Total Posts:398|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Evolution refuted in under 4 minutes

Eitan_Zohar
Posts: 2,697
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 3:27:02 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
Hard to know when medic is joking... no offense.
"It is my ambition to say in ten sentences what others say in a whole book."
Fruitytree
Posts: 2,176
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 3:33:42 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
Very good one, you should still post it on science forum just to see what kind of theories you'd get.
tmar19652
Posts: 727
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 5:31:56 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 3:33:42 AM, Fruitytree wrote:
Very good one, you should still post it on science forum just to see what kind of theories you'd get.

Its too bad we don't have a bullish*t forum
"Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first." -Ronald Reagan

"The notion of political correctness declares certain topics, certain ex<x>pressions even certain gestures off-limits. What began as a crusade for civility has soured into a cause of conflict and even censorship." -George H.W. Bush
AlbinoBunny
Posts: 3,781
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 6:58:06 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
So this is a joke, right?
bladerunner060 | bsh1 , 2014! Presidency campaign!

http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org... - Running for president.
http://www.debate.org... - Running as his vice president.

May the best man win!
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 7:04:11 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
How are you in the medical profession if you shun the scientific principles on which modern medicine is founded?
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
JonMilne
Posts: 1,302
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 7:46:10 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
Just to clarify, Medic, I thought it was only UCD you objected to. Isn't this highly inconsistent on your part that you keep shifting between an aspect of evolutionary theory and then the whole of it?
AlbinoBunny
Posts: 3,781
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 7:49:14 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 7:46:10 AM, JonMilne wrote:
Just to clarify, Medic, I thought it was only UCD you objected to. Isn't this highly inconsistent on your part that you keep shifting between an aspect of evolutionary theory and then the whole of it?

He thinks of "fish" as a "kind" I assume. And supposedly, kinds can only make the same kind; fish can only produce fish.

Yeah, sure... lol
bladerunner060 | bsh1 , 2014! Presidency campaign!

http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org... - Running for president.
http://www.debate.org... - Running as his vice president.

May the best man win!
JonMilne
Posts: 1,302
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 7:58:47 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 7:49:14 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:46:10 AM, JonMilne wrote:
Just to clarify, Medic, I thought it was only UCD you objected to. Isn't this highly inconsistent on your part that you keep shifting between an aspect of evolutionary theory and then the whole of it?

He thinks of "fish" as a "kind" I assume. And supposedly, kinds can only make the same kind; fish can only produce fish.

Yeah, sure... lol

And of course, what he also ignores is the fact that hybridisation is impossible for the vast majority of species, which means that, assuming Medic buys into the whole Flood belief, there definitely would be even more of a case of "Too Many Animals" to fit on the Ark.
AlbinoBunny
Posts: 3,781
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 8:05:55 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 7:58:47 AM, JonMilne wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:49:14 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:46:10 AM, JonMilne wrote:
Just to clarify, Medic, I thought it was only UCD you objected to. Isn't this highly inconsistent on your part that you keep shifting between an aspect of evolutionary theory and then the whole of it?

He thinks of "fish" as a "kind" I assume. And supposedly, kinds can only make the same kind; fish can only produce fish.

Yeah, sure... lol

And of course, what he also ignores is the fact that hybridisation is impossible for the vast majority of species, which means that, assuming Medic buys into the whole Flood belief, there definitely would be even more of a case of "Too Many Animals" to fit on the Ark.

The incest experienced by the "two by two" nature would have been phenomenal and they would have died out very quickly.
bladerunner060 | bsh1 , 2014! Presidency campaign!

http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org... - Running for president.
http://www.debate.org... - Running as his vice president.

May the best man win!
dylancatlow
Posts: 12,254
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 8:48:19 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 7:04:11 AM, 000ike wrote:
How are you in the medical profession if you shun the scientific principles on which modern medicine is founded?

Maybe he sucks?
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 11:11:53 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 3:27:02 AM, Eitan_Zohar wrote:
Hard to know when medic is joking... no offense.

Good, I like to be unpredictable.
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 11:28:08 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 5:31:56 AM, tmar19652 wrote:
At 4/28/2013 3:33:42 AM, Fruitytree wrote:
Very good one, you should still post it on science forum just to see what kind of theories you'd get.

Its too bad we don't have a bullish*t forum

Why should you have your own forum??
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 11:33:27 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 7:04:11 AM, 000ike wrote:
How are you in the medical profession if you shun the scientific principles on which modern medicine is founded?

In spite of your ignoramus assertions, we do not shun science. In fact we agree that there is alot of good science that benefits all mankind. Luckily the medical profession has nothing to do with the philosophical opinion that all life descended from a common ancestor.
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 11:39:30 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 7:46:10 AM, JonMilne wrote:
Just to clarify, Medic, I thought it was only UCD you objected to. Isn't this highly inconsistent on your part that you keep shifting between an aspect of evolutionary theory and then the whole of it?

Not at all since this is about fish changing into different kinds of animals. As I've said many times, I agree that evolution at the micro level is a proven fact. Organisms do adapt to their environment and that adaptability leads to variety within kinds.
Evolution at the macro level, UCD, is bogus.
dylancatlow
Posts: 12,254
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 11:40:47 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
"Luckily the medical profession has nothing to do with the philosophical opinion that all life descended from a common ancestor."

He didn't say it did.... he was just surprised that a type of thinking so devoid of reason could be present in the same person whose profession demands reason and science.
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 11:40:51 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 7:58:47 AM, JonMilne wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:49:14 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:46:10 AM, JonMilne wrote:
Just to clarify, Medic, I thought it was only UCD you objected to. Isn't this highly inconsistent on your part that you keep shifting between an aspect of evolutionary theory and then the whole of it?

He thinks of "fish" as a "kind" I assume. And supposedly, kinds can only make the same kind; fish can only produce fish.

Yeah, sure... lol

And of course, what he also ignores is the fact that hybridisation is impossible for the vast majority of species, which means that, assuming Medic buys into the whole Flood belief, there definitely would be even more of a case of "Too Many Animals" to fit on the Ark.

That objection has been refuted many times over.
AlbinoBunny
Posts: 3,781
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 11:45:16 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 11:40:51 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:58:47 AM, JonMilne wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:49:14 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:46:10 AM, JonMilne wrote:
Just to clarify, Medic, I thought it was only UCD you objected to. Isn't this highly inconsistent on your part that you keep shifting between an aspect of evolutionary theory and then the whole of it?

He thinks of "fish" as a "kind" I assume. And supposedly, kinds can only make the same kind; fish can only produce fish.

Yeah, sure... lol

And of course, what he also ignores is the fact that hybridisation is impossible for the vast majority of species, which means that, assuming Medic buys into the whole Flood belief, there definitely would be even more of a case of "Too Many Animals" to fit on the Ark.

That objection has been refuted many times over.

How has the objection that the Ark couldn't fit all the animals on been "refuted" many times over?
bladerunner060 | bsh1 , 2014! Presidency campaign!

http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org... - Running for president.
http://www.debate.org... - Running as his vice president.

May the best man win!
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 11:48:24 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 8:05:55 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:58:47 AM, JonMilne wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:49:14 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:46:10 AM, JonMilne wrote:
Just to clarify, Medic, I thought it was only UCD you objected to. Isn't this highly inconsistent on your part that you keep shifting between an aspect of evolutionary theory and then the whole of it?

He thinks of "fish" as a "kind" I assume. And supposedly, kinds can only make the same kind; fish can only produce fish.

Yeah, sure... lol

And of course, what he also ignores is the fact that hybridisation is impossible for the vast majority of species, which means that, assuming Medic buys into the whole Flood belief, there definitely would be even more of a case of "Too Many Animals" to fit on the Ark.

The incest experienced by the "two by two" nature would have been phenomenal and they would have died out very quickly.

You do realize that CD involves incest as well, right??

Those on the ark were not far removed from the genetically perfect Adam and Eve. They had not gone through thousands of years of genetic entropy, as you would see in more recent times.
dylancatlow
Posts: 12,254
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 11:50:45 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 11:40:51 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:58:47 AM, JonMilne wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:49:14 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:46:10 AM, JonMilne wrote:
Just to clarify, Medic, I thought it was only UCD you objected to. Isn't this highly inconsistent on your part that you keep shifting between an aspect of evolutionary theory and then the whole of it?

He thinks of "fish" as a "kind" I assume. And supposedly, kinds can only make the same kind; fish can only produce fish.

Yeah, sure... lol

And of course, what he also ignores is the fact that hybridisation is impossible for the vast majority of species, which means that, assuming Medic buys into the whole Flood belief, there definitely would be even more of a case of "Too Many Animals" to fit on the Ark.

That objection has been refuted many times over.

The refutations to that objection have been refuted many times over.
AlbinoBunny
Posts: 3,781
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 12:04:53 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 11:48:24 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 4/28/2013 8:05:55 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:58:47 AM, JonMilne wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:49:14 AM, AlbinoBunny wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:46:10 AM, JonMilne wrote:
Just to clarify, Medic, I thought it was only UCD you objected to. Isn't this highly inconsistent on your part that you keep shifting between an aspect of evolutionary theory and then the whole of it?

He thinks of "fish" as a "kind" I assume. And supposedly, kinds can only make the same kind; fish can only produce fish.

Yeah, sure... lol

And of course, what he also ignores is the fact that hybridisation is impossible for the vast majority of species, which means that, assuming Medic buys into the whole Flood belief, there definitely would be even more of a case of "Too Many Animals" to fit on the Ark.

The incest experienced by the "two by two" nature would have been phenomenal and they would have died out very quickly.

You do realize that CD involves incest as well, right??

Only very minimally, too much incest allows very damaging recessive genes to exist together and eliminates genetic diversity. Two of a species is not enough.


Those on the ark were not far removed from the genetically perfect Adam and Eve. They had not gone through thousands of years of genetic entropy, as you would see in more recent times.

Lions, tigers, bears?
bladerunner060 | bsh1 , 2014! Presidency campaign!

http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org... - Running for president.
http://www.debate.org... - Running as his vice president.

May the best man win!
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 12:11:19 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 8:48:19 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
At 4/28/2013 7:04:11 AM, 000ike wrote:
How are you in the medical profession if you shun the scientific principles on which modern medicine is founded?

Maybe he sucks?

Now ya did it.

Yeah, cuz it's really easy to keep a job as a paramedic when you aren't providing the right treatments to patients, and give the wrong medications, wrong dosages etc. The doctors that we turn our dead patients over to at the ER never realize our mistakes.

You and Ike need to grow up and go talk to a paramedic at your local EMS service. Have them explain some of the checks and balances that help assure that patients are getting the proper treatments.

It's very telling about the kind of person you are when you attack a person on a professional level which you know nothing about, simply because you can't defend your position on the unrelated issue being discussed. Go spend some time with mommy and daddy and less time on DDO trying to pretend to be a grown up.
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 12:16:17 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 11:38:36 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
Your avatar only serves to show your ignorance of the claims made by evolutionists.

There's a difference between ignorance and humor.
dylancatlow
Posts: 12,254
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 12:18:58 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 12:16:17 PM, medic0506 wrote:
At 4/28/2013 11:38:36 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
Your avatar only serves to show your ignorance of the claims made by evolutionists.

There's a difference between ignorance and humor.

But you're essentially saying evolution is as absurd as that creature-thing existing.
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 12:20:29 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 11:40:47 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
"Luckily the medical profession has nothing to do with the philosophical opinion that all life descended from a common ancestor."

He didn't say it did.... he was just surprised that a type of thinking so devoid of reason could be present in the same person whose profession demands reason and science.

I'm confounded at how you guys actually get people to believe that you have scientific fact supporting your side. Actual observable scientific evidence supports creation. You guys laying claim to "science" is a false claim and anyone who looks into the issue can see that.
dylancatlow
Posts: 12,254
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/28/2013 12:21:32 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/28/2013 12:20:29 PM, medic0506 wrote:
At 4/28/2013 11:40:47 AM, dylancatlow wrote:
"Luckily the medical profession has nothing to do with the philosophical opinion that all life descended from a common ancestor."

He didn't say it did.... he was just surprised that a type of thinking so devoid of reason could be present in the same person whose profession demands reason and science.

I'm confounded at how you guys actually get people to believe that you have scientific fact supporting your side. Actual observable scientific evidence supports creation. You guys laying claim to "science" is a false claim and anyone who looks into the issue can see that.

http://www.demotivation.us...