Total Posts:9|Showing Posts:1-9
Jump to topic:

Explanation of my god exists argument

Anti-atheist
Posts: 213
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2013 10:23:53 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
K i made the argument that owned guys like every atheist and imabench

1. If God exists,
2. then God exists
3. God does exist,
4.therefore God exists.

So are saying "WTF U CAAAANT DO THAAT"

How am I doing this? Its logically valid because when atheists say they dont believe in God there like "You need to do proof" but they just assume god doesn't exist just because, so I can assume god DOES exist just because

I know this argument is logically valid, because wouldn't something that exists be evidence that it exists? Obviously. My argument wins
Anti-atheist

Registered genius
Certified butt-f*cker

imabench for fuhrer '13
Rational_Thinker9119
Posts: 9,054
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2013 10:25:47 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/25/2013 10:23:53 AM, Anti-atheist wrote:
K i made the argument that owned guys like every atheist and imabench

1. If God exists,
2. then God exists
3. God does exist,
4.therefore God exists.

So are saying "WTF U CAAAANT DO THAAT"

How am I doing this? Its logically valid because when atheists say they dont believe in God there like "You need to do proof" but they just assume god doesn't exist just because, so I can assume god DOES exist just because

I know this argument is logically valid, because wouldn't something that exists be evidence that it exists? Obviously. My argument wins

Obvious troll is obvious.
imabench
Posts: 21,206
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2013 10:26:09 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
And this is why everyone thinks you're retarded :)
Kevin24018 : "He's just so mean it makes me want to ball up my fists and stamp on the ground"

7/14/16 = The Presidency Dies

DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015
Anti-atheist
Posts: 213
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2013 10:35:36 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/25/2013 10:26:09 AM, imabench wrote:
And this is why everyone thinks you're retarded :)

No one has refuted the argument!!! I make the same argument , I know imabench exists why? Because he exists! SAme with God!! If something exists, thats proof that it exists! It simple logic
Anti-atheist

Registered genius
Certified butt-f*cker

imabench for fuhrer '13
specracer
Posts: 11
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2013 10:44:40 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
First off I think that may be circular reasoning. And second can you prove point three? Because if you can't then the entire argument is out of whack.
Anti-atheist
Posts: 213
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2013 10:51:08 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/25/2013 10:44:40 AM, specracer wrote:
First off I think that may be circular reasoning. And second can you prove point three? Because if you can't then the entire argument is out of whack.

Oh so is it circular to say you exist because you exist? Its not! 3 is point proven by the other pemises.
Anti-atheist

Registered genius
Certified butt-f*cker

imabench for fuhrer '13
PureX
Posts: 1,519
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2013 10:53:23 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/25/2013 10:23:53 AM, Anti-atheist wrote:
K i made the argument that owned guys like every atheist and imabench

1. If God exists,
2. then God exists
3. God does exist,
4.therefore God exists.

So are saying "WTF U CAAAANT DO THAAT"

How am I doing this? Its logically valid because when atheists say they dont believe in God there like "You need to do proof" but they just assume god doesn't exist just because, so I can assume god DOES exist just because

I know this argument is logically valid, because wouldn't something that exists be evidence that it exists? Obviously. My argument wins

That's not an argument, it's a tautological statement.
medv4380
Posts: 200
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2013 10:57:30 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/25/2013 10:51:08 AM, Anti-atheist wrote:
Oh so is it circular to say you exist because you exist? Its not! 3 is point proven by the other pemises.

How do you know I exist? How do you know you're not in Plato's Cave?
specracer
Posts: 11
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2013 11:05:12 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/25/2013 10:51:08 AM, Anti-atheist wrote:
At 4/25/2013 10:44:40 AM, specracer wrote:
First off I think that may be circular reasoning. And second can you prove point three? Because if you can't then the entire argument is out of whack.

Oh so is it circular to say you exist because you exist? Its not! 3 is point proven by the other pemises.

Yes it is. You can not say that a man standing trial for murder should be declared guilty because he committed murder.