Total Posts:16|Showing Posts:1-16
Jump to topic:

Homosexuality and Abortion

bulproof
Posts: 25,274
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2013 4:32:59 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
Here's a question for the morally superior religionists in our midst.
If science discovers a genetic reason for homosexuality would that make the abortion of said abomination a moral imperative for any god believer who is informed of this information regarding their foetus?
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
Fruitytree
Posts: 2,176
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2013 6:51:38 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 7/5/2013 4:32:59 AM, bulproof wrote:
Here's a question for the morally superior religionists in our midst.
If science discovers a genetic reason for homosexuality would that make the abortion of said abomination a moral imperative for any god believer who is informed of this information regarding their foetus?

Abortion is Immoral regardless, the only thing that can make it lawful is the mother life.

Even if all the crimes are genetic, they still wouldn't make abortion Moral.
drafterman
Posts: 18,870
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2013 7:13:08 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 7/5/2013 4:32:59 AM, bulproof wrote:
Here's a question for the morally superior religionists in our midst.
If science discovers a genetic reason for homosexuality would that make the abortion of said abomination a moral imperative for any god believer who is informed of this information regarding their foetus?

No. You have to wait until they're born before it's OK to break their legs.
popculturepooka
Posts: 7,926
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2013 9:53:55 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 7/5/2013 7:13:08 AM, drafterman wrote:
At 7/5/2013 4:32:59 AM, bulproof wrote:
Here's a question for the morally superior religionists in our midst.
If science discovers a genetic reason for homosexuality would that make the abortion of said abomination a moral imperative for any god believer who is informed of this information regarding their foetus?

No. You have to wait until they're born before it's OK to break their legs.

Why do you keep on mentioning breaking legs?
At 10/3/2016 11:49:13 PM, thett3 wrote:
BLACK LIVES MATTER!
drafterman
Posts: 18,870
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2013 9:55:20 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 7/5/2013 9:53:55 AM, popculturepooka wrote:
At 7/5/2013 7:13:08 AM, drafterman wrote:
At 7/5/2013 4:32:59 AM, bulproof wrote:
Here's a question for the morally superior religionists in our midst.
If science discovers a genetic reason for homosexuality would that make the abortion of said abomination a moral imperative for any god believer who is informed of this information regarding their foetus?

No. You have to wait until they're born before it's OK to break their legs.

Why do you keep on mentioning breaking legs?

Read my sig.
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2013 11:37:04 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 7/5/2013 4:32:59 AM, bulproof wrote:
Here's a question for the morally superior religionists in our midst.
If science discovers a genetic reason for homosexuality would that make the abortion of said abomination a moral imperative for any god believer who is informed of this information regarding their foetus?

You actually believe that there might be a genetic cause for someone putting their wenis in the hole that other guys poop from?? If that's true then evolution sure gave them a crappy deal...lol
Rational_Thinker9119
Posts: 9,054
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2013 12:57:09 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 7/5/2013 11:37:04 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 7/5/2013 4:32:59 AM, bulproof wrote:
Here's a question for the morally superior religionists in our midst.
If science discovers a genetic reason for homosexuality would that make the abortion of said abomination a moral imperative for any god believer who is informed of this information regarding their foetus?

You actually believe that there might be a genetic cause for someone putting their wenis in the hole that other guys poop from?? If that's true then evolution sure gave them a crappy deal...lol

It's only crappy to you. Gays don't mind it sticking their penis in another man.
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2013 2:09:24 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 7/5/2013 12:57:09 PM, Rational_Thinker9119 wrote:
At 7/5/2013 11:37:04 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 7/5/2013 4:32:59 AM, bulproof wrote:
Here's a question for the morally superior religionists in our midst.
If science discovers a genetic reason for homosexuality would that make the abortion of said abomination a moral imperative for any god believer who is informed of this information regarding their foetus?

You actually believe that there might be a genetic cause for someone putting their wenis in the hole that other guys poop from?? If that's true then evolution sure gave them a crappy deal...lol

It's only crappy to you. Gays don't mind it sticking their penis in another man.

Goat and sheep lovers don't mind sticking their wenises in goats and sheep but I don't see anyone running to support that as acceptable human behavior, or saying that it's genetics that makes them do it.
bladerunner060
Posts: 7,126
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2013 2:12:07 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 7/5/2013 2:09:24 PM, medic0506 wrote:
At 7/5/2013 12:57:09 PM, Rational_Thinker9119 wrote:
At 7/5/2013 11:37:04 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 7/5/2013 4:32:59 AM, bulproof wrote:
Here's a question for the morally superior religionists in our midst.
If science discovers a genetic reason for homosexuality would that make the abortion of said abomination a moral imperative for any god believer who is informed of this information regarding their foetus?

You actually believe that there might be a genetic cause for someone putting their wenis in the hole that other guys poop from?? If that's true then evolution sure gave them a crappy deal...lol

It's only crappy to you. Gays don't mind it sticking their penis in another man.

Goat and sheep lovers don't mind sticking their wenises in goats and sheep but I don't see anyone running to support that as acceptable human behavior, or saying that it's genetics that makes them do it.

That's because our standard of ethics isn't based on a book that makes no rational arguments, only assertions. If your book told you it was the highest moral duty to molest children, you'd do it; it necessarily follows from DCT.
Assistant moderator to airmax1227. PM me with any questions or concerns!
medic0506
Posts: 13,450
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2013 3:03:20 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 7/5/2013 2:12:07 PM, bladerunner060 wrote:
At 7/5/2013 2:09:24 PM, medic0506 wrote:
At 7/5/2013 12:57:09 PM, Rational_Thinker9119 wrote:
At 7/5/2013 11:37:04 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 7/5/2013 4:32:59 AM, bulproof wrote:
Here's a question for the morally superior religionists in our midst.
If science discovers a genetic reason for homosexuality would that make the abortion of said abomination a moral imperative for any god believer who is informed of this information regarding their foetus?

You actually believe that there might be a genetic cause for someone putting their wenis in the hole that other guys poop from?? If that's true then evolution sure gave them a crappy deal...lol

It's only crappy to you. Gays don't mind it sticking their penis in another man.

Goat and sheep lovers don't mind sticking their wenises in goats and sheep but I don't see anyone running to support that as acceptable human behavior, or saying that it's genetics that makes them do it.

That's because our standard of ethics isn't based on a book that makes no rational arguments, only assertions.

You have no "standard", it's basically whatever you, as an individual, deem appropriate.

If your book told you it was the highest moral duty to molest children, you'd do it;

That's just plain retarded.

it necessarily follows from DCT.

DCT??
bladerunner060
Posts: 7,126
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2013 3:15:05 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 7/5/2013 3:03:20 PM, medic0506 wrote:
At 7/5/2013 2:12:07 PM, bladerunner060 wrote:
At 7/5/2013 2:09:24 PM, medic0506 wrote:
At 7/5/2013 12:57:09 PM, Rational_Thinker9119 wrote:
At 7/5/2013 11:37:04 AM, medic0506 wrote:
At 7/5/2013 4:32:59 AM, bulproof wrote:
Here's a question for the morally superior religionists in our midst.
If science discovers a genetic reason for homosexuality would that make the abortion of said abomination a moral imperative for any god believer who is informed of this information regarding their foetus?

You actually believe that there might be a genetic cause for someone putting their wenis in the hole that other guys poop from?? If that's true then evolution sure gave them a crappy deal...lol

It's only crappy to you. Gays don't mind it sticking their penis in another man.

Goat and sheep lovers don't mind sticking their wenises in goats and sheep but I don't see anyone running to support that as acceptable human behavior, or saying that it's genetics that makes them do it.

That's because our standard of ethics isn't based on a book that makes no rational arguments, only assertions.

You have no "standard", it's basically whatever you, as an individual, deem appropriate.

Uh huh. Want me to start making things up about you? First off, even if it was "whatever I as an individual deem appropriate", that would still be a standard. Second, that's not really a solid point considering your standard is "whatever your deity, a confessed genocider, deems appropriate".


If your book told you it was the highest moral duty to molest children, you'd do it;

That's just plain retarded.

it necessarily follows from DCT.

DCT??

Divine Command Theory, that what God tells you is moral is by definition moral.
Assistant moderator to airmax1227. PM me with any questions or concerns!
bladerunner060
Posts: 7,126
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2013 3:16:18 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 7/5/2013 4:32:59 AM, bulproof wrote:
Here's a question for the morally superior religionists in our midst.
If science discovers a genetic reason for homosexuality would that make the abortion of said abomination a moral imperative for any god believer who is informed of this information regarding their foetus?

Prolly NSFW, but:

http://www.explosm.net...
Assistant moderator to airmax1227. PM me with any questions or concerns!
tBoonePickens
Posts: 3,266
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2013 3:34:45 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 7/5/2013 4:32:59 AM, bulproof wrote:
Here's a question for the morally superior religionists in our midst.
OK, but let's not say morally superior because, as you know we shouldn't judge other people's morals.

If science discovers a genetic reason for homosexuality would that make the abortion of said abomination a moral imperative for any god believer who is informed of this information regarding their foetus?
It's fetus, btw. Are you that uninformed about the Pro-Life position and religious positions regarding homosexuality that you are unable to answer that question fro your self? I guess so.

Obviously, it would be wrong to abort in any case. The only way the anti-abortion position can be consistent is if that is the case. Ironically, if there were some genetic test to determine sexuality in utero, it would be those that hold pro-life positions (ie liberals / progressives) that would be aborting the potentially homosexual babies.
WOS
: At 10/3/2012 4:28:52 AM, Wallstreetatheist wrote:
: Without nothing existing, you couldn't have something.
bulproof
Posts: 25,274
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2013 9:15:27 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 7/5/2013 3:34:45 PM, tBoonePickens wrote:
At 7/5/2013 4:32:59 AM, bulproof wrote:
Here's a question for the morally superior religionists in our midst.
OK, but let's not say morally superior because, as you know we shouldn't judge other people's morals.

If science discovers a genetic reason for homosexuality would that make the abortion of said abomination a moral imperative for any god believer who is informed of this information regarding their foetus?
It's fetus, btw. Are you that uninformed about the Pro-Life position and religious positions regarding homosexuality that you are unable to answer that question fro your self? I guess so.

Obviously, it would be wrong to abort in any case. The only way the anti-abortion position can be consistent is if that is the case. Ironically, if there were some genetic test to determine sexuality in utero, it would be those that hold pro-life positions (ie liberals / progressives) that would be aborting the potentially homosexual babies.
In English it's foetus, but you keep writing American I can read that too.
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
Illegalcombatant
Posts: 4,008
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
7/5/2013 9:19:21 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 7/5/2013 4:32:59 AM, bulproof wrote:
Here's a question for the morally superior religionists in our midst.
If science discovers a genetic reason for homosexuality would that make the abortion of said abomination a moral imperative for any god believer who is informed of this information regarding their foetus?

Nah they have some wiggle room. Sexual orientation vs Sexual acts.

Wait for the person to grow up.......commit a homo act, then DIE FA$S

Of course religious people would never do such a thing, especially just based on a document that merely claims God wants them to kill................MUHAHAHAHAHAHA
"Seems like another attempt to insert God into areas our knowledge has yet to penetrate. You figure God would be bigger than the gaps of our ignorance." Drafterman 19/5/12