Total Posts:24|Showing Posts:1-24
Jump to topic:

The theory of evolution is not racist.

Gaming_Debater
Posts: 233
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't
DPMartin
Posts: 1,096
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 9:03:05 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
One race of monkeymen has to be superior to the rest of the monkeymen in order for ToE to work as a viable reasoning and logic. That supports superior race or master race theology or philosophy last time I checked.
bulproof
Posts: 25,218
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 10:12:55 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 9:03:05 AM, DPMartin wrote:
One race of monkeymen has to be superior to the rest of the monkeymen in order for ToE to work as a viable reasoning and logic. That supports superior race or master race theology or philosophy last time I checked.
And science has been working on a solution to the problem of the monkeymen who invented gods and religions and finding a way to remove them from the evolutionary tree, since they are of no value at all the the human race.

We're getting there.
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
Iredia
Posts: 1,608
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 10:28:36 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't

This only goes to show your level of ignorance of the history of the theory and the theory itself as presented by Darwin. Since I have no doubt that you'll be smug in your ignorance I won't bother correcting it. I have tried and failed with many like you.
Porn babes be distracting me. Dudes be stealing me stuff. I'm all about the cash from now. I'm not playing Jesus anymore.
Gaming_Debater
Posts: 233
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 10:40:15 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 10:28:36 AM, Iredia wrote:
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't

This only goes to show your level of ignorance of the history of the theory and the theory itself as presented by Darwin. Since I have no doubt that you'll be smug in your ignorance I won't bother correcting it. I have tried and failed with many like you.

I am not ignorant. I just understand evolution better than you do.
bulproof
Posts: 25,218
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 10:54:54 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 10:28:36 AM, Iredia wrote:
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't

This only goes to show your level of ignorance of the history of the theory and the theory itself as presented by Darwin. Since I have no doubt that you'll be smug in your ignorance I won't bother correcting it. I have tried and failed with many like you.

Ooh, Darwin.
You people never read modern books, do you.
bwuaha
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
DPMartin
Posts: 1,096
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 10:58:22 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 10:12:55 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 11/26/2014 9:03:05 AM, DPMartin wrote:
One race of monkeymen has to be superior to the rest of the monkeymen in order for ToE to work as a viable reasoning and logic. That supports superior race or master race theology or philosophy last time I checked.
And science has been working on a solution to the problem of the monkeymen who invented gods and religions and finding a way to remove them from the evolutionary tree, since they are of no value at all the the human race.

We're getting there.

Even so, gods don"t seek philosophies and theories that promote the superiority of one man over another do they? It is men who seek such things, because it benefits the men who seek to prove they are superior, or there is justification for the belief of superior men. Especially superior to those who believe otherwise like the white intellectual aristocracy, who enjoy a sense of superiority over others. Isn"t that true bulproof?

ToE is white man"s use of science to prove that there is some who are superior to the others. It was created and sponsored and promoted and established by the white intellectual aristocracy. Of which mainly Christianity has been apposed to. Christianity wasn"t established by the white intellectual aristocracy. Christianity may have throughout the years been taken advantage of by political powers of the day, but certainly not established by the white intellectual aristocracy who think themselves superior to anything not like them.
bulproof
Posts: 25,218
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 11:00:31 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 10:58:22 AM, DPMartin wrote:



Even so, gods don"t seek philosophies and theories

WHO??
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
Vox_Veritas
Posts: 7,072
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 11:22:53 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't

According to evolution, different kinds of life forms are different stages and paths in evolution. If Whites, Blacks, Asians, and Native Americans evolved, and they evolved separately (yes, they would've evolved separately), then at least to some degree one race would have something that makes them superior to another race in some aspect
Call me Vox, the Resident Contrarian of debate.org.

The DDO Blog:
https://debatedotorg.wordpress.com...

#drinkthecoffeenotthekoolaid
Burzmali
Posts: 1,310
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 11:34:57 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 11:22:53 AM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't

According to evolution, different kinds of life forms are different stages and paths in evolution. If Whites, Blacks, Asians, and Native Americans evolved, and they evolved separately (yes, they would've evolved separately), then at least to some degree one race would have something that makes them superior to another race in some aspect

There is no "superior" in evolution. Calling something "superior" from an evolutionary standpoint is a hallmark of the ignorant. There is only more or less fit for your environment. We're so spread across the planet that our environment is essentially the whole earth. And, in that regard, we are all unfit since we seem to be destroying our own habitat.
ThinkFirst
Posts: 1,391
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 11:36:14 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 10:12:55 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 11/26/2014 9:03:05 AM, DPMartin wrote:
One race of monkeymen has to be superior to the rest of the monkeymen in order for ToE to work as a viable reasoning and logic. That supports superior race or master race theology or philosophy last time I checked.
And science has been working on a solution to the problem of the monkeymen who invented gods and religions and finding a way to remove them from the evolutionary tree, since they are of no value at all the the human race.

We're getting there.

No, they're going to end up removing themselves...
"Never attribute to villainy that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
-----
"Men rarely if ever dream up a god superior to themselves. Most gods have the manners and morals of a spoiled child. "

-- Robert A Heinlein
Vox_Veritas
Posts: 7,072
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 11:36:58 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 11:34:57 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 11/26/2014 11:22:53 AM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't

According to evolution, different kinds of life forms are different stages and paths in evolution. If Whites, Blacks, Asians, and Native Americans evolved, and they evolved separately (yes, they would've evolved separately), then at least to some degree one race would have something that makes them superior to another race in some aspect

There is no "superior" in evolution. Calling something "superior" from an evolutionary standpoint is a hallmark of the ignorant. There is only more or less fit for your environment. We're so spread across the planet that our environment is essentially the whole earth. And, in that regard, we are all unfit since we seem to be destroying our own habitat.

By the very nature of evolution, increasingly superior life forms are being churned out of nature, though it's a slow process. So yes, I would say that there is such thing as superior and inferior.
Call me Vox, the Resident Contrarian of debate.org.

The DDO Blog:
https://debatedotorg.wordpress.com...

#drinkthecoffeenotthekoolaid
DPMartin
Posts: 1,096
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 11:37:06 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 11:00:31 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 11/26/2014 10:58:22 AM, DPMartin wrote:



Even so, gods don"t seek philosophies and theories

WHO??

Another 13 year old response showing what to you don"t know, I see. The subject is ToE is master racing, remember? You've got to stop smoking that stuff long enough to focus. Your just not that slick enough to fool anyone.
bulproof
Posts: 25,218
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 11:39:41 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 11:36:58 AM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
At 11/26/2014 11:34:57 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 11/26/2014 11:22:53 AM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't

According to evolution, different kinds of life forms are different stages and paths in evolution. If Whites, Blacks, Asians, and Native Americans evolved, and they evolved separately (yes, they would've evolved separately), then at least to some degree one race would have something that makes them superior to another race in some aspect

There is no "superior" in evolution. Calling something "superior" from an evolutionary standpoint is a hallmark of the ignorant. There is only more or less fit for your environment. We're so spread across the planet that our environment is essentially the whole earth. And, in that regard, we are all unfit since we seem to be destroying our own habitat.

By the very nature of evolution, increasingly superior life forms are being churned out of nature, though it's a slow process. So yes, I would say that there is such thing as superior and inferior.

And you think yourself superior to a T-Rex?
In what way?
Religion is just mind control. George Carlin
Vox_Veritas
Posts: 7,072
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 11:41:08 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 11:39:41 AM, bulproof wrote:
At 11/26/2014 11:36:58 AM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
At 11/26/2014 11:34:57 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 11/26/2014 11:22:53 AM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't

According to evolution, different kinds of life forms are different stages and paths in evolution. If Whites, Blacks, Asians, and Native Americans evolved, and they evolved separately (yes, they would've evolved separately), then at least to some degree one race would have something that makes them superior to another race in some aspect

There is no "superior" in evolution. Calling something "superior" from an evolutionary standpoint is a hallmark of the ignorant. There is only more or less fit for your environment. We're so spread across the planet that our environment is essentially the whole earth. And, in that regard, we are all unfit since we seem to be destroying our own habitat.

By the very nature of evolution, increasingly superior life forms are being churned out of nature, though it's a slow process. So yes, I would say that there is such thing as superior and inferior.

And you think yourself superior to a T-Rex?
In what way?

The T-Rex was wiped out, and thus according to evolution there was a setback. But if you believe in the possibility of the Omega Point, you must acknowledge what I say as valid.
Call me Vox, the Resident Contrarian of debate.org.

The DDO Blog:
https://debatedotorg.wordpress.com...

#drinkthecoffeenotthekoolaid
Burzmali
Posts: 1,310
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 2:31:20 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 11:36:58 AM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
At 11/26/2014 11:34:57 AM, Burzmali wrote:
At 11/26/2014 11:22:53 AM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't

According to evolution, different kinds of life forms are different stages and paths in evolution. If Whites, Blacks, Asians, and Native Americans evolved, and they evolved separately (yes, they would've evolved separately), then at least to some degree one race would have something that makes them superior to another race in some aspect

There is no "superior" in evolution. Calling something "superior" from an evolutionary standpoint is a hallmark of the ignorant. There is only more or less fit for your environment. We're so spread across the planet that our environment is essentially the whole earth. And, in that regard, we are all unfit since we seem to be destroying our own habitat.

By the very nature of evolution, increasingly superior life forms are being churned out of nature, though it's a slow process. So yes, I would say that there is such thing as superior and inferior.

What makes one life form "superior" to another within an evolutionary framework?
Gaming_Debater
Posts: 233
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 4:40:15 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 11:22:53 AM, Vox_Veritas wrote:
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't

According to evolution, different kinds of life forms are different stages and paths in evolution. If Whites, Blacks, Asians, and Native Americans evolved, and they evolved separately (yes, they would've evolved separately), then at least to some degree one race would have something that makes them superior to another race in some aspect

Actually, a white can be significantly less suited to the environment than another white. Same way with asians A and B.
IEnglishman
Posts: 148
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2014 9:12:29 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't

Nah man, it be racist. https://www.youtube.com....
Bulproof admits he's a troll http://www.debate.org... (see post 16). Do not feed.
Gaming_Debater
Posts: 233
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/27/2014 11:17:22 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 9:12:29 PM, IEnglishman wrote:
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't

Nah man, it be racist. https://www.youtube.com....

I can't watch the video. It's blocked.
jh1234lnew
Posts: 225
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/27/2014 8:19:40 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 10:28:36 AM, Iredia wrote:
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't

This only goes to show your level of ignorance of the history of the theory and the theory itself as presented by Darwin. Since I have no doubt that you'll be smug in your ignorance I won't bother correcting it. I have tried and failed with many like you.

The scientific method means that the theory has changed a lot since Darwin.
RoderickSpode
Posts: 2,372
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/29/2014 9:03:18 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't
Whether or not natural selection implies racism, the theory of evolution did spawn scientific racism for a time (and to some degree today).

Out of curiosity, do you believe humans are superior to giraffes?
Gaming_Debater
Posts: 233
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/29/2014 7:00:45 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/29/2014 9:03:18 AM, RoderickSpode wrote:
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't
Whether or not natural selection implies racism, the theory of evolution did spawn scientific racism for a time (and to some degree today).

Out of curiosity, do you believe humans are superior to giraffes?

*sigh* i guess this is what I get for starting a thread about evolution not being racist.
Gaming_Debater
Posts: 233
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/5/2014 7:17:18 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/26/2014 9:03:05 AM, DPMartin wrote:
One race of monkeymen has to be superior to the rest of the monkeymen in order for ToE to work as a viable reasoning and logic. That supports superior race or master race theology or philosophy last time I checked.

Survival of the fittest =/= racism. It's scientifically veerified and from impartial judgements. That is the opposite of racism.
Gaming_Debater
Posts: 233
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/5/2014 7:20:48 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 11/29/2014 9:03:18 AM, RoderickSpode wrote:
At 11/26/2014 8:57:47 AM, Gaming_Debater wrote:
Of all the cr*p that comes out of a Creationist mouth, this is the most ridiculous there is. The examples of natural selection that deal with color are NOT RACIST. They are just examples that have to do with camouflage. Think of one time you picked someone because they would be invisible because of their skin color. NOPE. If God caused evolution, it would be that way but it isn't
Whether or not natural selection implies racism, the theory of evolution did spawn scientific racism for a time (and to some degree today).

Um.... NO IT DID NOT. You have the burden of proof on evolution spawning racism.

Out of curiosity, do you believe humans are superior to giraffes?

Define "superior"