Total Posts:27|Showing Posts:1-27
Jump to topic:

The names.

annanicole
Posts: 19,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 10:07:31 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 7:13:03 AM, bulproof wrote:
What did Adam name Yersinia pestis?

Who said he named it?

Is Yersinia pestis one of your evolutionary ancestors? If so, the "yersinia" is long gone - but in your case the "pestis" lingers.
Madcornishbiker: "No, I don't need a dictionary, I know how scripture uses words and that is all I need to now."
bulproof
Posts: 25,274
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 10:20:43 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 10:07:31 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 7:13:03 AM, bulproof wrote:
What did Adam name Yersinia pestis?

Who said he named it?

Is Yersinia pestis one of your evolutionary ancestors? If so, the "yersinia" is long gone - but in your case the "pestis" lingers.

Your god says he named it.
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
annanicole
Posts: 19,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 10:22:18 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 10:20:43 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:07:31 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 7:13:03 AM, bulproof wrote:
What did Adam name Yersinia pestis?

Who said he named it?

Is Yersinia pestis one of your evolutionary ancestors? If so, the "yersinia" is long gone - but in your case the "pestis" lingers.

Your god says he named it.

Cite the passage
Madcornishbiker: "No, I don't need a dictionary, I know how scripture uses words and that is all I need to now."
ethang5
Posts: 4,115
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 10:30:07 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 10:07:31 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 7:13:03 AM, bulproof wrote:
What did Adam name Yersinia pestis?

Who said he named it?

Is Yersinia pestis one of your evolutionary ancestors? If so, the "yersinia" is long gone - but in your case the "pestis" lingers.

lol. He thinks, thousands of years later, that when some guy arbitrarily placed Yersinia pestis in some arbitrary "group", that that classification must have also been used by God and Adam.

It's like when some ignorant American tells a British person, "Why don't you drive on the correct side of the road?" Not able to think through that his arbitrary choice of driving on the right side is not the "correct" side.

What makes bully think Yersinia pestis was classified as an animal by God? Nothing but ignorance fueled hubris. Since men of bully's day so classify it, well, that must be the only correct way!

Doesn't God know the correct side of the road on which to drive?
bulproof
Posts: 25,274
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 10:41:02 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 10:22:18 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:20:43 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:07:31 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 7:13:03 AM, bulproof wrote:
What did Adam name Yersinia pestis?

Who said he named it?

Is Yersinia pestis one of your evolutionary ancestors? If so, the "yersinia" is long gone - but in your case the "pestis" lingers.

Your god says he named it.

Cite the passage

Oh Anna. That is surely beneath someone of your intellectual capacity.

It's in the great genesis.

Adam named every beast of the field.

What did he name "Yersinia pestis"
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
tahir.imanov
Posts: 272
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 10:50:17 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 10:41:02 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:22:18 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:20:43 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:07:31 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 7:13:03 AM, bulproof wrote:
What did Adam name Yersinia pestis?

Who said he named it?

Is Yersinia pestis one of your evolutionary ancestors? If so, the "yersinia" is long gone - but in your case the "pestis" lingers.

Your god says he named it.

Cite the passage

Oh Anna. That is surely beneath someone of your intellectual capacity.

It's in the great genesis.

Adam named every beast of the field.

What did he name "Yersinia pestis"

Bulproof.... Just kidding. You can ask Adam (pbuh) on Judgment Day (not the Terminator2).
This is red.
bulproof
Posts: 25,274
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 11:15:53 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 10:30:07 AM, ethang5 wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:07:31 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 7:13:03 AM, bulproof wrote:
What did Adam name Yersinia pestis?

Who said he named it?

Is Yersinia pestis one of your evolutionary ancestors? If so, the "yersinia" is long gone - but in your case the "pestis" lingers.

lol. He thinks, thousands of years later, that when some guy arbitrarily placed Yersinia pestis in some arbitrary "group", that that classification must have also been used by God and Adam.
No he doesn't. He asked what Adam named Yersinia pestis.
It's like when some ignorant American tells a British person, "Why don't you drive on the correct side of the road?" Not able to think through that his arbitrary choice of driving on the right side is not the "correct" side.
No it's not it's asking what Adam named Yersinia pestis
What makes bully think Yersinia pestis was classified as an animal by God? Nothing but ignorance fueled hubris. Since men of bully's day so classify it, well, that must be the only correct way!
What did Adam name Yersinia pestis?
Doesn't God know the correct side of the road on which to drive?
What did Adam name Yersinia pestis?
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
Burzmali
Posts: 1,310
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 11:16:24 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
I don't know that anyone, including an alleged god, would consider Y. pestis to be a "beast of the field."
bulproof
Posts: 25,274
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 11:20:47 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 11:16:24 AM, Burzmali wrote:
I don't know that anyone, including an alleged god, would consider Y. pestis to be a "beast of the field."
Where does it exist? On rodents? Do rodents live in fields?

I guess it is a beast of the field.

Unless you have a valid argument against that?
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
Burzmali
Posts: 1,310
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 11:31:18 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 11:20:47 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:16:24 AM, Burzmali wrote:
I don't know that anyone, including an alleged god, would consider Y. pestis to be a "beast of the field."
Where does it exist? On rodents? Do rodents live in fields?

I guess it is a beast of the field.

Unless you have a valid argument against that?

Yersinia pestis isn't an animal, it's a bacterium. I don't think it would fit anyone's definition of "beast."
annanicole
Posts: 19,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 11:36:10 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 10:41:02 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:22:18 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:20:43 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:07:31 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 7:13:03 AM, bulproof wrote:
What did Adam name Yersinia pestis?

Who said he named it?

Is Yersinia pestis one of your evolutionary ancestors? If so, the "yersinia" is long gone - but in your case the "pestis" lingers.

Your god says he named it.

Cite the passage

Oh Anna. That is surely beneath someone of your intellectual capacity.

It's in the great genesis.

Adam named every beast of the field.

What did he name "Yersinia pestis"

I hardly think Yersinia could be characterized as a beast.

To the contrary, this entire thread is beneath YOU ... and I only responded as a joke.
Madcornishbiker: "No, I don't need a dictionary, I know how scripture uses words and that is all I need to now."
bulproof
Posts: 25,274
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 11:40:06 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 11:31:18 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:20:47 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:16:24 AM, Burzmali wrote:
I don't know that anyone, including an alleged god, would consider Y. pestis to be a "beast of the field."
Where does it exist? On rodents? Do rodents live in fields?

I guess it is a beast of the field.

Unless you have a valid argument against that?

Yersinia pestis isn't an animal, it's a bacterium. I don't think it would fit anyone's definition of "beast."

God created everything that existed and Adam named them.
What did he name Yersinia pestis?

Or did god not create Yersinia pestis?
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
Burzmali
Posts: 1,310
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 11:43:22 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 11:40:06 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:31:18 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:20:47 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:16:24 AM, Burzmali wrote:
I don't know that anyone, including an alleged god, would consider Y. pestis to be a "beast of the field."
Where does it exist? On rodents? Do rodents live in fields?

I guess it is a beast of the field.

Unless you have a valid argument against that?

Yersinia pestis isn't an animal, it's a bacterium. I don't think it would fit anyone's definition of "beast."

God created everything that existed and Adam named them.
What did he name Yersinia pestis?

Or did god not create Yersinia pestis?

You said earlier that Adam named all of the beasts of the field. Y. pestis isn't a beast. Do you have a different passage that says Adam named every single thing that the god created? Y. pestis isn't visible to the naked eye, so it's hard to imagine anyone even knowing it exists as a living thing without a microscope.
bulproof
Posts: 25,274
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 11:45:32 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 11:43:22 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:40:06 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:31:18 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:20:47 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:16:24 AM, Burzmali wrote:
I don't know that anyone, including an alleged god, would consider Y. pestis to be a "beast of the field."
Where does it exist? On rodents? Do rodents live in fields?

I guess it is a beast of the field.

Unless you have a valid argument against that?

Yersinia pestis isn't an animal, it's a bacterium. I don't think it would fit anyone's definition of "beast."

God created everything that existed and Adam named them.
What did he name Yersinia pestis?

Or did god not create Yersinia pestis?

You said earlier that Adam named all of the beasts of the field. Y. pestis isn't a beast. Do you have a different passage that says Adam named every single thing that the god created? Y. pestis isn't visible to the naked eye, so it's hard to imagine anyone even knowing it exists as a living thing without a microscope.

Did god create Yersinia pestis?
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
Burzmali
Posts: 1,310
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 12:24:59 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 11:45:32 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:43:22 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:40:06 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:31:18 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:20:47 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:16:24 AM, Burzmali wrote:
I don't know that anyone, including an alleged god, would consider Y. pestis to be a "beast of the field."
Where does it exist? On rodents? Do rodents live in fields?

I guess it is a beast of the field.

Unless you have a valid argument against that?

Yersinia pestis isn't an animal, it's a bacterium. I don't think it would fit anyone's definition of "beast."

God created everything that existed and Adam named them.
What did he name Yersinia pestis?

Or did god not create Yersinia pestis?

You said earlier that Adam named all of the beasts of the field. Y. pestis isn't a beast. Do you have a different passage that says Adam named every single thing that the god created? Y. pestis isn't visible to the naked eye, so it's hard to imagine anyone even knowing it exists as a living thing without a microscope.

Did god create Yersinia pestis?

In the context of the Bible, yes. But you're arguing over a specific line of the book that, as far as I know, states that Adam named "the beasts of the field." Y. pestis is definitely not a beast. So unless you have an interpretation that says Adam named stuff that would include bacteria, then your contention is pretty ridiculous.

Really, of all the things to criticize the Bible over, this wouldn't even be on my list.
ethang5
Posts: 4,115
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 1:07:17 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 12:24:59 PM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:45:32 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:43:22 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:40:06 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:31:18 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:20:47 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:16:24 AM, Burzmali wrote:
I don't know that anyone, including an alleged god, would consider Y. pestis to be a "beast of the field."
Where does it exist? On rodents? Do rodents live in fields?

I guess it is a beast of the field.

Unless you have a valid argument against that?

Yersinia pestis isn't an animal, it's a bacterium. I don't think it would fit anyone's definition of "beast."

God created everything that existed and Adam named them.
What did he name Yersinia pestis?

Or did god not create Yersinia pestis?

You said earlier that Adam named all of the beasts of the field. Y. pestis isn't a beast. Do you have a different passage that says Adam named every single thing that the god created? Y. pestis isn't visible to the naked eye, so it's hard to imagine anyone even knowing it exists as a living thing without a microscope.

Did god create Yersinia pestis?

In the context of the Bible, yes. But you're arguing over a specific line of the book that, as far as I know, states that Adam named "the beasts of the field." Y. pestis is definitely not a beast. So unless you have an interpretation that says Adam named stuff that would include bacteria, then your contention is pretty ridiculous.

Really, of all the things to criticize the Bible over, this wouldn't even be on my list.

You must not know bully well. Absurdity is his forte. No matter how silly you point out his argument to be, he will simply keep on being silly. He is a great teaching tool for logic and Christian doctrine. There are even some here who think he is a mole inserted into the forum to set up arguments that Christians can knock out of the park.

But he is simply a militant atheist who is more interested in making the accusation than defending it or having it be rational. He's harmless though.
bulproof
Posts: 25,274
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2014 10:41:44 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 1:07:17 PM, ethang5 wrote:
At 6/17/2014 12:24:59 PM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:45:32 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:43:22 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:40:06 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:31:18 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:20:47 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:16:24 AM, Burzmali wrote:
I don't know that anyone, including an alleged god, would consider Y. pestis to be a "beast of the field."
Where does it exist? On rodents? Do rodents live in fields?

I guess it is a beast of the field.

Unless you have a valid argument against that?

Yersinia pestis isn't an animal, it's a bacterium. I don't think it would fit anyone's definition of "beast."

God created everything that existed and Adam named them.
What did he name Yersinia pestis?

Or did god not create Yersinia pestis?

You said earlier that Adam named all of the beasts of the field. Y. pestis isn't a beast. Do you have a different passage that says Adam named every single thing that the god created? Y. pestis isn't visible to the naked eye, so it's hard to imagine anyone even knowing it exists as a living thing without a microscope.

Did god create Yersinia pestis?

In the context of the Bible, yes. But you're arguing over a specific line of the book that, as far as I know, states that Adam named "the beasts of the field." Y. pestis is definitely not a beast. So unless you have an interpretation that says Adam named stuff that would include bacteria, then your contention is pretty ridiculous.

Really, of all the things to criticize the Bible over, this wouldn't even be on my list.

You must not know bully well. Absurdity is his forte. No matter how silly you point out his argument to be, he will simply keep on being silly. He is a great teaching tool for logic and Christian doctrine. There are even some here who think he is a mole inserted into the forum to set up arguments that Christians can knock out of the park.

But he is simply a militant atheist who is more interested in making the accusation than defending it or having it be rational. He's harmless though.

You're an angry little man thang.
Do you get help with that?
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
Skyangel
Posts: 8,234
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/18/2014 1:09:13 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 11:40:06 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:31:18 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:20:47 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:16:24 AM, Burzmali wrote:
I don't know that anyone, including an alleged god, would consider Y. pestis to be a "beast of the field."
Where does it exist? On rodents? Do rodents live in fields?

I guess it is a beast of the field.

Unless you have a valid argument against that?

Yersinia pestis isn't an animal, it's a bacterium. I don't think it would fit anyone's definition of "beast."

God created everything that existed and Adam named them.
What did he name Yersinia pestis?

Or did god not create Yersinia pestis?

Life (God) creates all that exists, has existed and will exist and Adam ( Mankind) names it when he discovers it or invents it. The process of mankind (ADAM) naming things will continue for all eternity.
Skyangel
Posts: 8,234
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/18/2014 1:15:09 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 12:24:59 PM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:45:32 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:43:22 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:40:06 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:31:18 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:20:47 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:16:24 AM, Burzmali wrote:
I don't know that anyone, including an alleged god, would consider Y. pestis to be a "beast of the field."
Where does it exist? On rodents? Do rodents live in fields?

I guess it is a beast of the field.

Unless you have a valid argument against that?

Yersinia pestis isn't an animal, it's a bacterium. I don't think it would fit anyone's definition of "beast."

God created everything that existed and Adam named them.
What did he name Yersinia pestis?

Or did god not create Yersinia pestis?

You said earlier that Adam named all of the beasts of the field. Y. pestis isn't a beast. Do you have a different passage that says Adam named every single thing that the god created? Y. pestis isn't visible to the naked eye, so it's hard to imagine anyone even knowing it exists as a living thing without a microscope.

Did god create Yersinia pestis?

In the context of the Bible, yes. But you're arguing over a specific line of the book that, as far as I know, states that Adam named "the beasts of the field." Y. pestis is definitely not a beast. So unless you have an interpretation that says Adam named stuff that would include bacteria, then your contention is pretty ridiculous.

Really, of all the things to criticize the Bible over, this wouldn't even be on my list.

Did a single Jew named Adam happen to name the kangaroos and koalas in Australia when he did not even know Australia existed?

Is it not common knowledge that the Hebrew word Adam refers to all of mankind of the past present and future?
Installgentoo
Posts: 1,420
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/18/2014 2:48:10 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 10:41:02 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:22:18 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:20:43 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:07:31 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 7:13:03 AM, bulproof wrote:
What did Adam name Yersinia pestis?

Who said he named it?

Is Yersinia pestis one of your evolutionary ancestors? If so, the "yersinia" is long gone - but in your case the "pestis" lingers.

Your god says he named it.

Cite the passage

Oh Anna. That is surely beneath someone of your intellectual capacity.

It's in the great genesis.

Adam named every beast of the field.


You're not getting away with that. Cite the ACTUAL passage, mongoloid.
bulproof
Posts: 25,274
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/18/2014 3:43:05 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/18/2014 2:48:10 AM, Installgentoo wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:41:02 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:22:18 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:20:43 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:07:31 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 7:13:03 AM, bulproof wrote:
What did Adam name Yersinia pestis?

Who said he named it?

Is Yersinia pestis one of your evolutionary ancestors? If so, the "yersinia" is long gone - but in your case the "pestis" lingers.

Your god says he named it.

Cite the passage

Oh Anna. That is surely beneath someone of your intellectual capacity.

It's in the great genesis.

Adam named every beast of the field.


You're not getting away with that. Cite the ACTUAL passage, mongoloid.

Goo, the grownups are talking. Go and play with your blocks.
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
Burzmali
Posts: 1,310
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/18/2014 7:54:51 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/18/2014 1:15:09 AM, Skyangel wrote:
At 6/17/2014 12:24:59 PM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:45:32 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:43:22 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:40:06 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:31:18 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:20:47 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:16:24 AM, Burzmali wrote:
I don't know that anyone, including an alleged god, would consider Y. pestis to be a "beast of the field."
Where does it exist? On rodents? Do rodents live in fields?

I guess it is a beast of the field.

Unless you have a valid argument against that?

Yersinia pestis isn't an animal, it's a bacterium. I don't think it would fit anyone's definition of "beast."

God created everything that existed and Adam named them.
What did he name Yersinia pestis?

Or did god not create Yersinia pestis?

You said earlier that Adam named all of the beasts of the field. Y. pestis isn't a beast. Do you have a different passage that says Adam named every single thing that the god created? Y. pestis isn't visible to the naked eye, so it's hard to imagine anyone even knowing it exists as a living thing without a microscope.

Did god create Yersinia pestis?

In the context of the Bible, yes. But you're arguing over a specific line of the book that, as far as I know, states that Adam named "the beasts of the field." Y. pestis is definitely not a beast. So unless you have an interpretation that says Adam named stuff that would include bacteria, then your contention is pretty ridiculous.

Really, of all the things to criticize the Bible over, this wouldn't even be on my list.

Did a single Jew named Adam happen to name the kangaroos and koalas in Australia when he did not even know Australia existed?

Is it not common knowledge that the Hebrew word Adam refers to all of mankind of the past present and future?

I don't know the answer to either of those questions. And I have no idea why you're directing them at me. I'm not a Bible scholar.
Installgentoo
Posts: 1,420
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/18/2014 3:22:23 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/18/2014 3:43:05 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/18/2014 2:48:10 AM, Installgentoo wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:41:02 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:22:18 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:20:43 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:07:31 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 7:13:03 AM, bulproof wrote:
What did Adam name Yersinia pestis?

Who said he named it?

Is Yersinia pestis one of your evolutionary ancestors? If so, the "yersinia" is long gone - but in your case the "pestis" lingers.

Your god says he named it.

Cite the passage

Oh Anna. That is surely beneath someone of your intellectual capacity.

It's in the great genesis.

Adam named every beast of the field.


You're not getting away with that. Cite the ACTUAL passage, mongoloid.

Goo, the grownups are talking. Go and play with your blocks.

Translation: "I had no idea what I was talking about when I said that God named the species in the Bible."

I'll take your admission of defeat.
Skyangel
Posts: 8,234
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/18/2014 8:09:44 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/18/2014 7:54:51 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/18/2014 1:15:09 AM, Skyangel wrote:
At 6/17/2014 12:24:59 PM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:45:32 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:43:22 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:40:06 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:31:18 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:20:47 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 11:16:24 AM, Burzmali wrote:
I don't know that anyone, including an alleged god, would consider Y. pestis to be a "beast of the field."
Where does it exist? On rodents? Do rodents live in fields?

I guess it is a beast of the field.

Unless you have a valid argument against that?

Yersinia pestis isn't an animal, it's a bacterium. I don't think it would fit anyone's definition of "beast."

God created everything that existed and Adam named them.
What did he name Yersinia pestis?

Or did god not create Yersinia pestis?

You said earlier that Adam named all of the beasts of the field. Y. pestis isn't a beast. Do you have a different passage that says Adam named every single thing that the god created? Y. pestis isn't visible to the naked eye, so it's hard to imagine anyone even knowing it exists as a living thing without a microscope.

Did god create Yersinia pestis?

In the context of the Bible, yes. But you're arguing over a specific line of the book that, as far as I know, states that Adam named "the beasts of the field." Y. pestis is definitely not a beast. So unless you have an interpretation that says Adam named stuff that would include bacteria, then your contention is pretty ridiculous.

Really, of all the things to criticize the Bible over, this wouldn't even be on my list.

Did a single Jew named Adam happen to name the kangaroos and koalas in Australia when he did not even know Australia existed?

Is it not common knowledge that the Hebrew word Adam refers to all of mankind of the past present and future?

I don't know the answer to either of those questions. And I have no idea why you're directing them at me. I'm not a Bible scholar.

The questions are not directed specifically at you but to all who are reading the thread.
Anyone is welcome to answer or comment.
ethang5
Posts: 4,115
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/20/2014 2:00:41 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/18/2014 2:48:10 AM, Installgentoo wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:41:02 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:22:18 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:20:43 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 10:07:31 AM, annanicole wrote:
At 6/17/2014 7:13:03 AM, bulproof wrote:
What did Adam name Yersinia pestis?

Who said he named it?

Is Yersinia pestis one of your evolutionary ancestors? If so, the "yersinia" is long gone - but in your case the "pestis" lingers.

Your god says he named it.

Cite the passage

Oh Anna. That is surely beneath someone of your intellectual capacity.

It's in the great genesis.

Adam named every beast of the field.


You're not getting away with that. Cite the ACTUAL passage, mongoloid.

he can't cite it and doesn't care. He only wants to make the charge. Sort of like the class moron calling you a "homo". He is only interested in poisoning the well so that the choir he's preaching to can repeat the "rumor". The truth and/or logic of his accusation is of no concern to him.

His payment is the shock and hurt he sees on the faces of the people on whose house he has spray-painted his vulgarity. It may be difficult to believe, but there actually are people like that.
ethang5
Posts: 4,115
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/20/2014 2:06:54 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 6/17/2014 10:41:44 PM, bulproof wrote:
At 6/17/2014 1:07:17 PM, ethang5 wrote:

I don't know that anyone, including an alleged god, would consider Y. pestis to be a "beast of the field."
Where does it exist? On rodents? Do rodents live in fields?

I guess it is a beast of the field.

Unless you have a valid argument against that?

Yersinia pestis isn't an animal, it's a bacterium. I don't think it would fit anyone's definition of "beast."

God created everything that existed and Adam named them.
What did he name Yersinia pestis?

Or did god not create Yersinia pestis?

You said earlier that Adam named all of the beasts of the field. Y. pestis isn't a beast. Do you have a different passage that says Adam named every single thing that the god created? Y. pestis isn't visible to the naked eye, so it's hard to imagine anyone even knowing it exists as a living thing without a microscope.

Did god create Yersinia pestis?

In the context of the Bible, yes. But you're arguing over a specific line of the book that, as far as I know, states that Adam named "the beasts of the field." Y. pestis is definitely not a beast. So unless you have an interpretation that says Adam named stuff that would include bacteria, then your contention is pretty ridiculous.

Really, of all the things to criticize the Bible over, this wouldn't even be on my list.

You must not know bully well. Absurdity is his forte. No matter how silly you point out his argument to be, he will simply keep on being silly. He is a great teaching tool for logic and Christian doctrine. There are even some here who think he is a mole inserted into the forum to set up arguments that Christians can knock out of the park.

But he is simply a militant atheist who is more interested in making the accusation than defending it or having it be rational. He's harmless though.

You're an angry little man thang.

Yet I'm not dodging questions or side-stepping the truth the way you are. Angry people behave like you. They provoke, lie, are crass and insensitive -the way you are.

Your reputation on this site as a troll is growing. Soon, you will have to once again, create another account so that someone will talk to you. But as always, we will figure you out as a troll.

Do you get help with that?

Yes, Jesus. You've been caught in a repeated lie. Perhaps you need help too?