Total Posts:95|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Atheists, dont belive in God because.......

Thaddeus
Posts: 6,985
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/9/2011 9:49:18 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

Dude, a few minutes after you decide that the lynch mob will let you live, you decide to troll...
To answer your question; insufficient evidence.
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/9/2011 9:54:50 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

I have the power of lactokinesis. I can telekinetically control milk.

Do you consider this claim likely or far fetched?

If you consider it far fetched, why should I accept the existence of God without challenge?
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
Thaddeus
Posts: 6,985
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/9/2011 9:56:18 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/9/2011 9:54:50 AM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

I have the power of lactokinesis. I can telekinetically control milk.

Do you consider this claim likely or far fetched?

If you consider it far fetched, why should I accept the existence of God without challenge?

Misfits. Brilliant programme. =D
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/9/2011 10:06:31 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/9/2011 9:56:18 AM, Thaddeus wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:54:50 AM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

I have the power of lactokinesis. I can telekinetically control milk.

Do you consider this claim likely or far fetched?

If you consider it far fetched, why should I accept the existence of God without challenge?

Misfits. Brilliant programme. =D

Haha yea!
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
JustCallMeTarzan
Posts: 1,922
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/9/2011 10:42:30 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

Who? I haven't seen, heard, smelled, touched, or tasted this "Almighty." Must not be very almighty, eh?
Greyparrot
Posts: 14,250
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/9/2011 10:45:37 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

There are a lot of Theists that don't believe in your version of the 'Almighty' either.

You are an equal opportunity offender interrogator!
Meatros
Posts: 1,075
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/9/2011 11:12:26 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

Which 'God' are you referring to?

I find most definitions of God to lack coherence. I have not seen any evidence of any Gods existing. Some "Gods" could exist, others could not - by definition.

Therefore I'm an atheist.
GodSands
Posts: 2,843
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/9/2011 11:44:41 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/9/2011 9:54:50 AM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

I have the power of lactokinesis. I can telekinetically control milk.

Do you consider this claim likely or far fetched?

If you consider it far fetched, why should I accept the existence of God without challenge?

On what basis do you suppose the existence of God being far fetched?
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/9/2011 11:50:38 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/9/2011 11:44:41 AM, GodSands wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:54:50 AM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

I have the power of lactokinesis. I can telekinetically control milk.

Do you consider this claim likely or far fetched?

If you consider it far fetched, why should I accept the existence of God without challenge?

On what basis do you suppose the existence of God being far fetched?

Again,
I have the power of lactokinesis. I can telekinetically control milk.

Do you consider this claim likely or far fetched?
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
Drodick
Posts: 13
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 12:59:06 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/9/2011 10:42:30 AM, JustCallMeTarzan wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

Who? I haven't seen, heard, smelled, touched, or tasted this "Almighty." Must not be very almighty, eh?

So you need to "touch" "see" "hear" or "taste" something in order to believe it?
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:02:34 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 12:59:06 PM, Drodick wrote:
At 3/9/2011 10:42:30 AM, JustCallMeTarzan wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

Who? I haven't seen, heard, smelled, touched, or tasted this "Almighty." Must not be very almighty, eh?

So you need to "touch" "see" "hear" or "taste" something in order to believe it?

Or be informed of it from a reliable source.
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
Drodick
Posts: 13
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:03:48 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 1:02:34 PM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 3/10/2011 12:59:06 PM, Drodick wrote:
At 3/9/2011 10:42:30 AM, JustCallMeTarzan wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

Who? I haven't seen, heard, smelled, touched, or tasted this "Almighty." Must not be very almighty, eh?

So you need to "touch" "see" "hear" or "taste" something in order to believe it?

Or be informed of it from a reliable source.

What would you accept as a reliable source>
Greyparrot
Posts: 14,250
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:05:10 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 1:03:48 PM, Drodick wrote:
At 3/10/2011 1:02:34 PM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 3/10/2011 12:59:06 PM, Drodick wrote:
At 3/9/2011 10:42:30 AM, JustCallMeTarzan wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

Who? I haven't seen, heard, smelled, touched, or tasted this "Almighty." Must not be very almighty, eh?

So you need to "touch" "see" "hear" or "taste" something in order to believe it?

Or be informed of it from a reliable source.

What would you accept as a reliable source>

Reason for plausibility gives weight to your faith.
Drodick
Posts: 13
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:07:30 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 1:05:10 PM, Greyparrot wrote:
At 3/10/2011 1:03:48 PM, Drodick wrote:
At 3/10/2011 1:02:34 PM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 3/10/2011 12:59:06 PM, Drodick wrote:
At 3/9/2011 10:42:30 AM, JustCallMeTarzan wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

Who? I haven't seen, heard, smelled, touched, or tasted this "Almighty." Must not be very almighty, eh?

So you need to "touch" "see" "hear" or "taste" something in order to believe it?

Or be informed of it from a reliable source.

What would you accept as a reliable source>

Reason for plausibility gives weight to your faith.

Well like I asked before in so many words what will you accept as evidence?
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:09:41 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 1:03:48 PM, Drodick wrote:
At 3/10/2011 1:02:34 PM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 3/10/2011 12:59:06 PM, Drodick wrote:
At 3/9/2011 10:42:30 AM, JustCallMeTarzan wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

Who? I haven't seen, heard, smelled, touched, or tasted this "Almighty." Must not be very almighty, eh?

So you need to "touch" "see" "hear" or "taste" something in order to believe it?

Or be informed of it from a reliable source.

What would you accept as a reliable source>

Well take Australia, I've never been there, how do I know it exists? It has been witnessed by a large cross section of society, it is mentioned in reliable publications and reliable news outlets.

Can I be absolute certain it exists... no. Has it's existence been proven beyond reasonable doubt... yes.

Can you make a similar case for God?
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
Ogan
Posts: 407
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:11:16 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 12:59:06 PM, Drodick wrote:
At 3/9/2011 10:42:30 AM, JustCallMeTarzan wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

Who? I haven't seen, heard, smelled, touched, or tasted this "Almighty." Must not be very almighty, eh?

So you need to "touch" "see" "hear" or "taste" something in order to believe it?

I am sorry to inform you my dear that the answer is certainly yes in the case of atheists, they ignore and deny the struggle within their hearts, and think the intellect, their intellect especially, is the only god and can answer all things. Furthermore, they cannot in any other way known to man be persuaded otherwise. In their 'minds' we are just material mush and thats basically it, with a lot of complicated justifications for it.
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:14:17 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 1:11:16 PM, Ogan wrote:
At 3/10/2011 12:59:06 PM, Drodick wrote:
At 3/9/2011 10:42:30 AM, JustCallMeTarzan wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

Who? I haven't seen, heard, smelled, touched, or tasted this "Almighty." Must not be very almighty, eh?

So you need to "touch" "see" "hear" or "taste" something in order to believe it?

I am sorry to inform you my dear that the answer is certainly yes in the case of atheists, they ignore and deny the struggle within their hearts, and think the intellect, their intellect especially, is the only god and can answer all things. Furthermore, they cannot in any other way known to man be persuaded otherwise. In their 'minds' we are just material mush and thats basically it, with a lot of complicated justifications for it.

Nice strawmanning.
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
annhasle
Posts: 6,657
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:15:46 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 12:59:06 PM, Drodick wrote:
At 3/9/2011 10:42:30 AM, JustCallMeTarzan wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

Who? I haven't seen, heard, smelled, touched, or tasted this "Almighty." Must not be very almighty, eh?

So you need to "touch" "see" "hear" or "taste" something in order to believe it?

If I cannot touch, see, hear or taste something -- why should I believe in it?
I'm not back. This idiot just upset me which made me stop lurking.
mattrodstrom
Posts: 12,028
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:16:53 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 1:11:16 PM, Ogan wrote:
I am sorry to inform you my dear that the answer is certainly yes in the case of atheists, they ignore and deny the struggle within their hearts,

what struggle within my heart?

and think the intellect, their intellect especially, is the only god and can answer all things.

I don't think the intellect can Fully answer for anything... I think it is the means by which we understand the nature of things... but that doesn't mean we Fully understand the nature of things.

And my saying so doesn't make me not an atheist.

Furthermore, they cannot in any other way known to man be persuaded otherwise.

umm.. I'm persuaded by what's apparent.

my "intellectual" capabilities are one of the things which go into that... and which iron it all out a bit... and sharpen the image of it all a bit.

In their 'minds' we are just material mush and thats basically it, with a lot of complicated justifications for it.

that's what seems to be the case!

Though I'm not quite certain what that Material mush is at bottom :/

Still, you're just wrong and silly though.
"He who does not know how to put his will into things at least puts a meaning into them: that is, he believes there is a will in them already."

Metaphysics:
"The science.. which deals with the fundamental errors of mankind - but as if they were the fundamental truths."
Drodick
Posts: 13
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:16:58 PM
Posted: 5 years ago

Well take Australia, I've never been there, how do I know it exists? It has been witnessed by a large cross section of society, it is mentioned in reliable publications and reliable news outlets.

Can I be absolute certain it exists... no. Has it's existence been proven beyond reasonable doubt... yes.

Can you make a similar case for God?

Oui, I can first ask a quick question are you Agnostic by chance?
Now, your grandmother; had a mother. Correct me if I'm mistaken but have you ever met your Great Grandmother? Yet she had to of be alive at one point since you sir are alive currently and here.
With all due respect, you can be certain she existed because of she didn't well then you wouldn't exist either.
Ogan
Posts: 407
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:17:57 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 1:14:17 PM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 3/10/2011 1:11:16 PM, Ogan wrote:
At 3/10/2011 12:59:06 PM, Drodick wrote:
At 3/9/2011 10:42:30 AM, JustCallMeTarzan wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

Who? I haven't seen, heard, smelled, touched, or tasted this "Almighty." Must not be very almighty, eh?

So you need to "touch" "see" "hear" or "taste" something in order to believe it?

I am sorry to inform you my dear that the answer is certainly yes in the case of atheists, they ignore and deny the struggle within their hearts, and think the intellect, their intellect especially, is the only god and can answer all things. Furthermore, they cannot in any other way known to man be persuaded otherwise. In their 'minds' we are just material mush and thats basically it, with a lot of complicated justifications for it.

Nice strawmanning.

Regardless of intellectual tittle-tattle, its true nevertheless.
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:19:43 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
There exists about 45 Atheological arguments against God. A good handful of them succeed.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Drodick
Posts: 13
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:20:14 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 1:15:46 PM, annhasle wrote:
At 3/10/2011 12:59:06 PM, Drodick wrote:
At 3/9/2011 10:42:30 AM, JustCallMeTarzan wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

Who? I haven't seen, heard, smelled, touched, or tasted this "Almighty." Must not be very almighty, eh?

So you need to "touch" "see" "hear" or "taste" something in order to believe it?

If I cannot touch, see, hear or taste something -- why should I believe in it?

Why shouldn't' you?
Drodick
Posts: 13
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:21:03 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 1:19:43 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
There exists about 45 Atheological arguments against God. A good handful of them succeed.

That's nice where are they. Sources please.
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:21:28 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 1:16:58 PM, Drodick wrote:

Well take Australia, I've never been there, how do I know it exists? It has been witnessed by a large cross section of society, it is mentioned in reliable publications and reliable news outlets.

Can I be absolute certain it exists... no. Has it's existence been proven beyond reasonable doubt... yes.

Can you make a similar case for God?

Oui, I can first ask a quick question are you Agnostic by chance?

No I am an atheist.

Now, your grandmother; had a mother. Correct me if I'm mistaken but have you ever met your Great Grandmother? Yet she had to of be alive at one point since you sir are alive currently and here.
With all due respect, you can be certain she existed because of she didn't well then you wouldn't exist either.

Yes I met her. And reliable sources inform me that she did exist and would need to have existed for me to exist. Her existence is proven beyond all reasonable doubt.

Now... what about God?
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:22:21 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 1:19:43 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
There exists about 45 Atheological arguments against God. A good handful of them succeed.

You don't have confidence in any of them however, they are mostly crap.
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:23:40 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 1:15:46 PM, annhasle wrote:
At 3/10/2011 12:59:06 PM, Drodick wrote:
At 3/9/2011 10:42:30 AM, JustCallMeTarzan wrote:
At 3/9/2011 9:47:00 AM, interrogator wrote:
What's your reason. I mean, 'excuse' for not believing in The Almighty.

Who? I haven't seen, heard, smelled, touched, or tasted this "Almighty." Must not be very almighty, eh?

So you need to "touch" "see" "hear" or "taste" something in order to believe it?

If I cannot touch, see, hear or taste something -- why should I believe in it?

You can't touch, see, hear, or taste a black hole. Do you not believe in those?
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
Drodick
Posts: 13
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:24:14 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 1:21:28 PM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 3/10/2011 1:16:58 PM, Drodick wrote:

Well take Australia, I've never been there, how do I know it exists? It has been witnessed by a large cross section of society, it is mentioned in reliable publications and reliable news outlets.

Can I be absolute certain it exists... no. Has it's existence been proven beyond reasonable doubt... yes.

Can you make a similar case for God?

Oui, I can first ask a quick question are you Agnostic by chance?

No I am an atheist.

Now, your grandmother; had a mother. Correct me if I'm mistaken but have you ever met your Great Grandmother? Yet she had to of be alive at one point since you sir are alive currently and here.
With all due respect, you can be certain she existed because of she didn't well then you wouldn't exist either.

Yes I met her. And reliable sources inform me that she did exist and would need to have existed for me to exist. Her existence is proven beyond all reasonable doubt.

Now... what about God?

What do you consider to be a reliable source?
Then I shall use another example, Hitler; do you believe he existed?
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/10/2011 1:26:47 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/10/2011 1:24:14 PM, Drodick wrote:
At 3/10/2011 1:21:28 PM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 3/10/2011 1:16:58 PM, Drodick wrote:

Well take Australia, I've never been there, how do I know it exists? It has been witnessed by a large cross section of society, it is mentioned in reliable publications and reliable news outlets.

Can I be absolute certain it exists... no. Has it's existence been proven beyond reasonable doubt... yes.

Can you make a similar case for God?

Oui, I can first ask a quick question are you Agnostic by chance?

No I am an atheist.

Now, your grandmother; had a mother. Correct me if I'm mistaken but have you ever met your Great Grandmother? Yet she had to of be alive at one point since you sir are alive currently and here.
With all due respect, you can be certain she existed because of she didn't well then you wouldn't exist either.

Yes I met her. And reliable sources inform me that she did exist and would need to have existed for me to exist. Her existence is proven beyond all reasonable doubt.

Now... what about God?

What do you consider to be a reliable source?
Then I shall use another example, Hitler; do you believe he existed?

There is no one absolute reliable source, all things can be doubted. There is a body of evidence that very strongly suggests that Hitler existed. We can do this all day, do you believe Sweden exists, do you believe I am have a giant invisible space goat etc etc.

Rational people are convinced of things because of evidence. Where is your evidence for God?
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.