Total Posts:17|Showing Posts:1-17
Jump to topic:

THW outlaw extreme religions

joceyjoce1212
Posts: 2
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/11/2014 8:49:19 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
People have the freedom to believe what they choose. So we should not outlaw extreme religions.
hwofhihwighii
biomystic
Posts: 606
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/11/2014 8:59:00 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Wtf? So a religion that tells its believers its their duty to God to go out and strap bombs to themselves to rid the world of enemies of God is OK with you? So a religion that told its believers to go out and strap herbal practitioners and midwives and homosexuals to stakes and set fire to them is OK with you?

No, we don't allow violent religions to flourish unchecked by laws made to combat religious madness.
bulproof
Posts: 25,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/11/2014 9:34:05 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 1/11/2014 8:59:00 AM, biomystic wrote:
Wtf? So a religion that tells its believers its their duty to God to go out and strap bombs to themselves to rid the world of enemies of God is OK with you? So a religion that told its believers to go out and strap herbal practitioners and midwives and homosexuals to stakes and set fire to them is OK with you?

No, we don't allow violent religions to flourish unchecked by laws made to combat religious madness.

No you couldn't say that.

It's perfectly Ok though for an omnipotent omniscient god to conduct a human sacrifice to himself. cos someone pissed him off.
biomystic
Posts: 606
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/11/2014 1:16:41 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 1/11/2014 9:34:05 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 1/11/2014 8:59:00 AM, biomystic wrote:
Wtf? So a religion that tells its believers its their duty to God to go out and strap bombs to themselves to rid the world of enemies of God is OK with you? So a religion that told its believers to go out and strap herbal practitioners and midwives and homosexuals to stakes and set fire to them is OK with you?

No, we don't allow violent religions to flourish unchecked by laws made to combat religious madness.

No you couldn't say that.

It's perfectly Ok though for an omnipotent omniscient god to conduct a human sacrifice to himself. cos someone pissed him off.

Schtupnagel ignorance again, Bull? Please go to your nearest Google or Wikipedia search engine and read about the Gnostic Christian religion and then stop your slander of Christians who are not believer's in Paul's doctrines and never were. You can address your bitches and moans about Pauline Christian doctrines to Pauline Christians but not to me. I'm a Celestial Torah Christian and none of your Bible complaints apply to my Christian beliefs.
cybertron1998
Posts: 5,818
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/11/2014 1:22:32 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 1/11/2014 8:59:00 AM, biomystic wrote:
Wtf? So a religion that tells its believers its their duty to God to go out and strap bombs to themselves to rid the world of enemies of God is OK with you? So a religion that told its believers to go out and strap herbal practitioners and midwives and homosexuals to stakes and set fire to them is OK with you?

No, we don't allow violent religions to flourish unchecked by laws made to combat religious madness.

ummmm instances of al queda are frowned upon by the general muslim population
Epsilon: There are so many stories where some brave hero decides to give their life to save the day, and because of their sacrifice, the good guys win, the survivors all cheer, and everybody lives happily ever after. But the hero... never gets to see that ending. They'll never know if their sacrifice actually made a difference. They'll never know if the day was really saved. In the end, they just have to have faith.
srehtiw
Posts: 491
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2014 8:58:17 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 1/11/2014 9:34:05 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 1/11/2014 8:59:00 AM, biomystic wrote:
Wtf? So a religion that tells its believers its their duty to God to go out and strap bombs to themselves to rid the world of enemies of God is OK with you? So a religion that told its believers to go out and strap herbal practitioners and midwives and homosexuals to stakes and set fire to them is OK with you?

No, we don't allow violent religions to flourish unchecked by laws made to combat religious madness.

No you couldn't say that.

It's perfectly Ok though for an omnipotent omniscient god to conduct a human sacrifice to himself. cos someone pissed him off.

I'm sorry what?
bulproof
Posts: 25,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2014 9:07:48 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 1/12/2014 8:58:17 AM, srehtiw wrote:
At 1/11/2014 9:34:05 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 1/11/2014 8:59:00 AM, biomystic wrote:
Wtf? So a religion that tells its believers its their duty to God to go out and strap bombs to themselves to rid the world of enemies of God is OK with you? So a religion that told its believers to go out and strap herbal practitioners and midwives and homosexuals to stakes and set fire to them is OK with you?

No, we don't allow violent religions to flourish unchecked by laws made to combat religious madness.

No you couldn't say that.

It's perfectly Ok though for an omnipotent omniscient god to conduct a human sacrifice to himself. cos someone pissed him off.

I'm sorry what?

Read the holy bible and rejoin the conversation, there's a good little devil.
bulproof
Posts: 25,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2014 9:08:52 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 1/11/2014 8:49:19 AM, joceyjoce1212 wrote:
People have the freedom to believe what they choose. So we should not outlaw extreme religions.
BTW what the fvck is a THW?
srehtiw
Posts: 491
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2014 9:23:37 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 1/12/2014 9:07:48 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 1/12/2014 8:58:17 AM, srehtiw wrote:
At 1/11/2014 9:34:05 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 1/11/2014 8:59:00 AM, biomystic wrote:
Wtf? So a religion that tells its believers its their duty to God to go out and strap bombs to themselves to rid the world of enemies of God is OK with you? So a religion that told its believers to go out and strap herbal practitioners and midwives and homosexuals to stakes and set fire to them is OK with you?

No, we don't allow violent religions to flourish unchecked by laws made to combat religious madness.

No you couldn't say that.

It's perfectly Ok though for an omnipotent omniscient god to conduct a human sacrifice to himself. cos someone pissed him off.

I'm sorry what?

Read the holy bible and rejoin the conversation, there's a good little devil.

You mean Jesus? The situation is rendered far more complicated than you think based on the fact Jesus is actually part of god. So it's not really human sacrifice it's more a situation no human can really draw a parallel to due to the fact we have no experience we can compare it to. Much like the higher dimensions.
bulproof
Posts: 25,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2014 9:58:16 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 1/12/2014 9:23:37 AM, srehtiw wrote:
At 1/12/2014 9:07:48 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 1/12/2014 8:58:17 AM, srehtiw wrote:
At 1/11/2014 9:34:05 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 1/11/2014 8:59:00 AM, biomystic wrote:
Wtf? So a religion that tells its believers its their duty to God to go out and strap bombs to themselves to rid the world of enemies of God is OK with you? So a religion that told its believers to go out and strap herbal practitioners and midwives and homosexuals to stakes and set fire to them is OK with you?

No, we don't allow violent religions to flourish unchecked by laws made to combat religious madness.

No you couldn't say that.

It's perfectly Ok though for an omnipotent omniscient god to conduct a human sacrifice to himself. cos someone pissed him off.

I'm sorry what?

Read the holy bible and rejoin the conversation, there's a good little devil.

You mean Jesus? The situation is rendered far more complicated than you think based on the fact Jesus is actually part of god. So it's not really human sacrifice it's more a situation no human can really draw a parallel to due to the fact we have no experience we can compare it to. Much like the higher dimensions.
So god can be killed by hanging him on a stick, now that's what I call all powerful.
Mysterious_Stranger
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2014 10:15:29 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Religion itself should be heavily restricted to the extent that your average fast food restaurant would have more of a say in matters than your local church, yet seldom justice exists out there.
Turn around, go back.
srehtiw
Posts: 491
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2014 11:57:31 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 1/12/2014 9:58:16 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 1/12/2014 9:23:37 AM, srehtiw wrote:
At 1/12/2014 9:07:48 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 1/12/2014 8:58:17 AM, srehtiw wrote:
At 1/11/2014 9:34:05 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 1/11/2014 8:59:00 AM, biomystic wrote:
Wtf? So a religion that tells its believers its their duty to God to go out and strap bombs to themselves to rid the world of enemies of God is OK with you? So a religion that told its believers to go out and strap herbal practitioners and midwives and homosexuals to stakes and set fire to them is OK with you?

No, we don't allow violent religions to flourish unchecked by laws made to combat religious madness.

No you couldn't say that.

It's perfectly Ok though for an omnipotent omniscient god to conduct a human sacrifice to himself. cos someone pissed him off.

I'm sorry what?

Read the holy bible and rejoin the conversation, there's a good little devil.

You mean Jesus? The situation is rendered far more complicated than you think based on the fact Jesus is actually part of god. So it's not really human sacrifice it's more a situation no human can really draw a parallel to due to the fact we have no experience we can compare it to. Much like the higher dimensions.
So god can be killed by hanging him on a stick, now that's what I call all powerful.

Not exactly killed. More a small chunk which had been separated from the main whole was returned to the whole.
RoderickSpode
Posts: 2,384
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2014 1:43:14 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 1/12/2014 10:15:29 AM, Mysterious_Stranger wrote:
Religion itself should be heavily restricted to the extent that your average fast food restaurant would have more of a say in matters than your local church, yet seldom justice exists out there.
How do you propose that should happen? The terrorist crimes committed are just that; terrorism, not religion. How do you control what others believe in your own country, let alone in foreign countries?

And since most of the references in this thread seem to involve mostly Muslim terrorism, did you mix up the term local church with local mosque?
Mysterious_Stranger
Posts: 1,562
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2014 1:47:25 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 1/12/2014 1:43:14 PM, RoderickSpode wrote:
At 1/12/2014 10:15:29 AM, Mysterious_Stranger wrote:
Religion itself should be heavily restricted to the extent that your average fast food restaurant would have more of a say in matters than your local church, yet seldom justice exists out there.
How do you propose that should happen? The terrorist crimes committed are just that; terrorism, not religion. How do you control what others believe in your own country, let alone in foreign countries?

And since most of the references in this thread seem to involve mostly Muslim terrorism, did you mix up the term local church with local mosque?

I am speaking of dangerous religion in general, any religion can become dangerous when fundamentalism has a role to play.
Turn around, go back.
Dazz
Posts: 1,163
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2014 1:52:57 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 1/11/2014 1:22:32 PM, cybertron1998 wrote:


ummmm instances of al queda are frowned upon by the general muslim population
Remove the "I want", remainder is the "peace". ~Al-Ghazali~
"This time will also pass", a dose to cure both; the excitement & the grievance. ~Ayaz~
RoderickSpode
Posts: 2,384
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/12/2014 4:18:30 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 1/12/2014 1:47:25 PM, Mysterious_Stranger wrote:
At 1/12/2014 1:43:14 PM, RoderickSpode wrote:
At 1/12/2014 10:15:29 AM, Mysterious_Stranger wrote:
Religion itself should be heavily restricted to the extent that your average fast food restaurant would have more of a say in matters than your local church, yet seldom justice exists out there.
How do you propose that should happen? The terrorist crimes committed are just that; terrorism, not religion. How do you control what others believe in your own country, let alone in foreign countries?

And since most of the references in this thread seem to involve mostly Muslim terrorism, did you mix up the term local church with local mosque?

I am speaking of dangerous religion in general, any religion can become dangerous when fundamentalism has a role to play.
I know. My question was how do you heavily restrict religion? The law concerning terrorism is already in place, and is a law enforced on everyone religious or not.

And which religions are dangerous?
RoderickSpode
Posts: 2,384
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2014 10:00:01 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 1/11/2014 8:49:19 AM, joceyjoce1212 wrote:
People have the freedom to believe what they choose. So we should not outlaw extreme religions.
To be fair, in relation to my previous post, I should ask you as well. What do you consider extreme religions?