Total Posts:13|Showing Posts:1-13
Jump to topic:

Is Melania Trump a Mail Order Bride?

lawrencemcdonald1
Posts: 1
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/21/2016 3:40:17 AM
Posted: 4 months ago
Is Melania Trump a Mail Order Bride?

Melania Knavs, was born in 1970 in Yugoslavia, now know as Slovenia. Knavs studied design and architecture at the University of Ljubljana in Slovenia. She then worked as a model for fashion houses in Milan and Paris before relocating to New York City in 1996.

After moving to New York City , Knavs supposedly met Donald Trump at a Fashion Week party in New York City in September 1998. Their relationship gained attention after a 1999 interview on The Howard Stern Show, and additional publicity after the 2004 launch of Trump's successful business-oriented reality television show, The Apprentice. Donald Trump described their long courtship in 2005: "We literally have never had an argument, forget about the word 'fight' . We just are very compatible. We get along."
After becoming engaged in 2004, Donald Trump and Melania Knavs were married on January 22, 2005, at The Episcopal Church of Bethesda-by-the-Sea in Palm Beach, Florida, followed by a reception in the 17,000-sq.-ft ballroom at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate.

Trump has always stated he met his wife Melania at a fashion week party in 1998. But Anna Novak a matchmaker who operated an office in Slovenia for several "Mail Order Bride" companies, including a company called A Foreign Affair, says she received a call sometime around 1995 from the head office to help arrange a call between a female member Melanija, and A VIP client she only knew as Donald. Shortly after the call, Melania asked to be removed as a member and to have her profile completely removed from the websites.

If this was truly "The Donald" and the "Melania" then why the secrecy? Trump was married at the time, even when they met each at the Fashion Week party. It is not a secret that Trump has had a long history of infidelity, When married to his first wife, Czech model Ivana Zeln" Kov", he had an affair with actress Marla Maples, In 1992 Ivana's and Donald's divorce was finalized, shortly thereafter Donald sued Ivana for $25 million, alleging she was not honoring a gag clause in their divorce agreement by disclosing facts about him. Maples and Donald were married the following year after his first divorce on December 20, 1993. The couple's divorce finalized in June 1999, nearly one year after the Fashion Week party where supposedly Donald met Melania for the first time.

A spoke's person for A Foreign Affair' in Phoenix AZ, says. "We have a strict confidentiality policy so we can not make any comments about any member or client." They did admit they do help many rich and or famous clients find love overseas.

Article by: Lawrence Mcdonald
MakeSensePeopleDont
Posts: 1,106
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/21/2016 4:25:33 AM
Posted: 4 months ago
At 7/21/2016 3:40:17 AM, lawrencemcdonald1 wrote:
Is Melania Trump a Mail Order Bride?

Melania Knavs, was born in 1970 in Yugoslavia, now know as Slovenia. Knavs studied design and architecture at the University of Ljubljana in Slovenia. She then worked as a model for fashion houses in Milan and Paris before relocating to New York City in 1996.

After moving to New York City , Knavs supposedly met Donald Trump at a Fashion Week party in New York City in September 1998. Their relationship gained attention after a 1999 interview on The Howard Stern Show, and additional publicity after the 2004 launch of Trump's successful business-oriented reality television show, The Apprentice. Donald Trump described their long courtship in 2005: "We literally have never had an argument, forget about the word 'fight' . We just are very compatible. We get along."
After becoming engaged in 2004, Donald Trump and Melania Knavs were married on January 22, 2005, at The Episcopal Church of Bethesda-by-the-Sea in Palm Beach, Florida, followed by a reception in the 17,000-sq.-ft ballroom at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate.

Trump has always stated he met his wife Melania at a fashion week party in 1998. But Anna Novak a matchmaker who operated an office in Slovenia for several "Mail Order Bride" companies, including a company called A Foreign Affair, says she received a call sometime around 1995 from the head office to help arrange a call between a female member Melanija, and A VIP client she only knew as Donald. Shortly after the call, Melania asked to be removed as a member and to have her profile completely removed from the websites.

If this was truly "The Donald" and the "Melania" then why the secrecy? Trump was married at the time, even when they met each at the Fashion Week party. It is not a secret that Trump has had a long history of infidelity, When married to his first wife, Czech model Ivana Zeln" Kov", he had an affair with actress Marla Maples, In 1992 Ivana's and Donald's divorce was finalized, shortly thereafter Donald sued Ivana for $25 million, alleging she was not honoring a gag clause in their divorce agreement by disclosing facts about him. Maples and Donald were married the following year after his first divorce on December 20, 1993. The couple's divorce finalized in June 1999, nearly one year after the Fashion Week party where supposedly Donald met Melania for the first time.

A spoke's person for A Foreign Affair' in Phoenix AZ, says. "We have a strict confidentiality policy so we can not make any comments about any member or client." They did admit they do help many rich and or famous clients find love overseas.

Article by: Lawrence Mcdonald

A mail order bride, really? No, not at all. She was a famous model, traveling the world back then. They met at a party in 1998 where Melania initially refused to give Trump her number but took his phone number that night. After returning from a photo shoot, Melania called Trump and they began talking.

As far as this Anna Novak lady; I would never trust a person running services promoting extramarital affairs -- the fact that she would also then brag about it to the media when her business requires the utmost secrecy and confidentiality of her clients REALLY calls into question her honesty and trustworthiness.

Think about it; Obama keeps lying about how our unemployment rate is under 5%. Lois Lerner lied that the IRS wasn't targeting conservatives. Hillary blamed Benghazi on a video and to this day still lies through her teeth about the e-mail server. So why couldn't a random lady running numerous international dating and affair sites lie in order to increase website traffic?
Emilrose
Posts: 2,479
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/21/2016 2:56:27 PM
Posted: 4 months ago
She dropped out of university...as far as I'm aware.

Anyway, I doubt that she's actually a mail order bride. Though she's obviously a gold digger who wouldn't have looked twice at Trump, if he wasn't rich.
Commentator on a picture with David Cameron and a Cat: 'Amazing what you can achieve with photoshop these days. I'm sure that used to be a pig.'

Commentator on Hillary Clinton: 'If Clinton is now what passes for progressive, maybe this country deserves Trump.'

Commentator on British parliament: 'All that talent in one place, where is Ebola when you need it?'

John Kerry on words: 'These aren't just words, folks.'
slo1
Posts: 4,352
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/21/2016 5:15:57 PM
Posted: 4 months ago
At 7/21/2016 4:25:33 AM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:

Think about it; Obama keeps lying about how our unemployment rate is under 5%.

This is the intellectual trash that people need to call out on this site.

1. Fact. Dept of labor uses the household survey to generate the labor participation rates which the employment rate is based upon just like it has been done for decades and previous administration's.

2. The Dept of labor is open how it calculates it's metrics.

3. Keeping a steady labor participation rate rather than polling periodic would produce even more anomalies such as not taking in effects such as baby boomers retiring, immigration, or Obama care. In other terms how do you know that someone who has not gotten a job in 6 months wants a job.

4. If you have gripes about the labor participation rate not being readily mentioned, blame the media as the dept of labor publishes it regularly.

In short if you don't have proof that he lied, get to stepping.
MakeSensePeopleDont
Posts: 1,106
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/21/2016 5:46:49 PM
Posted: 4 months ago
At 7/21/2016 5:15:57 PM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/21/2016 4:25:33 AM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:

Think about it; Obama keeps lying about how our unemployment rate is under 5%.

This is the intellectual trash that people need to call out on this site.

1. Fact. Dept of labor uses the household survey to generate the labor participation rates which the employment rate is based upon just like it has been done for decades and previous administration's.

2. The Dept of labor is open how it calculates it's metrics.

3. Keeping a steady labor participation rate rather than polling periodic would produce even more anomalies such as not taking in effects such as baby boomers retiring, immigration, or Obama care. In other terms how do you know that someone who has not gotten a job in 6 months wants a job.

4. If you have gripes about the labor participation rate not being readily mentioned, blame the media as the dept of labor publishes it regularly.

In short if you don't have proof that he lied, get to stepping.

You do realize that if you search for a job for 12 months and are unsuccessful, the DOL changes your status to out of the labor market right?
slo1
Posts: 4,352
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/21/2016 7:09:45 PM
Posted: 4 months ago
At 7/21/2016 5:46:49 PM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:
At 7/21/2016 5:15:57 PM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/21/2016 4:25:33 AM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:

Think about it; Obama keeps lying about how our unemployment rate is under 5%.

This is the intellectual trash that people need to call out on this site.

1. Fact. Dept of labor uses the household survey to generate the labor participation rates which the employment rate is based upon just like it has been done for decades and previous administration's.

2. The Dept of labor is open how it calculates it's metrics.

3. Keeping a steady labor participation rate rather than polling periodic would produce even more anomalies such as not taking in effects such as baby boomers retiring, immigration, or Obama care. In other terms how do you know that someone who has not gotten a job in 6 months wants a job.

4. If you have gripes about the labor participation rate not being readily mentioned, blame the media as the dept of labor publishes it regularly.

In short if you don't have proof that he lied, get to stepping.

You do realize that if you search for a job for 12 months and are unsuccessful, the DOL changes your status to out of the labor market right?

Yes, however that does not constitute a lie. It is fully disclosed and how the dept of labor has tracked employment for decades. It has nothing to do with Obama.
MakeSensePeopleDont
Posts: 1,106
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/21/2016 11:35:30 PM
Posted: 4 months ago
At 7/21/2016 7:09:45 PM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/21/2016 5:46:49 PM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:
At 7/21/2016 5:15:57 PM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/21/2016 4:25:33 AM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:

Think about it; Obama keeps lying about how our unemployment rate is under 5%.

This is the intellectual trash that people need to call out on this site.

1. Fact. Dept of labor uses the household survey to generate the labor participation rates which the employment rate is based upon just like it has been done for decades and previous administration's.

2. The Dept of labor is open how it calculates it's metrics.

3. Keeping a steady labor participation rate rather than polling periodic would produce even more anomalies such as not taking in effects such as baby boomers retiring, immigration, or Obama care. In other terms how do you know that someone who has not gotten a job in 6 months wants a job.

4. If you have gripes about the labor participation rate not being readily mentioned, blame the media as the dept of labor publishes it regularly.

In short if you don't have proof that he lied, get to stepping.

You do realize that if you search for a job for 12 months and are unsuccessful, the DOL changes your status to out of the labor market right?

Yes, however that does not constitute a lie. It is fully disclosed and how the dept of labor has tracked employment for decades. It has nothing to do with Obama.

I don't know how you were raised, but where I'm from, omitting facts is exactly the same as lying.
slo1
Posts: 4,352
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/22/2016 3:22:22 AM
Posted: 4 months ago
At 7/21/2016 11:35:30 PM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:
At 7/21/2016 7:09:45 PM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/21/2016 5:46:49 PM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:
At 7/21/2016 5:15:57 PM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/21/2016 4:25:33 AM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:

Think about it; Obama keeps lying about how our unemployment rate is under 5%.

This is the intellectual trash that people need to call out on this site.

1. Fact. Dept of labor uses the household survey to generate the labor participation rates which the employment rate is based upon just like it has been done for decades and previous administration's.

2. The Dept of labor is open how it calculates it's metrics.

3. Keeping a steady labor participation rate rather than polling periodic would produce even more anomalies such as not taking in effects such as baby boomers retiring, immigration, or Obama care. In other terms how do you know that someone who has not gotten a job in 6 months wants a job.

4. If you have gripes about the labor participation rate not being readily mentioned, blame the media as the dept of labor publishes it regularly.

In short if you don't have proof that he lied, get to stepping.

You do realize that if you search for a job for 12 months and are unsuccessful, the DOL changes your status to out of the labor market right?

Yes, however that does not constitute a lie. It is fully disclosed and how the dept of labor has tracked employment for decades. It has nothing to do with Obama.

I don't know how you were raised, but where I'm from, omitting facts is exactly the same as lying.

Nobody omitted any facts. It is public knowledge and anyone who wants to get the household survey and the methodology of calculating unemployment rate and labor force numbers can get from the dept of labor website.
MakeSensePeopleDont
Posts: 1,106
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/22/2016 3:42:36 AM
Posted: 4 months ago
At 7/22/2016 3:22:22 AM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/21/2016 11:35:30 PM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:
At 7/21/2016 7:09:45 PM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/21/2016 5:46:49 PM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:
At 7/21/2016 5:15:57 PM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/21/2016 4:25:33 AM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:

Think about it; Obama keeps lying about how our unemployment rate is under 5%.

This is the intellectual trash that people need to call out on this site.

1. Fact. Dept of labor uses the household survey to generate the labor participation rates which the employment rate is based upon just like it has been done for decades and previous administration's.

2. The Dept of labor is open how it calculates it's metrics.

3. Keeping a steady labor participation rate rather than polling periodic would produce even more anomalies such as not taking in effects such as baby boomers retiring, immigration, or Obama care. In other terms how do you know that someone who has not gotten a job in 6 months wants a job.

4. If you have gripes about the labor participation rate not being readily mentioned, blame the media as the dept of labor publishes it regularly.

In short if you don't have proof that he lied, get to stepping.

You do realize that if you search for a job for 12 months and are unsuccessful, the DOL changes your status to out of the labor market right?

Yes, however that does not constitute a lie. It is fully disclosed and how the dept of labor has tracked employment for decades. It has nothing to do with Obama.

I don't know how you were raised, but where I'm from, omitting facts is exactly the same as lying.

Nobody omitted any facts. It is public knowledge and anyone who wants to get the household survey and the methodology of calculating unemployment rate and labor force numbers can get from the dept of labor website.

And any mother that wants to know that her son is a thug selling drugs to kids or that her daughter is the neighborhood $lut could follow them around and get the facts. Or, her kids could tell her the truth instead of saying they were at the park hanging out and at their friend's out laying around.

But alas, there has to be a level of trust within a relationship right?
slo1
Posts: 4,352
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/22/2016 3:54:27 AM
Posted: 4 months ago
At 7/22/2016 3:42:36 AM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:
At 7/22/2016 3:22:22 AM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/21/2016 11:35:30 PM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:
At 7/21/2016 7:09:45 PM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/21/2016 5:46:49 PM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:
At 7/21/2016 5:15:57 PM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/21/2016 4:25:33 AM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:

Think about it; Obama keeps lying about how our unemployment rate is under 5%.

This is the intellectual trash that people need to call out on this site.

1. Fact. Dept of labor uses the household survey to generate the labor participation rates which the employment rate is based upon just like it has been done for decades and previous administration's.

2. The Dept of labor is open how it calculates it's metrics.

3. Keeping a steady labor participation rate rather than polling periodic would produce even more anomalies such as not taking in effects such as baby boomers retiring, immigration, or Obama care. In other terms how do you know that someone who has not gotten a job in 6 months wants a job.

4. If you have gripes about the labor participation rate not being readily mentioned, blame the media as the dept of labor publishes it regularly.

In short if you don't have proof that he lied, get to stepping.

You do realize that if you search for a job for 12 months and are unsuccessful, the DOL changes your status to out of the labor market right?

Yes, however that does not constitute a lie. It is fully disclosed and how the dept of labor has tracked employment for decades. It has nothing to do with Obama.

I don't know how you were raised, but where I'm from, omitting facts is exactly the same as lying.

Nobody omitted any facts. It is public knowledge and anyone who wants to get the household survey and the methodology of calculating unemployment rate and labor force numbers can get from the dept of labor website.

And any mother that wants to know that her son is a thug selling drugs to kids or that her daughter is the neighborhood $lut could follow them around and get the facts. Or, her kids could tell her the truth instead of saying they were at the park hanging out and at their friend's out laying around.

But alas, there has to be a level of trust within a relationship right?

I don't have a clue what you are taking about.

Study this table and figure out how unemployment and labor participation is tracked before claiming people lied to you.

http://www.bls.gov...
MakeSensePeopleDont
Posts: 1,106
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/22/2016 4:15:31 AM
Posted: 4 months ago
At 7/22/2016 3:54:27 AM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/22/2016 3:42:36 AM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:
At 7/22/2016 3:22:22 AM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/21/2016 11:35:30 PM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:
At 7/21/2016 7:09:45 PM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/21/2016 5:46:49 PM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:
At 7/21/2016 5:15:57 PM, slo1 wrote:
At 7/21/2016 4:25:33 AM, MakeSensePeopleDont wrote:

Think about it; Obama keeps lying about how our unemployment rate is under 5%.

This is the intellectual trash that people need to call out on this site.

1. Fact. Dept of labor uses the household survey to generate the labor participation rates which the employment rate is based upon just like it has been done for decades and previous administration's.

2. The Dept of labor is open how it calculates it's metrics.

3. Keeping a steady labor participation rate rather than polling periodic would produce even more anomalies such as not taking in effects such as baby boomers retiring, immigration, or Obama care. In other terms how do you know that someone who has not gotten a job in 6 months wants a job.

4. If you have gripes about the labor participation rate not being readily mentioned, blame the media as the dept of labor publishes it regularly.

In short if you don't have proof that he lied, get to stepping.

You do realize that if you search for a job for 12 months and are unsuccessful, the DOL changes your status to out of the labor market right?

Yes, however that does not constitute a lie. It is fully disclosed and how the dept of labor has tracked employment for decades. It has nothing to do with Obama.

I don't know how you were raised, but where I'm from, omitting facts is exactly the same as lying.

Nobody omitted any facts. It is public knowledge and anyone who wants to get the household survey and the methodology of calculating unemployment rate and labor force numbers can get from the dept of labor website.

And any mother that wants to know that her son is a thug selling drugs to kids or that her daughter is the neighborhood $lut could follow them around and get the facts. Or, her kids could tell her the truth instead of saying they were at the park hanging out and at their friend's out laying around.

But alas, there has to be a level of trust within a relationship right?

I don't have a clue what you are taking about.

Study this table and figure out how unemployment and labor participation is tracked before claiming people lied to you.

http://www.bls.gov...

You don't have a clue what I'm talking about? OK, well I would love to help you understand, just tell me which part you're having trouble with:

1) The part where Obama omits facts in order to alter public perception of an item in his favor?

2) The part where a son and daughter omit facts in order to alter their mother's perception of items in their favor?

3) Or the part where relationships involving truth require a level of trust?
brontoraptor
Posts: 11,685
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/22/2016 4:32:42 AM
Posted: 4 months ago
At 7/21/2016 3:40:17 AM, lawrencemcdonald1 wrote:
Is Melania Trump a Mail Order Bride?

Melania Knavs, was born in 1970 in Yugoslavia, now know as Slovenia. Knavs studied design and architecture at the University of Ljubljana in Slovenia. She then worked as a model for fashion houses in Milan and Paris before relocating to New York City in 1996.

After moving to New York City , Knavs supposedly met Donald Trump at a Fashion Week party in New York City in September 1998. Their relationship gained attention after a 1999 interview on The Howard Stern Show, and additional publicity after the 2004 launch of Trump's successful business-oriented reality television show, The Apprentice. Donald Trump described their long courtship in 2005: "We literally have never had an argument, forget about the word 'fight' . We just are very compatible. We get along."
After becoming engaged in 2004, Donald Trump and Melania Knavs were married on January 22, 2005, at The Episcopal Church of Bethesda-by-the-Sea in Palm Beach, Florida, followed by a reception in the 17,000-sq.-ft ballroom at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate.

Trump has always stated he met his wife Melania at a fashion week party in 1998. But Anna Novak a matchmaker who operated an office in Slovenia for several "Mail Order Bride" companies, including a company called A Foreign Affair, says she received a call sometime around 1995 from the head office to help arrange a call between a female member Melanija, and A VIP client she only knew as Donald. Shortly after the call, Melania asked to be removed as a member and to have her profile completely removed from the websites.

If this was truly "The Donald" and the "Melania" then why the secrecy? Trump was married at the time, even when they met each at the Fashion Week party. It is not a secret that Trump has had a long history of infidelity, When married to his first wife, Czech model Ivana Zeln" Kov", he had an affair with actress Marla Maples, In 1992 Ivana's and Donald's divorce was finalized, shortly thereafter Donald sued Ivana for $25 million, alleging she was not honoring a gag clause in their divorce agreement by disclosing facts about him. Maples and Donald were married the following year after his first divorce on December 20, 1993. The couple's divorce finalized in June 1999, nearly one year after the Fashion Week party where supposedly Donald met Melania for the first time.

A spoke's person for A Foreign Affair' in Phoenix AZ, says. "We have a strict confidentiality policy so we can not make any comments about any member or client." They did admit they do help many rich and or famous clients find love overseas.

Article by: Lawrence Mcdonald

God I hope so. It gives me incentive to purchase one.
"What Donald Trump is doing is representing the absolute heartbreak, and anger, and frustration at a government gone mad."

http://youtu.be...
acecomando
Posts: 1
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/27/2016 2:38:27 AM
Posted: 2 months ago
Proof?

Well, it took me several days and a lot of code writing to sift through the millions of achieved pages on the Wayback Machine achieves. Was about to give up when a colleague gave me mining script to look at all archived pages whether displayed or not. And lord and behold jackpot, here she is!

Ace Comando

http://s1347.photobucket.com...