Total Posts:22|Showing Posts:1-22
Jump to topic:

masturbation disproves evolution! Praise GOD!

Anti-atheist
Posts: 213
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/25/2013 11:09:48 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
there s an activity called masturation u jerk ur weenie insteadof reproducing. What a minute itwould be best if you can onlyget off by sex not by jerkin. If evo is true. if creation is true we sboukd be able.to choose or not

we do.

God is real.
Anti-atheist

Registered genius
Certified butt-f*cker

imabench for fuhrer '13
Poetaster
Posts: 587
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/25/2013 11:16:13 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
I would advise that you submit your research to a peer-reviewed journal of science:

http://www.nature.com...
"The book you are looking for hasn't been written yet. What you are looking for you are going to have to find yourself, it's not going to be in a book..." -Sidewalker
Anti-atheist
Posts: 213
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/25/2013 11:20:05 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/25/2013 11:16:13 PM, Poetaster wrote:
I would advise that you submit your research to a peer-reviewed journal of science:

http://www.nature.com...

Cool i will thanks. It will probably ve rejected bc scienpissts ban creationists from journals
Anti-atheist

Registered genius
Certified butt-f*cker

imabench for fuhrer '13
DakotaKrafick
Posts: 1,517
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 12:03:36 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/25/2013 11:09:48 PM, Anti-atheist wrote:
there s an activity called masturation u jerk ur weenie insteadof reproducing. What a minute itwould be best if you can onlyget off by sex not by jerkin. If evo is true. if creation is true we sboukd be able.to choose or not

we do.

God is real.

I don't understand your reasoning at all. Could you please speak English properly? And using sound logic wouldn't hurt either.
Mysterious_Stranger
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 1:10:13 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/26/2013 12:03:36 AM, DakotaKrafick wrote:
At 6/25/2013 11:09:48 PM, Anti-atheist wrote:
there s an activity called masturation u jerk ur weenie insteadof reproducing. What a minute itwould be best if you can onlyget off by sex not by jerkin. If evo is true. if creation is true we sboukd be able.to choose or not

we do.

God is real.

I don't understand your reasoning at all. Could you please speak English properly? And using sound logic wouldn't hurt either.

Yes that would help greatly. Or perhaps a translation guide.
Turn around, go back.
Poetaster
Posts: 587
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 1:15:54 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
I think the argument has attained a perfection beyond formal refinement. Let's segment its lemmatical deductions to reveal its impervious structure:

there s an activity called masturation (P1)
u jerk ur weenie insteadof reproducing. (P2)
What a minute itwould be best if you can onlyget off by sex not by jerkin (C1)

If evo is true. (P3)
if creation is true we sboukd be able.(P4)
to choose or not (C2)

we do. (P5) (this seems to rely on a metalogical type-token distinction)

Therefore, by material implication of the above:
God is real. (C3)

I think I see a way to derive a proof of Fermat's Last Theorem using similar techniques.
"The book you are looking for hasn't been written yet. What you are looking for you are going to have to find yourself, it's not going to be in a book..." -Sidewalker
slo1
Posts: 4,354
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 8:26:11 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/25/2013 11:09:48 PM, Anti-atheist wrote:
there s an activity called masturation u jerk ur weenie insteadof reproducing. What a minute itwould be best if you can onlyget off by sex not by jerkin. If evo is true. if creation is true we sboukd be able.to choose or not

we do.

God is real.

I would extend this logic to conclude that since God mad "Jerkin" and the ability to experience such pleasure by oneself, one should honor God by doing it as frequent as possible.

Secondly, if that is not allowed via the scriptures then one must conclude that God is an ahole for making something so pleasurable that he does not want done. It would be like bringing donuts to over eaters anonymous meetings -Jerkish (no pun intended)
Sower4GS
Posts: 1,718
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 11:47:25 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/25/2013 11:09:48 PM, Anti-atheist wrote:
there s an activity called masturation u jerk ur weenie insteadof reproducing. What a minute itwould be best if you can onlyget off by sex not by jerkin. If evo is true. if creation is true we sboukd be able.to choose or not

we do.

God is real.
Do you have any goodness in you? Doubtful.
You reconcile with God through obedeince. Man brings sorrow on Himself. God offers peace and man spits in His face,
One needs to follow Yahshua the Living Torah! Christians do not though so this is a true Christian.
CJB) For Moshe writes about the righteousness grounded in the Torah that the person who does these things will attain life through them.

(KJV) For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.

(The Scriptures 1998+) For Mosheh writes about the righteousness which is of the Torah, "The man who does these shall live by them."
johnlubba
Posts: 2,892
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 1:19:19 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/25/2013 11:09:48 PM, Anti-atheist wrote:
there s an activity called masturation u jerk ur weenie insteadof reproducing. What a minute itwould be best if you can onlyget off by sex not by jerkin. If evo is true. if creation is true we sboukd be able.to choose or not

we do.

God is real.

By this logic, God has created a bunch of wankers.
Poetaster
Posts: 587
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 1:44:26 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
Guys, this is a classical Proof by Masturbation, closely related to the more general argumentum ad erectio. Consider the Etiological Arousal Argument:

That which begins to exist has a cause.
An erection has begun to exist.
Therefore, the erection has a cause.

Erections have real causes.
The cause was a thought about God.
Therefore, God is real.

QED

And that's before we even get into the evidential case.
"The book you are looking for hasn't been written yet. What you are looking for you are going to have to find yourself, it's not going to be in a book..." -Sidewalker
Magic8000
Posts: 975
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 1:51:44 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/26/2013 1:44:26 PM, Poetaster wrote:
Guys, this is a classical Proof by Masturbation, closely related to the more general argumentum ad erectio. Consider the Etiological Arousal Argument:

That which begins to exist has a cause.
An erection has begun to exist.
Therefore, the erection has a cause.

Erections have real causes.
The cause was a thought about God.
Therefore, God is real.

QED

And that's before we even get into the evidential case.

Couldn't stop loling.
404 coherent debate topic not found. Please restart the debate with clear resolution.

"So Magic8000 believes Einstein was a proctologist who was persuaded by the Government and Hitler to fabricate the Theory of Relativity"- GWL-CPA
Enji
Posts: 1,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 7:02:49 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/26/2013 1:44:26 PM, Poetaster wrote:
Guys, this is a classical Proof by Masturbation, closely related to the more general argumentum ad erectio. Consider the Etiological Arousal Argument:

That which begins to exist has a cause.
An erection has begun to exist.
Therefore, the erection has a cause.

Erections have real causes.
The cause was a thought about God.
Therefore, God is real.

QED

And that's before we even get into the evidential case.

Well.. I'm convinced.
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 7:09:16 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/26/2013 12:03:36 AM, DakotaKrafick wrote:
At 6/25/2013 11:09:48 PM, Anti-atheist wrote:
there s an activity called masturation u jerk ur weenie insteadof reproducing. What a minute itwould be best if you can onlyget off by sex not by jerkin. If evo is true. if creation is true we sboukd be able.to choose or not

we do.

God is real.

I don't understand your reasoning at all. Could you please speak English properly? And using sound logic wouldn't hurt either.

Anti-Atheist is probably an atheist that's trolling.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
sadolite
Posts: 8,839
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 7:28:34 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/26/2013 1:19:19 PM, johnlubba wrote:
At 6/25/2013 11:09:48 PM, Anti-atheist wrote:
there s an activity called masturation u jerk ur weenie insteadof reproducing. What a minute itwould be best if you can onlyget off by sex not by jerkin. If evo is true. if creation is true we sboukd be able.to choose or not

we do.

God is real.

By this logic, God has created a bunch of wankers.

Wait!! Did you just call yourself a wanker?
It's not your views that divide us, it's what you think my views should be that divides us.

If you think I will give up my rights and forsake social etiquette to make you "FEEL" better you are sadly mistaken

If liberal democrats would just stop shooting people gun violence would drop by 90%
Nidhogg
Posts: 503
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 8:04:04 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
I got this guy banned and yet he somehow returned. He's like the Trolling Voldermort of DDO. Trolldermort.
Ridiculously Photogenic Debater

DDO's most mediocre member since at least a year ago
YYW
Posts: 36,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 8:09:21 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/26/2013 8:04:04 PM, Nidhogg wrote:
I got this guy banned and yet he somehow returned. He's like the Trolling Voldermort of DDO. Trolldermort.

How unfortunate it is that he has returned.
Tsar of DDO
Poetaster
Posts: 587
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 8:11:19 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/26/2013 8:04:04 PM, Nidhogg wrote:
I got this guy banned and yet he somehow returned. He's like the Trolling Voldermort of DDO. Trolldermort.

He's doing God's work. And this work apparently involves divinely commanded autoeroticism.
"The book you are looking for hasn't been written yet. What you are looking for you are going to have to find yourself, it's not going to be in a book..." -Sidewalker
Enji
Posts: 1,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 9:27:10 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/26/2013 1:15:54 AM, Poetaster wrote:
I think the argument has attained a perfection beyond formal refinement. Let's segment its lemmatical deductions to reveal its impervious structure:


there s an activity called masturation (P1)
u jerk ur weenie insteadof reproducing. (P2)
What a minute itwould be best if you can onlyget off by sex not by jerkin (C1)

If evo is true. (P3)
if creation is true we sboukd be able.(P4)
to choose or not (C2)

we do. (P5) (this seems to rely on a metalogical type-token distinction)

Therefore, by material implication of the above:
God is real. (C3)

I think I see a way to derive a proof of Fermat's Last Theorem using similar techniques.

^ I'm not sure if you'd have room to do that in a forum post.
Poetaster
Posts: 587
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 9:49:41 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/26/2013 9:27:10 PM, Enji wrote:
At 6/26/2013 1:15:54 AM, Poetaster wrote:
I think I see a way to derive a proof of Fermat's Last Theorem using similar techniques.

^ I'm not sure if you'd have room to do that in a forum post.

Or in a narrow margin...
"The book you are looking for hasn't been written yet. What you are looking for you are going to have to find yourself, it's not going to be in a book..." -Sidewalker
Wallstreetatheist
Posts: 7,132
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2013 10:31:45 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/26/2013 1:15:54 AM, Poetaster wrote:
I think the argument has attained a perfection beyond formal refinement. Let's segment its lemmatical deductions to reveal its impervious structure:


there s an activity called masturation (P1)
u jerk ur weenie insteadof reproducing. (P2)
What a minute itwould be best if you can onlyget off by sex not by jerkin (C1)

If evo is true. (P3)
if creation is true we sboukd be able.(P4)
to choose or not (C2)

we do. (P5) (this seems to rely on a metalogical type-token distinction)

Therefore, by material implication of the above:
God is real. (C3)

I think I see a way to derive a proof of Fermat's Last Theorem using similar techniques.

I died xD
DRUG HARM: http://imgur.com...
Primal Diet. Lifting. Reading. Psychedelics. Cold-Approach Pickup. Music.
DakotaKrafick
Posts: 1,517
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2013 2:00:25 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/26/2013 10:31:45 PM, Wallstreetatheist wrote:
At 6/26/2013 1:15:54 AM, Poetaster wrote:
I think the argument has attained a perfection beyond formal refinement. Let's segment its lemmatical deductions to reveal its impervious structure:


there s an activity called masturation (P1)
u jerk ur weenie insteadof reproducing. (P2)
What a minute itwould be best if you can onlyget off by sex not by jerkin (C1)

If evo is true. (P3)
if creation is true we sboukd be able.(P4)
to choose or not (C2)

we do. (P5) (this seems to rely on a metalogical type-token distinction)

Therefore, by material implication of the above:
God is real. (C3)

I think I see a way to derive a proof of Fermat's Last Theorem using similar techniques.

I died xD

Seriously, that makes two of Poetaster's posts I've fallen in love with.
bulproof
Posts: 25,274
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2013 2:08:08 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 6/25/2013 11:09:48 PM, Anti-atheist wrote:
there s an activity called masturation u jerk ur weenie insteadof reproducing. What a minute itwould be best if you can onlyget off by sex not by jerkin. If evo is true. if creation is true we sboukd be able.to choose or not

we do.

God is real.
Judging by this post it is also capable of producing a life form, after a fashion I mean.
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin