compared to the U.S.? That is what he is saying; instead of requiring persons to meet a standard, REGARDLESS OF SEX, we have said if you are a woman you don't have to meet the highest standard.
When ever an exception, a preference, is given to a group standards are lowered, and the performance of the groups given the exception or preference declines since less is required of them than the non-deferred group. The outcome of preferences, exception to set standards, a less competent , less qualified individuals holding positions they aren't competent to fill.
Robkwoods
Posts: 570
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/8/2016 3:14:49 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/8/2016 3:11:57 PM, Lookingatissues wrote:
What are their standards of performance compared to the U.S.? That is what he is saying; instead of requiring persons to meet a standard, REGARDLESS OF SEX, we have said if you are a woman you don't have to meet the highest standard.
When ever an exception, a preference, is given to a group standards are lowered, and the performance of the groups given the exception or preference declines since less is required of them than the non-deferred group. The outcome of preferences, exception to set standards, a less competent , less qualified individuals holding positions they aren't competent to fill.

+1
Harikrish
Posts: 11,005
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/8/2016 3:20:56 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/8/2016 3:03:28 PM, Robkwoods wrote:
At 7/8/2016 2:55:57 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 7/8/2016 2:20:49 PM, Robkwoods wrote:
At 7/8/2016 2:00:21 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 7/8/2016 12:56:09 PM, Robkwoods wrote:
At 6/29/2016 12:16:00 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 11:13:01 PM, Lookingatissues wrote:
At 6/28/2016 3:44:44 PM, Harikrish wrote:
At 6/28/2016 4:15:48 AM, brontoraptor wrote:
At 6/28/2016 2:12:04 AM, Lookingatissues wrote:
Feminists leaders are a unhappy lot because they live in a world that refuses to recognize reality preferring their personal conception of things. They for instance refuse to acknowledge that the human species is composed of both male and female and each has ,by nature, been assigned specify roles in life by the laws of nature. As in nature the one sex is the stronger and its instincts are those that nature assigned to the male by nature to be the provider, the hunter, the builder of shelters, and protector of the female of the human sex. The Human female's role by nature is to bear the off springs of the male and female union to comfort and to enhance the life of the male and their children by providing love and companionship to her family members , to nurture and care for them as only a woman can do. The feminists would denigrate women who are comfortable with the role nature assigned to them and have women believe that they can replace the male by taking up the male's role in life. The only reason that these feminist leaders promote this radical position against nature is that in most cases these women feminist leaders fail as females because of their attributes as women falls short and they are unable to compete for a male partner with other more attractive females. A woman who is assured of herself won't feel her role is one to be looked down upon but one that she has been assigned by
nature and she, in her feminity, personifies natures perfection in women.

Notice, women scream for equality in the workplace, yet do not want included in the draft, do not but rarely join the military, police force, join firefighting squadrons, work laboring jobs, etc.
You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only. You should read more and rely less on your own stupidity.
POSTED ".....You are profoundly ignorant and behind the times. Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."

lookingatheissues response to this statement below
"......Women are found in law enforcement, in the army and many fields that were for men only....."
The fact that women are found in all of these fields doesn't prove the appropriateness of females occupying positions in those fields in fact the very nature of females and their physical characteristics prove the opposite. The facts are that women in these different fields is strictly a matter of asserting political correctness and the feminists objectives above all other considerations effecting the ability of the country to function properly and effectively.For example, in a book by Robert Bork," Slouching Towards Gommorrah,"" He writes about the negative effects from the admission of women. Robert Knight draws on the sworn courtroom testimony of a west Point official that women cannot preform nearly as well as men and the men's training program has, for that reason, been downgraded. For example, men are no longer required to run carrying heavy weapons because women are unable to do that."
"Pregnancies due to sex during the preceding phase, Desert Shield, was the primary reason the non-deployment rate of women was many times higher than that of men when the troops were called to battle in Desert Storm."
" 61 percent of female cadets at West Point...failed the complete physical test, compared to 4.8 percent of men." "... it has been reported that navy ships have had to be recalled from missions because of the pregnancy of female sailors."

"James Q. Wilson writes," The military is to be used as a means for reforming society and not exclusively as the means of defending the country and our interests around the world."
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
John Adams, Feminists, political correctness, doesn't change the fact that because of the differences in females and males by nature's design, Political correctness, feminists can't change the physical conditions of the sexes.

Why are you making a public display of your ignorance?

" Here's a list of the countries that allow women in front-line combat positions. In Europe: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania and Sweden. Elsewhere: Australia, Canada and New Zealand in the Anglosphere; plus Eritrea, Israel, and North Korea.

You truly are ignorant. What are their standards of performance compared to the U.S.? That is what he is saying; instead of requiring persons to meet a standard, REGARDLESS OF SEX, we have said if you are a woman you don't have to meet the highest standard.

America is behind women's rights compared to other developed countries. America is even behind in civil rights to minorities compared to other developed countries. Worst of all America is behind in education compared to other developed countries.
They even shut down the Trump University that was trying to stop this downward spiral.

Behind maybe in your dystopian view of the world.

America was the first to say all men are created equally. America fought a civil war over slavery. America voted for the 19th amendment, multiple times, light years before the suffragette movement.
America is a brand name for Freedom. No one is mass immigrating to Mexico. America is the greatest country in the world, and did so in under a 100 years of existence. Despite the unbelievable idiocy occurring within the borders today, the name still conjures immense pride.

Listen to Trump.
America doesn't win anymore, America will be 21 trillion in debt, America is run by losers, he loves the poorly educated Americans and wants to win America back for them. America is no longer great or exceptional. He wants to make America great again. He will restart his Trump University to help Americans learn how to become successful.

Why? He is an idiot. Clinton is a political elite who is corrupt flaming garage heap of a person.

I am not voting for Trump, nor am I voting for Clinton. However, there is legitimate line of reasoning for choosing Trump.

It is about time Americans picked a president who will throw back insults instead of ducking from shoes thrown at him. He never paid people who did work for him. Not even the Chinese or Mexicans can compete with free American labour.
But can he deliver? Where is Trump steak, Trump water,Trump Vodka, Trump wine, Trump University, Trump University, Trump Casinos. Trump Airlines, Trump investments, Trump Mortgages? Even free labour doesn't work in America today like it did during black slavery.
Robkwoods
Posts: 570
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/8/2016 3:31:09 PM
Posted: 5 months ago
At 7/8/2016 3:20:56 PM, Harikrish wrote:
Listen to Trump.
America doesn't win anymore, America will be 21 trillion in debt, America is run by losers, he loves the poorly educated Americans and wants to win America back for them. America is no longer great or exceptional. He wants to make America great again. He will restart his Trump University to help Americans learn how to become successful.

Why? He is an idiot. Clinton is a political elite who is corrupt flaming garage heap of a person.

I am not voting for Trump, nor am I voting for Clinton. However, there is legitimate line of reasoning for choosing Trump.

It is about time Americans picked a president who will throw back insults instead of ducking from shoes thrown at him. He never paid people who did work for him. Not even the Chinese or Mexicans can compete with free American labour.
But can he deliver? Where is Trump steak, Trump water,Trump Vodka, Trump wine, Trump University, Trump University, Trump Casinos. Trump Airlines, Trump investments, Trump Mortgages? Even free labour doesn't work in America today like it did during black slavery.

It is about time someone in the beltway stand up for American Exceptionalism. I will reiterate trump is an idiot, but his diagnosis of the current America is correct. For the matter Bernie's diagnosis also correct. The problem is they are too stupid come up with the correct cure.

Also failed business ventures are inherent in a free market system. It means you F*ck up and need to do better next time. This concept does not apply to the government; which is huge problem because they never have to learn from the failure and do better next time.

*sidenote* Black Slavery in history is very minor in the scope of all slavery. Slavery is a failed economic system that is why the north was much more advanced than the south.