Total Posts:21|Showing Posts:1-21
Jump to topic:

Who founded the UN?

smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/2/2016 10:23:25 AM
Posted: 2 months ago
-Mao Tse Tsung (eventually, obviously because of a screw up Vietnam technically founded it): 91 million dead
-Josef Stalin: 32 million dead
-Winston Churchill: 6 million dead
-Truman: 2 million dead
-De Gaulle: ~1 million dead, and a massive racist, egotist and fool
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/2/2016 10:23:46 AM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/2/2016 10:23:25 AM, smelisox wrote:
-Mao Tse Tsung (eventually, obviously because of a screw up Vietnam technically founded it): 91 million dead
-Josef Stalin: 32 million dead
-Winston Churchill: 6 million dead
-Truman: 2 million dead
-De Gaulle: ~1 million dead, and a massive racist, egotist and fool

TAIWAN founded it*, not Vietnam. Sorry.
Lynx_N
Posts: 276
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/2/2016 11:39:55 AM
Posted: 2 months ago
On 12 June 1941, representatives of the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, and of the exiled governments of Belgium, Czechoslovakia, Greece, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, and Yugoslavia, as well as General de Gaulle of France, met in London and signed the Declaration of St. James's Palace. This was the first of six conferences that led up to the founding of the United Nations and the Charter of the United Nations.

Source https://en.wikipedia.org...
Bronto?
Congrats.

poet
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/2/2016 11:41:49 AM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/2/2016 11:39:55 AM, Lynx_N wrote:
On 12 June 1941, representatives of the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, and of the exiled governments of Belgium, Czechoslovakia, Greece, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, and Yugoslavia, as well as General de Gaulle of France, met in London and signed the Declaration of St. James's Palace. This was the first of six conferences that led up to the founding of the United Nations and the Charter of the United Nations.

Source https://en.wikipedia.org...

Check the security council. They call the shots, the rest are useless.
NHN
Posts: 624
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/2/2016 12:04:20 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/2/2016 10:23:46 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 10/2/2016 10:23:25 AM, smelisox wrote:
-Mao Tse Tsung (eventually, obviously because of a screw up Vietnam technically founded it): 91 million dead
-Josef Stalin: 32 million dead
-Winston Churchill: 6 million dead
-Truman: 2 million dead
-De Gaulle: ~1 million dead, and a massive racist, egotist and fool
TAIWAN founded it*, not Vietnam. Sorry.
Your misuse of statistics aside, do you know how communist China ended up as a permanent member on the Security Council?
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/2/2016 12:25:46 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/2/2016 12:04:20 PM, NHN wrote:
At 10/2/2016 10:23:46 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 10/2/2016 10:23:25 AM, smelisox wrote:
-Mao Tse Tsung (eventually, obviously because of a screw up Vietnam technically founded it): 91 million dead
-Josef Stalin: 32 million dead
-Winston Churchill: 6 million dead
-Truman: 2 million dead
-De Gaulle: ~1 million dead, and a massive racist, egotist and fool
TAIWAN founded it*, not Vietnam. Sorry.
Your misuse of statistics aside, do you know how communist China ended up as a permanent member on the Security Council?

They were true china after they kicked the non-communists out.
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/2/2016 12:26:29 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/2/2016 12:04:20 PM, NHN wrote:
At 10/2/2016 10:23:46 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 10/2/2016 10:23:25 AM, smelisox wrote:
-Mao Tse Tsung (eventually, obviously because of a screw up Vietnam technically founded it): 91 million dead
-Josef Stalin: 32 million dead
-Winston Churchill: 6 million dead
-Truman: 2 million dead
-De Gaulle: ~1 million dead, and a massive racist, egotist and fool
TAIWAN founded it*, not Vietnam. Sorry.
Your misuse of statistics aside, do you know how communist China ended up as a permanent member on the Security Council?

What misuse? They all killed those many people in their war crimes.
Stymie13
Posts: 2,162
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/2/2016 12:44:05 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/2/2016 12:26:29 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 10/2/2016 12:04:20 PM, NHN wrote:
At 10/2/2016 10:23:46 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 10/2/2016 10:23:25 AM, smelisox wrote:
-Mao Tse Tsung (eventually, obviously because of a screw up Vietnam technically founded it): 91 million dead
-Josef Stalin: 32 million dead
-Winston Churchill: 6 million dead
-Truman: 2 million dead
-De Gaulle: ~1 million dead, and a massive racist, egotist and fool
TAIWAN founded it*, not Vietnam. Sorry.
Your misuse of statistics aside, do you know how communist China ended up as a permanent member on the Security Council?

What misuse? They all killed those many people in their war crimes.

War crimes??? That really does call for a stfu.
NHN
Posts: 624
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/2/2016 1:06:38 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/2/2016 12:25:46 PM, smelisox wrote:
They were true china after they kicked the non-communists out.
Your English is a bit off. Where are you from?

What misuse? They all killed those many people in their war crimes.
Churchill, FDR and Truman acted in defense. That can't be equated with the famines of Stalin and Mao. That's why it is misused.

Furthermore, I wouldn't care if the allied forces had killed ten times as many, or if they had nuked all major Japanese cities before the Japanese emperor had surrendered.
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/3/2016 2:26:42 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/2/2016 1:06:38 PM, NHN wrote:
At 10/2/2016 12:25:46 PM, smelisox wrote:
They were true china after they kicked the non-communists out.
Your English is a bit off. Where are you from?

What misuse? They all killed those many people in their war crimes.
Churchill, FDR and Truman acted in defense. That can't be equated with the famines of Stalin and Mao. That's why it is misused.

Furthermore, I wouldn't care if the allied forces had killed ten times as many, or if they had nuked all major Japanese cities before the Japanese emperor had surrendered.

Great Britain. And no, it's perfectly correct.
They were "True China" after they kicked the non-communists out.

" Furthermore, I wouldn't care if the allied forces had killed ten times as many, or if they had nuked all major Japanese cities before the Japanese emperor had surrendered."

Says a lot about you then. I do.
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/3/2016 2:27:22 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/2/2016 12:44:05 PM, Stymie13 wrote:
At 10/2/2016 12:26:29 PM, smelisox wrote:
At 10/2/2016 12:04:20 PM, NHN wrote:
At 10/2/2016 10:23:46 AM, smelisox wrote:
At 10/2/2016 10:23:25 AM, smelisox wrote:
-Mao Tse Tsung (eventually, obviously because of a screw up Vietnam technically founded it): 91 million dead
-Josef Stalin: 32 million dead
-Winston Churchill: 6 million dead
-Truman: 2 million dead
-De Gaulle: ~1 million dead, and a massive racist, egotist and fool
TAIWAN founded it*, not Vietnam. Sorry.
Your misuse of statistics aside, do you know how communist China ended up as a permanent member on the Security Council?

What misuse? They all killed those many people in their war crimes.

War crimes??? That really does call for a stfu.

Purposefully starving 4 billion Indians in a disastrous famine isn't a war crime?
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/3/2016 2:27:42 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/2/2016 1:06:38 PM, NHN wrote:
At 10/2/2016 12:25:46 PM, smelisox wrote:
They were true china after they kicked the non-communists out.
Your English is a bit off. Where are you from?

What misuse? They all killed those many people in their war crimes.
Churchill, FDR and Truman acted in defense. That can't be equated with the famines of Stalin and Mao. That's why it is misused.

Furthermore, I wouldn't care if the allied forces had killed ten times as many, or if they had nuked all major Japanese cities before the Japanese emperor had surrendered.

Purposefully starving 4 billion Indians in a disastrous famine is self-defense?
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/3/2016 2:28:47 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/2/2016 1:06:38 PM, NHN wrote:
At 10/2/2016 12:25:46 PM, smelisox wrote:
They were true china after they kicked the non-communists out.
Your English is a bit off. Where are you from?

What misuse? They all killed those many people in their war crimes.
Churchill, FDR and Truman acted in defense. That can't be equated with the famines of Stalin and Mao. That's why it is misused.

Furthermore, I wouldn't care if the allied forces had killed ten times as many, or if they had nuked all major Japanese cities before the Japanese emperor had surrendered.

Trying to use someone's nationality against them is disgusting and worthy of Adolf Hitler.
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/3/2016 2:29:32 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
Especially when the average Yank "rites like dis" despite having a Master's Degree. You really shouldn't be lecturing people on grammar when your own country is full of illiterates.
NHN
Posts: 624
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/3/2016 2:37:40 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/3/2016 2:26:42 PM, smelisox wrote:
Great Britain. And no, it's perfectly correct.
U.K., son. Britain stopped being great (colloquially) when Ireland broke off. But I digress.

They were "True China" after they kicked the non-communists out.
No, that's not how it happened. Through shuttle diplomacy, Nixon and Kissinger were able to introduce communist China as permanent UNSC members in 1971 following a new vote in the General Assembly. It was an American initiative in a move to ally against the influence of the Soviet Union.

The seat was initially intended for India.

Purposefully starving 4 billion Indians in a disastrous famine is self-defense?
I don't know where to begin with this statement.

Especially when the average Yank "rites like dis" despite having a Master's Degree. You really shouldn't be lecturing people on grammar when your own country is full of illiterates.
Informal fallacy.
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/3/2016 2:53:00 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/3/2016 2:37:40 PM, NHN wrote:
At 10/3/2016 2:26:42 PM, smelisox wrote:
Great Britain. And no, it's perfectly correct.
U.K., son. Britain stopped being great (colloquially) when Ireland broke off. But I digress.

They were "True China" after they kicked the non-communists out.
No, that's not how it happened. Through shuttle diplomacy, Nixon and Kissinger were able to introduce communist China as permanent UNSC members in 1971 following a new vote in the General Assembly. It was an American initiative in a move to ally against the influence of the Soviet Union.

The seat was initially intended for India.

Purposefully starving 4 billion Indians in a disastrous famine is self-defense?
I don't know where to begin with this statement.

Especially when the average Yank "rites like dis" despite having a Master's Degree. You really shouldn't be lecturing people on grammar when your own country is full of illiterates.
Informal fallacy.

My passport says Great Britain, you crazy bastard. Even without Ireland, which is a shithole anyway.
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/3/2016 2:56:06 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/3/2016 2:37:40 PM, NHN wrote:
At 10/3/2016 2:26:42 PM, smelisox wrote:
Great Britain. And no, it's perfectly correct.
U.K., son. Britain stopped being great (colloquially) when Ireland broke off. But I digress.

They were "True China" after they kicked the non-communists out.
No, that's not how it happened. Through shuttle diplomacy, Nixon and Kissinger were able to introduce communist China as permanent UNSC members in 1971 following a new vote in the General Assembly. It was an American initiative in a move to ally against the influence of the Soviet Union.

The seat was initially intended for India.

Purposefully starving 4 billion Indians in a disastrous famine is self-defense?
I don't know where to begin with this statement.

Especially when the average Yank "rites like dis" despite having a Master's Degree. You really shouldn't be lecturing people on grammar when your own country is full of illiterates.
Informal fallacy.

The Republic of China held the seat for a long time.
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/3/2016 2:57:02 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/3/2016 2:37:40 PM, NHN wrote:
At 10/3/2016 2:26:42 PM, smelisox wrote:
Great Britain. And no, it's perfectly correct.
U.K., son. Britain stopped being great (colloquially) when Ireland broke off. But I digress.

They were "True China" after they kicked the non-communists out.
No, that's not how it happened. Through shuttle diplomacy, Nixon and Kissinger were able to introduce communist China as permanent UNSC members in 1971 following a new vote in the General Assembly. It was an American initiative in a move to ally against the influence of the Soviet Union.

The seat was initially intended for India.

Purposefully starving 4 billion Indians in a disastrous famine is self-defense?
I don't know where to begin with this statement.

Especially when the average Yank "rites like dis" despite having a Master's Degree. You really shouldn't be lecturing people on grammar when your own country is full of illiterates.
Informal fallacy.

https://en.wikipedia.org...

"If the Indians are starving, why isn't Gandhi dead?"
-Winston Churchill

He was a despicable war criminal.
Ramshutu
Posts: 4,063
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/3/2016 3:00:24 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/2/2016 10:23:25 AM, smelisox wrote:
-Mao Tse Tsung (eventually, obviously because of a screw up Vietnam technically founded it): 91 million dead
-Josef Stalin: 32 million dead
-Winston Churchill: 6 million dead
-Truman: 2 million dead
-De Gaulle: ~1 million dead, and a massive racist, egotist and fool

This post is a sphere when it needs to be a cone.
BrendanD19
Posts: 2,047
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/3/2016 3:24:55 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/2/2016 10:23:25 AM, smelisox wrote:
-Mao Tse Tsung (eventually, obviously because of a screw up Vietnam technically founded it): 91 million dead
Mao didn't come to power until 1949, the UN was founded in 1945
And Vietnam didn't gain its independence from France until 1954. It was still a French colony until then.
-Josef Stalin: 32 million dead
-Winston Churchill: 6 million dead
-Truman: 2 million dead
-De Gaulle: ~1 million dead, and a massive racist, egotist and fool
smelisox
Posts: 849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/3/2016 3:29:58 PM
Posted: 2 months ago
At 10/3/2016 3:24:55 PM, BrendanD19 wrote:
At 10/2/2016 10:23:25 AM, smelisox wrote:
-Mao Tse Tsung (eventually, obviously because of a screw up Vietnam technically founded it): 91 million dead
Mao didn't come to power until 1949, the UN was founded in 1945
And Vietnam didn't gain its independence from France until 1954. It was still a French colony until then.
-Josef Stalin: 32 million dead
-Winston Churchill: 6 million dead
-Truman: 2 million dead
-De Gaulle: ~1 million dead, and a massive racist, egotist and fool

Read the other posts.